ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the ratio of fluoroquinolone (FQ) exposure before the diagnosis of patients with a new case of active pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) and to investigate the correlation of this treatment with the emergence of FQ-resistant strains. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective comparative case series study, a total of 132 patients, who had been diagnosed with adult, culture-positive, active pulmonary TB were reviewed. The FQ group had 30 patients who had had ≥1 time and ≥7 days of FQ exposure within 1 year before the diagnoses. The control group included an equal number of patients with TB with similar demographic characteristics (non-FQ group). Ofloxacin (OFX) and moxifloxacin (MFX) resistance were examined at 2 different concentrations (2 and 4 mg/L for OFX; 0.25 and 0.5 mg/L for MFX). RESULTS: Of the 132 patients, 30 (22%) had 7 days or longer of FQ monotherapy within 1 year of initiation of anti-TB treatment. FQ resistance was detected in 2 (3.3%) patients. In the FQ group, MFX resistance at 0.25 mg/L concentration was observed in 1 patient, whereas another patient had OFX and MFX resistance at 4 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L concentrations, respectively. In the non-FQ group, no FQ resistance was detected in any of the patients. No statistically significant difference in terms of development of FQ resistance was found between the ratios of FQ and non-FQ groups (p=0.492). Although there was no statistically significant difference, 2 patients, in whom resistance was detected, had FQ exposure before their diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The FQ exposure ratio before the diagnosis is high (22%) in this cohort that includes patients with new active pulmonary TB, and the presence of patients with FQ resistance (even if only a few) should be a noteworthy and cautionary result in terms of FQ exposure and resistance development.
ABSTRACT
AIM: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), which enables cytological examination of mediastinal lymph node (LN) aspiration samples, is a safe and minimally invasive method for diagnosis and staging of lung cancer and diagnosis of diseases affecting mediastinal LNs. In this study, we investigated the yield of EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis of lymphoma and reviewed the literature since the British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines were published. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated our database for patients who underwent EBUS between March 2011 and December 2014. One hundred eighty-nine patients with isolated mediastinal lymphadenopathy were included in the study. Patients with other causes of lymphadenopathy, such as lung cancer or extrathoracic malignancy, and those with pulmonary lesions accompanying mediastinal lymphadenopathy were excluded from the study. Patients with final diagnosed lymphoma were included in the study on the basis of a history of lymphoma or newly evaluated mediastinal lymphadenopathy. The sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of EBUS-TBNA were calculated. RESULTS: There were 13 patients with the final diagnosis of lymphoma. Eleven of them were new diagnoses and 2 patients were known chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and underwent EBUS-TBNA for determination of recurrence. Twelve EBUS-TBNA procedures were performed for suspected new cases. Three (25%) were diagnostic, 2 (16.7%) were suspicious for lymphoma and underwent further interventions for definite diagnosis, and 7 (58.3%) were false negative. All 3 patients diagnosed with EBUS-TBNA were non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). None of the Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) cases could be diagnosed with EBUS-TBNA. The overall diagnostic sensitivity and NPV of EBUS-TBNA in detecting lymphoma was 65% and 96.1%, respectively. For the newly diagnosed lymphoma cases, EBUS-TBNA had a sensitivity of 61.1%. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we believe that since the publication of the BTS guidelines, the value of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of lymphoma still remains controversial. EBUS-TBNA can be the first diagnostic modality in diagnosis of recurrent lymphomas. However, for suspected new cases, especially for HL, the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA is low and negative results do not exclude lymphoma. Further interventions such as mediastinoscopy should be performed for high-suspicion patients.
ABSTRACT
AIM: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a safe and minimally invasive procedure that can be performed in outpatient settings. Several studies have demonstrated the usefulness of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and malignant diseases. This study focused on the role of cell block (CB) analysis in determining the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA in malignant diseases and sarcoidosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted at a training and research hospital. Records of patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA between March 2011 and December 2014 for diagnosed sarcoidosis or malignancy were retrospectively analyzed. Results of all EBUS-TBNA smears and CB were separately evaluated to determine the diagnostic value of each. RESULTS: There were 84 sarcoidosis and 179 malignancy patients. In the malignancy group, CB contributed to cancer diagnosis in 15 (8.3%) patients and subclassification in 19 (10.6%) patients. In the sarcoidosis group, for 45.2% of patients (38/84), smears were not diagnostic but CB showed granulomatous inflammation. CONCLUSION: CB significantly increases the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA for sarcoidosis. In our study, in the malignancy group the diagnostic yield was low but it was helpful for subclassification, especially for adenocarcinoma.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is being increasingly used in hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients but the most appropriate ventilation mode is still not known. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate if assisted pressure-controlled ventilation (APCV) can be a better alternative to pressure-support ventilation (PSV) for NIV in COPD patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF). METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, we evaluated the early effects of noninvasive APCV and PSV in 34 consecutive COPD patients with AHRF. Patients were randomized into 1 of the 2 modes, and respiratory and hemodynamic values were compared before and after 1 h of NIV. RESULTS: Baseline values did not differ between the 2 groups. There were significant improvements in partial arterial carbon dioxide pressure and pH levels in the APCV group when compared with baseline (p < 0.05). Cardiac output and cardiac index decreased in both groups (p < 0.05) but more significantly in the PSV group (p < 0.0001). The decreases in stroke volume index and increases in arterial oxygen content after NIV were also considerable in both groups (p < 0.05). Central venous pressure and systemic vascular resistance index values increased notably only after PSV (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: From these data, we deduce that APCV can be a better alternative to PSV for NIV in COPD patients with AHRF owing to its more beneficial physiological effects.
