Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 11(2): e4797, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36798718

ABSTRACT

The Antia-Buch flap is a popular reconstructive method for full-thickness ear defects involving the helical rim. However, scaphal or conchal resection is often required to prevent ear distortion. Noel et al described a modified technique to the Antia-Buch flap, which includes an incision in the temporal scalp and complete detachment of the preauricular helical root to increase mobility of the flap. Since then, no studies have reported on the use of this modification. We report our experience in implementing Noel et al's modification of the Antia-Buch flap for helical rim defects. Methods: The modified technique differs from the original Antia-Buch flap by completely detaching the root of the helix and adding a vertical incision to the temporal scalp to increase mobility of the flap. No scaphal resection is necessary. After complete elevation of the flaps, the flaps are advanced and inset toward each other followed by closure. Results: In our practice, 10 patients have been treated with Noel et al's modification to the Antia-Buch flap. In each of these patients, acceptable reconstruction of the helical rim was able to be achieved. All the patients were pleased with their reconstructive outcome and ear anatomy was able to be successfully maintained. Conclusions: The modified Antia-Buch flap has shown to be an excellent method for large, helical rim defects, creating versatility by adding the temporal scalp incision. Our outcomes with Noel et al's modification to the original Antia-Buch flap support this method as a versatile technique for wide full-thickness helical rim defects.

2.
Ann Plast Surg ; 89(6): 694-702, 2022 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36416706

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to determine rates of overall complications and failure of prepectoral breast reconstruction between various types of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs). BACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction is the most common reconstructive technique after mastectomy in the United States. Traditionally, the reconstruction has been performed in the subpectoral plane; however, there has been an emerging interest in prepectoral reconstruction using ADM. Human (hADM), porcine (pADM), and bovine (bADM) ADMs are available for use, but little is known about the benefits and complication profiles of each for prepectoral breast reconstruction. METHODS: Studies examining complications after the use of ADM for prepectoral breast reconstruction were identified using MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, LILACS, and the Web of Science from January 2010 to August 2021. Titles and abstracts of 1838 studies were screened, followed by full-text screening of 355 articles. Thirty-three studies were found to meet inclusion criteria. RESULTS: From the 33 studies, 6046 prepectoral reconstructions were examined. Implant loss was comparable across the different types of ADM (pADM, 4.0%; hADM, 4.0%; bADM, 3.7%). Bovine ADM had the highest rate of capsular contracture (6.1%), infection (9.0%), skin flap necrosis (8.3%), dehiscence (5.4%), and hematoma (6.1%) when compared with both hADM and pADM. Human ADM had the highest rate of postoperative seroma (5.3%), followed by pADM (4.6%) and bADM (4.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Among the prepectoral breast reconstruction studies using hADM, pADM, or bADM included in our analysis, complication profiles were similar. Bovine ADM had the highest proportion of breast complications in the following categories: capsular contracture, infection rate, skin flap necrosis, dehiscence, and hematoma. Implant loss was comparable across the cohorts. Overall, prepectoral breast reconstruction using ADM leads to relatively low complication rates with the highest rates within the bADM cohort.


Subject(s)
Acellular Dermis , Breast Implants , Breast Neoplasms , Contracture , Mammaplasty , Humans , Cattle , Animals , Swine , United States , Female , Mastectomy/methods , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mammaplasty/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Hematoma , Necrosis
3.
Hand (N Y) ; 16(3): 391-396, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31331207

ABSTRACT

Background: Hand and distal forearm allotransplantation has advanced over the last 20 years from experimental to a viable treatment option for bilateral upper extremity amputation. Despite widespread growth of this field, there are few technical reports that elaborate the details of donor arm procurement. This article details a technique for rapid donor procurement through the elbow for mid to distal forearm-level hand allograft procurement. Methods: Nine arm procurements were performed on deceased tissue-only donors provided by the local organ procurement organization, including two bilateral and five unilateral cases. Technique highlights include using a fishmouth incision through the lateral and medical epicondyles, identification of the neurovascular structures, and disarticulating the elbow joint. Results: Procuring through the elbow provides straightforward anatomy, bypasses the need to cut through bone, and allows tissue allotransplantation teams to achieve procurement, flushing, and packaging within 20 minutes. Conclusions: Procurement through the elbow is a simple procedure that streamlines the process for multi-organ donors by minimizing the time needed for hand allograft procurement. Team coordination and surgical rehearsals are essential for successful hand and upper extremity procurement and allotransplantation.


