Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
BMJ Open ; 12(6): e063144, 2022 06 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35672075

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Development of a Community Engagement Package composed of (1) database of community engagement (CE) experiences from different contexts, (2) CE learning package of lessons and tools presented as online modules, and (3) CE workshop package for identifying CE experiences to enrich the CE database and ensure regular update of learning resources. The package aims to guide practitioners to promote local action and enhance skills for CE. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The packages were co-created with diverse teams from WHO, Social Innovation in Health Initiative, UNICEF, community practitioners, and other partners providing synergistic contributions and bridging existing silos. METHODS: The design process of the package was anchored on CE principles. Literature search was performed using standardised search terms through global and regional databases. Interviews with CE practitioners were also conducted. RESULTS: A total of 356 cases were found to fit the inclusion criteria and proceeded to data extraction and thematic analysis. Themes were organised according to rationale, key points and insights, facilitators of CE and barriers to CE. Principles and standards of CE in various contexts served as a foundation for the CE learning package. The package comprises four modules organised by major themes such as mobilising communities, strengthening health systems, CE in health emergencies and CE as a driver for health equity. CONCLUSION: After pilot implementation, tools and resources were made available for training and continuous collection of novel CE lessons and experiences from diverse socio-geographical contexts.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Humans , World Health Organization
2.
Health Promot Int ; 36(Supplement_1): i24-i38, 2021 Dec 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34897448

ABSTRACT

Community engagement is crucial for controlling disease outbreak and mitigating natural and industrial disasters. The COVID-19 pandemic has reconfirmed the need to elevate community engagement to build equity, trust and sustained action in future health promotion preparedness strategies. Using the health promotion strategy of strengthening community action enhances the opportunity for better outcomes. There is, therefore, a need to improve our understanding of community engagement practices during crises, scale-up good community engagement initiatives, and improve and sustain people-centered approaches to emergency responses. This paper presents five case studies from the United States, Singapore, Sierra Leone, Kenya and South Africa that demonstrate the potential strengths that can be nurtured to build resilience in local communities to help mitigate the impact of disasters and emergencies. The case studies highlight the importance of co-developing relevant education and communication strategies, amplifying the role of community leaders, empowering community members to achieve shared goals, assessing and adapting to changing contexts, pre-planning and readiness for future emergencies and acknowledgement of historic context.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Community Participation , Health Promotion , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
4.
Trop Med Int Health ; 9(8): 887-96, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15303994

ABSTRACT

We studied the involvement of community-directed distributors (CDDs) of ivermectin for onchocerciasis control in other health and development activities in Nigeria, Togo and Cameroon. Most CDDs (82%) were involved in additional activities, especially EPI, water and sanitation and community development projects. These activities did not take up much time and were not considered an important burden. Ivermectin treatment coverage did not decline with increasing number of additional activities. Other health programmes are interested in building on the experiences and structures of community-directed treatment with ivermectin and involving CDDs in their health programmes. Some, such as EPI, provide financial incentives. Incentives by other programmes may enhance the performance of CDDs when they are selected on the basis of their CDD status. CDDs, health personnel and community members have very positive attitudes towards greater involvement of CDDs in additional health and development activities. We conclude that additional activities for CDDs do not pose a threat to but rather provide an opportunity to strengthen sustainability and effectiveness of ivermectin treatment.


Subject(s)
Community Health Services/organization & administration , Filaricides/administration & dosage , Ivermectin/administration & dosage , Onchocerciasis/prevention & control , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cameroon , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Filaricides/therapeutic use , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Humans , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Nigeria , Program Evaluation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL