ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The etiology of Tolosa-Hunt Syndrome (THS) is still unknown. The initial standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may not be sufficient for diagnosis, so dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI may be necessary to demonstrate the presence of lesions. METHODS: Seven patients diagnosed with THS according to the International Headache Society criteria (beta version) were included into the study. Patients were assessed in terms of type, age, symptoms and findings, accompanying disease, localization of the determined lesion, response to treatment, and clinical progress. The "Tolosa-Hunt protocol" was applied in all patients, and the cavernous sinuses, orbital apices, and orbits were evaluated. The parameters used for the patients were as follows: Turbospin echo T1 and T2 weighted sequences on the axial plane, turbospin echo fat-saturated T2 weighted sequence on the coronal plane, turbospin echo T2 weighted sequence on the sagittal plane, spin echo fat-saturated T1 sequences repeated on the axial and coronal planes followed by intravenous administration of gadolinium. In all sequences the slice thickness was 3 mm. RESULTS: Four of seven cases diagnosed with THS were males, and the average age of the patients was 45.7±18.1 years (range 25-69 years). A follow-up MRI in patient 5 after three months showed decreased signal intensity and enhancement of the affected cavernous sinus. CONCLUSION: Conventional MRI may be insufficient to show the granulomatous inflammation, and an MRI method referred to as the Tolosa-Hunt protocol should be applied to those who are thought to have THS.
ABSTRACT
Multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMN-CB) is purely a motor neuropathy with progressive weakness that is characteristically caused by conduction blocks. Association with antiganglioside antibodies and a good response to immunomodulating therapies suggest an autoimmune etiology. In rare cases, MMN-CB has been reported as an adverse effect of infliximab, a tumor necrosis factor-α blocker. We present a case of MMN-CB due to infliximab in a 45-year-old man with psoriatic arthritis who was exposed to the drug for 2 years because of a delayed diagnosis. We emphasize the possibility of this adverse effect and the importance of detailed electrophysiological examinations, which is supported by a review of the literature.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Infliximab/adverse effects , Polyneuropathies/chemically induced , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polyneuropathies/diagnosis , Polyneuropathies/physiopathologyABSTRACT
A 35-year-old female presented with three days' history of aching discomfort in her back, chest, and ankles. She had also noticed increasing weakness of her legs and a week before admission had shown flu-like symptoms. Chest X-ray showed bilateral hilar and right paratracheal lymphadenopathy. Bronchoscopic biopsies revealed non-caseating granuloma. She was diagnosed with sarcoidosis and was given prednisolone. The patient developed facial palsy and rapidly progressive ascending paralysis beginning from the lower extremities on the third and fourth days after initial presentation, respectively. Analysis of lumbar puncture showed acellular fluid with a high protein content. EMG was consistent with diffuse sensorimotor demyelinating polyneuropathy. Thus, the diagnosis was Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) presenting with sarcoidosis. Intravenous immune globulin was given and prednisolone stopped. One month after initial presentation the patient was completely recovered and discharged on prednisolone therapy. If neurologic symptoms such as aching discomfort and weakness are the main complaints in patients with suspected or biopsy proven sarcoidosis, GBS should be suspected.
Subject(s)
Guillain-Barre Syndrome/complications , Sarcoidosis/complications , Adult , Female , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Radiography, Thoracic , Sarcoidosis/diagnostic imaging , Thorax/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
Dipyrone, an effective analgesic drug, is widely used in the management of headache. However, few studies have evaluated its efficacy and safety in migraine. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of 1 g dipyrone (Novalgin, two 500 mg tablets) on pain and related symptoms in acute migraine attacks with or without aura in a double-blind, cross-over, randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-center study design. Seventy-three migraine with or without aura patients, diagnosed according to the IHS criteria, were randomized to receive dipyrone (for 2 attacks) and placebo (for 1 attack). Pain intensity was measured on a four-point verbal pain scale before and 1, 2, 4 and 24 hours after drug intake. Significant improvement of pain was achieved with dipyrone compared to placebo at all time points measured. Both patient and physician evaluations were significantly in favor of dipyrone. Side effects were few and trivial in both groups. We conclude that dipyrone is an effective, safe and cost-effective option in acute migraine management.
Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Dipyrone/therapeutic use , Migraine with Aura/drug therapy , Migraine without Aura/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chi-Square Distribution , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Migraine with Aura/complications , Migraine without Aura/complications , Pain Measurement , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess the comprehensibility, internal consistency, patient-physician reliability, test-retest reliability, and validity of Turkish version of Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire in patients with headache. BACKGROUND: MIDAS questionnaire has been developed by Stewart et al and shown to be reliable and valid to determine the degree of disability caused by migraine. DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was designed as a national multicenter study to demonstrate the reliability and validity of Turkish version of MIDAS questionnaire. Patients applying to 17 Neurology Clinics in Turkey were evaluated at the baseline (visit 1), week 4 (visit 2), and week 12 (visit 3) visits in terms of disease severity and comprehensibility, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity of MIDAS. Since the severity of the disease has been found to change significantly at visit 2 compared to visit 1, test-retest reliability was assessed using the MIDAS scores of a subgroup of patients whose disease severity remained unchanged (up to +/-3 days difference in the number of days with headache between visits 1 and 2). RESULTS: A total of 306 patients (86.2% female, mean age: 35.0 +/- 9.8 years) were enrolled into the study. A total of 65.7%, 77.5%, 82.0% of patients reported that "they had fully understood the MIDAS questionnaire" in visits 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A highly positive correlation was found between physician and patient and the applied total MIDAS scores in all three visits (Spearman correlation coefficients were R= 0.87, 0.83, and 0.90, respectively, P <.001). Internal consistency of MIDAS was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and was found at acceptable (>0.7) or excellent (>0.8) levels in both patient and physician applied MIDAS scores, respectively. Total MIDAS score showed good test-retest reliability (R= 0.68). Both the number of days with headache and the total MIDAS scores were positively correlated at all visits with correlation coefficients between 0.47 and 0.63. There was also a moderate degree of correlation (R= 0.54) between the total MIDAS score at week 12 and the number of days with headache at visit 2 + visit 3, which quantify headache-related disability over a 3-month period similar to MIDAS questionnaire. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrated that the Turkish translation is equivalent to the English version of MIDAS in terms of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity. Physicians can reliably use the Turkish translation of the MIDAS questionnaire in defining the severity of illness and its treatment strategy when applied as a self-administered report by migraine patients themselves.