Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Diabetes Metab Syndr ; 12(3): 417-421, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29580872

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Expeditious and precise discerning of bacterial pathogens is a fundamental grail, of clinical diagnostic microbiology. Genotypic detection is a budding substitute to recognize phenotypic culture based processes in bacterial identification. AIMS: We report a comparative evaluation of biochemical and genomic-based assays for exploring the commonest bacterial flora of infected diabetic foot ulcers along with clinical variables of subjects enrolled. METHODS: The pathogens selected (i) Staphylococcus aureus ii) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, iii) Escherichia coli and iv) Klebsiella pneumonia, stood for the most frequent isolates of diabetic foot infection in previous studies from Northern India. Identification of these pathogens were done by conventional assays and polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Of 50 specimens obtained from infected DFUs, 74% of cases were affirmative by bacteriological assays and 90% showed positivity via polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Among processed samples 44 isolates were detectable through phenotypic analysis and 65 bacteria by species-specific PCR. Thirteen samples and 21 isolates could not be scrutinized by phenotypic identification systems. The most prevalent pathogens identifiable were Klebsiella pneumonia, followed by Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that PCR-based diagnostic methods improved the identification compared to conventional methods and highlight the incorporation of PCR due to shorten turnaround time translating into improved clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/pathogenicity , Bacterial Infections/complications , Biomarkers/analysis , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Diabetic Foot/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
2.
Diabetes Metab Syndr ; 12(3): 301-304, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29279270

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major health burden worldwide with many patients encountering thyroid dysfunction later in their life. Various studies have found that diabetes and thyroid disorders mutually influence each other and both disorders tend to coexists. However, the prevalence of thyroid dysfunction and associated clinical variables in these patients has not been investigated. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed at determining the incidence and prevalence of thyroid dysfunction in patients with T2DM in relation to age, sex, metabolic syndrome and other co-morbid conditions. RESEARCH DESIGNS & METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 250 Type 2 DM patients were enrolled aged between 40 and 75 years. All the patients were evaluated for thyroid dysfunction by testing thyroid profile (T3, T4 and TSH. These subjects were also investigated for fasting blood sugar (FBS), post prandial glucose (PPG) glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum cholesterol, serum triglycerides, high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein(LDL), very low density lipoprotein(VLDL), blood urea, serum creatinine and presence of other co-morbid conditions. The observations and interpretations were recorded and results obtained were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A high prevalence of thyroid dysfunction (28%) was observed in type 2 diabetic patients with subclinical hypothyroidism (18.8%) as the commonest thyroid disorder. Thyroid dysfunction was more prevalent in females, with presence of dyslipidemia, retinopathy, poor glycemic state (HbA1c ≥7) and longer duration of diabetes as significant contributing factors associated. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to glycemic status, screening of thyroid disorder should be routinely done in type 2 diabetic subjects along with other comorbid conditions.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology , Thyroid Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prognosis
3.
Foot (Edinb) ; 32: 44-48, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28802182

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), a dreadful microvascular complication of diabetes is responsible for substantial increase in morbidity and mortality. Infection, not a cause, but a consequence in DFUs that accounts for minor or major limb loss. The current study aimed to evaluate the microbial etiology of infected diabetic foot ulcers in northern tertiary care hospital, assessment of risk factors and role of inflammatory markers involved in colonization of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and their impact on the outcome. METHODS: Pus aspirates and soft tissue samples from 65 patients with infected DFUs were collected and processed for aerobic culture analysis. Serum concentrations of IL-6 and TNF-α were determined by enzyme linked immuno-sorbent assay. RESULTS: Aerobic gram-negative isolates were more commonly present (74.7%), followed by gram-positive aerobes (25.2%). Fifty-seven percent patients were positive for MDROs. IL-6 (pg/mL) was significantly lower in diabetic patients with MDROs infected foot ulcers than without (47.0±17.2 vs. 78.3±22.1 vs. p=<0.001) and TNF-α (pg/mL) was also significantly diminished in MDROs infected subjects than without (144.2±25.8 vs. 168.7±20.9, p<0.001) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study diabetic foot wounds harbored by MDROs were associated with longer duration of ulcer and increased ulcer size. Poor glycemic control was also a confounding factor in mounting MDROs infected ulcers. The declined levels WBCs and neutrophils as well as of cytokines IL-6 and TNF-alpha explains compromised immune responses of host in multi drug resistant infections.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Chi-Square Distribution , Cohort Studies , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Diabetic Foot/physiopathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Humans , India/epidemiology , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
4.
Front Microbiol ; 7: 1792, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27920754

ABSTRACT

The study was carried on diabetic foot patients to deduce clinical attributes, the occurrence of the range of aerobic microbial flora and to assess their comparative in vitro susceptibility to the customarily used antimicrobials. We also studied the potential risk factors involved in the development of non-healing ulcers. A total of 87 organisms were isolated from 70 specimens, including Escherichia coli (19.5%) among the Gram-negative and Staphylococcus aureus (18.4%) among the Gram-positive as the predominant aerobes explored. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and E. coli were predominant isolates of non-healing ulcers. The antimicrobial sensitivity pattern revealed that vancomycin (100%) and amikacin (90.4%) exhibited highest sensitivity to Gram-positive cocci, while all strains of P. aeruginosa were sensitive toward imipenem (100%). The prevalent uncontrolled glycemic status, altered lipid spectra, the existence of neuropathy, and peripheral vascular disease, suggested predisposition toward the development of non-healing lesions. The study has underlined the need for continuous surveillance of bacteria and their antimicrobial sensitivity blueprints to provide the basis for empirical therapy and to minimize the risk of complications. Further, stringent clinical evaluation, and medical history will help in revealing the risk of developing non-healing status in diabetic foot ulcers.

5.
J Obstet Gynaecol India ; 66(Suppl 2): 623-625, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27803526
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...