Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 279(2): 987-994, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33956207

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: There is still no widely-accepted local agent proven to be effective in nerve regeneration. We aimed to investigate the effects of chitosan gel and platelet-rich plasma MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electrophysiological measurements were performed before and immediately after injury. The injured nerves were covered with spongostan impregnated with the following agents: Group 1 (Control Group): Saline at a dose of 50 µl; Group 2: Chitosan (CHT) at a dose of 50 µl; Group 3: PRP at a dose of 50 ml; and Group 4: a solution of CHT with PRP (1:1). The final measurements were performed after 3 weeks and the injured nerve of each rat was removed. RESULTS: There were statistically-significant differences between the groups regarding the measurements of the after-treatment values of stimulus threshold (p < 0.05). The best improvement in electrophysiological measurement and histopathological evaluation was found in Group 4 (CHT-PRP). CONCLUSION: Chitosan gel has a positive effect on nerve healing and applying it along with PRP can enhance the effect of chitosan.


Subject(s)
Chitosan , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Facial Nerve , Nerve Regeneration , Rats
3.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 73(9): 1747-1757, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32278659

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Capsular contracture remains a problem following breast implant surgery. Although impact of biofilm and implant surface on capsule formation has been demonstrated, interaction of microorganisms with different surface types has not been clarified yet. We aimed to compare the ability of biofilm formation of implants with different surfaces, under standard conditions and to demonstrate its impact on capsular contracture. METHODS: Twenty-four rats were divided into four groups. Mini-implants with three different surfaces (fine-textured, rough-textured and polyurethane) were placed on the dorsum of each rat. In Group-1, sterile implants were placed in submuscular pockets. In Group-2, implants were incubated in Staphylococcus epidermidis medium before implantation. In Group-3, before implantation, implants were immersed in Rifamycin solution following bacterial contamination. In Group-4, sterile implants were immersed in Rifamycin solution before implantation, and served as the control group. Rats were sacrificed at three months. Clinical, microbiological, histological and immunohistochemical evaluations were performed. RESULTS: Capsule contracture developed only on infected rough-textured implants. Rough-textured and polyurethane implants showed more biofilm formation than fine-textured implants. Capsule thickness and inflammatory cell density were higher on rough-textured implants compared to fine-textured implants (p = 0.004). Actin sequence was parallel and concentric on fine-textured and rough-textured implants; but was in irregular array on polyurethane implants. CONCLUSION: In presence of bacterial contamination, rough-textured implants have the most propensity of developing capsular contracture comparing to fine-textured and polyurethane implants at three months after implantation. Despite high bacterial load and biofilm formation, polyurethane implants are resistant to capsule contracture due to surface characteristics.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Breast Implants , Implant Capsular Contracture/microbiology , Prosthesis Design , Surface Properties , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Polyurethanes , Rats, Long-Evans , Rifamycins/pharmacology , Staphylococcus epidermidis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...