Metabolic Abnormalities Following Tirzepatide Monotherapy in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Phase 3 SURPASS J-mono Post Hoc Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The presence of metabolic abnormalities in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and other comorbidities. This analysis compared the effects of tirzepatide (5, 10, and 15 mg) and dulaglutide 0.75 mg on the prevalence of metabolic abnormalities in Japanese patients with T2D. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of SURPASS J-mono, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial that compared the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide monotherapy (5, 10, and 15 mg) to dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese patients with T2D. Thresholds for abnormalities were based on the Japanese criteria for metabolic syndrome. Proportions of participants meeting a composite endpoint (visceral fat accumulation measured by waist circumference plus two or more of dyslipidemia, hypertension, or hyperglycemia) or individual component thresholds were calculated at baseline and week 52 for the overall population and for baseline body mass index (BMI) subgroups (< 25, 25 to < 30, and ≥ 30 kg/m2). RESULTS: Of 636 randomized participants, 431 (67.8%) met the composite endpoint at baseline, with similar findings observed across treatment arms. At week 52, the proportion of participants on treatment that met the composite endpoint was 31.7%, 23.0%, and 14.2% in the tirzepatide 5-, 10-, and 15-mg arms, respectively, and 56.5% in the dulaglutide arm (p < 0.001). A higher proportion met the composite endpoint at baseline in the BMI 25 to < 30 and ≥ 30 kg/m2 subgroups (73.2-79.3%) compared with the < 25 kg/m2 subgroup (45.3%), with reductions observed across all BMI subgroups treated with tirzepatide. The proportion of participants with individual metabolic abnormalities showed similar trends to those observed for the composite endpoint. Tirzepatide was consistently superior to dulaglutide across all assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Tirzepatide reduced the prevalence of multiple metabolic abnormalities, indicating tirzepatide may have metabolic benefit in Japanese patients with T2D. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03861052.

Glycaemic control, body weight, and safety of tirzepatide versus dulaglutide by baseline glycated haemoglobin level in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A subgroup analysis of the SURPASS J-mono study.

AIM: To evaluate glycaemic control, body weight, and safety outcomes following treatment with tirzepatide or dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with a baseline haemoglobin (HbA1c) level of ≤8.5% (≤69 mmol/mol) versus >8.5% (>69 mmol/mol). MATERIALS AND METHODS: SURPASS J-mono was a 52-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, phase 3 study conducted in Japan. In this exploratory subgroup analysis of SURPASS J-mono, we examined mean change in HbA1c and body weight and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) in patients with a baseline HbA1c of ≤8.5% versus >8.5% after treatment with tirzepatide (5, 10 or 15 mg) or dulaglutide 0.75 mg. RESULTS: Of 636 randomized participants, 203 had a baseline HbA1c of >8.5% and 433 had a baseline HbA1c of ≤8.5% (range ≥7.0% to ≤10.0%). Both subgroups showed significantly greater reductions in HbA1c and body weight with any-dose tirzepatide versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg, with greater HbA1c reductions observed in patients with a baseline HbA1c of >8.5% treated with tirzepatide (least squares mean [LSM] differences of -3.13% to -3.86%) or dulaglutide (LSM -1.81%) compared with patients with a baseline HbA1c of ≤8.5% (LSM -2.00% to -2.32%) or dulaglutide (LSM -1.05%; treatment-by-baseline HbA1c subgroup interaction P ≤ 0.001). For the tirzepatide treatment arms, LSM change from baseline in body weight ranged from -6.7 to -10.7 kg for the baseline HbA1c ≤8.5% subgroup and from -4.0 to -10.6 kg for the baseline HbA1c >8.5% subgroup, compared with -0.6 kg and -0.4 kg, respectively, for the dulaglutide arm. The incidence of hypoglycaemia was low, with no substantial difference in hypoglycaemia or treatment-emergent AEs between subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of baseline HbA1c (≤8.5% or >8.5%), tirzepatide at doses of 5, 10 and 15 mg is effective in Japanese patients with T2D compared with dulaglutide 0.75 mg in terms of glycaemic control and body weight reduction, with an adequate safety profile consistent with previous reports.

