Telecoaching for Parents of Young Autistic Children Using Strength-Based Video Feedback.

Parent-implemented Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBIs), rooted from applied behavioral and developmental sciences, focus on empowering families by training and coaching natural change agents to embed evidence-based strategies during regular events or contexts (e.g., play time). No research, however, has relied on strength-based video feedback coaching within parent-implemented NDBIs while providing flexibility with self-recorded sessions. We conducted a single case multiple-baseline design across five parent-child dyads to evaluate the effects of a telepractice-based parent-training on five NDBI strategies (i.e., Follow and Imitate, Model Language, Arrange Environment, Wait Time, Reward and Expand), utilizing strength-based video feedback coaching with parents (i.e., two mothers and three fathers) of young autistic children (i.e., ages 2 to 5) on parent strategy use and child social communication. An additional coaching package (i.e., parent self-reflections, goal setting, and joint discussions) was introduced to parents who did not meet a predetermined criterion. Maintenance data were collected 2-, 4-, and 6-weeks after intervention concluded. Visual analyses, nonoverlap calculations, and standardized mean difference effect sizes indicate strong effects for parent strategy use and small, varied effects on child social communication. Maintenance of parent strategy use and child social communication varied, with most remaining at equivalent or higher levels. Parent-implemented interventions that are delivered via telepractice may continue to be successful when coaching is focused on the parents' strengths, all coaching feedback is provided asynchronously, and families can flexibly record sessions based upon their week's schedules rather than relying on regularly scheduled meeting times with a coach.

Photographs and Parent Training to Support Conversations about Past Events between Caregivers and Children with Autism.

Objectives: Children with autism spectrum disorder experience communication difficulties that can make it challenging to engage in conversations. Their caregivers also often struggle with finding ways to support the child's communication. Parent-implemented interventions and visual supports are evidence-based practices to support the communication skills of children with autism. Method: A multi-method design (single-case multiple probe and qualitative) was used to evaluate the effects of family photographs, training, and telecoaching on parental implementation of communication strategies. Three parents and their children with and at risk for autism participated. Results: Results indicate that the use of photographs increased the communication strategies used by all parents. Telecoaching further increased the overall strategy use for two parents. Interviews with the parents indicate spontaneous generalization and maintenance of strategy use. Conclusion: Family photos and naturalistic developmental behavior intervention approaches have the potential to improve communication about past events between parents and children with and at risk for ASD.

Centering the family in their system: a framework to promote family-centered AAC services.

Families are the most significant communication partners for an individual with complex communication needs. Even though family-centered approaches are recommended to support augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) services for an individual, it is difficult to establish a successful plan that fits each individual's family. A framework for practitioners is proposed to effectively obtain and understand information about a family's unique dynamics as part of service delivery to positively impact AAC device uptake and long-term use. The goal of using this model is to minimize the disruption to the family while maximizing the integration of the AAC system. This paper proposes and illustrates a framework to enrich AAC services through the integration of several theoretical models of family systems theory, family paradigms, and a procedure called the self-created genogram. This paper begins by reviewing ecological family systems theory and family systems to guide and provide a framework to support effective AAC implementation. The process of self-creating genograms is then introduced as a means to obtain a rich perspective on family characteristics and dynamics that is informed by the individual who uses AAC. All of this information allows professionals to provide relevant information and tailor options for the family. As a result, the family is able to make informed decisions about AAC intervention in a manner most consistent with how they typically operate. Finally, we apply this framework to a hypothetical case of a child with autism and complex communication needs across three timepoints (preschool, late elementary/early middle school, and high school/post-secondary transition) to demonstrate how this framework can be used in clinical practice.

Personalized AAC Intervention to Increase Participation and Communication for a Young Adult with Down Syndrome.

Many adults with Down syndrome (DS) experience difficulty with speech production, and intelligibility challenges and communication breakdowns are common. Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention can provide important supports for persons with these complex communication needs, but must be customized to address the goals, strengths, and needs of the individual. This article provides a description of a personalized AAC intervention for a young adult with DS whose speech was frequently unintelligible. The AAC intervention made use of a video visual scene display (VSD) approach, and was investigated in two separate studies in two key community settings: An inclusive post-secondary education program (a single-case reversal ABAB design), and a community shopping activity (a non-experimental AB case study design). The participant demonstrated sharp increases in successful communication and participation in both settings following the introduction of the video VSD, and both the participant and key stakeholders viewed the intervention positively. The results provide preliminary evidence that personalized AAC intervention, including the use of a video VSD approach, can provide important supports for communication and participation in community settings for adults with DS and complex communication needs.

Brief Report: Collateral Joint Engagement During a Playdate Intervention for Children with and at Risk for Autism.

Joint engagement involves a child coordinating their attention between a person and a shared event. Children with autism present with impaired joint engagement. Playdates are a common way that children socially engage yet have been largely overlooked in the social skills literature. Requesting skills have been conceptualized as pivotal, producing collateral effects. In the current study, we conducted a secondary analysis of a single-case design that evaluated a parent-implemented playdate intervention focused on supporting children and peers to request and respond to one another during games. We examined the collateral effects of the playdate intervention on joint engagement. Two children demonstrated gains in joint engagement with a peer, and the third exhibited variable changes. Implications for future research are discussed.

A comparison of single-case evaluation tools applied to functional communication training with augmentative and alternative communication supports for students with developmental disabilities.

BACKGROUND: Students with developmental disabilities frequently present with both limited vocal speech and challenging behavior. Functional communication training (FCT) with augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) supports, is a commonly recommended intervention to reduce challenging behavior for these students, while also increasing appropriate communication. AIMS: Current research on this topic has not applied multiple evaluation tools, despite the recent suggestion to do so. Further, there are limited studies in the field of special education that have (a) applied multiple evaluation tools and (b) compared the results of the tools. METHOD: In the current review, we applied three evaluation tools to intervention studies examining the use of FCT with AAC supports in school-based settings to determine the current level of scientific support for this intervention. We identified 38 studies, which contained 59 single-case designs (SCDs). Next, we compared the methodological rigor and/or quality, outcome scores, and Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) ratings provided by the three evaluation tools. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Our results yielded inconsistent methodological rigor and/or quality, participant outcome measures, and EBP classifications between the evaluation tools. No two evaluation tools completely aligned. Limitations and future research are discussed.