Orally administered boldine reduces muscle atrophy and promotes neuromuscular recovery in a rodent model of delayed nerve repair.

Peripheral nerve injury often results in poor functional recovery due to a prolonged period of muscle denervation. In particular, absent axonal contact, denervated muscle can undergo irrevocable atrophy and diminished receptiveness for reinnervation over time, ultimately reducing the likelihood for meaningful neuromuscular recovery. While innovative surgical approaches can minimize the harmful effects of denervation by re-routing neighboring-otherwise uninjured-axons, there are no clinically-available approaches to preserve the reinnervation capacity of denervated muscles. Blocking intramuscular connexin hemichannel formation has been reported to improve muscle innervation in vitro and prevent atrophy in vivo. Therefore, the current study investigated the effects of orally administered boldine, a connexin hemichannel inhibitor, on denervated-related muscle changes and nerve regeneration in a rat model of delayed peripheral nerve repair. We found that daily boldine administration significantly enhanced an evoked response in the tibialis anterior muscle at 2 weeks after common peroneal nerve transection, and decreased intramuscular connexin 43 and 45 expression, intraneural Schwann cell expression of connexin 43, and muscle fiber atrophy up to 4 weeks post transection. Additional animals underwent a cross nerve repair procedure (tibial to common peroneal neurorrhaphy) at 4 weeks following the initial transection injury. Here, we found elevated nerve electrophysiological activity and greater muscle fiber maturation at 6 weeks post repair in boldine treated animals. These findings suggest that boldine may be a promising pharmacological approach to minimize the deleterious effects of prolonged denervation and, with further optimization, may improve levels of functional recovery following nerve repair.

Can costs be measured and predicted by modeling within a cooperative clinical trials group? Economic methodologic pilot studies of the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) studies 90-03 and 91-04.

PURPOSE: To (1) measure radiation therapy costs for patients in randomized controlled clinical trials, (2) compare measured costs to modeling predictions, (3) examine cost distributions, and (4) assess feasibility of collecting economic data within a cooperative group. METHODS: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group conducted economic pilot studies for two Phase III studies that compared fractionation patterns. Expected quantities of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and relative value units (RVU) were modeled. Institutions retrospectively provided procedure codes, quantities, and components, which were converted to RVUs used for Medicare payments. Cases were included if the radiation therapy quality control review judged them to have been treated per protocol or with minor variation. Cases were excluded if economic quality review found incomplete economic data. RESULTS: The median and mean RVUs were within the range predicted by the model for all arms of one study and above the predicted range for the other study. CONCLUSION: The model predicted resource use well for patients who completed treatment per protocol. Actual economic data can be collected for critical cost items. Some institutions experienced difficulty collecting retrospective data, and prospective collection of data is likely to allow wider participation in future Radiation Therapy Oncology Group economic studies.

Socioeconomic characteristics of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radiotherapy in the 1992 to 1994 patterns of care study.

PURPOSE: To describe the relationship between socioeconomic variables and the treatment of patients with radiotherapy for cervix cancer.40% minority patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-two institutions werw r andomly selected from a list of all radiotherapy facilities in the Unite d States. From these we randomly selected and reviewed 471 cases of squ amous cell carcinoma treated during 1992 to 1994. To create an addition al minority-rich sample, we randomly selected 215 additional cases from 17 randomly selected institutions that admitted >40% minority patients. The median household income of each patient's neighborhood was determined by matching her zip code to data from the 1990 United States Census. RESULTS: Pati ents who lived in low-income neighborhoods, who had only Medicaid covera ge, or who were treated at large academic or minority-rich institutions tended to have a poorer initial performance status, higher-stage or bulk y central disease, and a lower pretreatment hemoglobin level. Ability t o complete treatment did not correlate with ethnicity or income. Howeve r, noncompliant patients tended to be treated at minority-rich instituti ons and were more often < 40 or > 60 years old. Patients who completed definitive treatment were more likely to have had

A preliminary outcome analysis of the Patterns of Care Study in Japan for esophageal cancer patients with special reference to age: non surgery group.