Treatment Satisfaction and Quality of Life with Tirzepatide Versus Dulaglutide Among Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Exploratory Evaluation of the SURPASS J-mono Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment satisfaction in diabetes management is vital to achieving long-term clinical outcomes. This analysis evaluated treatment satisfaction among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) after 52 weeks of treatment with once-weekly tirzepatide (5, 10, and 15 mg) compared with dulaglutide 0.75 mg. METHODS: This exploratory analysis of the phase 3 SURPASS J-mono trial assessed treatment satisfaction using the Japanese translation of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status (DTSQs) and change versions (DTSQc). Subgroup analyses were post hoc and conducted for the DTSQc overall treatment satisfaction score based on age (< 65 or ≥ 65 years), sex (male or female), baseline body mass index (BMI; < 25 or ≥ 25 kg/m2), and baseline glycated hemoglobin (≤ 8.5% or > 8.5%). RESULTS: Baseline DTSQs scores were similar among patients across all treatment arms. Overall, trends showed higher satisfaction among patients who received any tirzepatide dose compared with those who received dulaglutide after 52 weeks of treatment. Mean overall DTSQc treatment satisfaction scores at week 52 were significantly higher with tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg (11.5, 12.1, and 12.3, respectively, vs 8.9; P < 0.001). The DTSQc perceived frequency scores for unacceptable hyperglycemia were significantly lower with tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg (- 1.7, - 1.8, and - 2.3, respectively, vs - 0.6; P < 0.001), while scores for unacceptable hypoglycemia were similar across all treatment arms, ranging from - 0.8 to - 1.1. Subgroup analyses showed increased treatment satisfaction with tirzepatide compared with dulaglutide in the < 65 years (P < 0.001) and baseline BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 subgroups (P < 0.01 or < 0.001) and similar treatment satisfaction across treatment arms in the ≥ 65 years and BMI < 25 kg/m2 subgroups. CONCLUSION: Patients with T2D reported higher treatment satisfaction with once-weekly tirzepatide (5, 10, and 15 mg) compared with dulaglutide 0.75 mg after 52 weeks of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03861052.

Change in pharmacodynamic variables following once-weekly tirzepatide treatment versus dulaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS J-mono substudy).

AIM: To evaluate the pharmacodynamic effects of tirzepatide, a novel dual glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist, compared with dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SURPASS J-mono was a 52-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, Phase 3 study, conducted in Japan. This substudy of SURPASS J-mono evaluated postprandial metabolic variables and appetite after a meal tolerance test, and body composition measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis. RESULTS: Of 636 participants in SURPASS J-mono, 48 were included in this substudy and assigned to tirzepatide 5 mg (n = 9), tirzepatide 10 mg (n = 11), tirzepatide 15 mg (n = 9), or dulaglutide 0.75 mg (n = 19). Participants had a mean (standard deviation) age of 58.6 (7.5) years, duration of diabetes of 6.0 (6.3) years, and body mass index of 27.5 (3.5) kg/m2 . Mean glycated haemoglobin at baseline was 66 mmol/mol (8.22%). Following a standardized meal test, statistically significant differences in change from baseline in area under the concentration versus time curve from time zero to 6 h after dose for glucose, insulin, glucagon, C-peptide and triglycerides were observed in all tirzepatide treatment arms, except triglycerides at 10 mg, compared with dulaglutide at Week 32. For body composition, tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg resulted in a significant reduction in body weight, and all doses of tirzepatide resulted in a significant reduction in body fat mass at Week 52. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with dulaglutide, tirzepatide showed greater potential for normalizing metabolic factors after a standardized meal. Tirzepatide reduced body weight and body fat mass.

