Out of hospital emergency care in Nigeria: A narrative review.

Introduction: Out of Hospital Emergency Care (OHEC) in Nigeria, the most populous country with the highest GDP in Africa, is considered inadequate. A better understanding of the current state of OHEC is essential to address the country's unique challenges and offer potential solutions. Objectives: This paper sought to identify gaps, barriers, and facilitators in implementing an OHEC model in Nigeria and provide recommendations for improvement. Methods: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Google Scholar, using combinations of "emergency medical care" ('FRC,' 'PHC,' and 'EMS') OR prehospital care OR emergency training' AND 'Nigeria.' We included papers that described OHEC in Nigeria and were published in English. Of the initial 73 papers, those that met our inclusion criteria and those obtained after examination of reference lists comprised the 20 papers that contributed to our final review. Two authors independently reviewed all the papers, extracted data relevant to our objectives and performed a content analysis. All authors reviewed, discussed, and refined the proposed recommendations. Key recommendations: For OHEC to meet the needs of Nigerians and achieve international standards, the following challenges need to be addressed: harmful cultural practices, inadequate training of citizens in the provision of first aid or of professionals that provide prehospital care, lack of proper infrastructure, poor communication, absent policy, and poor funding. Based on the available literature, this paper proposes key recommendations to improve OHEC with the hope of improving the standards of living. The federal government should provide general oversight, but this will require political will on the part of the country's leadership and the provision of adequate funding.

Extensive Upper Airway Hematoma Secondary to Supratherapeutic Warfarin Anticoagulation.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 63-year-old female presented to the emergency department complaining of cough, neck swelling, dysphagia, and dysphonia for two days, with a past medical history of atrial fibrillation managed with warfarin. Investigations revealed a supratherapeutic international normalised ratio (greater than 10). Imaging and endoscopic examination showed an extensive retropharyngeal hematoma with significant mass effect on the airway. DISCUSSION: A rare but potentially fatal complication of warfarin anticoagulation is upper airway hematoma, with violent coughing described as an inciting cause. Signs of airway compromise necessitate specialist consultation and definitive airway management, while mild cases without airway concerns can be managed conservatively with medical anticoagulation reversal.

Emergency department referrals from a provincial medical call centre: Is it more than just 1-800-go-to-emerg?

OBJECTIVE: HealthLine is Saskatchewan's provincial 24-hour health information and support telephone line. A proportion of HealthLine's callers are referred to the emergency department (ED) for further assessment. The purpose of this study was to gain insight into the appropriateness of these referrals and assess whether they increased the burden on an already strained ED system. METHODS: A list of callers referred from HealthLine to Saskatoon EDs from January 1, 2014, to March 31, 2014 was obtained. This list was cross-referenced with Saskatoon Health Region registration data to determine which of those callers had been registered in one of the three Saskatoon EDs within 48 hours of the original call. RESULTS: During the 90-day time period in question, 707/3,938 (17.9%) of callers were referred by HealthLine to the ED. Out of those referred, 601 were identifiable and 358 attended the ED. Hospital charts were pulled for full data extraction and analysis of the 276 who met inclusion criteria. Of those who presented to the ED and met inclusion criteria, 60% had investigations performed while 66% received some form of treatment. The overall admission rate for the patient population studied was 12.0% v. 16% for non-referred patients. Referred pediatric patients had fewer investigations and treatments with a lower admission rate compared with the adult patients. CONCLUSION: The Saskatchewan HealthLine is doing an effective job at directing callers both to and away from EDs in Saskatoon and not overburdening our local EDs with unnecessary referrals.

Equality of care between First Nations and non-First Nations patients in Saskatoon emergency departments.

OBJECTIVE: Studies show that First Nations patients have worse health outcomes than non-First Nations patients, raising concerns that treatment within the healthcare system, including emergency care, is inequitable. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of Status First Nations and non-First Nations patients presenting to two emergency departments in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan with abdominal pain and a Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale score of 3. From 190 charts (95 Status First Nations and 95 non-First Nations), data extracted included time to doctor, time to analgesia, length of stay, specialist consult, bloodwork, imaging, physical exam and history, and disposition. Univariate comparisons and multiple regression modelling were performed to compare care outcomes between patient groups. Equivalence testing comparing time intervals was also undertaken. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in presentation characteristics were observed, although Status First Nations subjects showed a greater tendency towards weekend presentation and younger age. Care parameters were similar, although a marginally significant difference was observed in Status First Nations versus non-First Nations subjects for imaging (46% versus 60%, p=0.06), which resolved on adjustment for age and weekend presentation. Time to physician was found to be similar among First Nations patients on equivalence testing within a 15-minute margin. CONCLUSION: In this study, First Nations patients presenting with abdominal pain did not receive delayed care. There were no detectable differences in the time-related care parameters/variables that were provided relative to non-First Nations patients. Meaningful and important qualitative factors need to be examined in the future.