BACKGROUND: The Patterns of Care Study (PCS) was imported to Japan from the United States in July 1996. A preliminary outcome analysis of the PCS for esophageal cancer patients in Japan was made with special reference to age, because the elderly population is rapidly increasing in Japan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 1996 to February 1998, external PCS audits were performed for 37 institutions nationwide and detailed information of 561 esophageal cancer patients treated during the period 1992-1994 was collected by using the fifth PCS data format developed in the United States. This format was provided courtesy of the American College of Radiology. For this study, patients who had not undergone surgery (n = 336) were selected. The patients were classified into three age groups: < 65 years old (n = 119), between 65 and 74 years (n = 93), and 75 years or older (n =123). Cox's proportional hazards model was used for the statistical analysis, with survival, acute/subacute complication and late complication of grade 3 or more based on RTOG criteria, as the endpoints. RESULTS: Significant prognostic factors for the entire non-surgery group were Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (p = 0.0007), stage (p = 0.0001), and external irradiation dose (p = 0.0001). For the younger group, KPS (p = 0.0004), stage (p = 0.0197), and utilization of brachytherapy (p = 0.0010) were significant, while for the intermediate age group it was KPS (p = 0. 0027), history of pulmonary disease (p = 0.0339), stage (p = 0.0001), and external dose (p = 0.0001), and for the elderly group, stage (p = 0.0001) and external irradiation dose (p = 0.0224) were significant. Significant risk factors for complications for the entire group were stage (p = 0.0411), external dose (p = 0.0163), and stratification of institution (academic vs. nonacademic) (p = 0. 0114). Significant risk factors for the younger group were history of pulmonary disease (p = 0.0495) and external dose (p = 0.0037), and the other age groups showed no significant risk factors. CONCLUSION: Age was not a significant prognostic or risk factor for esophageal cancer patients in the non-surgery group treated with radiation therapy. Therefore, radiation therapy represented an important treatment modality for the elderly as well as for the younger esophageal cancer patients. External dose was a treatment-related prognostic factor for the elderly as well as for the intermediate age group.

Outcome of patients receiving radiation for cancer of the esophagus: results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care Study.

PURPOSE: A Patterns of Care Study examined the records of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) treated with radiation in 1992 through 1994 to determine the national practice processes of care and outcomes and to compare the results with those of clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A national survey of 63 institutions was conducted using two-stage cluster sampling, and specific information was collected on 400 patients with squamous cell (62%) or adenocarcinoma (37%) of the thoracic esophagus who received radiation therapy (RT) as part of primary or adjuvant treatment. Patients were staged according to a modified 1983 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Fifteen percent of patients had clinical stage (CS) I disease, 40% had CS II disease, and 30% had CS III disease. Twenty-six percent of patients underwent esophagectomy. Seventy-five percent of patients received chemotherapy; 84% of these received concurrent chemotherapy and radiation (CRT). RESULTS: Significant variables for overall survival in multivariate analysis include the use of esophagectomy (risk ratio [RR] = 0.62), the use of chemotherapy (RR = 0.63), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) greater than 80 (RR = 0.61), CS I or II disease (RR = 0.66), and facility type (RR = 0.72). Age, sex, and histology were not significant. Preoperative CRT resulted in a nonsignificantly higher 2-year survival rate compared with definitive CRT alone (63% v 39%; P =.11), whereas 2-year survival by planned treatment rather than treatment given was 47.7% for preoperative CRT and 35.4% for definitive CRT (P =.23). Definitive CRT compared with definitive RT alone resulted in significantly higher 2-year survival (39% v 20.6%; P =.027) and lower 2-year local regional failure (30% v 57.9%; P =. 0031). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the value of CRT in EC treatment. It indicates that the results obtained in practice settings nationwide are similar to those obtained in clinical trials and that KPS and the 1983 clinical staging system are useful prognostic indicators. The suggested value of esophagectomy and superiority of preoperative CRT over CRT alone in this study should be tested in a randomized trial.

Management of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer: a national patterns of care study of 17,151 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and axillary irradiation (AI) in patients with breast cancer and to identify the factors influencing them. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Routine performance of ALND in the treatment of breast cancer has become controversial. AI has been proposed as an alternative to ALND, and it has been suggested that AI in addition to ALND may decrease local failure in high-risk patients. METHODS: A joint study was conducted by the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons and the American College of Radiology. A total of 17,151 patients with stage I and II breast cancer treated at 819 institutions in 1994 were studied. RESULTS: A total of 15,992 patients underwent ALND (93%). The mean ages of patients who did and did not undergo ALND were 60.4 and 73.0 years. Univariate analysis demonstrated significantly decreased rates of ALND for women age 70 or older (86% vs. 97%), patients with clinical T1 a tumors (81% vs. 93%), grade I histology (90% vs. 95%), and patients with favorable tumor types (88% vs. 94%). The ALND rate did not vary between palpable and nonpalpable tumors. Multivariate analysis of variables affecting the rate of ALND identified type of surgery, age, tumor size, histology, and payer status as significant. A total of 889 patients received AI. Patients not undergoing ALND were more likely to receive AI (10% vs. 5%). A total of 1.6% of patients with no lymph node metastasis underwent AI, 8.9% of those with one to three positive nodes underwent AI, 24.0% of those with four to nine positive lymph nodes underwent AI, and 29.9% of those with > or = 10 positive lymph nodes underwent AI. Multivariate analysis of variables affecting the proportion of patients who received AI and had undergone ALND identified nodal status and type of surgery as significant. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary lymph node dissection continues to be routinely applied in the treatment of breast cancer, and AI remains underused in patients at high risk for local regional relapse.