Efficacy and safety of tirzepatide monotherapy compared with dulaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS J-mono): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: As the disease progresses, many patients with type 2 diabetes have difficulty in reaching treatment goals. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide, a novel GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, compared with dulaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted in 46 medical research centres and hospitals in Japan. Adults aged 20 years or older with type 2 diabetes who had discontinued oral antihyperglycaemic monotherapy or were treatment-naïve were included. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive tirzepatide (5, 10, or 15 mg) or dulaglutide (0·75 mg) once per week using a computer-generated random sequence with an Interactive Web Response System. Participants were stratified based on baseline HbA1c (≤8·5% or >8·5%), baseline BMI (<25 or ≥25 kg/m2), and washout of antidiabetic medication. Participants, investigators, and the sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The starting dose of tirzepatide was 2·5 mg once per week for 4 weeks, which was then increased to 5 mg in the tirzepatide 5 mg treatment group. For the tirzepatide 10 and 15 mg treatment groups, increases by 2·5 mg occurred once every 4 weeks until the assigned dose was reached. The primary endpoint was mean change in HbA1c from baseline at week 52 measured in the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03861052. FINDINGS: Between May 7, 2019, and March 31, 2021, 821 participants were assessed for study eligibility and 636 were randomly assigned to receive at least one dose of tirzepatide 5 mg (n=159), 10 mg (n=158), or 15 mg (n=160), or dulaglutide 0·75 mg (n=159). 615 (97%) participants completed the study and 21 (3%) discontinued. Participants had a mean age of 56·6 years (SD 10·3) and were mostly male (481 [76%]). At week 52, HbA1c decreased from baseline by a least squares mean of -2·4 (SE 0·1) for tirzepatide 5 mg, -2·6 (0·1) for tirzepatide 10 mg, -2·8 (0·1) for tirzepatide 15 mg, and -1·3 (0·1) for dulaglutide. Estimated mean treatment differences versus dulaglutide were -1·1 (95% CI -1·3 to -0·9) for tirzepatide 5 mg, -1·3 (-1·5 to -1·1) for tirzepatide 10 mg, and -1·5 (-1·71 to -1·4) for tirzepatide 15 mg (all p<0·0001). Tirzepatide was associated with dose-dependent reductions in bodyweight with a least square mean difference of -5·8 kg (SE 0·4; -7·8% reduction) for 5 mg, -8·5 kg (0·4; -11·0% reduction) for 10 mg, and -10·7 kg (0·4; -13·9% reduction) for 15 mg of tirzepatide compared with -0·5 kg (0·4; -0·7% reduction) for dulaglutide. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (19 [12%] participants in the 5 mg group vs 31 [20%] in the 10 mg group vs 32 [20%] in the 15 mg group all receiving tirzepatide vs 12 (8%) in the group receiving dulaglutide), constipation (24 [15%] vs 28 [18%] vs 22 [14%] vs 17 [11%]), and nasopharyngitis (29 [18%] vs 25 [16%] vs 22 [14%] vs 26 [16%]). The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal (23 [4%] of 636). INTERPRETATION: Tirzepatide was superior compared with dulaglutide for glycaemic control and reduction in bodyweight. The safety profile of tirzepatide was consistent with that of GLP-1 receptor agonists, indicating a potential therapeutic use in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company. TRANSLATION: For the Japanese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

A phase 1 multiple-ascending dose study of tirzepatide in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes.

AIM: To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of tirzepatide in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: This phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-dose, multiple-ascending dose study randomized participants to once-weekly subcutaneous tirzepatide or placebo. The tirzepatide treatment groups were: 5 mg (5 mg, weeks 1-8), 10 mg (2.5 mg, weeks 1-2; 5 mg, weeks 3-4; 10 mg, weeks 5-8), and 15 mg (5 mg, weeks 1-2; 10 mg, weeks 3-6; 15 mg, weeks 7-8). The primary outcome was tirzepatide safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Forty-eight participants were randomized. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were decreased appetite and gastrointestinal AEs, which were generally dose-dependent and mild in severity. The plasma tirzepatide concentration half-life was approximately 5 days. After 8 weeks of treatment, fasting plasma glucose decreased from baseline with tirzepatide versus placebo; the least squares (LS) mean decrease compared with placebo (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 52.7 (35.9-69.6), 69.1 (52.3-85.9), and 68.9 (53.2-84.6) mg/dL in the 5-, 10-, and 15-mg treatment groups, respectively (P < .0001 for all treatment groups). Tirzepatide also resulted in LS mean decreases from baseline versus placebo at 8 weeks in HbA1c up to 1.6% (95% CI 1.2%-1.9%; P < .0001 for all treatment groups) and body weight up to 6.6 kg (95% CI 5.3-7.9; P < .0001 for all treatment groups). CONCLUSIONS: All tirzepatide doses were well tolerated. The safety, tolerability, PK, and PD profiles of tirzepatide support further evaluation of once-weekly dosing in Japanese people with T2D.

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Using Insulin: Exploratory Subgroup Analysis by Insulin Regimen.

