Sedation and fiberoptic intubation of a neonate with a cystic hygroma.

The flexible bronchoscope (FB) has been used to secure the difficult airway in pediatric patients. Difficult intubations in patients with cystic hygromas have been performed in awake patients or after the induction of general anesthesia. A recent case report acknowledges the challenges of performing intubations in pediatric patients under sedation because of their inability to fully cooperate. The following case demonstrates the two step-two fiberoptic bronchoscopic tracheal intubation performed using sedation and topical anesthesia in a neonate with a difficult airway.

Use of the intubating LMA-Fastrach in 254 patients with difficult-to-manage airways.

BACKGROUND: The laryngeal mask airway (LMA; LMA North America, Inc., San Diego, CA) has a well-established role in the emergency and elective treatment of patients with difficult-to-manage airways (DA). In this study, the authors report their clinical experience with the intubating LMA (LMA-Fastrach; LMA North America, Inc., San Diego, CA) in 254 patients with different types of DA. METHODS: The authors reviewed the anesthetic and medical records of patients with DA in whom the LMA-Fastrach was used electively or emergently at four institutions from October 1997 through October 2000. In each case, the number of insertion and intubation attempts was recorded. Success rates for blind and fiber optically guided intubation through the LMA-Fastrach were calculated, up to a maximum of five attempts per patient. RESULTS: The LMA-Fastrach was used in 257 procedures performed in 254 patients with DA, including patients with Cormack-Lehane grade 4 views; patients with immobilized cervical spines; patients with airways distorted by tumors, surgery, or radiation therapy; and patients wearing stereotactic frames. Insertion of the LMA-Fastrach was accomplished in three attempts or fewer in all patients. The overall success rates for blind and fiber optically guided intubations through the LMA-Fastrach were 96.5% and 100.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The LMA-Fastrach was used successfully in a high percentage of patients who presented with a variety of DA. The clinical experience presented herein indicates that this device may be particularly useful in the emergency and elective treatment of patients in whom intubation with a rigid laryngoscope has failed and in the treatment of patients with immobilized cervical spines.

The flexible bronchoscope. A tool for anesthesiologists.

Fiberoptic intubation is the technique of choice in management of a difficult intubation. It should be a first choice, not a last resort after attempts with conventional techniques have failed. It should be mastered by all physicians involved in airway management. The technique is cost-effective because it avoids airway trauma and cancellation of surgical cases because of failed intubation. The flexible bronchoscope for airway management as a diagnostic, therapeutic, and problem-solving tool is not used to the degree that it deserves. Anesthesiologists and other critical care physicians should master the technique and use it on a daily basis. The widespread use of the instrument for airway management deserves encouragement.

The effect of sevoflurane and desflurane on upper airway reactivity.

BACKGROUND: Although bronchial reactivity can be assessed by changes in airway resistance, there is no well-accepted measure of upper airway reactivity during anesthesia. The authors used the stimulus of endotracheal tube cuff inflation and deflation to assess changes in airway reactivity in patients anesthetized with sevoflurane and desflurane. METHODS: Sixty-four patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II participated in this randomized, double-blind study. Patients were anesthetized with either sevoflurane or desflurane at 1.0 and 1.8 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). The trachea was stimulated by inflating the endotracheal tube cuff. A blinded observer assessed the severity of patient response to the stimulus and changes in hemodynamic variables. The process was repeated at the second MAC treatment condition. RESULTS: At 1.0 MAC, patients anesthetized with desflurane had a more intense response and a greater likelihood of significant coughing and associated hemodynamic changes (both at P < 0.05). At 1.8 MAC, sevoflurane and desflurane both suppressed clinically significant responses to tracheal stimulation. Interrater reliability was excellent for this measure of upper airway reactivity (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of the cough response to tracheal stimulation by endotracheal tube cuff inflation is a reliable and clinically meaningful measure of upper airway reactivity. At 1.0 MAC, sevoflurane is superior to desflurane for suppressing moderate and severe responses to this stimulus.

Practice patterns in managing the difficult airway by anesthesiologists in the United States.

