Effect of flipped venous catheter combined with spinal cord electrical stimulation on functional recovery in patients with sciatic nerve injury.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the effect of flipped venous catheters combined with spinal cord electrical stimulation on functional recovery in patients with sciatic nerve injury. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 160 patients with hip dislocation and sciatic nerve injury were divided into conventional release and flipped catheter + electrical stimulation groups according to the treatment methods (n=80). Motor nerve conduction velocity (MCV) and lower limb motor function were compared. Serum neurotrophic factors brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and nerve growth factor (NGF) were compared. The frequency of complications and quality of life were also compared. RESULTS: The MCV levels of the common peroneal nerve and tibial nerve in the flipped catheter + electrical stimulation group were greater than the conventional lysis group (p<0.05). After treatment, the lower extremity motor score (LMEs) in the flipped catheter + electrical stimulation group was greater than the conventional lysis group (p<0.05). The serum levels of BDNF and NGF in the flip catheter + electrical stimulation group were higher than the conventional lysis group (p<0.05). The complication rate in the flipped catheter + electrical stimulation group was lower than in the conventional release group (6.25% vs. 16.25%, p<0.05). The quality-of-life score in the flip catheter + electrical stimulation group was greater than the conventional lysis group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The flipped venous catheter combined with spinal cord electrical stimulation can improve nerve conduction velocity, lower limb motor function, serum BDNF and NGF levels, reduce complications, and help improve the quality of life of sufferers with sciatic nerve injury. Chictr.org.cn ID: ChiCTR2400080984.

Clinical efficacy analysis of minimally invasive intramedullary nailing in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures combined with radial nerve injury.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to research the therapeutic effectiveness of radial nerve damage paired with a humeral shaft fracture and intramedullary nailing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective research was performed on the medical records of 58 individuals who had humeral shaft fractures and radial nerve injuries. The admission period was between June 1, 2020, and June 31, 2022. All study subjects that satisfied the requirements for inclusion were separated, using the random number table approach, into two groups: one for internal fixation (group N), which included 29 cases, and one for minimally invasive procedures (group W), which included 29 patients. Group W received minimally invasive intramedullary nail treatment, and group N received internal fixation with compression plates. The changes in the clinical effects, surgery-related indicators, joint function, nerve function, and levels of stress indicators of the two groups of treatment were analyzed. The changes in adverse reactions and satisfaction of patients were compared. RESULTS: The effective rate of group W was 89.66% (26/29), and that of group N was 72.41% (21/29). Although group W's effective rate was higher than group N's, there was no discernible disparity between the two groups (p>0.05). Surgical blood loss and incision length were much smaller in group W than in group N, and overall operation duration and length of stay were considerably shorter in group W than in group N (p<0.05). The excellent and good rate of elbow joint function in group W was 93.10% (27/29), whereas the excellent and good rate of group N was 65.52% (19/29). The excellent and good rate of elbow joint function in group W was considerably greater than that of group N (p<0.05). In group W, the excellent and good rate of shoulder joint was 96.55% (28/29), and that in group N was 68.97% (20/29), and group W had a considerably greater probability of excellent shoulder joint function than group N (p<0.05); the excellent and good rate of neurological function was 82.76% (24/29) in group W and 58.62% (17/29) in group N, and group W had much greater rates of excellent and good neurological function than group N (p<0.05). prostaglandin E-2 (PGE2), C-reactive protein (CRP) and Substance P (SP) levels in the W group and the N group were substantially higher after the surgery than they were prior to it (p<0.05), and in the W group, the aforementioned stress markers were much lower than they were in the N group (p<0.05). Group W experienced a 3.45% (1/29) rate of adverse events, while group N saw a 24.14% (7/29) incidence. The incidence of adverse responses was substantially lower in group W than in group N (p<0.05). The contentment rate of group W was 93.10% (27/29), and that of group N was 72.41% (21/29). Group W had a much greater contentment percentage than group N (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive intramedullary nailing is a successful therapeutic approach for humeral shaft fractures with radial nerve damage, which may successfully enhance patients' shoulder and elbow joint function and nerve function, reduce patients' stress response, and has the characteristics of minimal adverse responses and high contentment, which is worthy of popularization and deployment.