Outcomes of patients receiving radiation for carcinoma of the rectum. Results of the 1988-1989 patterns of care study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of surgical adjuvant treatment for patients with rectal carcinoma (RC) indicate that postoperative radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy (CRT) is superior to postoperative radiation alone (RT) or surgery alone. Whether preoperative treatment is superior to postoperative treatment is controversial. This Patterns of Care Study (PCS) surveyed patients with RC treated with radiation during the years 1988-1989 to determine the national practice standards and outcomes and to compare these results with those of clinical trials. METHODS: A national survey of 73 institutions was conducted using 2-stage cluster sampling, and specific information on 406 patients with RC who received radiation at 69 facilities was collected. Follow-up information on 215 patients was subsequently collected by mail survey. There were no significant differences between the known prognostic indicators or treatment-related variables for patients for whom follow-up was available compared with the variables for patients for whom follow-up was not available. Follow-up ranged from 0 to 8.44 years with a median of 4 years. One hundred fifty-four patients (71%) received postoperative treatment, either RT (37%) or CRT (34%); and 40 (18%) received preoperative treatment, either RT (15%) or CRT (3%). Ninety-six patients (45%) received chemotherapy, and for 86% of those patients chemotherapy was administered concurrently with radiation. RESULTS: Survival was stage-dependent (85% Stage I, 69% Stage II, and 54% Stage III at 5 years, P = 0.04). Survival was also substage-dependent, and patients with C(1) cancer had significantly higher 5-year survival than those with C(2)/C(3) cancer (89% vs. 48%, P = 0.008). Local failure was similar for Stage II and Stage III patients (10% vs. 11% at 5 years, respectively). In multivariate analyses, only stage and use of chemotherapy were significant to survival (Stage III vs. Stage I and II, relative risk [RR] = 2.52, and chemotherapy vs. no chemotherapy, RR = 0.46). A significantly higher 5-year survival rate was seen with postoperative CRT than with postoperative RT (69% vs. 50%, P = 0. 011). Preoperative radiation resulted in a significantly higher 5-year survival rate than postoperative radiation (85% vs. 50%, P = 0.0006), but not compared with postoperative CRT. Survival and local failure did not differ according to radiation therapy interruption or the interval between surgery and radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Stage is an important prognostic indicator for survival, and among patients with Stage III malignancies survival in the substage C(1) is significantly higher than in the substages C(2) and C(3). As has been demonstrated in randomized trials, adjuvant postoperative CRT is superior to postoperative RT for patients with RC in this national study. These nationwide results of adjuvant treatment are comparable to those reported in randomized trials. The use of CRT was the only treatment-related factor that resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of death.

Genetic aspects of body composition.

Body composition is reviewed as a composite of several traits each with their distinctive genetic basis, including major effects of genes at single loci. Studies involving twins, adopted offspring, and other family relatives have demonstrated the high heritability (0.4-0.7) of many of the traits involved. Genotype-environment interactions with diet and activity occur in domesticated animals and humans and associations with voluntary choice of diet and level of activity are unfavorable. Body composition is the main reference for a normal homeostatic mechanism involving appetite and energy expenditure control. Identification of major genes controlling products, such as leptin, indicate mechanisms for this control and its manifestations in leanness and obesity. The plasticity of certain aspects of body composition can be exploited by livestock breeders, although the side effects are unpredictable. They also promise the possibility of gene therapy in these hitherto intractable conditions. Novel major genes that are being rapidly uncovered in many species may enable future deployment of gene therapy. The control of body composition is likely to remain a challenge because of the unfavorable genetic correlations and the failure of ordinary, fallible humans to thwart the complex genetically programmed destiny they have inherited.

The evaluation and treatment of patients receiving radiation therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care Study.

