Loss of POLE3-POLE4 unleashes replicative gap accumulation upon treatment with PARP inhibitors.

The advent of PARP inhibitors (PARPis) has profoundly changed the treatment landscape of BRCA1/BRCA2-mutated cancers. Despite this, the development of resistance to these compounds has become a major challenge. Hence, a detailed understanding of the mechanisms underlying PARPi sensitivity is crucially needed. Here, we show that loss of the POLE3-POLE4 subunits of DNA polymerase epsilon (Polε) strongly sensitizes cancer cells to PARPis in a Polε level-independent manner. Loss of POLE3-POLE4 is not associated with defective RAD51 foci formation, excluding a major defect in homologous recombination. On the contrary, treatment with PARPis triggers replicative gap accumulation in POLE3-POLE4 knockout (KO) cells in a PRIMPOL-dependent manner. In addition to this, the loss of POLE3-POLE4 further sensitizes BRCA1-silenced cells to PARPis. Importantly, the knockdown of 53BP1 does not rescue PARPi sensitivity in POLE3-POLE4 KO cells, bypassing a common PARPi resistance mechanism and outlining a potential strategy to sensitize cancer cells to PARPis.

The linker histone H1-BRCA1 axis is a crucial mediator of replication fork stability.

The maintenance of genome integrity relies on replication fork stabilization upon encountering endogenous and exogenous sources of DNA damage. How this process is coordinated with the local chromatin environment remains poorly defined. Here, we show that the replication-dependent histone H1 variants interact with the tumour suppressor BRCA1 in a replication stress-dependent manner. Transient loss of the replication-dependent histones H1 does not affect fork progression in unchallenged conditions but leads to the accumulation of stalled replication intermediates. Upon challenge with hydroxyurea, cells deficient for histone H1 variants fail to recruit BRCA1 to stalled replication forks and undergo MRE11-dependent fork resection and collapse, which ultimately leads to genomic instability and cell death. In summary, our work defines an essential role of the replication-dependent histone H1 variants in mediating BRCA1-dependent fork protection and genome stability.

Microtubule-associated proteins MAP7 and MAP7D1 promote DNA double-strand break repair in the G1 cell cycle phase.

The DNA-damage response is a complex signaling network that guards genomic integrity. The microtubule cytoskeleton is involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks; however, little is known about which cytoskeleton-related proteins are involved in DNA repair and how. Using quantitative proteomics, we discovered that microtubule associated proteins MAP7 and MAP7D1 interact with several DNA repair proteins including DNA double-strand break repair proteins RAD50, BRCA1 and 53BP1. We observed that downregulation of MAP7 and MAP7D1 leads to increased phosphorylation of p53 after γ-irradiation. Moreover, we determined that the downregulation of MAP7D1 leads to a strong G1 arrest and that the downregulation of MAP7 and MAP7D1 in G1 arrested cells negatively affects DNA repair, recruitment of RAD50 to chromatin and localization of 53BP1 to the sites of damage. These findings describe for the first time a novel function of MAP7 and MAP7D1 in cell cycle regulation and repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

Assessing BRCA1 activity in DNA damage repair using human induced pluripotent stem cells as an approach to assist classification of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance.

Establishing a universally applicable protocol to assess the impact of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) expression is a problem which has yet to be resolved despite major progresses have been made. The numerous difficulties which must be overcome include the choices of cellular models and functional assays. We hypothesised that the use of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells might facilitate the standardisation of protocols for classification, and could better model the disease process. We generated eight iPS cell lines from patient samples expressing either BRCA1 pathogenic variants, non-pathogenic variants, or BRCA1 VUSs. The impact of these variants on DNA damage repair was examined using a ɣH2AX foci formation assay, a Homologous Repair (HR) reporter assay, and a chromosome abnormality assay. Finally, all lines were tested for their ability to differentiate into mammary lineages in vitro. While the results obtained from the two BRCA1 pathogenic variants were consistent with published data, some other variants exhibited differences. The most striking of these was the BRCA1 variant Y856H (classified as benign), which was unexpectedly found to present a faulty HR repair pathway, a finding linked to the presence of an additional variant in the ATM gene. Finally, all lines were able to differentiate first into mammospheres, and then into more advanced mammary lineages expressing luminal- or basal-specific markers. This study stresses that BRCA1 genetic analysis alone is insufficient to establish a reliable and functional classification for assessment of clinical risk, and that it cannot be performed without considering the other genetic aberrations which may be present in patients. The study also provides promising opportunities for elucidating the physiopathology and clinical evolution of breast cancer, by using iPS cells.