ABSTRACT
Osseointegration (OI) is the direct attachment of bone onto a titanium implant. Recently, the term is used to describe "transdermal" implants that allow an external prosthesis to be connected directly to the skeleton. This technology eliminates the challenges of conventional socket-based prostheses, such as skin breakdown and poor fit, which are common in patients with major extremity amputations. Osseointegration patients demonstrate encouraging improvements in quality of life and function. Patients report improvement in prosthetic use, prosthetic mobility, global health, and pain reduction on a variety of clinical assessment tools. Various implants have been developed for osseointegration for amputees. These implants use a variety of fixation strategies and surface augments to allow for successful integration into the host bone. Regardless of design, all OI implants face similar challenges, particularly infections. Other challenges include the inability to determine when integration has occurred and the inability to detect loss of integration. These challenges may be met by incorporating sensing systems into the implants. The percutaneous nature of the metal devices can be leveraged so that internal sensors need not be wireless, and can be interrogated by external monitoring systems, thus providing crucial, real-time information about the state of the implant. The purpose of this review is to (1) review the basic science behind osseointegration, (2) provide an overview of current implants, practice patterns, and clinical outcomes, and (3) preview sensor technologies which may prove useful in future generations of transdermal orthopaedic implants.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Internal fixation remains the treatment of choice for non-displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Improved outcomes with arthroplasty following displaced femoral neck fractures may indicate that outcomes of non-displaced patterns should be reexamined. The aim of our study was to conduct a systematic review of the orthopaedic literature to determine the outcomes of internal fixation for the treatment of non-displaced and minimally displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. METHODS: Relevant articles were identified using PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases. Manuscripts were included if they contained (1) patients 60 years or older with (2) nondisplaced or minimally displaced (Garden I or II) femoral neck fractures (3) treated with internal fixation (4) separately reported outcomes in this patient population. The primary outcome was reoperation. Secondary outcomes included mortality, patient-reported outcomes, length of hospitalization, infection, and transfusions. Fixed and random effects modeling was used to determine pooled estimates of the outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were identified with a total of 21,155 patients, all of which were treated with internal fixation. The pooled risk of reoperation was 14.1% (95% CI: 10.6-18.2). The risk of one-year mortality was 14.6% (95% CI: 11.5-18.2) based on the reporting in 15 studies. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of reoperation and mortality following the treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly with internal fixation exceeds 14%. This complication profile may be unacceptably high. Arthroplasty may offer improved short-term functional outcomes and a reduced risk of reoperation. However, there is currently little evidence to consider this treatment to be an alternative to internal fixation.