BACKGROUND: For the first time, a Patterns of Care Study (PCS) was conducted in 1992-1994 to determine the national practice standards in evaluating and treating patients with esophageal carcinoma and to determine the degree to which clinical trials have been incorporated into national practice. METHODS: A national survey of 61 institutions using 2-stage cluster sampling was conducted, and specific information was collected on 400 patients with squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the thoracic esophagus who received radiation therapy (RT) as part of definitive or adjuvant management of their disease. Patients were staged according to a modified 1983 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Chi-square tests for significant differences between academic and nonacademic institutions for a particular variable were performed. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 66.7 years (range, 26-89 years); 76.5% were male and 23.5% were female. Karnofsky performance status was > or = 80 for 88.3% of patients. Squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 61.5% and adenocarcinoma in 36.8%. Fifteen percent were Clinical Stage (CS) I, 39.5% CS II, and 29.5% CS III. Evaluative procedures included endoscopy (>93%), computed tomography (CT) of the chest (86%), CT of the abdomen (75%), esophagography (68.5%), and endoscopic ultrasound (3.5%). Endoscopic ultrasound and CT of the chest were performed significantly more frequently at academic than nonacademic facilities (6.1% vs. 1.0% and 91.9% vs. 81.3%, respectively). Three-quarters of all patients received chemotherapy and RT and 62.5% received concurrent chemotherapy and RT as part of their treatment. Treatments included chemotherapy plus RT (54.0%), RT alone (20.3%), preoperative chemotherapy + RT (13.3%), postoperative chemotherapy + RT (7.7%), postoperative RT (3.5%), and preoperative RT (1.2%). The chemotherapeutic agents most frequently used were 5-fluorouracil (84%), cisplatin (64%), and mitomycin (9%); academic instututions used cisplatin significantly more often and mitomycin significantly less often than nonacademic institutions. Brachytherapy was used in 8.5% of cases. The median total dose of external beam radiation was 50.4 gray and the median dose per fraction was 1.8 gray. CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes the national benchmarks for the evaluation and treatment of patients with esophageal carcinoma at radiation facilities in the U.S. It also indicates that the majority of patients given RT as a component of treatment for esophageal carcinoma receive chemoradiation rather than RT alone, as supported by clinical trials. Although some differences in the evaluation of esophageal carcinoma were noted between academic and nonacademic facilities, there was no difference in the frequency of use of chemoradiation versus RT by facility type.

National average for the process of radiation therapy in Japan by Patterns of Care Study.

BACKGROUND: A nationwide effort is in progress to establish the actual state of radiotherapy and its quality assurance (QA) in Japan by using the Patterns of Care Study (PCS). In this study, national averages are calculated with a limited number of patients. A calculation program for national averages was prepared and applied to the radiotherapeutic processes used for esophageal cancer patients entered in the PCS. METHODS: The calculation program for national averages, which were revised on the basis of differences between individual facilities and institutional strata, was developed in accordance with Sedransk's equation for the original PCS in the USA. National averages for several aspects concerning the sampled patients who had esophageal cancer between 1992 and 1994 were calculated with these procedures. Data for facilities and stratification of institution were simulated from a national structure survey of radiation oncology in 1990. RESULTS: Values of the national average by Sedransk's equation were different from those of the simple sample average. There were significant differences in radiotherapeutic processes among stratification of institutions. For esophageal cancer, national averages were 0.129 for applications of endoscopic ultrasound, 0.599 for 'all fields treated each day' and 0.088 for application of brachytherapy. CONCLUSION: National averages for radiotherapy could be calculated. The values obtained in this PCS will be a useful measure for future QA in radiation oncology and in other specialties in Japan.

Results of the 1988-1989 Patterns of Care Study process survey for Hodgkin's disease.

