Regulation of intracellular pH in human melanoma: potential therapeutic implications.

Melanoma cells in vivo maintain intracellular pH (pHi) in a viable range despite an extracellular tumor pH (pHe) that is typically below 7.0. In general, three families of transporters are capable of removing metabolic protons, but the specific transporters responsible for the maintenance of pHi at low pHe in melanomas have not been identified. Although the transporters exist in most cells, an inhibitor would be predicted to have selectivity for cells located in an acidic tumor bed because cells in that environment would be expected to have transporters chronically activated. In this report, the levels and extent of expression of the Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE-1) and two of the H+-linked monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) were evaluated in three melanoma cell lines. The effects of inhibitors of each transporter were tested at an extracellular pH (pHe) of 7.3, 6.7, or 6.5 in melanoma cells that were grown at pHe 7.3 or 6.7. The activity of MCT isoform 1 (MCT-1) was up-regulated in three melanoma cell lines at low pHe, but that of NHE-1 was not. Furthermore, NHE-1 activity was lower in the melanomas than in other normal and malignant cell lines that were tested. Reverse transcription-PCR using primers specific for MCT-1, MCT-4, and NHE-1 showed that expression of none of these transporters was reproducibly up-regulated at the level of transcription when cells were grown at pHe 6.7 instead of pHe 7.3. Ex vivo experiments using DB-1 human melanoma xenografts grown in severe combined immunodeficient mice found that MCT-1 and not NHE-1 was a major determinant of DB-1 tumor cell pHi. Taken together, the data indicate that MCTs are major determinants of pH regulation in melanoma. In contrast, keratinocytes and melanocytes under low pHe conditions relied on NHE-1. Inhibitors of MCTs thus have great potential to improve the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic drugs that work best at low pHi, such as alkylating agents and platinum-containing compounds, and they should be selective for cells in an acidic tumor bed. In most tissues, it is proposed that the NHE-1 could compensate for an inhibited MCT to prevent acidification, but in melanoma cells this did not occur. Therefore, MCT inhibitors may be particularly effective against malignant melanoma.

Angiostatin induces intracellular acidosis and anoikis in endothelial cells at a tumor-like low pH.

Angiostatin inhibits angiogenesis by binding to endothelial cells (ECs) lining the vasculature of growing tumors. These cells are in a dynamic state during angiogenesis and are thus not firmly attached to the extracellular matrix. This makes them more vulnerable to anoikis, a process resulting in cell death initiated by or promoted by loss of attachment. Another potential source of EC vulnerability during tumor angiogenesis is that tumor extracellular pH is typically lower than in normal tissues. This presents an additional challenge to ECs in terms of maintaining ionic homeostasis. We report here that the lethality of angiostatin is significantly enhanced both by reduced matrix attachment during exposure and lowered extracellular pH (pH(e)). Another effect of angiostatin at reduced pH(e) is a decreased intracellular pH (pH(i)). These effects were observed in three model systems: aortic ring sprouts, ECs during tube formation, and ECs in a scratch/migration assay. In these three dynamic assays, angiostatin-induced cell death and intracellular acidification were clearly seen when pH(e) was reduced to 6.7. The intracellular acidification was far greater than that induced by pH(e) reduction alone. In contrast, the effect of angiostatin on pH(i) and on viability were not observed in a subconfluent monolayer in which the cells were allowed to attach to substrate for 48 h prior to exposure to angiostatin. These data suggest that low pH(e) and reduced adhesion to matrix play a role in the specificity of angiostatin for tumor neovasculature in contrast to wound healing and other normal angiogenic processes. The results also implicate roles for both pH(e) and pH(i) regulation in the mechanism of angiostatin action.