Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory (HDI/T) in patients with cervicogenic headache.

PURPOSE: Cultural adaptation to Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory (HDI) and investigating the validity and reliability of this inventory. METHODS: International standards were followed in conducting the cultural adaption of Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory Turkish version (HDI-T). Test-Retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) were included in the psychometric assessments; Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to assess the structural validity; and construct validity was performed by examining relationship the HDI-T between the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT- 6), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Perceived Stress Scale-14 (PSS-14), and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). RESULTS: HDI-T showed excellent test-retest reliability (ICC =0.901), excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's a = 0.935), and low to high correlation with Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Perceived Stress Scale-14 (PSS-14) and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). Following EFA, two factors (emotional and functional) were extracted, accounting for 50.734% of the total variation. The dimensional structure of the HDI-T obtained in the EFA was confirmed by CFA. CONCLUSION: The HDI-T is a reliable and valid instrument to determine the symptoms and disability in the Turkish population with cervicogenic headaches.Implications for RehabilitationHenry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory Turkish version (HDI-T) is an outcome measure with high validity and reliability to obtain objective data in the determination of disability due to cervicogenic headache.HDI-T is recommended for all rehabilitation professionals to evaluate both the disability levels before rehabilitation and the changes during the rehabilitation process in patients with cervicogenic headaches in the Turkish population.Physiotherapists, orthopedists and neurosurgeons can also use HDI-T to objectively evaluate the secondary effects of their treatment for neck problems.

The Effects of Yoga and Stabilization Exercises in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Crossover Study.

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of yoga and stabilization exercises in patients with chronic low back pain. Thirty-five female patients were randomly assigned to the stabilization exercise group or the yoga group. Outcome measures were the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Back Performance Scale (BPS), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The scores of the VAS, ODI, BPS, 6MWT, and PSQI improved significantly after both interventions (P < .05). Improvements in the stabilization program were higher on the transversus abdominis activation (P < .05). Both interventions had no effect on kinesiophobia (P > .05). Both exercise approaches were found to be similarly effective on pain, function, metabolic capacity, and sleep quality.

Tele-Assessment of Functional Capacity: Validity, Intra- and Inter-rater Reliability.

BACKGROUND: Functional capacity evaluation is a standardized tool that assesses work-related skills. Although there are different test batteries, the most frequently used one is Work Well Systems. This study aims to determine the validity and inter- and intra-rater reliability of remote implementation of functional capacity tests (repetitive reaching, lifting object overhead, and working overhead) in asymptomatic individuals. METHODS: A total of 51 asymptomatic individuals were included in the study. Participants completed all tests both face-to-face and remotely. Remote assessment videos were rewatched by the same researcher and different researchers for intra- and inter-rater reliability. All processes were scored by two independent researchers. RESULTS: Remotely performing repetitive reaching (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.85-0.92, p < .001), lifting object overhead (ICC: 0.98, p < .001), and working overhead (ICC: 0.88 p < .001) tests are valid and reliable. DISCUSSION: Repetitive reaching, lifting an object overhead, and sustained overhead work tests in the Work Well Systems-Functional Capacity Evaluation test battery can be performed remotely through videoconferencing. Remotely evaluating these tests, which are especially important in work-related situations, may be important in pandemic conditions and hybrid working conitions.

Determination of cognitive status and influencing variables in patients with chronic neck pain: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate cognitive function in individuals with chronic neck pain (CNP) and investigate the effects of different variables on cognition. METHODS: The sociodemographic characteristics of the individuals who participated in this study were recorded. Pain intensity of the individuals was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale, pain-related disability was evaluated with the Neck Disability Index and cognitive function was evaluated using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). RESULTS: For this study, 95 patients with CNP were recruited. The mean age was 45.61 ± 11.14, and the median MoCA score was 24 (20-26), and 64.2% of the patients scored below the original cutoff (<26/30 points). The regression analysis showed that higher age and lower education levels were associated with lower MoCA scores. Education appeared to be the most influential variable. Younger participants (18-45) performed systematically better on naming, attention and language domains than their older counterparts (over 45). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that age and education play an important role in MoCA total and domain scores in these patients. While treating these patients, assessment of cognitive function can be useful for effective pain management.

Investigation of Joint Position Sense and Balance in Individuals With Chronic Idiopathic Neck Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between joint position sense and static and dynamic balance in female patients with chronic neck pain compared with healthy controls. METHODS: The study sample comprised 25 female patients with chronic neck pain and 25 healthy (asymptomatic) female controls. Pain severity with the visual analog scale, joint position sense with the laser pointer method, static balance with the Single-Leg Balance Test, and dynamic balance with the Y Balance Test were assessed. RESULTS: The deviation in cervical joint position sense was greater in extension (P < .001), right rotation (P < .001), and left lateral rotation (P < .05) in the patients with chronic neck pain compared with the healthy controls. The results of the patients with chronic neck pain were worse than the healthy controls in the Single-Leg Balance Test with both eyes open (P < .05) and eyes closed (P < .05). The patients with chronic neck pain had worse dynamic balance only in the anterior direction reach of the left leg (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Cervical joint position sense and static balance were worse in female patients with chronic idiopathic neck pain when compared with asymptomatic controls. Dynamic balance in all other directions except for the anterior direction was not negatively affected in individuals with chronic idiopathic neck pain.