PURPOSE: To document national standards of care for patients receiving radiotherapy as part of curative treatment for Hodgkin's disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A national survey was conducted of 61 institutions treating 275 patients with Stages I-III Hodgkin's disease and representing six facility type strata. Pretreatment evaluation, radiotherapy treatment parameters, and use of combined modality therapy were assessed. RESULTS: Ann Arbor stage for the 275 patients was as follows: IA, 69 (25%); IB, 7 (3%); IIA, 123 (45%); IIB, 36 (13%); IIIA 23 (8%), IIIB, 14 (5%); unknown, 3 (1%). Pretreatment evaluation included complete blood count for 93%, sedimentation rate in 29%, chest CT in 88%, abdominal CT scan in 87%, and bone marrow biopsy in 81%. Lymphangiograms were obtained in 50% of cases; laparotomy was performed in 46%. The yield of positive findings in the spleen at laparotomy was 6.5 % overall. Facility differences with respect to staging were seen only for the use of gallium scans, which were more commonly used in academic centers (44% vs. 15-23% elsewhere, p<0.001). Radiotherapy was delivered with a linear accelerator in 94% of cases. Treatment simulation was performed for 94% and individualized blocks constructed for 95% overall; however, freestanding facilities had a lower rate of performance of these procedures (78% vs. 98-99% for simulation and 88% vs. 96-99% for customized blocking, p<0.001). The mean supradiaphragmatic dose was 36.74 Gy and the mean subdiaphragmatic dose was 33.81 Gy. Planned combined modality therapy was given in 36% of patients. The use of combined modality therapy by stage was as follows: IA, 11%; IB, 43%; IIA, 30%; IIB, 68%; IIIA, 57%; IIIB, 100%. Chemotherapy was completed prior to radiation in 80% of cases and generally consisted of ABVD (32%), an alternating regimen (25%), or MOPP (22%). Among Stage I/II patients, use of chemotherapy was associated with reduced radiation doses (mean supradiaphragmatic dose 34.53 Gy vs. 38.43 Gy and mean subdiaphragmatic dose 31.27 Gy vs. 34.51 Gy), and reduced volumes of treatment (87% vs. 28% treated to one side of the diaphragm only). Laparotomy was not associated with decreased supra- or subdiaphragmatic radiation doses or decreased volumes of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of gallium scans, pretreatment evaluation is relatively uniform across facility strata. Increased understanding of prognostic factors in Hodgkin's disease and greater use of planned combined modality therapy for higher risk patients appears to have contributed to a decreased use of and low yield of positive findings for laparotomy. Laparotomy was not associated with reduced radiation volumes or doses. Freestanding radiation facilities had a lower rate than other facility types for the performance of treatment simulation and customized patient blocking.

Patterns of care study of radiation therapy for cervix cancer in Japan: the influence of the stratification of institution on the process.

BACKGROUND: To improve the quality of radiation oncology in Japan, Patterns of Care Study (PCS), a widely known quality assurance (QA) program in the USA, was introduced. The feasibility was tested by collecting nationwide data by extramural audit for cervix cancer. METHODS: From July 1996 through February 1997, PCS audits were performed for 29 institutions nationwide. On the basis of the facility survey by Tsunemoto, 13 institutions were classified as A1 (university hospital/cancer center), 10 as B1 (other institutions treating >120 patients/year) and six as B2 (other institutions treating <120 patients/year). Medical charts for the patients treated for cervix cancer between 1992 and 1994 were reviewed based on the data format of the US PCS. The total number of patients surveyed was 432. RESULTS: Simulation was used for >90% of the patients in both A1 and B1-2 institutions. However, in B1-2, planning for 5% of the patients was performed with only a clinical set-up (p = 0.0287). A daily fraction with a size of 200 cGy was given to >65% of patients in A1 and to <47% in B1-2. On the other hand, >50% of those in B1-2 were treated with daily fractions of 180 cGy and less compared with 25% in A1 institutions (p < 0.0001). Brachytherapy was utilized more frequently for patients in Stages II (p = 0.0365), III (p = 0.0015) and IV (p = 0.0483) in A1 than in B1-2. As for external beam equipment, linear accelerators with 10 MV or more were used for 83% of the patients in A1. However, in B1-2 institutions, machines with lower energy were used for 38% of the patients (p < 0.0001). The median number of full-time-equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists was 2.7 in A1, 0.65 in B1 and 0.2 in B2. CONCLUSIONS: Institutional stratification, including equipment and personnel, was found to affect significantly the patterns of care for cervix cancer. Therefore, to improve the quality of radiation therapy nationwide, improvements in equipment and in supply of FTE personnel are extremely important. PCS was found to have great potential for a practical evaluation of how much improvement will be required in Japan.

Patterns of care study of radiation therapy for esophageal cancer in Japan: influence of the stratification of institution on the process.

