French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: management of kidney cancer.

AIM: To update the recommendations for the management of kidney cancers. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted from 2015 to 2022. The most relevant articles on the diagnosis, classification, surgical treatment, medical treatment and follow-up of kidney cancer were selected and incorporated into the recommendations. Therefore, the recommendations were updated while specifying the level of evidence (high or low). RESULTS: The gold standard for the diagnosis and evaluation of kidney cancer is contrast-enhanced chest and abdominal CT. MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound are indicated in special cases. Percutaneous biopsy is recommended in situations where the results will influence the therapeutic decision. Renal tumours should be classified according to the pTNM 2017 classification, the WHO 2022 classification and the ISUP nucleolar grade. Metastatic kidney cancer should be classified according to the IMDC criteria. Partial nephrectomy is the gold standard treatment for T1a tumours and can be performed by an open approach, by laparoscopy or by robot-guidance. Active surveillance of tumours less than 2cm in size can be considered regardless of the patient's age. Ablative therapies and active surveillance are options in elderly patients with comorbidity. T1b tumours should be treated by partial or radical nephrectomy depending on the complexity of the tumour. Radical nephrectomy is the first-line treatment for locally advanced cancers. Adjuvant treatment with pembrolizumab should be considered in patients at intermediate and high risk for recurrence after nephrectomy. In metastatic patients: Immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy may be offered to oligometastatic patients in combination with local treatment of metastases if this can be complete and delayed cytoreductive nephrectomy can be proposed for patients with a complete response or a significant partial response. Medical treatment should be proposed as first-line therapy for patients with a poor or intermediate prognosis. Surgical or local treatment of metastases can be proposed in case of single or oligo-metastases. The recommended first-line drugs for metastatic patients with clear cell renal carcinoma are the combinations axitinib/pembrolizumab, nivolumab/ipililumab, nivolumab/cabozantinib and lenvatinib/pembrolizumab. Cabozantinib is the recommended first-line treatment for patients with metastatic papillary carcinoma. Cystic tumours should be classified according to the Bosniak classification. Surgical removal should be proposed as a priority for Bosniak III and IV lesions. It is recommended that patient monitoring be adapted to the aggressiveness of the tumour. CONCLUSION: These updated recommendations are a reference that will allow French and French-speaking practitioners to improve kidney cancer management.

Nefrectomía parcial laparoscópica off-clamp tras la embolización del tumor en sala híbrida frente a nefrectomía parcial convencional: un análisis de pares emparejados por puntuación de propensión / Off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a hybrid room after tumor embolization versus conventional partial nephrectomy: A propensity score matched pair analysis

Objetivo: La nefrectomía parcial laparoscópica off-clamp tras la embolización arterial superselectiva (NPLh) en un quirófano híbrido es un abordaje mínimamente invasivo prometedor. En este estudio comparamos los resultados quirúrgicos perioperatorios de esta técnica innovadora con los de la técnica estándar de nefrectomía parcial laparoscópica convencional (NPLc).Pacientes y métodos: En total se incluyeron 86 y 127 pacientes tratados con NPLh y NPLc, respectivamente. Las dos técnicas se compararon en términos de complicaciones quirúrgicas, pérdida de sangre estimada (PSE), tiempo quirúrgico, duración de la estancia hospitalaria (DEH), márgenes quirúrgicos y tasa de consecución de la Trifecta (definida como duración de isquemia caliente <25min, márgenes quirúrgicos negativos y ausencia de complicaciones). Se utilizó una puntuación de propensión basada en la edad, el sexo, el índice de masa corporal (IMC), la tasa de filtración glomerular estimada (TFGe) preoperatoria y el tamaño tumoral para un emparejamiento 1:1 de los pacientes de cada grupo. Tras el emparejamiento, se obtuvieron dos grupos de 67 pacientes con características similares.Resultados: La tasa de conversión a cirugía abierta, las complicaciones y la PSE fueron similares entre ambos grupos. Por el contrario, el tiempo quirúrgico, la DEH y las tasas de Trifecta favorecieron la NPLh. El análisis multivariante demostró que la NPLh tenía un 70% más de probabilidades de lograr la Trifecta que la NPLc en todos los grupos de edad y para cualquier tamaño tumoral en toda la población del estudio.Conclusión: En comparación con el abordaje convencional, la nefrectomía parcial laparoscópica sin clampado después de la embolización arterial superselectiva en una sala híbrida mostró resultados quirúrgicos satisfactorios inmediatos y alcanzó una mayor tasa de consecución de la Trifecta. Se necesitan resultados funcionales y oncológicos a medio y a largo plazo para establecer esta