PURPOSE: In East Asian patients, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterized primarily by ß-cell dysfunction, with lower insulin secretion than in Caucasian individuals. Therefore, bolus insulin and premixed insulin containing a bolus insulin component are important therapeutic tools in Japan, in addition to basal insulin. This subgroup analysis is stratified by insulin regimen and uses data from a phase 4, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind and subsequent open-label study in Japan to assess the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide combined with various insulin therapies. METHODS: This multicenter study enrolled Japanese patients with T2DM and inadequate glycemic control [glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 7.5% to ≤ 10.5%] on insulin therapy [basal (B), premixed (PM), or basal bolus (BB)] in combination with or without one or two oral antidiabetic agents. Randomized participants received once-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg (n = 120) or placebo (n = 39) during a 16-week double-blind treatment period, and dulaglutide during a 36-week open-label extension. In this subgroup analysis, efficacy measures were changes from baseline in HbA1c, 7-point self-monitored blood glucose profiles, and body weight. Safety measures were incidence of adverse events and hypoglycemia during the first 16 weeks. RESULTS: At week 16, least squares mean differences (95% CI) regarding changes from baseline in HbA1c for each insulin regimen versus placebo were: B: - 1.62% (- 1.96, - 1.28), PM: - 1.78% (- 2.25, - 1.30), and BB: - 1.15% (- 1.54, - 0.77); p < 0.001 dulaglutide vs. placebo for each subgroup. No significant differences in body weight changes were observed between dulaglutide and placebo for any insulin regimen. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most commonly observed adverse events in dulaglutide-treated patients. Hypoglycemia incidence rates were: B: dulaglutide 38.5% vs. placebo 23.5%; PM: dulaglutide 38.5% vs. placebo 44.4%; BB: dulaglutide 50.0% vs. placebo 30.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, dulaglutide was generally well tolerated and improved glycemic control significantly versus placebo, regardless of insulin regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02750410.

Ultra-Rapid Lispro results in accelerated insulin lispro absorption and faster early insulin action in comparison with Humalog® in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Ultra-rapid lispro (URLi) is a novel ultra-rapid mealtime insulin. This study compared the pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic profiles, safety, and tolerability of URLi and lispro (Humalog® ) in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a phase I, single center, randomized, patient- and investigator-blind, two-period, cross-over study. A total of 31 patients received a single subcutaneous 15-U dose of URLi or lispro before undergoing a euglycemic clamp procedure. Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were the time to early half-maximal drug concentration and the area under the concentration versus time curve from 0 to 30 min postdose. The glucodynamic endpoints were the time to early half-maximal glucose infusion rate before time to maximum glucose infusion rate, and the time to onset of insulin action. RESULTS: URLi showed accelerated insulin lispro absorption compared with lispro, as shown by a decrease of 56% (URLi: 10.2 min, lispro: 23.3 min; P < 0.0001) in the early half-maximal drug concentration, and a 2.4-fold increase in the area under the concentration versus time curve from 0 to 30 min (P < 0.0001). The duration of insulin lispro exposure was 88 min shorter after URLi administration compared with lispro. URLi reduced the early half-maximal glucose infusion rate before time to maximum glucose infusion rate and the time to onset of insulin action significantly compared with lispro. The glucose infused within the first 30 min of the clamp was 2.16-fold greater with URLi compared with lispro. There was no difference in total exposure or glucose infused between treatments. All treatment-emergent adverse events were mild/moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese type 1 diabetes mellitus patients, URLi showed accelerated insulin lispro absorption, reduced late exposure, overall shorter duration and faster early insulin action compared with lispro.

Once-Weekly Dulaglutide with Insulin Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes: Efficacy and Safety Results from a Phase 4, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

INTRODUCTION: Although global studies have investigated the combination of dulaglutide with insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), differences in lean body mass and dulaglutide dosing can complicate the extrapolation of global study results to Japanese patients. This phase 4, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, and subsequent open-label study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg in combination with insulin therapy in patients with T2DM. METHODS: Patients enrolled in this multicenter study were Japanese with T2DM who had inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c 7.5-10.5%) with insulin therapy (basal insulin, premixed insulin, or basal/mealtime insulin) in combination with or without one or two oral antidiabetic agents (OADs). Patients were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to dulaglutide or placebo. The first 16 weeks was the double-blind period with stable insulin dosing, and patients taking placebo were switched to dulaglutide for an additional 36-week open-label period in which all patients took dulaglutide (52 weeks total). RESULTS: Patients (N = 159) were randomized to dulaglutide (n = 120) or placebo (n = 39). The least-squares (LS) mean changes from baseline in HbA1c at week 16 were dulaglutide - 1.45% and placebo 0.06%. The LS mean and 95% confidence interval for the difference were - 1.50% (- 1.73%, - 1.28%) and dulaglutide was superior to placebo. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in changes from baseline in body weight and insulin dose. The most frequently observed treatment-emergent adverse events in dulaglutide were nasopharyngitis, constipation, abdominal discomfort, nausea, and decreased appetite. The incidence rates of hypoglycemic events by week 16 were dulaglutide 42.5% and placebo 30.8% (P = 0.258). CONCLUSION: Once-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg was superior to once-weekly placebo in glycemic control improvement and well tolerated in patients with T2DM in combination with insulin therapy with or without OADs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02750410. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company.

