Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cancer ; 80(4): 676-80, 1997 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9264350

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating the efficacy of routine follow-up testing in detecting disease recurrence in treated lung carcinoma patients are lacking. METHODS: To investigate this subject, the authors studied 115 patients who had previously been entered on North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) small cell lung carcinoma clinical trials, had achieved a complete response after chemotherapy/radiotherapy treatment, and subsequently developed disease progression. The authors included 58 patients with limited stage and 57 patients with extensive stage disease. Follow-up testing on these clinical trials was scheduled at 4-month intervals in the first year and every 6 months thereafter. At each visit, testing included a clinical history, physical examination, chest X-ray, chemistry group, and hematology group. Patients' records were evaluated to determine the first test(s) to identify disease recurrence, whether the recurrence was diagnosed at the time of routine follow-up or between scheduled follow-up evaluations, the sites of recurrence, and patient outcome. RESULTS: Recurrences occurred in 56 patients (49%) in the first follow-up year, 51 (44%) in the second year, and 8 (7%) after 2 years. Recurrences were signaled by clinical histories in 71% of patients, by physical examinations in 10%, chest X-rays in 12%, and abnormal chemistry testing in 6%. Although 41% of recurrences were detected at scheduled clinical visits, 59% of patients had disease recurrence signaled by symptoms that prompted interval visits between scheduled appointments. At last follow-up, all the patients in this study had died (median survival, 115 days [range, 1-793 days] after diagnosis of recurrence), supporting the lack of curative therapy for patients with recurrent small cell lung carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: These data, demonstrating that clinical histories and physical examinations are the most fruitful means of detecting evidence of recurrent lung carcinoma, are consistent with data regarding the follow-up of other curatively treated cancers, such as breast carcinoma and melanoma. Chest X-rays in asymptomatic patients detect recurrences in a small proportion of patients, whereas routine blood tests appear to be of little value.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Small Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Small Cell/secondary , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Carcinoma, Small Cell/therapy , Continuity of Patient Care , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Lymphatic Metastasis , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
Cancer ; 72(2): 405-9, 1993 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8391378

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The primary goal of this study was to determine the incidence of severe or greater acute radiation toxicity, and secondarily, response, survival, and local control in patients with unresectable Stage IIIA or B non-small cell lung cancer treated with accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiation therapy (AHTRT). METHODS: From September, 1989 through March, 1990, 21 evaluable patients with unresectable Stage IIIA or B non-small cell lung cancer were treated with AHTRT, using 6000 cGy in 40 fractions of 150 cGy twice daily, 6 hours between fractions, with a 2-week break midway through treatment. RESULTS: Two patients (9.5%) had acute Grade 3 radiation esophagitis requiring intravenous hydration, and two patients (9.5%) had acute Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis requiring oxygen and steroids. Only one patient had chronic toxicity, a Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis. Five patients (24%) achieved a complete response, whereas eight (38%) had a partial response or regression. With minimum follow-up of nearly 3 years, 3 patients are alive and 18 are dead. The median survival time and 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 10.8 months, 48%, 29%, and 14%, respectively. Local control was achieved in 11 of 21 (52%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: This AHTRT regimen can be given with an acceptable incidence of acute radiation toxicity. Response, survival, and local control rates in this unfavorable group of patients are encouraging. A North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase III study of standard thoracic radiation therapy (6000 cGy in 30 fractions of 200 cGy daily) versus AHTRT (+/- chemotherapy) is now open.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/radiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...