Objective: Off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a hybrid operating room after superselective arterial embolization (hLPN) is a promising minimally invasive approach. In this study, we compared the perioperative surgical outcomes of this innovative technique with the conventional standard of care laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (cLPN) technique.Patients and methods: Overall, 86 and 127 patients treated with hLPN and cLPN, respectively, were included. These two techniques were compared in terms of surgical complications, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of stay (LOS), surgical margins, and Trifecta achievement rate (defined as warm ischemia duration <25min, negative surgical margins and absence of complications). A propensity score based on age, gender, BMI, preoperative eGFR and tumor size was used for a 1:1 matching of patients of each group. After matching, two groups of 67 patients with similar characteristics were obtained.Results: Conversion rate to open surgery, complications and EBL were similar in both groups. Conversely, operative time, LOS and Trifecta rates favored hLPN. The multivariate analysis showed that hLPN had a 70% higher chance of Trifecta achievement than cLPN in all age groups and for all tumor size across the study population.Conclusion: Compared to a conventional approach, off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a hybrid room after superselective arterial embolization showed satisfying immediate surgical outcomes and reached a higher rate of Trifecta achievement. Mid and long-term functional and oncological results are needed to establish this minimally invasive surgical alternative (AU)

Off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a hybrid room after tumor embolization versus conventional partial nephrectomy: A propensity score matched pair analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a hybrid operating room after superselective arterial embolization (hLPN) is a promising minimally invasive approach. In this study, we compared the perioperative surgical outcomes of this innovative technique with the conventional standard of care laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (cLPN) technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 86 and 127 patients treated with hLPN and cLPN, respectively, were included. These two techniques were compared in terms of surgical complications, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of stay (LOS), surgical margins, and Trifecta achievement rate (defined as warm ischemia duration <25 min, negative surgical margins and absence of complications). A propensity score based on age, gender, BMI, preoperative eGFR and tumor size was used for a 1:1 matching of patients of each group. After matching, 2 groups of 67 patients with similar characteristics were obtained. RESULTS: Conversion rate to open surgery, complications and EBL were similar in both groups. Conversely, operative time, LOS and Trifecta rates favored hLPN. The multivariate analysis showed that hLPN had a 70% higher chance of Trifecta achievement than cLPN in all age groups and for all tumor size across the study population. CONCLUSION: Compared to a conventional approach, off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a hybrid room after superselective arterial embolization showed satisfying immediate surgical outcomes and reached a higher rate of Trifecta achievement. Mid and long-term functional and oncological results are needed to establish this minimally invasive surgical alternative.

[Trends in the use of midurethral slings after the new legislation: A nationwide survey]. / Évolution des pratiques après l'arrêté encadrant les bandelettes sous-urétrales : résultats d'une enquête nationale.

