ABSTRACT
Background: Simulation is a new pedagogical method in Africa that underscores the need to operationalize it and generate context-specific scholarship regarding clinical simulation in Africa. Despite the superior learning outcomes of using simulation in medical education, its use in developing countries is often limited, compounded by limited scholarship on simulation especially relevant to an African context. The research aimed to explore perceptions surrounding the use of simulation among undergraduate students. Methods: A mixed method convergent parallel design was used in which both the quantitative and qualitative approaches were employed currently to explore the perception of the undergraduate students towards the use of clinical simulation in teaching and learning. The quantitative approach assessed the perception of the students on a five-point Likert from strongly disagree to strongly agree scale while the qualitative approach employed a focused group discussion to explore the perception of the students in regards to clinical simulation. Quantitative data was analyzed using Stata Version 17. Qualitative results were analyzed through thematic analysis by Brauna and Clark. Results: 298 participants were recruited into the study. The mean age of the participants was 27 years with a standard deviation of 5.81 years. The majority 152(51.01%) of the participants were males. Most 111(37.25%) of the participants were pursuing Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery. The grand mean of the perception scores of the students towards the use of simulation in clinical teaching was 3.875269 ±0.5281626. The participants strongly agreed that it is incredibly helpful to have someone who works in the field debrief with them after completing a scenario and their overall perception towards this was high (Mean =4.65241±0.6617337). Conclusion: This exploratory study revealed that medical, nursing, and midwifery students from the rural Universities of Busitema and Lira demonstrated a positive perception of the use of clinical simulation in teaching and learning. The results conclude that simulations help students better understand concepts in clinical settings, provide them with valuable learning experiences, and help them stimulate critical thinking abilities. Further, the participants perceive simulation to be realistic, and knowledge gained could be transferred to the clinical areas.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Experiences regarding the use of simulation in low-resource settings like Uganda where it has not taken root have not been explored. The purpose of the study was to explore the experiences of students, clinical staff, and faculty regarding the use of clinical simulation in teaching undergraduate students. Materials and methods: The study was conducted at Busitema and Lira Universities in Uganda. We conducted 20 in-depth interviews with the faculty staff and 10 focused group discussions with undergraduate Nursing, Midwifery, Medical and Anesthesia students. The study obtained ethical clearance from the Busitema University Research and Ethics Committee (BUFHS-2023-78) and Uganda National Council of Science and Technology (HS3027ES). Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: Four themes emerged from the data. Simulation was seen to be about improvising and (return) demonstration. Concerns of realism were expressed including notions that simulation was not real, that simulation felt real and the extreme end that simulation tends to present the ideal setting. Perceived benefits of simulation include room for mistakes and immediate feedback, enhanced confidence and self-efficacy, enhanced acquisition of soft and clinical skills, prepares students for clinical placement, convenient and accessible. Concerns were expressed related to whether skills in clinical simulation would translate to clinical competence in the clinical setting. Conclusion: Students perceived simulation to be beneficial. However, concerns about realism and transferability of skills to clinical settings were noted. Clarifying preconceived notions against the use of clinical simulation will enhance its utilization in educational settings where simulation is not readily embraced.