BACKGROUND: To improve the quality of radiation therapy in Japan, Patterns of Care Study (PCS), a widely known QA program in the USA, was introduced in Japan. The feasibility was tested by collecting nationwide data by extramural audit for esophageal cancer. METHODS: From July 1996 through February 1997, PCS audits were performed for 29 institutions. Based on the facility survey by Tsunemoto, 13 institutes were classified as A1 (university hospital/cancer center treating > 300 patients/year), 10 as B1 (other institutes > 120 patients/year) and six as B2 (other institutes < 120 patients/year). Medical charts for 455 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer between 1992 and 1994 were reviewed based on the data format of PCS in the USA. RESULTS: Concerning external beam equipment, linear accelerators of > or = 10 MV were used for 73% of patients in A1, whereas in B1-2, 60Co machines were still used for 13% of patients (P < 0.0001). The median number of full-time equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists was 2.7 in A1, 0.65 in B1 and 0.2 in B2. Forty-five percent of patients had received surgery in A1 and 34% in B1-2 (P = 0.0068). In the non-surgery group, a higher radiation dose of > 60 Gy was delivered in A1 than in B1-2 (P = 0.0008). Chemotherapy was administered to 51% of the patients in A1 and to 30% in B1-2 (P < 0.0001). Brachytherapy was utilized for 17% in A1 and only for 5% in B1-2 (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Institutional stratification, including equipment and personnel, significantly affected the patterns of care for esophageal cancer. Therefore, to improve the quality of radiation therapy nationwide, improvement of equipment and supply of FTE personnel is extremely important. PCS was found to have great potential for the practical evaluation of how much will be required in Japan.

The structure of radiation oncology in the United States in 1994.

PURPOSE: 1) to measure the basic structural characteristics of radiation oncology facilities for the entire country, providing census data for January 1, 1994; 2) to allow comparisons by facility type, equipment, or patient load; 3) to allow comparisons of the patterns of equipment and personnel to previous surveys; and 4) to make a preliminary assessment of the geographic distribution of facilities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A mail survey verified whether each potential facility delivered megavoltage radiation therapy and collected data on treatment machines, other equipment, personnel, new patients, and procedures performed. Responses were obtained from 99% of potential facilities. The census data was summarized for the entire country, by hospital-based, free-standing, or federal category, by single or multiple treatment machine group, and by new patient load category. Geographic analysis compared the center of radiation oncology facilities with the center of cities or towns having a population of more than 25,000 residents in 1990. RESULTS: In the United States in 1994, 1542 facilities delivered megavoltage radiation therapy, with 2744 treatment machines, 2777 FTE radiation oncologists, 1349 FTE physicists, 1314 FTE dosimetrists, and 7167 FTE radiation therapists. They treated 560,262 new patients and reported that 60% were treated with curative intent. Eighty percent of the facilities had a dedicated treatment planning computer and 15% had a time-sharing treatment-planning computer, but 5% had no treatment-planning capability. Ninety-five percent of all facilities reported that patients were simulated at that facility. Fourteen percent of all facilities used hyperthermia, 8% intraoperative radiation therapy, 12% stereotactic radiosurgery, and 19% conformal therapy with 3D planning. Of all facilities 35% reported having a dedicated CT scanner and 12% reported having a CT simulator in the department. The distributions of these measures were reported for hospital-based, free-standing, and federal facilities, for single-treatment machine, and multiple-treatment machines facilities, and for three categories based on patient load. Only 18 cities with a population over 25,000 were more than 25 miles from a radiation oncology facility, of which only eight were more than 50 miles from a facility. CONCLUSION: The Facilities Surveys continue to provide a unique source of census data on radiation oncology in the United States, allowing comparisons by facility group and over time.

Intriguing links between animal behavior and anorexia nervosa.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to examine the literature on possible animal models for anorexia nervosa. METHOD: The literature was searched using MedLine, PSYCHLIT, and CAB Abstracts using search items that included body composition, thin sow syndrome, and halothane gene. In addition, key workers in the field of animal husbandry and body composition were sent earlier drafts of the paper for comment. RESULTS: Thin sow syndrome in pigs has some similarities to anorexia nervosa. Leanness and susceptibility to stress are associated in pigs with mutations of the ryanodine gene. Body composition in animals has a high heritability and various components of this overall composite trait are influenced to a major extent by polymorphism at specific gene loci. DISCUSSION: Recent developments in understanding body composition in animals offer intriguing insights into anorexia nervosa and suggest several candidate genes which would be worthy of further examination.

Treatment planning for adenocarcinoma of the rectum and sigmoid: a patterns of care study. PCS Committee.