INTRODUCTION: The French Department of Health published on October 23, 2020 a decree governing acts associated with mid-urethral sling (MUS) operations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in practice following this new legislation. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out among French urologists and gynecologists using an online survey to collect changes in practices since the publication of the decree. RESULTS: From January to February 2021, 436 surgeons participated in the survey. Among these surgeons, 87% were aware of the new legislation and 56% of them considered the decree as useless. The order resulted in an increase in working time in 81% of cases. Among these surgeons, 66% of the surgeons worked in tertiary referral centers for the management of incontinence, of which 55% had a multidisciplinary meeting in urogynecology. Among the surgeons, 31% considered this meeting to be useful but 80% considered that it did not lead to any change in surgical indications, even though 33% of complications of BSU were discussed there. In conclusion, 61% of surgeons felt more reluctant to schedule a BSU placement with this new legislation. CONCLUSION: The majority of questioned surgeons considered the decree as useless. It generated few changes in practices which already respected the law on information, consultation, consent, experience and training. Most urologists and gynecologists are more reluctant to offer MUS after this new legislation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Results of active surveillance for sporadic renal angiomyolipomas greater than 4cm: A pledge for active surveillance]. / Résultats de la surveillance active des angiomyolipomes sporadiques du rein de plus de 4cm : un plaidoyer en faveur de la surveillance active.

INTRODUCTION: Active surveillance (AS) of sporadic renal angiomyolipomas (AML) is under-utilised because of an old dogma fearing a life-threatening retroperitoneal hemorrhage when tumour size exceeds 4cm. The objective of this study was to report the outcome of AS in patients with sporadic AML greater than 4cm. METHODS: The results of AS in 35 patients managed for sporadic renal AML greater than 4cm were analysed. During AS, tumour growth, occurrence of new symptoms and/or complications, discontinuation of AS protocol, reason for discontinuation as well as subsequent treatment options were reported. RESULTS: Within a median follow-up of 36 months, 16 (46 %) patients discontinued AS at the end of the study period (mean follow-up 55±66, median 36 months). Patients who discontinued AS were more symptomatic at diagnosis but had similar age, mean tumour size and sex ratio. Active treatment-free survival was 66 % at 5 years. Retroperitoneal hemorrhage was reported in 3 (8.5 %) patients. None of these bleedings required transfusion or monitoring in an intensive care unit. Other reasons for discontinuation were pain (37 %), patient preference (19), changes in the radiological appearance of the tumour (19 %), and hematuria (6 %). CONCLUSION: This study showed that AS in AML bearing patients was feasible even in the setting of tumours larger than 4cm. More than 50% of the patients were still on AS at 5 years. Discontinuation of AS was not related to bleeding complications in most cases. LEVEL OF PROOF: 3.

[French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: management of kidney cancer]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de cancérologie de l'AFU ­ actualisation 2020­2022 : prise en charge du cancer du rein.

OBJECTIVE: - To update the French guidelines on kidney cancer. METHODS: - A systematic review of the literature between 2015 and 2020 was performed. The most relevant articles regarding the diagnosis, the classification, surgical treatment, medical treatment and follow-up of kidney cancer were retrieved and included in the new guidelines. The guidelines were updated with corresponding levels of evidence. RESULTS: - Thoraco-abdominal CT scan with injection is the best radiological exam for the diagnosis of kidney cancer. MRI and contrast ultra-sound can be useful in some cases. Percutaneous biopsy is recommended when histological results will affect clinical decision. Renal tumours must be classified according to pTNM 2017 classification and ISUP grade. Metastatic kidney cancers must be classified according to IMDC criteria. Partial nephrectomy is the recommended treatment for T1a tumours and can be done through an open, laparoscopic or robotic access. T1b tumours can be treated by partial or total nephrectomy according to tumour complexity. Radical nephrectomy is the recommended treatment of advanced localized tumours. There is no recommended adjuvant treatment. In metastatic patients: cyto-reductive nephrectomy can be offered in case of good prognosis; medical treatment must be counseled first in case of intermediate or bad prognosis. Surgical or local treatment of metastases should be considered in case of solitary lesion or oligo-metastases. First line recommended drugs in metastatic patients include the associations axitinib/pembrolizumab and nivolumab/ipilimumab. Cystic tumours must be classified according to Bosniak Classification. Surgical excision should be offered to patients with Bosniak III and IV lesions. It is recommended to follow patients clinically and with imaging according to tumour aggressiveness. CONCLUSION: - These updated recommendations should assist French speaking urologists for their management of kidney cancers.

[Surgical management of suburethral sling complications and functional outcomes]. / Prise en charge chirurgicale des complications de bandelette sous-urétrale et résultats fonctionnels.

OBJECTIVES: To identify various clinical presentation leading to the diagnosis of mid-urethral sling (MUS) complications and to analyze the functional outcomes after surgical management of these complications. METHOD: Retrospective observational monocentric study of all patients treated by MUS section or removal, between December 2005 and October 2019, in a pelviperineology centre. RESULTS: During this study, 96 patients were included. MUS complications surgically managed were vaginal mesh exposure (48 %), urethral mesh exposure (17 %), bladder mesh exposure (10 %); dysuria (30 %), pain (6 %), and infection (3 %). The mean time to diagnosis was 2 years. This diagnosis delay was caused by a non-specific and heterogeneous symptomatology. Surgical management consisted in MUS partial removal (79 %) and MUS simple section (21 %) with low perioperative morbidity. At three months follow-up, 36 patients (53 %) had stress urinary incontinence (SUI), including 13 (19 %) de novo (meaning no SUI before MUS section/removal) and 19 (28 %) had overactive bladder, including 9 (13 %) de novo. Half of the patients with SUI after MUS section/removal were able to be treated by a second MUS with a success rate of 83 % at 3 years. CONCLUSION: Clinical presentation of MUS complications is heterogeneous. Surgical treatment was associated with low morbidity in our study. Post-operatively, half of the patients had SUI and a second MUS was a relevant treatment option after proper evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Long-term oncological outcomes of cystic renal cell carcinoma according to the Bosniak classification.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognostic role of the Bosniak classification on the long-term oncological outcomes of cystic renal cell carcinomas. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In a national multicentric retrospective study, we included patients treated surgically for localized cystic RCC from 2000 to 2010. Patients with a follow-up of less than 4 years, benign tumors, and ablative treatments were excluded. The primary outcome was disease-free survival. RESULTS: 152 patients met the inclusion criteria: Bosniak II (6%), III (53%), IV (41%), with a median follow-up of 61 (12-179) months. Characteristics of the population and the tumors were [median, (min-max)] age 57 (25-84) years old, tumor size 43 mm (20-280), RENAL score 7 (4-12), PADUA score 8 (5-14). Treatments were 55% partial nephrectomy, 45% radical nephrectomy, 74% open surgery, and 26% laparoscopy. In pathological report, cystic RCC were mainly of low grade (1-2, 77%) and low stage (pT1, 81%). The two main histological subtypes were conventional (56%) and papillary (23%) RCC. Staging at presentation and histological characteristics were similar between Bosniak III and IV, except for high grade which was more common in Bosniak IV (12 vs 36%, p < 0.01). The Bosniak classification was not predictive of the recurrence, as 5- and 10-year disease-free survival were similar in Bosniak III and IV (92% vs 92% and 84% vs 83%, p = 0.60). CONCLUSION: The Bosniak classification is predictive of the risk of malignancy but not of the oncological prognosis. Regardless of the initial Bosniak categories, almost all cystic RCCs were of low stage/grade and had low long-term recurrence rate.

RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l'AFU ­ Actualisation 2018­2020 : prise en charge du cancer du reinFrench ccAFU guidelines ­ Update 2018­2020: Management of kidney cancer / Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l'AFU ­ Actualisation 2018­2020 : prise en charge du cancer du rein.

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations. Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004. C'est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l'article. This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published. The replacement has been published at the DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004. That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.

[French ccAFU guidelines - Update 2018-2020: Management of kidney cancer]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l'AFU ­ Actualisation 2018­2020 : prise en charge du cancer du rein.

