ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite advances in the medical treatment of Crohn's disease (CD), many patients will still need bowel resections and face the subsequent risk of recurrence and re-resection. We describe contemporary re-resection rates and identify disease-modifying factors and risk factors for re-resection. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, population-based, individual patient data cohort study covering 47.4% of the Danish population, including all CD patients who underwent a primary resection between 2010 and 2020. RESULTS: Among 631 primary resected patients, 24.5% underwent a second resection, and 5.3% a third. Re-resection rates after one, five, and 10 years were 12.6%, 22.4%, and 32.2%, respectively. Reasons for additional resections were mainly disease activity (57%) and stoma reversal (40%). Disease activity-driven re-resection rates after one, five, and 10 years were 3.6%, 10.1%, and 14.1%, respectively. Most stoma reversals occurred within one year (80%). The median time to recurrence was 11.0 months. Biologics started within one year of the first resection revealed protective effect against re-resection for stenotic and penetrating phenotypes. Prophylactic biologic therapy at primary ileocecal resection reduced disease recurrence and re-resection risk (HR 0.58, 95% CI (0.34-0.99), p=0.047). Risk factors for re-resection were location of resected bowel segments at the primary resection, disease location, disease behavior, smoking, and perianal disease. CONCLUSION: Re-resection rates, categorized by disease activity, are lower than those reported in other studies and are closely associated with disease phenotype and localization. Biological therapy may be disease-modifying for certain subgroups when initiated within one year of resection.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Contemporary techniques to assess disease activity or bowel damage in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), such as endoscopy and imaging, are either invasive or lack accuracy. Non-invasive biomarkers for this purpose remain an unmet medical need. Herein, we provide a comprehensive systematic review of studies evaluating blood extracellular matrix (ECM) biomarkers and their relevance in IBD. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify citations pertaining ECM biomarkers of IBD up to March 1, 2024. Studies were categorized based on marker subtype and clinical use. RESULTS: Thirty-one ECM markers were identified, 28 of these demonstrated the ability to differentiate IBD disease activity. Collagen III emerged as the most extensively investigated (1212 IBD patients), with the degradation marker C3M and deposition marker PRO-C3 being associated with IBD and subtypes. Collagen V markers C5M and PRO-C5 emerged as the most accurate single markers for diagnosis of IBD, with an area under the curves of 0.91 and 0.93, respectively. Overall, studies were characterized by variable endpoints. None of the studies included histological grading of intestinal damage, repair, or fibrosis formation as the primary outcome in relation to the ECM blood markers. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple ECM markers are linked with IBD and its phenotypes. However, more rigorous study designs and clearly defined endpoints are needed to ensure reproducibility and develop reliable and accurate biomarkers. ECM markers hold promise as they provide a 'window' into transmural tissue remodeling and fibrosis burden, warranting further investigation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The influence of concomitant prednisolone on clinical outcomes and safety in infliximab-treated ulcerative colitis (UC) patients is unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND OUTCOME MEASURES: A retrospective cohort study was performed, including 147 UC patients treated with infliximab at a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) centre. Primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFCR) at week 14 and week 52. Patients were grouped according to prednisolone tapering regimens: standard (≤5 mg/week), fast (>5 mg/week), direct discontinuation or no prednisolone. Patients intolerant to corticosteroids and patients stopping corticosteroids in preparation for surgery including colectomy during their initial admission were excluded. RESULTS: There was no overall association between prednisolone exposure or no exposure and CFCR at weeks 14 or 52 of infliximab. The proportion of patients with C reactive protein ≤5 mg/L was higher in the standard tapering at week 14 as compared with faster regimens or no prednisolone. In subgroup analyses, the standard tapering was associated with a higher rate of CFCR at week 14 compared with the fast-tapering regimen in patients receiving ≥40 mg prednisolone at initiation of infliximab (64.3% vs 26.3%, p=0.04) and among patients admitted with acute severe UC (66.6% vs 23.5%, p<0.05). Similar data were seen at week 52. Prednisolone did not affect infliximab trough levels but increased infection rates (10/77 vs 2/70, p=0.03), in particular C. difficile infection. CONCLUSION: In UC patients with limited disease burden, prednisolone did not affect effectiveness of infliximab. However, patients with increased disease burden seem to benefit from corticosteroid combination therapy.
