Effect of the menstrual cycle on standard achromatic and blue-on-yellow visual field analysis of women with migraine.

BACKGROUND: It has been postulated that migraine and glaucoma may have common vascular causative factors. Significant sex-based differences in the incidence of many important ocular conditions raise the possibility that estrogens may have direct effects on the eye. We performed a study to determine the effect of the menstrual cycle on standard achromatic automated perimetry (SAP) and short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) (blue-on-yellow perimetry) of women with migraine. METHODS: Both eyes of 73 normally menstruating women (31 subjects with migraine and 42 healthy control subjects) were included in the study. Subjects underwent a complete ocular examination including SAP and SWAP in both the follicular phase (12th to 13th day of the cycle) and the luteal phase (1 to 2 days before the onset of bleeding) of two consecutive menstrual cycles.We performed visual field analysis using the Humphrey Field Analyzer II with the full-threshold central 30-2 program. Mean sensitivity was calculated for the superior temporal, inferior temporal, superior nasal and inferior nasal regions separately. RESULTS: Thirteen subjects were lost to follow-up (5 in the migraine group and 8 in the control group), leaving 26 subjects and 34 subjects respectively. There was no significant difference in mean age between the two groups (33.9 years [standard deviation (SD) 3.4 years] vs. 35.1 years [SD 3.3 years]). The mean duration of migraine was 7.6 (SD 3.1) years (range 3-14 years). In both groups, serum estradiol levels were significantly lower (p = 0.001) and serum progesterone levels were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the luteal phase than in the follicular phase. In the control group, the mean sensitivity values with SWAP were significantly lower in the luteal phase than in the follicular phase (p = 0.04). A similar decrease was observed for the subjects with migraine with both SAP and SWAP (p = 0.01). There was no difference in regional mean sensitivity between the two phases with either perimetric test in the control group. For the subjects with migraine, there was no difference in regional mean sensitivity between the two phases with SAP. However, with SWAP, the mean sensitivity for the nasal visual field locations was significantly lower in the luteal phase than in the follicular phase (p = 0.01). INTERPRETATION: Our study provides further evidence of an effect of sex hormones on the visual field of women with migraine. In addition to assessment of intraocular pressure, menstrual cycle phases should be considered in women with migraine at risk for glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Menstrual cycle-dependent changes in visual field analysis of healthy women.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of menstrual cycle phases on the visual field analysis of healthy females. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One randomly selected eye each of 59 healthy normally menstruating women, and of 54 men with no systemic and ocular problems, other than refractive error, were included in the study. Subjects underwent complete ocular examination, and standard achromatic perimetric (SAP) and short-wavelength automated perimetric (SWAP) analysis in both follicular (7th to 10th day of the cycle) and luteal phases (days 3-7 before the menstrual bleeding) of the menstrual cycle. Visual field analysis was performed using a Model 750 Humphrey Field Analyzer II (Humphrey Instruments Inc., San Leandro, Calif., USA) with full-threshold, central 30-2 program. Visual fields were divided into four regions as superior temporal, inferior temporal, superior nasal and inferior nasal, respectively. RESULTS: The mean age of female (n = 59) and the male subjects (n = 54) were 34.6 +/- 2.9 and 35.0 +/- 2.7 years, respectively (p = 0.49). SWAP tests demonstrated a significantly decreased mean MS value in the luteal phase (p < 0.05). However, it did not change significantly with SAP tests. Regional MS values of both SAP and SWAP tests were not different in both phases of the menstrual cycle (all p values >0.05). Mean perimetric test durations obtained with both SAP and SWAP were not different throughout the menstrual cycle (both p values >0.05). CONCLUSION: Clinicians should verify menstrual status when evaluating a suspected loss of visual field sensitivity in menstruating women. The findings of the present study suggest that the SWAP test may be more sensitive to determine subtle sex hormone-dependent changes in visual field analysis of healthy women.

Menstrual cycle dependent changes in blue-on-yellow visual field analysis of young diabetic women with severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate menstrual cycle dependent changes on blue-on-yellow visual fields of diabetic women, and to compare the results with those of healthy women. METHODS: Left eyes of 93 normally menstruating women were included in the study, comprising 45 with type-1 diabetes mellitus and severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy and 48 healthy controls. All subjects underwent baseline complete ocular examination and achromatic visual field analysis. Blue-on-yellow visual field tests (short-wavelength automated perimetry) were performed in both follicular (days 7-10 of the cycle) and luteal phases (days 3-6 before the bleeding) of two consecutive menstrual cycles. Visual field analyses were performed using Humphrey Field Analyser II with full threshold, central 30-2 program. Visual fields were divided into four regions: superior temporal, inferior temporal, superior nasal and inferior nasal. Visual field mean sensitivity (MS) was calculated for all regions separately. RESULTS: The mean ages of diabetic and control subjects were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Mean MS values of the diabetic group were significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Control subjects did not demonstrate any menstrual cycle dependent changes in MS values (P > 0.05). However, diabetic women demonstrated a significant decrease in MS values in the luteal phase (P < 0.05). The decrease in MS was most marked in the nasal visual field (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Young diabetic women demonstrated a significant depression in visual field threshold sensitivity in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Nasal visual fields are more prone to have menstrual cycle dependent threshold sensitivity depression. This should be taken into consideration in the clinical assessment of women with advanced diabetes who are at risk of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.