OBJECTIVE: To update the French guidelines on kidney cancer. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature between 2015 and 2018 was performed. The most relevant articles regarding the diagnosis, the classification, surgical treatment, medical treatment and follow-up of kidney cancer were retrieved and included in the new guidelines. The guidelines were updated with corresponding levels of evidence. RESULTS: Thoraco-abdominal CT scan with injection is the best radiological exam for the diagnosis of kidney cancer. MRI and contrast ultrasound can be useful in some cases. Percutaneous biopsy is recommended when histological results will affect clinical decision. Renal tumours must be classified according to pTNM 2017 classification and ISUP grade. Metastatic kidney cancers must be classified according to IMDC criteria. Partial nephrectomy is the recommended treatment for T1a tumours and can be done through an open, laparoscopic or robotic access. T1b tumours can be treated by partial or total nephrectomy according to tumour complexity. Radical nephrectomy is the recommended treatment of advanced localized tumours. In metastatic patients: cytoreductive nephrectomy is recommended in case of good prognosis; medical treatment must be offered first in case of intermediate or bad prognosis. Surgical or local treatment of metastases should be considered in case of solitary lesion or oligo-metastases. First-line recommended drugs in metastatic patients include sunitinib, pazopanib, and the association nivolumab/ipilimumab. Cabozantinib can be offered in option in intermediate and bad prognostic patients. Cystic tumours must be classified according to Bosniak Classification. Surgical excision should be offered to patients with Bosniak III and IV lesions. It is recommended to follow patients clinically and with imaging according to tumour aggressiveness. CONCLUSION: These updated recommendations should assist French speaking urologists for their management of kidney cancers.

European temporal trends in the use of lymph node dissection in patients with renal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The role of lymph node dissection (LND) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is still under debate. We aimed to assess the utilization rates of LND over time in Europe. METHODS: A multi-institutional database of 13,581 RCC patients who underwent radical nephrectomy (RN) or nephron sparing surgery (NSS) between 1988 and 2014 was created within an European consortium. We analysed temporal trends in the frequency of LND by using Joinpoint regression. Logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of LND. RESULTS: Overall, 5114 patients (42.7%) underwent LND. Lymph node invasion was recorded in 566 cases (11% of LND patients) which represents 4.7% of the whole study cohort. A gradual decline in the use of LND started in the 1990s. After 2008 LND decreased significantly by 21.5% per year (95%CI -33.3 to -7.5, p < 0.01) until 2011 and stabilized thereafter (Annual Percentage Change 4.9%, 95%CI -3.4 to 13.8, p = 0.2). At multivariable analyses, patient age (OR 0.98, p < 0.0001), type of surgery (RN vs. NSS: OR 5.46, p < 0.0001), surgical approach (open vs. minimally invasive: OR 1.75, p < 0.0001), T stage (T2 vs. T1: OR 1.57; T3-4 vs. T1: OR 1.44, p < 0.0001), clinical tumour size (OR 1.14, p < 0.0001), and year of surgery (OR 0.95, p < 0.0001) were associated with higher probability of LND at nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: A trend towards lower LND was observed over time for RCC patients who underwent RN or NSS. LND is more frequently performed in younger patients, locally advanced diseases and in case of open surgery.

[Evaluation of the operating results and costs associated with the implementation of a flexible ureteroscopy activity within a university hospital center]. / Évaluation des résultats opératoires et des coûts liés à la mise en place d'une activité d'urétéroscopie souple au sein d'un centre hospitalo-universitaire.

INTRODUCTION: The increasing use of flexible ureteroscopy (USSR) sets the cost problems inevitably associated with the fragility of these endoscopes. The aim of this work is to clear from a recent example (universitary hospital) results, costs during the implementation of this technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study conducted from December 2012 (date of introduction of the activity) in March 2015 concerning the USSR made in a French universitary hospital for stone disease. In this analysis, the cost of consumables was not evaluated, nor the costs of the operating theater or hospitalization. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one hundred and thirteen patients USSR were conducted by seven surgeons. Seventeen breakages and failures have been identified and have led to the sending of the endoscope for repair. Breakage rate and failure was 12%. All failures were treated with a standard exchange of the device (including 4 standard exchanges made under warranty). The estimated average cost of outages was 3600 euros. This represents an average cost per procedure of about 625 euros (acquisition plus cost of failures) without counting the costs of sterilization or high-level disinfection. The impossibility of relocating the lower calyx stones is associated with an excess risk of breakage (odd ratio: 2.92 CI95: [1.02; 8.37]). CONCLUSION: This study is novel because it focuses on the cost of implementing a technique in a French university hospital. The use of flexible ureteroscope to unique uses might be an interesting source of savings in the implementation of this technique. This remains to be evaluated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

