Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bone Joint J ; 97-B(2): 147-9, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25628273

ABSTRACT

Revision knee arthroplasty presents a number of challenges, not least of which is obtaining solid primary fixation of implants into host bone. Three anatomical zones exist within both femur and tibia which can be used to support revision implants. These consist of the joint surface or epiphysis, the metaphysis and the diaphysis. The methods by which fixation in each zone can be obtained are discussed. The authors suggest that solid fixation should be obtained in at least two of the three zones and emphasise the importance of pre-operative planning and implant selection.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Diaphyses , Epiphyses , Femur/surgery , Humans , Reoperation , Tibia/surgery
2.
J Bone Joint Surg Br ; 92(9): 1222-6, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20798438

ABSTRACT

Periprosthetic infection following total hip replacement can be a catastrophic complication for the patient. The treatments available include single-stage exchange, and two-stage exchange. We present a series of 50 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of infected total hip replacement who were assessed according to a standardised protocol. Of these, 11 underwent single-stage revision arthroplasty with no recurrence of infection at a mean of 6.8 years follow-up (5.5 to 8.8). The remaining 39 underwent two-stage revision, with two recurrences of infection successfully treated by a second two-stage procedure. At five years, significant differences were found in the mean Harris Hip Scores (single-stage 87.8; two-stage 75.5; p = 0.0003) and in a visual analogue score for satisfaction (8.6; 6.9; p = 0.001) between the single- and two-stage groups. Single-stage exchange is successful in eradicating periprosthetic infection and results in excellent functional and satisfaction scores. Identification of patients suitable for the single-stage procedure allows individualisation of care and provides as many as possible with the correct strategy in successfully tackling their periprosthetic infection.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Disability Evaluation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hip Joint/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Satisfaction , Replantation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...