Subject(s)
Elbow Joint , Hand Transplantation , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation , Elbow/surgery , Elbow Joint/surgery , Humans , Tissue Donors
4.
J Burn Care Res ; 41(2): 306-316, 2020 02 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32074295

ABSTRACT

Vital, genetically engineered, porcine xenografts represent a promising alternative to human cadaveric allografts (HCA) in the treatment of severe burns. However, their clinical value would be significantly enhanced if preservation and long-term storage-without the loss of cellular viability-were feasible. The objective of this study was to examine the direct impact of cryopreservation and the length of storage on critical in vivo and in vitro parameters, necessary for a successful, potentially equivalent substitute to HCA. In this study, vital, porcine skin grafts, continuously cryopreserved for more than 7 years were compared side-by-side to otherwise identically prepared skin grafts stored for only 15 minutes. Two major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-controlled donor-recipient pairs received surgically created deep-partial wounds and subsequent grafting with split-thickness porcine skin grafts, differentiated only by the duration of storage. Clinical and histological outcomes, as well as quantification of cellular viability via a series of 3-4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays, were assessed. No statistically significant differences were observed between skin grafts cryopreserved for 15 minutes vs 7 years. Parametric distinctions between xenografts stored for short- vs long-term durations could not be ascertained across independent clinical, histological, or in vitro evaluative methods. The results of this study validate the ability to reliably preserve, store, and retain the essential metabolic activity of porcine tissues after cryopreservation. Plentiful, safe, and readily accessible inventories of vital xenografts represent an advantageous solution to numerous limitations associated with HCA, in the treatment of severe burns.


Subject(s)
Burns/surgery , Cryopreservation/methods , Skin Transplantation/methods , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Swine
5.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 142(2): 133e-144e, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30045174

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Outcomes in primary breast augmentation depend on careful preoperative planning and clear communication between patient and surgeon. Three-dimensional imaging with computer simulation is an evolving technology with the potential to enhance the preoperative consultation for patients considering primary breast augmentation. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the impact of three-dimensional imaging with computer simulation on patient-reported and objective, mammometric outcomes in women undergoing primary breast augmentation. METHODS: One hundred patients were enrolled in a prospective trial with randomized and nonrandomized arms. The randomized arm was composed of a control group consisting of patients who underwent tissue-based planning without simulation (n = 13) and an intervention group consisting of patients who were simulated (n = 10). The remainder constituted the nonrandomized group who specifically sought preoperative simulation. Patient-reported outcomes (BREAST-Q) and mammometric data were recorded and compared preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Over time, significantly more patients refused randomization and chose simulation (p = 0.03). Breast augmentation led to substantial improvements in satisfaction with breasts, sexual well-being, and outcome. Simulation, however, did not significantly impact patient-reported outcomes or mammometric parameters. No strong correlations were identified between patient-reported outcomes and mammometrics. CONCLUSIONS: Patients are likely to use novel technology such as three-dimensional photography with computer simulation if they perceive it to enhance their understanding of their final outcome. These patients may seek out practices specifically offering such technology. Incorporation of simulation into the preoperative consultation, however, did not lead to clinically meaningful changes in patient-reported outcomes. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.


Subject(s)
Computer Simulation , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Mammaplasty/methods , Models, Anatomic , Preoperative Care/methods , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Photography , Prospective Studies
6.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 40(6): 854-862, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27562834

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tissue liquefaction technology (TLT) delivers warmed saline from the liposuction cannula tip at low pressure pulses to disaggregate adipocytes. This technology differs significantly from that used in other liposuction devices including water jet-assisted liposuction. Here we introduce our early experience with this technology in the setting of fat transfer for revision breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 136 consecutive patients who underwent fat harvest with TLT and subsequent transfer into 237 breast reconstructions was conducted at a single institution. This two-surgeon series examined donor and recipient site complication rates over a median follow-up of 143 days [87-233]. RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 28.7 %, of which the majority (22.1 %) was fat necrosis at the recipient site as documented by any clinical, imaging, or pathologic evidence. The abdomen served as the donor site for half of the cases. Donor site complications were limited to widespread ecchymosis of the donor site notable in 10.4 % of cases. Twenty-five percent of patients had received postmastectomy radiotherapy prior to fat transfer. Prior to revision with fat transfer, implant-based breast reconstruction was used in 75.5 % of cases, and autologous flaps in the remainder. Fat transfer was combined with other reconstructive procedures 94.1 % of the time. CONCLUSIONS: TLT can be used to harvest adipocytes for fat transfer with donor site morbidity and recipient site complications comparable to other modalities. The efficiency and quality of harvested fat makes this technology appealing for wide spread adoption during fat transfer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that the authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue/transplantation , Breast Implantation/methods , Lipectomy/methods , Mammaplasty/methods , Wound Healing/physiology , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Chi-Square Distribution , Cohort Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Survival , Humans , Mastectomy/methods , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Transplantation, Autologous
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...