UNLABELLED: Despite the availability of several techniques and devices for the management of the difficult airway, little information has been published regarding the prevalence of their use by anesthesiologists in the United States. To determine current practice patterns, we surveyed clinicians using a questionnaire consisting of 14 difficult airway scenarios. Anesthesiologists were requested to indicate their likely approach to anesthetic induction (e.g., awake but sedated, general anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation, general anesthesia with apnea after assuring a patent airway, or general anesthesia with apnea) and the primary device they would use to intubate (e.g., direct laryngoscopy [DL], flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope [FOB], rigid fiberoptic device, surgical airway, retrograde intubation kit, laryngeal mask airway, gum elastic bougie, or Combitube). The availability of these devices was also determined (in room at all times, available "stat," available if arranged preoperatively, or not available). The survey was mailed to 1000 randomly chosen active members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Second and third surveys were mailed to non responders. Four hundred seventy-two completed surveys were returned. Responses by demographic groups were compared by using chi 2 analysis. DL and FOB-aided tracheal intubation techniques were chosen for most cases by most anesthesiologists (P < 0.05). Anesthesiologists with > 10 yr of clinical experience and those older than 55 yr of age preferred DL with apneic conditions (P < 0.05). Anesthesiologists who had attended workshops within the last 5 yr had greater availability of retrograde guidewire equipment and FOBs (P < 0.05). There was little use of newer alternative airway devices. IMPLICATIONS: Although the teaching of alternative methods of securing a difficult airway has become ubiquitous, most anesthesiologists rely on direct laryngoscopy and fiberoptic-aided intubation in most clinical circumstances. Although workshops in the management of the difficult airway may have resulted in increased use of the fiberoptic bronchoscope and the availability of retrograde guidewire intubation equipment, other devices have not enjoyed such an increase.

The role of the fiberscope in the critically ill patient.

The role of the fiberscope in the management of difficult and failed intubations has been well established and the importance of learning this valuable skill has been emphasized. Nonetheless, the fiberscope is underutilized in anesthesia and critical care practices because of a high rate of intubation failure. The main cause of failure is lack of expertise in maneuvering the fiberscope. Other technical causes of failure include fogging or clouding of the fiberscope's lens, drifting off the midline, and inability to advance the endotracheal tube or withdraw the fiberscope after completing intubation. Proper selection of the size of the fiberscope in relation to the size of the endotracheal tube, adequate lubrication, and careful passage of the fiberscope through the distal opening of the tracheal tube (not the Murphy eye) prevent difficulties encountered during advancement of the tube or upon withdrawal of the bronchoscope. Patient-related causes include inadequate topical anesthesia, which leads to abrupt movement of the larynx, laryngeal spasm, coughing, and copious secretions; a large floppy epiglottis; and tumor and edema of the upper airway, which also interfere with exposure of the larynx. Various approaches for learning and applying fiberoptic endoscopy have been instituted. The key to increased success involves initial training and practice with an intubation model and tracheobronchial tree. These models enable the learner to develop the eye-hand coordination skills needed to use the fiberscope properly. The fiberscope is best used in patients after learning to perform three simultaneous movements--advancing the fiberscope, coordinated rotation of the insertion cord, and bending the tip of the fiberscope while traversing the airway. After the technical skills of the fiberscope become second nature, the endoscopist can give more attention to patient-related factors to improve the success rate of tracheal intubation. Expert use of the fiberscope can be a life-saving measure through alleviating major airway complications and unnecessary tracheostomies.

Dissemination of fibreoptic airway endoscopy skills by means of a workshop utilizing models.

A questionnaire was mailed to 182 attendees of four practical workshops on fibreoptic endoscopy. After the workshops, 35% of the attendees were able to introduce fibreoptic intubation into their clinical practice or improve their success rate. This suggests that a new psychomotor skill can be disseminated effectively to clinicians by a practical workshop that utilizes inanimate models, and is based on sound educational principles.

Awake fibreoptic intubation in the patient at high risk of aspiration.

This report describes our experiences with 129 awake oral and nasal fibreoptic intubations in 123 patients considered to be at high risk of aspiration of gastric contents. I.v. sedation was used on all but six occasions. Local anaesthesia was applied to the larynx and trachea through the working channel of the fibrescope on 85 occasions, and by transtracheal injection on 29. Rigid laryngoscopy was necessary after fibreoptic laryngoscopy failed in one patient (with a bleeding peptic ulcer) who vomited a large amount of fresh and clotted blood. No other patient regurgitated during the procedure, and no patient developed evidence of aspiration.