Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Malar J ; 22(1): 307, 2023 Oct 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37821868

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Malaria prevalence in Kenya is 6%, with a three-fold higher prevalence in western Kenya. Adherence to malaria treatment guidelines improves care for suspected malaria cases and can reduce unnecessary anti-malarial use. Data on adherence to guidelines in retail drug outlets (DOs) is limited, yet approximately 50% of people with fever access treatment first in these outlets. This study assessed adherence to the national malaria treatment guidelines among DOs in a high transmission area of Western Kenya. METHODS: In a cross-sectional survey of DOs in Kisumu Central and Seme sub-counties in 2021, DO staff were interviewed using structured questionnaires to assess outlet characteristics (location, testing services), staff demographics (age, sex, training), and health system context (supervision, inspection). Mystery shoppers (research assistants disguised as clients) observed malaria management practices and recorded observations on a standardized tool. Adherence was defined as dispensing artemether-lumefantrine (AL) to patients with a confirmed positive test, accompanied by appropriate medication counseling. Logistic regression was used to test for association between adherence to guidelines and DO-related factors. RESULTS: None of the 70 DOs assessed had a copy of the guidelines, and 60 (85.7%) were in an urban setting. Staff adhered to the guidelines in 14 (20%) outlets. The odds of adherence were higher among staff who had a bachelor's degree {odds ratio (OR) 6.0, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.66-21.74}, those trained on malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) {OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.29-15.04}, and those who asked about patient's symptoms {OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.08-12.25}. DOs that had higher odds of adherence included those with functional thermometers {OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.46-19.14}, those recently inspected (within three months) by Pharmacy and Poisons Board (PPB) {OR 9.4, 95% CI 2.55-34.67}, and those with all basic infrastructure {OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.01-15.00}. On logistic regression analysis, recent PPB inspection {adjusted OR (AOR) 4.6, 95% CI 1.03-20.77} and malaria RDT-trained staff (aOR 4.5, 95% CI 1.02-19.84) were independently associated with adherence. CONCLUSION: Most outlets didn't adhere to malaria guidelines. Regular interaction with regulatory bodies could improve adherence. Ministry of Health should enhance private sector engagement and train DOs on RDT use.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Malaria , Humans , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Kenya/epidemiology , Artemether/therapeutic use , Malaria/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Fever/drug therapy
2.
Pan Afr Med J ; 28(Suppl 1): 12, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30167037

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: in February 2015, an outbreak of acute watery diarrhea was reported in two sub counties in western Kenya. Vibrio cholerae 01 serotype Ogawa was isolated from 26 cases and from water samples collected from a river mainly used by residents of the two sub-counties for domestic purposes. We carried out an investigation to determine factors associated with the outbreak. METHODS: we conducted a frequency matched case control study in the community. We defined cases as episodes of watery diarrhea (at least three motions in 24 hours) in persons ≥ 2 years who were residents of Rongo or Ndhiwa sub-counties from January 23-February 25, 2015. Cases were systematically recruited from a cholera line list and matched to two controls (persons without diarrhea since January 23, 2015) by age category and residence. A structured questionnaire was administered to evaluate exposures in cases and controls and multivariable logistic regression done to determine independent factors associated with the outbreak. RESULTS: we recruited 52 cases and 104 controls. Females constituted 61% (95/156) of all participants. Overall latrine coverage was 58% (90/156). Latrine coverage was 44% (23/52) for cases and 64% (67/104) for controls. Having no latrine at home (aOR = 10.9; 95% CI: 3.02-39.21), practicing communal hand washing in a basin (aOR = 6.5; 95% CI: 2.30-18.11) and vending of food as an occupation (aOR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.06-10.74) were independently associated with the outbreak. CONCLUSION: poor latrine coverage and personal hygiene practices were identified as the main drivers of the outbreak. We recommended improved public health education on latrine usage and promotion of hand washing with soap and water in the community.


Subject(s)
Cholera/epidemiology , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Vibrio cholerae O1/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Diarrhea/microbiology , Female , Hand Disinfection/standards , Humans , Hygiene/standards , Kenya/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Toilet Facilities/standards , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...