ABSTRACT
Two mild strains of Cocoa swollen shoot virus (CSSV), N1 and SS365B, were assessed for their capability to mitigate the devastating effects of CSSV in field trials at the Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana in comparison with noninoculated cocoa plants. Analysis of growth, mortality, and yield of cocoa trees inoculated with the mild strains over a period of two decades between 1996 and 2014 indicated that the cocoa plants inoculated with mild strains performed significantly (P < 0.05) better in the presence of the severe strains (CSSV 1A) than noninoculated cocoa, albeit degenerated over time. The development of cocoa hybrids studied in the trial showed differences in their performance in the presence of the mild-strain viruses. Spread of the severe virus increased and deteriorated the effects of the mild isolates over time, thereby decreasing the economic life span of the cocoa trees. This observation was consistent in all the trials regardless of the type of mild strain involved. Apparently, the immunity and protection conferred by mild strains of CSSV (SS365B and N1) on cocoa declined over time, and we further confirmed 'Amelonado' cocoa to be very susceptible to CSSV infection in terms of effects on growth and yield.