PURPOSE: To conduct a study of the process of treatment planning and treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum and sigmoid in the United States, and to compare survey results to consensus guidelines. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A consensus committee developed guidelines for the radiotherapeutic management of adenocarcinoma of the rectum and sigmoid, and also developed a survey form that was used to gather data to evaluate the practice patterns for patients treated in 1989 and 1990 against the consensus guidelines. Seventy-three facilities were randomly selected for site visits from the 1321 radiation therapy facilities in the US: 21 academic, 26 hospital based, and 26 free standing. During the site visits, the radiotherapy records were examined by the surveyor physicist and radiation oncologist to extract and record the required data. Data collected included items related to treatment specific parameters, including treatment planning considerations. Analyses included stratification as to the types of institutions, academic, hospital based, or free standing. RESULTS: For many treatment parameters there are discrepancies between the patterns of practice determined by the surveys and the consensus guidelines for radiotherapy treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum and sigmoid. Significant differences in practice among the stratified institution types were found in only a few parameters.

Treatment planning for primary breast cancer: a patterns of care study.

PURPOSE: The 1989 Patterns of Care Study included treatment planning for early breast cancer. A Consensus Committee of radiation physicists and oncologists determined current guidelines and developed questionnaires to determine treatment planning and delivery processes used by the participating institutions (e.g., use of portal films). This article presents and analyzes the results of that survey. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The survey included 449 respondents, distributed as follows: 136 (30%) from Strata I (academic facilities); 169 (38%) from Strata II (hospital based facilities); and 144 (32%) from Strata III (freestanding facilities). The treatment planning procedures surveyed included: whether individualized tissue compensators are used, whether inhomogeneity corrections are used in dose calculations, the use of computerized tomography, whether isodose distributions for external beam tangents and interstitial implants are generated, the use of lymphoscintigraphy, immobilization devices, simulations, portal films, etc. RESULTS: The survey results demonstrated that out of 305 patients from Strata I and II institutions, 237 (78%) had simulated tangential fields. Consistent with this finding is that 76% of patients from Strata I and II institutions were immobilized, while only 51% of Strata III patients were. Moreover, only 18 out of the 449 (4%) of cases did not have any type of external beam dose distribution calculated--presumably, in these cases missing tissue compensation would be unlikely. On the other hand, 41% of the Strata II, 27% of Strata III, but only 19% of Strata I (p < 0.0002) cases received CT. Surprisingly, 19% of the Strata I, 35% of the Strata II, and 25% of the Strata III (p = 0.0011) patients received lymphoscintigraphy, perhaps reflecting the use of wide tangents to encompass the internal mammary nodes in these patients. In terms of optimizing treatments, 74% of Strata I, 70% of Strata II, and 78% of Strata III patients had wedges used on both tangential fields, although in 5, 12, and 14%, respectively, no beam modification of any sort was used. Furthermore, it should be noted that in 7% of the Strata I, 23% of Strata II, and 37% of Strata III cases there was no attempt to reduce the divergence of the tangential fields into the lung. On the other hand, if one considers the 135 (of 449) patients where matching of the tangential and supraclavicular fields was applicable, 41% of Strata I, 22% of Strata II and 46% of Strata III patients had those fields matched in a vertical plane, which would involve sophisticated alignment procedures. Quality control of treatment delivery was high: 97% of all surveyed received portal films at least once. The use of thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD) to measure the dose to the contralateral breast was of little interest: only 4 of the 305 Strata I and II patients received in vivo measurements. CONCLUSIONS: This national survey has established the patterns of treatment planning for early breast cancer. It shows a generally consistent approach-although a number of statistically significant variations have been identified.

Treatment planning for carcinoma of the cervix: a patterns of care study report.