Risk avoidance of screw-induced suprascapular nerve injury in arthroscopic Latarjet procedure and reliable anatomical landmark analysis of Latarjet surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Shoulder dislocation represents a prevalent category within joint dislocation, accounting for about 40% of all joint dislocations, and anterior dislocation stands out as the prevailing type. It has been reported that in 1.6% of patients, the Latarjet procedure performed under arthroscopy involves transferring the coracoid process to the anterior-inferior aspect of the glenoid and fixing it with two bicortical screws. The tip of the screws may impinge the suprascapular nerve located behind the scapula, resulting in shoulder pain and weakness. This study was performed to analyze the risk of suprascapular nerve (SSN) injury caused by bicortical screws during arthroscopic Latarjet surgery and to identify reliable anatomical landmarks for Latarjet surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dissection was conducted on 23 fresh adult intact shoulder joint specimens, and the experimental protocol complied with the hospital's ethical requirements for research. Using the glenoid clock face as a reference, the distances between the suprascapular nerve and the anterior edge of the glenoid were measured at the 12:00, 11:00, 10:00, and 9:00 positions, as well as at the level of the suprascapular notch and the level of the spinoglenoid notch. The distances between the suprascapular nerve and the narrowest point of the glenoid rim and the clock scale were recorded. The scapula was divided into three zones, and the number of nerve branches in each zone was recorded. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis. The suprascapular nerve trunk and branches were marked using radiopaque lines, and measurements were taken at three positions in computed tomography horizontal scans: the suprascapular foramen, the spinoglenoid notch, and the point of entry of the outermost nerve branch into the muscle. RESULTS: The suprascapular nerve originates from the brachial plexus, passes downward and backward through the suprascapular foramen, closely adheres to the bone surface, and runs outward and downward deep to the supraspinatus muscle. The distances between the suprascapular nerve and the glenoid rim at the 12:00, 11:00, 10:00, and 9:00 positions were 335.18±2.31 mm, 28.23±3.47 mm, 22.32±2.78 mm, and 22.12±2.07 mm, respectively. There was a mean of 1.12 nerve branches in zone 1, 2.86 in zone 2, and 3.64 in zone 3. In the neutral position of the shoulder joint, the horizontal distance between point A and the axillary nerve was 27.37 (19.80, 34.55) mm, and the vertical distance was 16.67 (12.85, 20.35) mm. CONCLUSIONS: The use of bicortical screws, especially upper screws, for Latarjet fixation at the level of the spinoglenoid notch, is associated with the risk of suprascapular nerve injury. The narrowest distance between the glenoid rim and the suprascapular nerve was found between 9:00 and 9:30 at the glenoid clock surface. Therefore, caution should be exercised when performing any procedure related to this area. Overall, the Latarjet procedure is a reliable and effective surgical technique, providing benefits such as favorable positioning of the coracoid graft and low bone absorption rate, while also avoiding the potential for suprascapular nerve injury.

[Chronic kidney disease after adrenalectomy in a patient with primary aldosteronism].

We report one case of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline after taking unilateral adrenalectomy due to aldosterone adenoma. A 60-year-old male with 23-year history of hypertension was reported to the endocrinologist due to hypokalemia (serum potassium 3.01 mmol/L). Urine microalbumin/creatinine (ALB/CR) was 70.15 mg/g, serum creatinine was 82 µmol/L and eGFR was 89.79 mL/(min·1.73 m2). Random serum aldosterone was 172.2-203.5 ng/L, and random plasma rennin activity was 0-0.17 µg/(L·h). His captopril challenge test suggested that his aldosterone le-vels were suppressed by 8% (< 30%) and the adrenal enhanced computed tomography scan revealed a left adrenal tumor. The patient was diagnosed with primary hyperaldosteronism (PA), aldosterone adenoma and underwent left laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Histological examination confirmed adrenal cortical adenoma. One week after the operation, his serum creatinine was increased to 127 µmol/L compared with preoperative level; eGFR was 32.34 mL/(min·1.73 m2). His systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 110 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was 60 mmHg (hypotensive drugs discontinued), and serum potassium level was 5.22 mmol/L. At the end of the 2-year follow up, the serum creatinine of this patient remained at 109-158 µmol/L and eGFR fluctuated from 63.28-40.12 mL/(min·1.73 m2). PA is one of the most common causes of secondary hypertension. Several studies have reported renal function deterioration of PA patients after unilateral adrenalectomy, like the patient in this article. Age, preoperative plasma aldosterone concentration, albuminuria and preoperative potassium level might be significant predictors of a decrease in the eGFR. Growing evidence suggests that aldosterone could contribute to structural kidney damage, arterial injury and hemodynamic disorder. At the same time, patients with PA exhibit glomerular hyperfiltration and glomerular vascular hypertension, leading to the misinterpretation of renal function in PA patients as subtle kidney damage may be masked by the glomerular hyperfiltration before treatment. After a unilateral adrenalectomy, glomerular hyperfiltration by aldosterone excess is resolved and renal damage can be unmasked. In conclusion, kidney function deterioration after adrenalectomy can be detected in some patients with PA. Thus, accurate evaluation of kidney function in patients with PA may be essential, especially for those with preoperative risk factors for postoperative renal impairment. After unilateral adrenalectomy, close monitoring of renal function and adequate management are required for PA patients.

In vitro and in vivo studies of adenovirus-mediated human norepinephrine transporter gene transduction to hepatocellular carcinoma.

The clinical value of (131)I-MIBG for targeted imaging and targeted radiotherapy is limited to neural crest-derived tumors expressing human norepinephrine transporters (hNET) protein. To extend (131)I-MIBG-targeted therapy to other nonexpressed hNET tumors, this study investigated the hNET expression in vitro and in vivo in HepG2 hepatoma mediated by recombinant adenovirus encoding the hNET gene (Ad-hNET). For this purpose, the HepG2 cells showed a 4.87-fold increase in (125)I-MIBG uptake after infection with Ad-hNET, and the uptake of (125)I-MIBG could be specifically inhibited by maprotiline. Immunohistological analysis, in vivo biological study and (131)I-MIBG scintigraphic imaging also revealed the high expression of hNET protein in hepatoma. This in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate the feasibility of hNET gene transfer, meditated by adenovirus vector, could extend to tumors other than those derived from the neural crest, which provides a sound foundation for further investigation of hepatocellular carcinoma-targeted radiotherapy mediated by adenovirus transfection with hNET gene.