Effect of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide on Glucose Levels in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Findings from a Phase 4, Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Dulaglutide is a recombinant glucagon-like peptide-1 immunoglobulin G4 Fc fusion protein approved for treating patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The aim of this study was to assess postprandial data over 4 weeks for dulaglutide (0.75 mg) versus placebo after a standardized test meal in Japanese patients with T2D. METHODS: The pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of once-weekly dulaglutide (0.75 mg) in Japanese patients with T2D on diet and exercise therapy (N = 12) were evaluated by assessing postprandial data up to week 4 in a phase 4, single-center, randomized, cross-over, single-blind, placebo-controlled study. The primary end point was the change in 4-h glucose area under the concentration versus time curve [AUC (0-4 h)] from baseline to week 4. Secondary end points included changes from baseline in other PD parameters (insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, and triglycerides) at weeks 1, 2, and 4 and the safety and tolerability of dulaglutide 0.75 mg. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) during the 1st week was performed as an exploratory measure in each treatment period. RESULTS: The decrease in AUC (0-4 h) from baseline to week 4 following dulaglutide administration was statistically significant compared with placebo at weeks 1, 2, and 4 (P < 0.0001). Insulin and C-peptide levels were also significantly increased (P < 0.05) with dulaglutide versus placebo at weeks 2 and 4. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in glucagon and triglyceride levels. Daily average glucose concentrations were decreased on the day after the first administration of dulaglutide and remained at similar levels for 4 days. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was slightly higher with dulaglutide versus placebo. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, dulaglutide decreased postprandial glucose from week 1 in Japanese patients with T2D, indicating that dulaglutide treatment is associated with favorable PD effects soon after treatment begins. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03315780. FUNDING: Eli Lilly Japan K.K. (Kobe, Japan).

Subgroup Analysis Stratified by Baseline Pancreatic ß-cell Function in a Japanese Study of Dulaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: This analysis investigated the relationship between baseline fasting pancreatic ß-cell function and efficacy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with once-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg (dulaglutide) or once-daily liraglutide 0.9 mg (liraglutide) for up to 52 weeks. METHODS: In a 52-week study of monotherapy in Japanese patients with T2D, patients were categorized into three subgroups defined by tertiles (low, medium, and high) of baseline values of three pancreatic ß-cell function parameters [fasting C-peptide, C-peptide index, and secretory units of islets in transplantation (SUIT) index]. Associations between these parameters and efficacy [defined by changes from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial blood glucose (PBG), mean of all meals blood glucose excursion, and body weight] in the dulaglutide group (280 patients) or the liraglutide group (137 patients) were evaluated. RESULTS: Patients in the subgroups with high insulin-secreting ability (based on pancreatic ß-cell function) were younger and had shorter disease duration and higher body mass index compared to those with low insulin-secreting ability. No specific trend was observed between baseline pancreatic ß-cell function and changes in HbA1c or FBG. Reductions from baseline in mean PBG and excursion were greatest for patients in the low ß-cell function tertiles. Inconsistent trends in body weight were observed across the treatment groups and ß-cell function parameters. CONCLUSION: In Japanese patients with T2D, changes in HbA1c and body weight after 52 weeks of treatment with dulaglutide or liraglutide could not be predicted by patients' fasting pancreatic ß-cell function before treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01558271). FUNDING: Eli Lilly K.K. (Kobe, Japan).

Efficacy and safety of subgroup analysis stratified by baseline HbA1c in a Japanese phase 3 study of dulaglutide 0.75 mg compared with insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg (dulaglutide) compared with once-daily insulin glargine (glargine) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes were evaluated according to subgroups stratified by baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (≤8.5% or >8.5%). This exploratory analysis of a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study included 361 patients. In both HbA1c subgroups (patients with baseline HbA1c ≤8.5% or >8.5%), a statistically significantly greater reduction in HbA1c was observed in dulaglutide-treated patients compared with glargine-treated patients after 26 weeks of treatment (HbA1c ≤8.5%: dulaglutide, -1.27%; glargine, -0.72%; HbA1c >8.5%: dulaglutide, -2.04%; glargine, -1.47%; p < 0.001 for both). Mean body weight was decreased from baseline in both subgroups of the dulaglutide group and increased in both subgroups of the glargine group; there were statistically significant differences between the treatment groups in both subgroups (p < 0.05 for both). In both subgroups, similar reductions in fasting blood glucose were observed for dulaglutide- and glargine-treated patients, and a greater reduction in postprandial blood glucose was observed for dulaglutide-treated patients compared with glargine-treated patients. Although dulaglutide increased gastrointestinal adverse events compared with glargine in both subgroups, all gastrointestinal events of diarrhea, nausea, constipation, and vomiting in dulaglutide-treated patients were mild in intensity and well tolerated. In both subgroups, there was a lower incidence of hypoglycemia with dulaglutide than with glargine. Dulaglutide demonstrated significantly greater HbA1c reduction compared with glargine, with an acceptable safety profile, regardless of baseline HbA1c.