Education level is a strong determinant of cognitive function as measured by MoCA in people with chronic low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Over recent years there has been increasing clinical interest in the relationship between chronic pain and cognitive function. There are very few studies on individuals with low back pain (LBP) in the literature, which has remained under-researched. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate cognitive function in individuals with chronic back pain and investigate the effects of different variables on cognition. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: In this study, 115 individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) participated. The sociodemographic characteristics of the individuals who participated were recorded, including age, sex, weight, height, education and pain duration. Pain intensity of the individuals was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale, functional status was evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index, and cognitive function was evaluated using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). RESULTS: One hundred fifteen individuals with CLBP were recruited. The mean age was 48.4±11.8, and the mean MoCA score was 22.9±4.4. MoCA scores were associated with education, age, gender and pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings obtained in the current study showed that individuals with CLBP had low MoCA scores and cognitive function was affected. In individuals with CLBP, cognitive function was affected depending on education level, age and intensity of pain. Assessment of the cognitive function in pain management can be useful for clinicians interested in LBP.

Is cervical region tightness related to vagal function and stomach symptoms?

The vagal nerve is a cranial nerve that carries mainly parasympathetic fibers (average 75%) with both sensory and motor functions. The vagal nerve contains a complex neuro-endocrine-immune network. The majority, at least 66%, of the gastric myenteric neurons receive direct cholinergic excitatory stimulation from the pre-enteric vagal nerve. Changes in vagal function may cause stomach problems, although the mechanisms that change the vagal function have not yet been fully illuminated. Considering the course of the vagal nerve in the cervical region, it is thought that conditions such as stiffness, tightness and decreased elasticity in this region may compress the vagal nerve andmay affect vagal function. According to this hypothesis, neuroinflammation and hyperalgesia may occur in the vagal nerve under mechanical pressure, resulting in increased complaints of pain and burning in the stomach increases. However, as the vagal nerve has various effects on the motility of the stomach and vagal dysfunction affects the motor function of the stomach, relaxation techniques applied to the soft tissues of the cervical region will provide mechanical relief in the nerve. Thus, the vagal nerve will be decompressed and be able to function optimally. According to our clinical observations, in patients whose soft tissues in the cervical region are relaxed, gastric symptoms are decreased. Based on research results and clinical experience, cervical region tightness can be considered to cause stomach problems through the vagal nerve, and soft tissue relaxation of the cervical region can be a promising treatment method for stomach symptoms.

Body awareness and chronic low back pain: validity and reliability study of Turkish version of body awareness rating scale

Background/aim: Previous studies reported that patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) had trouble describing senses or body functions. A questionnaire, the body awareness rating questionnaire (BARQ), was recently developed for assessing body awareness. The aim of the study was to develop a Turkish version of the BARQ and investigate the validity and reliability in patients with CLBP. Materials and methods: BARQ translated to Turkish with forward-backward method. Ninety-nine patients with CLBP and 101 healthy controls (HC) completed the BARQ-T. Fifty-one of patients with CLBP and HC repeated BARQ-T 3 days later. In addition to BARQ-T, Oswestry disability index (ODI), pain severity, short form 36 (SF-36) and Toronto alexithymia scale (TAS) were administered. Results: The current study found good-excellent Cronbach's alpha values for patients with CLBP (α: between 0.883­0.967) and acceptable-good Cronbach's alpha values for HC (α: between 0.649­0.825) in factors of BARQ-T. ICC values for test-retest validity were found to be good-excellent for patients with CLBP in all factors. BARQ-T was positively correlated with SF-36 and negatively correlated with ODI and TAS (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The study confirmed that the BARQ-T has acceptable validation and reliability in terms of pain perception and pain assessment in the Turkish CLBP community.

Rasch analysis of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: Turkish version, validity, and reliability study

Background/aim: The multidimensional evaluation of patients with chronic neck pain is important for planning the treatment program. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ). Materials and methods: The internal construct validity of the NBQ was examined by the fit of the data to the Rasch measurement model. External validity of the NBQ was evaluated by testing for expected associations of Rasch transformed NBQ score with the corresponding variables through the process of convergent validity. The reliability of the NBQ in terms of both internal consistency and test-retest reliability was assessed by the person separation index (PSI) and differential item functioning (DIF) by time effect. Results: It was determined that the questionnaire has 2 factors. None of the items of Factor 1 (F1) and Factor 2 (F2) showed DIF. The reliability of F1 (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89, PSI = 0.87) and F2 (Cronbach's alpha = 0.77, PSI = 0.87) was good with Cronbach's alpha and PSI. There was a good correlation between NBQ/F1 and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) (r = 0.673) and Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) (r = 0.709). Also, there was a correlation between NBQ/F2 and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (r = 0.552) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) (r = 0.410). Conclusion: The Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire is valid and reliable.