PURPOSE: The Patterns of Care Study (PCS) of patients treated in 1988-89 included "patterns of treatment planning" for radiotherapy of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A Consensus Committee of radiation physicists and oncologists established current guidelines and developed questionnaires to assess the treatment planning process (i.e., the general structure, methodology, and tools) of institutions involved in the Patterns of Care Study. This paper reports the findings of the assessment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The PCS surveyed 73 radiotherapy facilities, of which 21 are academic institutions (AC), 26 hospital-based facilities (HB), and 26 free-standing centers (FS). In total, 242 cases were assessed with 39% from academic centers, 33% from hospital-based centers, and 28% from free-standing centers. The survey collected treatment planning information such as the use of computed tomography (CT), simulation procedure, contouring of patient outline, tumor or target delineation, identification of critical structures, method of dose prescription (point or isodose), etc. Data was also obtained concerning implant boosts, e.g., radioisotope used, use of midline block for external beam treatment, availability of remote afterloader, practice of interstitial implants, combination with hyperthermia, etc. RESULTS: There is a high degree of compliance relative to the basic treatment planning standards. For example, 171 cases (out of 173) from AC and HB institutions included simulation and 169 used port film; for cases from FS centers, 61 out of 69 involved simulation and 66 out of 69 included port film. Most institutions used linacs (231 out of 242); in five cases, Co-60 units and in six cases betatron was used. In terms of treatment planning, 53% used skin contours, but only 14% had target volume delineation, with AC and HB being slightly more conscientious in these efforts. Critical organs did not appear to be explicitly considered in external beam treatment planning, with only 3% outlining the bladder, 5% the rectum, and less than 1% the small bowel. Only 11% of the centers used CT in treatment planning, and none reported the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For patients receiving implants, about 40% had midline blocking during external beam treatment, of which one out of three were shielded by standard blocks and two out of three with customized ones. About 11% of the patients receiving implants were treated with remote afterloading devices, 5% received interstitial implants, and none were treated in combination with hyperthermia. CONCLUSION: The treatment planning aspects of radiotherapy of carcinoma of the cervix have been established by this Patterns of Care Study Survey. There is a high level of uniformity in the approach. Some variations exist among centers in the different strata.

A comparison of the structure of radiation oncology in the United States and Japan.

PURPOSE: The United States and Japan have very different backgrounds in their medical care systems. In the field of radiation oncology, national surveys on structure have been conducted for both countries and compared to illustrate any similarities and differences present from 1989-1990. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Patterns of Care Study Facility Survey conducted in 1989 in the United States and the National Survey of Structure in Japan in 1990 were compared to evaluate the equipment pattern, staffing pattern, compliance rate with the "blue book" (3) guideline, and the geographic distribution of institutions. RESULTS: In the United States, a total of 598,184 (49% of the total of newly diagnosed) patients were treated with radiation therapy. In Japan, 62,829 (approximately 15% of the total of newly diagnosed) patients were treated. The numbers of external megavoltage treatment machines were 2,397 in the United States and 494 in Japan. The numbers of full time equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists were 2,335 in the United States and 366 in Japan. Only 15% of United States facilities and 11% of Japan facilities complied with the narrow blue book guideline for the patients per FTE radiation oncologist (200-250), while the most common ratio was 151-200 patients/FTE in the United States and 51-100 in Japan. In Japan, more than 60% of institutions were staffed by a part-time radiation oncologist (FTE < 1.0). Between geographic regions, there was variation in the percentage of cancer patients treated with radiation therapy for both the United States (42-56%) and Japan (6-25%). CONCLUSION: There is a major difference in the usage of radiation therapy for treating cancer between the United States and Japan with 49% of all new cancer patients treated in the United States and approximately 15% treated in Japan. Equipment structure in the United States is more complete than in Japan with important differences in treatment simulators, treatment planning computers, and support personnel. High dose rate intracavitary radiation is commonly available in Japan and there are geographic differences in radiation oncology utilization in both countries.

The sex ratio of American radiologists: comparison and implications by age, subspecialty, and type of practice.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to present results related to two questions regarding changes in the sex ratio of American radiologists. Do men and women in radiology have different patterns of subspecialization, postresidency training, board certification, or practice characteristics? Do differences in patterns between the sexes imply that the number of radiologists required in the future will change with a changing sex ratio of radiologists? MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey questionnaire was mailed to a stratified random sample of 2804 radiologists, radiation oncologists, and nuclear medicine specialists drawn from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. The survey achieved a response rate of 69%. Stratification criteria included sex, age, and subspecialty. The survey questions included age, sex, subspecialty, training status, board certification, type of practice, principal work activity, source of income, hours worked, and amount of time away from the practice. Data analysis used descriptive statistics, ordinary least squares regression, and logit analysis. Weighting assured that results represent all radiologists. RESULTS: Only 13% of active radiologists who have finished training are women. The percentage varies with age; 6% of radiologists 45 years old or older; 22% of those 35-44 years old, and 23% of those younger than 35 years old were women. Differences in the sex ratio were not associated with differences in board certification or postresidency fellowships, but subspecialization differed by sex. Women were more likely than men to be salaried, to work part-time, to be engaged in teaching, and to work in an office rather than in a hospital. Differences in the sex ratio had little impact on estimates of the number of radiologists that will be needed in the future. CONCLUSION: Female radiologists have subspecialization and practice characteristics different from those of male radiologists. The increasing percentage of women in the profession will have little effect on the number of radiologists and radiation oncologists needed.