Evaluation of the impact of once weekly dulaglutide on patient-reported outcomes in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: comparisons with liraglutide, insulin glargine, and placebo in two randomized studies.

BACKGROUND: Standardized patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires can be utilized to evaluate treatment satisfaction (subjective evaluation of treatment) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). These outcomes are important because they may affect patient adherence and overall study results. METHODS: PROs were evaluated in two randomized 26-week clinical trials in Japanese patients with T2D taking dulaglutide 0.75 mg (dulaglutide) once weekly; comparators were once-daily liraglutide (0.9 mg/day) and once-weekly placebo in one study and once-daily insulin glargine (glargine) in the other study. The Perceptions About Medications-Diabetes 21 Questionnaire - Japanese version (PAM-D21-J) and the Injectable Diabetes Medication Questionnaire - Japanese version (IDMQ-J) were completed by patients in both studies. These measures were both considered exploratory endpoints. All scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes. RESULTS: Patients reported that dulaglutide was more convenient and flexible than liraglutide (PAM-D21-J Convenience/Flexibility subscale: dulaglutide least-square mean [LSM], 84.58; liraglutide LSM, 78.94; p = .026), and that they were more satisfied with dulaglutide than with liraglutide (IDMQ-J Satisfaction subscale: dulaglutide, 75.24; liraglutide, 69.53; p = .012). Patients also reported that dulaglutide was more convenient and flexible than glargine (PAM-D21-J Convenience/Flexibility subscale: dulaglutide, 87.89; glargine, 79.22; p < .001), and that they were more satisfied with dulaglutide than with glargine (IDMQ-J Satisfaction subscale: dulaglutide, 78.86; glargine, 69.66; p < .001), and felt dulaglutide was more effective than glargine, with fewer symptoms and adverse events (PAM-D21-J Perceived Effectiveness subscale: dulaglutide, 77.61; glargine, 67.22; p < .001; Emotional Effects subscale: dulaglutide, 93.02; glargine, 89.55; p = .017; IDMQ-J Blood Glucose Control subscale: dulaglutide, 76.33; glargine, 67.57; p < .001). In addition, patients responded that dulaglutide was superior to placebo in the PAM-D21-J Convenience/Flexibility, Perceived Effectiveness, and Emotional Effects subscales and all IDMQ-J subscales (Satisfaction, Ease of Use, Lifestyle Impact, Blood Glucose Control). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, after 26 weeks of once-weekly dulaglutide administration in Japanese patients with T2D, PROs were generally positive versus the three comparator treatments (liraglutide, glargine, and placebo), suggesting increased treatment satisfaction through better blood glucose control and convenience/flexibility and reduced negative emotional effects of diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (monotherapy study: NCT01558271 , registered March 12, 2012; combination therapy study: NCT01584232 , registered April 23, 2012).

Analysis of efficacy and safety of dulaglutide 0.75 mg stratified by sex in patients with type 2 diabetes in 2 randomized, controlled phase 3 studies in Japan.

We analyzed the efficacy and safety of once weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg by sex in 2 randomized, controlled phase 3 studies in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (a 52-week monotherapy study [comparator liraglutide 0.9 mg] and a 26-week combination therapy study [comparator insulin glargine]). Females comprised 18% of patients in the monotherapy study and 29% of patients in the combination therapy study. Mean reductions from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were similar between the sexes for dulaglutide- and liraglutide-treated patients (range -1.17% to -1.49%). Females had numerically greater weight loss or less weight gain than males across all treatment groups. The percentages of patients with reductions in both HbA1c and weight from baseline were also greater for females than for males in all treatment groups. In all treatment groups, the incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events tended to be greater among females than among males. No differences in the incidences of total or nocturnal hypoglycemia were observed between the sexes in any treatment group. Overall, in 2 studies in Japan, across all treatment groups it appeared that HbA1c lowering was unaffected by patient sex, while female patients had greater weight loss or less weight gain and greater incidence of adverse events, including nausea, compared to male patients. Incidences of patients discontinuing dulaglutide early due to adverse event were low (<10%) for both sexes, and no new safety concerns related to dulaglutide were identified for either sex. Therefore, the benefit/risk ratio for dulaglutide remains unchanged, positive for both sexes.

