ABSTRACT
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of keratinized mucosa width (KMW) and mucosal thickness (MT) around dental implants on marginal bone loss (MBL). The evaluation was performed one year after loading by comparing clinical, radiographic, and biochemical parameters. Methods: The study included 87 implants in 87 patients undergoing regular follow-ups without hard or soft tissue augmentation one year after loading. Clinical measurements included plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BoP), probing depth (PD), KMW, and MT. MBL was assessed with periapical radiography. The peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) was analyzed for tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and microRNA-27a. Results: The MBL of implants with thin MT (<2 mm) was higher than that of implants with thick MT (≥2 mm) (p < 0.05). A significant negative correlation (r: -0.217) was established between MT and MBL. No significant association was found between KMW and MBL (p > 0.05). No significant associations was found between KMW and MT with TNF-α, RANKL, OPG and RANKL/OPG (p > 0.05), with the exception of increased microRNA-27a levels in implants with KMW ≥ 2 mm (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Implants with a thick MT had a lower MBL. There may be an association between adequate KMW and high miRNA-27a levels. The relationship between MBL and miRNA-27a remains unclear.
ABSTRACT
Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and completeness of the answers given by Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) (OpenAI OpCo, LLC, San Francisco, CA), to the most frequently asked questions on different topics in the field of periodontology. Methods The 10 most frequently asked questions by patients about seven different topics (periodontal diseases, peri-implant diseases, tooth sensitivity, gingival recessions, halitosis, dental implants, and periodontal surgery) in periodontology were created by ChatGPT. To obtain responses, a set of 70 questions was submitted to ChatGPT, with an allocation of 10 questions per subject. The responses that were documented were assessed using two distinct Likert scales by professionals specializing in the subject of periodontology. The accuracy of the responses was rated on a Likert scale ranging from one to six, while the completeness of the responses was rated on a scale ranging from one to three. Results The median accuracy score for all responses was six, while the completeness score was two. The mean scores for accuracy and completeness were 5.50 ± 0.23 and 2.34 ± 0.24, respectively. It was observed that ChatGPT's responses to the most frequently asked questions by patients for information purposes in periodontology were at least "nearly completely correct" in terms of accuracy and "adequate" in terms of completeness. There was a statistically significant difference between subjects in terms of accuracy and completeness (P<0.05). The highest and lowest accuracy scores were peri-implant diseases and gingival recession, respectively, while the highest and lowest completeness scores were gingival recession and dental implants, respectively. Conclusions The utilization of large language models has become increasingly prevalent, extending its applicability to patients within the healthcare domain. While ChatGPT may not offer absolute precision and comprehensive results without expert supervision, it is apparent that those within the field of periodontology can utilize it as an informational resource, albeit acknowledging the potential for inaccuracies.
ABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the treatment efficacy of the bilateral multiple gingival recession areas with a titanium-platelet-rich-fibrin (T-PRF) and subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) combined with a modified coronal advanced flap (MCAF) and the clinical results. METHOD: In the study, 118 maxillary bilateral multiple Miller I recessions were treated. Gingival index, plaque index, probing pocket depth, gingival thickness, recession height, recession width, keratinized gingival width and open root surface area were measured at baseline and at 6 months. Postoperative pain levels Visual Analog Scale, healing status, wound healing index evaluated with. The results of both groups pre and postoperative were compared. RESULTS: The initial recession height was 2.15 ± 1.0 mm in the T-PRF group; 2.04 ± 0.80 mm in the SCTG group. After 6 months, the mean root closure rate was 61.77%, 75.31% in T-PRF and SCTG group, respectively. Clinical attachment gain was achieved in both groups compared to baseline. When the results were compared, the gains achieved in the SCTG group were statistically significantly higher. It was determined that patient satisfaction was higher in T-PRF group and wound healing was faster. CONCLUSION: Considering the advantages of T-PRF such as providing effective results in the treatment of defects, patient satisfaction and rapid recovery; It can be applied as an alternative to SCTG. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: T-PRF can be an alternative to SCTG in the treatment of gingival recessions.