[Urethral strictures treated with excision and primary anastomosis: Impact of etiology on care pathways and management]. / L'urétroplastie par résection­anastomose en un temps : impact du mécanisme lésionnel sur la prise en charge et les résultats.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Excision and primary anastomosis is a common treatment of the short urethral posterior strictures. Strictures can be associated to pelvic bone fractures, endourological procedure (iatrogenic) or idiopathic. Whether outcomes are different with respect to etiology is still under reported. Herein, we aimed to explore the impact of etiology on care pathway and management of patients treated with excision and primary anastomosis for urethral strictures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2015, 97 patients were referred and treated with excision and primary anastomosis for a short urethral stricture. Data were extracted from a single institutional registry and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were sorted into 3 groups with respect to the etiology: pelvic bone fracture (n=23), iatrogenic (n=24) and idiopathic (n=50). Preoperative patient's and stricture characteristics as well as postoperative outcomes of the three groups were compared using Student or Chi2 tests as appropriate. Specifically, recurrence rate and time to first recurrence was analyzed according to a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Patients with strictures caused by pelvic bone fracture were younger (P<0.001), more likely to have a suprapubic catheter (P=0.007), and no attempted procedures before the referral (P<0.001). Strictures length and maximum flowmetry were similar in all groups. Postoperatively, 90-d complications and flowmetry were similar in both groups. After a mean follow-up of 25±24 (range: 1-102) months, 27 (27.8 %) patients recurred. According to our model, etiology did not seem to impact overall recurrence rate. However, when the subgroup of patients with recurrence were analyzed, strictures associated with pelvic bone seemed to recur faster than the 2 remaining groups. CONCLUSION: With some limitations of due to the population size and the retrospective design of the analysis, etiology impacted care pathway in terms of referral and initial management of patients treated with excision and primary anastomosis for a short urethral posterior stricture. However, recurrence rate and mid-term outcomes seem less impacted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[CCAFU french national guidelines 2016-2018 on renal cancer]. / Recommandations en onco-urologie 2016-2018 du CCAFU : Cancer du rein.

The previous guidelines from the Cancer Committee of the Association Française d'Urologie were published in 2013. We wanted this new version to be simple, clear and straightforward. All significant recent publications on kidney cancer have been included. The main changes compared to 2013 are the following: © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

[Introduction of the photoselective vaporization of the prostate in an outpatient setting: Outcomes after the first 100 cases]. / Introduction de la photovaporisation de prostate en ambulatoire : résultats sur les 100 premiers patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to describe the progressive introduction of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in an academic department of urology in an outpatient care setting and report our outcomes after the first 100 cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since May 2014, XPS GreenLight™ (Boston Scientific-AMS, USA) PVP in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia was introduced in our department. A prospective local registry was opened to collect patients' demographics, preoperative characteristics and surgical outcomes including operative time, length of stay, catheterization time, and postoperative complications as well as functional outcomes. We also assessed limitations to the outpatient care setting. RESULTS: Conversion to TURP was reported in 6 % for uncontrolled bleeding. Overall, 21 % patients needed more than 1-day catheterization. After 6 months of follow-up, 3 patients (prostate volume 50, 117, and 178mL) had reintervention (second PVP). Ninety days' complications were reported to be up to 6 % (3 urinary obstructions, 1 prostatitis, 1 transfusion and a severe sepsis). After 8 months, an 80 % plateau of outpatient care setting was achieved. Anesthesiologists counter-indicated outpatient care in 59 % of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: A progressive introduction of the PVP in an outpatient care setting is associated with a low complication rate. A plateau was achieved in less than 100 procedures. The major limitation of the outpatient care setting was patients' competitive comorbidities and not disease characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.