Pancreatic safety in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with once weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg up to 52 weeks in phase 3 clinical trials.

The effects of incretin therapies on pancreatic safety are currently being evaluated. In 3 phase 3 clinical studies of once weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg (dulaglutide) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), symptoms suggestive of acute pancreatitis as well as pancreatic enzymes were assessed and the risk of acute pancreatitis was evaluated. Patients who met any of the predefined criteria (clinical signs/symptoms of acute pancreatitis, confirmed amylase or lipase level ≥3 times the upper limit of normal [ULN], abdominal imaging of the pancreas) were adjudicated for acute pancreatitis by a blinded external committee. A total of 43 events in 40 patients (dulaglutide, 35/917 patients; liraglutide, 2/137 patients; insulin glargine, 2/180 patients; and placebo, 2/70 patients) were adjudicated (1 patient had events adjudicated during both placebo and dulaglutide treatment); 2 patients treated with dulaglutide had acute pancreatitis confirmed (2/917 [0.2%]; 2.651 patients/1,000 patient-years). One of these patients was diagnosed by the investigator with acute pancreatitis related to dulaglutide, but there was no typical abdominal pain. The event in the other patient occurred following an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Transient increases in lipase ≥3×ULN were observed in 2% of patients in both the dulaglutide and liraglutide groups; the incidence in dulaglutide-treated patients was not significantly different from the incidences in liraglutide, placebo-, or insulin glargine-treated patients. Results of systematic assessments of pancreatic safety in 3 phase 3 studies for up to 52 weeks do not suggest an increased risk of acute pancreatitis in Japanese patients treated with dulaglutide.

The combination of dulaglutide and biguanide reduced bodyweight in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

The efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg (dulaglutide) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) were evaluated according to subgroups defined by concomitant oral hypoglycaemic agents. This exploratory analysis included data from a randomized, open-label, phase III study that compared dulaglutide with insulin glargine (glargine) (n = 361). The three subgroups were dulaglutide or glargine in combination with sulphonylurea (SU) alone, biguanide (BG) alone or SU and BG combined. There were no clinically relevant differences in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) changes among the three subgroups in the dulaglutide group; in the glargine group, a numerically greater reduction was observed in combination with BG alone compared to the other two groups (SU alone and SU + BG). Weight loss was observed with dulaglutide in combination with BG alone or with SU + BG. The incidence of adverse events among subgroups was significantly different in the glargine group but not in the dulaglutide group. Incidence of hypoglycaemia was highest in combination with SU for both treatments. For patients with T2D, dulaglutide added to concomitant BG may be more likely to result in weight loss than dulaglutide added to concomitant SU.

Subgroup analysis of phase 3 studies of dulaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

The efficacy and tolerability of once weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) were evaluated by subgroups defined by key demographic characteristics. This post hoc analysis included data from patients who received dulaglutide 0.75 mg for up to 26 weeks in three phase 3 trials (one open-label, randomized; one double-blind and open-label, randomized; one open-label, nonrandomized). Patients were classified into subgroups on the basis of sex (male, female), age (<65, ≥65 years), body weight (<70, ≥70 kg), body mass index (BMI; <25, ≥25 kg/m(2)), duration of diabetes (<7, ≥7 years), HbA1c (≤8.5, >8.5%), use of concomitant sulfonylurea (yes, no), and use of concomitant biguanide (yes, no). Efficacy measures analyzed were changes from baseline in HbA1c and body weight and percentages of patients achieving HbA1c <7.0%. Safety measures analyzed were incidence of hypoglycemia and nausea and change from baseline in seated pulse rate. A total of 855 patients were analyzed. Once weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg improved blood glucose control as measured by HbA1c regardless of patient characteristics; patients with higher baseline HbA1c values had greater improvements compared to patients with lower baseline values. Weight loss was greater in patients with lower baseline HbA1c and in patients taking concomitant biguanides. Concomitant use of sulfonylureas had the greatest effect on the incidence of hypoglycemia. Treatment of T2D with once weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg for 26 weeks was associated with significant improvement in glycemic control irrespective of age, sex, duration of diabetes, body weight, BMI, or concomitant medication.

A 1-year safety study of dulaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes on a single oral hypoglycemic agent: an open-label, nonrandomized, phase 3 trial.

