ABSTRACT
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures are performed with multimodality neuromonitoring of the femoral nerve to prevent lumbosacral plexus and peripheral nerve injury from positioning, dilation, retraction, and hardware implantation. The integrity of the femoral nerve can be continuously assessed during these procedures by Somatosensory Evoked Potentials of the Saphenous nerve (Sn-SSEPs). Sn-SSEPs are technically challenging to acquire and necessitate advanced troubleshooting skills with a more rigid anesthetic regimen and physiological parameters. We performed a retrospective analysis of Sn-SSEP data for 100 consecutive lateral lumbar surgeries where the stimulation electrodes were placed distally below the knee and medial to the tibia bone (i.e., DSn-SSEPs). Monitorable baseline responses were present in 87% of patients after the exclusion of fourteen cases where the tibial nerve SSEP was absent, quadriceps transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCeMEPs) were absent or not utilized. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis, mean arterial pressure (MAP), inhalational anesthetic levels, reliability of ulnar and posterior tibial nerve SSEPs, and the reliability of femoral nerve innervated quadriceps TCeMEPs were evaluated but were not of statistically significant consequence between cases where the DSn-SSEP was present or absent in this study. We found the utilization of DSn-SSEPs to be a valuable adjunct to femoral nerve monitoring. Stimulation electrode placement is easy to palpate with clear anatomical borders. Significant muscle artifact and patient movement from stimulation do not affect waveform morphology, allowing for continuous and reliable monitoring. We recommend including DSn-SSEPs to optimize recordings during lateral lumbar procedures.
Subject(s)
Monitoring, Intraoperative , Tibia , Evoked Potentials, Motor , Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
A T10 to L2 spinal cord tumor exploration and biopsy was performed with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) on a 75-year-old male diagnosed with an intradural intramedullary appearing spinal cord lesion with no other lesions in the central nervous system, chest, abdomen or pelvis. Intraoperative neurophysiology consisted of transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCeMEPs), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), triggered and spontaneous electromyography (S-EMG, T-EMG), bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) and train of four (TOF) monitoring. Loss of BCR responses during conus exposure and identification were resolved with multiple small pauses in manipulation throughout the procedure. T-EMG mapping aided in identification and avoiding the removal of nervous tissue. Postoperatively the patient experienced some mild weakness in his left foot and leg that correlated with a significant amplitude drop in the left abductor hallucis TCeMEP. By the following day, the patient was almost back to preoperative baseline. The patient's bowel and bladder function were preserved, consistent with final BCR recordings. The patient was discharged to rehabilitation postoperatively. Pathology results indicated glioblastoma. This case study demonstrates the utility of a multimodality approach with bulbocavernosus reflex and urethral sphincter monitoring to optimize intraoperative data to the surgeon during conus tumor surgeries.
ABSTRACT
Arthroscopic hip surgery is performed routinely for the treatment of various hip disorders. Leg traction during labral tear repair, femoroplasty, and acetabuloplasty for hip stabilization can stretch the peripheral nerves. This may cause temporary or permanent nerve injury. This study illustrates the benefit of utilizing multimodality Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IONM) during hip surgical procedures. We performed a retrospective review of 10 arthroscopic hip surgeries with neurophysiological monitoring at one medical center. The patients consisted of six females and four males (mean age: 48.9 years). The procedures were equally divided into left and right-sided procedures. IONM setup included posterior tibial, peroneal, and femoral or saphenous nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCeMEP), train of four (TOF), and electromyography (EMG) from the lower extremities. All patients exhibited changes in IONM data during the surgical procedure. Changes in the latency and amplitude or loss of the lower SSEPs on the surgical side occurred in 36% of the monitorable SSEPs. The surgeon instructed the team to reduce the leg lengthening by removing traction when changes were observed. The SSEPs exhibited a full recovery in 75% of the affected lower extremity SSEPs. In the two instances of nonrecovery, the SSEP responses remained increased in latency or decreased in amplitude at closing, but the waveform was intact. There were five instances of complete loss of the waveform (four in the ipsilateral leg, and one in the contralateral leg) with recovery after traction was reduced. TCeMEP changes occurred in 53% of the ipsilateral lower muscles monitored. Many of the TCeMEP changes were attributed to ischemia of the feet and could not be resolved intraoperatively. Multimodality IONM can be a beneficial and protective tool during surgical procedures involving hip and acetabular areas. Early identification of changes in evoked potentials during hip arthroscopy surgeries can minimize post-operative neurological deficits due to peripheral nerve injury and leg ischemia.