The goal of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of 0.75 mg of dulaglutide, a once weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on a single oral hypoglycemic agent (OHA). In this phase 3, nonrandomized, open-label, parallel-group, 52-week study, safety and efficacy of once weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg were assessed in Japanese patients with T2D on a single OHA (sulfonylureas [SU], biguanides [BG], α-glucosidase inhibitors [AGI], thiazolidinedione [TZD], or glinides [GLN]). A total of 394 patients were treated with study drug, and 92.9% completed the 52-week treatment period. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were nasopharyngitis and gastrointestinal disorders, including constipation, diarrhea, and nausea. Incidences of hypoglycemia varied across the combination therapy groups: incidence was greater in patients receiving SU compared with other combinations. No severe hypoglycemic episodes occurred during the study. Increases from baseline in pancreatic and total amylase, lipase, and pulse rate were observed in all 5 combination therapy groups. Significant reductions from baseline in HbA1c were observed in all 5 combination therapy groups (-1.57% to -1.69%, p < 0.001 for all). Mean body weight changes from baseline varied across the combination therapy groups: a significant increase was observed in combination with TZD, there were no significant changes in combination with SU or GLN, and significant reductions were observed in combination with BG or AGI. Once weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg in combination with a single OHA was overall well tolerated and improved glycemic control in Japanese patients with T2D.

Cancer outlier analysis based on mixture modeling of gene expression data.

Molecular heterogeneity of cancer, partially caused by various chromosomal aberrations or gene mutations, can yield substantial heterogeneity in gene expression profile in cancer samples. To detect cancer-related genes which are active only in a subset of cancer samples or cancer outliers, several methods have been proposed in the context of multiple testing. Such cancer outlier analyses will generally suffer from a serious lack of power, compared with the standard multiple testing setting where common activation of genes across all cancer samples is supposed. In this paper, we consider information sharing across genes and cancer samples, via a parametric normal mixture modeling of gene expression levels of cancer samples across genes after a standardization using the reference, normal sample data. A gene-based statistic for gene selection is developed on the basis of a posterior probability of cancer outlier for each cancer sample. Some efficiency improvement by using our method was demonstrated, even under settings with misspecified, heavy-tailed t-distributions. An application to a real dataset from hematologic malignancies is provided.

Efficacy and safety profile of exenatide once weekly compared with insulin once daily in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antidiabetes drug(s): results from a 26-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, noninferiority study.

BACKGROUND: Exenatide once weekly (QW) is an extended-release formulation of exenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist that reportedly improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that exenatide QW is noninferior to insulin glargine, as measured by change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline to end point (week 26 [primary end point]) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycemic control with oral antidiabetes drugs. METHODS: In this open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, noninferiority registration study, patients were randomized (1:1) to add exenatide QW (2 mg) or once-daily insulin glargine (starting dose, 4 U) to their current oral antidiabetes drug treatment. The primary analysis was change in HbA(1c) from baseline to end point, evaluated by using a last-observation-carried-forward ANCOVA model, with a predefined noninferiority margin of 0.4%. Secondary analyses (a priori) included analysis of superiority for between-group comparisons of change in weight and the proportion of patients reaching HbA(1c) target levels of ≤7.0% or ≤6.5%. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the exenatide QW (215 patients) and insulin glargine (212 patients) treatment groups were similar: mean (SD) age, 57 (10) years and 56 (11) years, respectively; 66.0% and 69.8% male; mean HbA(1c), 8.5% (0.82%) and 8.5% (0.79%); and mean weight, 69.9 (13.2) kg and 71.0 (13.9) kg. Exenatide QW was statistically noninferior to insulin glargine for the change in HbA(1c) from baseline to end point (least squares mean difference, -0.43% [95% CI, -0.59 to -0.26]; P < 0.001), with the 95% CI upper limit less than the predefined noninferiority margin (0.4%). A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving exenatide QW compared with insulin glargine achieved HbA(1c) target levels of ≤7.0% (89 of 211 [42.2%] vs 44 of 210 [21.0%]) or ≤6.5% (44 of 214 [20.6%] vs 9 of 212 [4.2%]) at end point (P < 0.001 for both). Patient weight was reduced with exenatide QW compared with insulin glargine at end point (least squares mean difference, -2.01 kg [95% CI, -2.46 to -1.56]; P < 0.001). Exenatide QW was well tolerated, with a lower risk of hypoglycemia compared with insulin glargine but a higher incidence of injection-site induration. CONCLUSIONS: Exenatide QW was statistically noninferior to insulin glargine for the change in HbA(1c) from baseline to end point; these results suggest that exenatide QW may provide an effective alternative treatment for Japanese patients who require additional therapy to control their diabetes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00935532.