ABSTRACT
AIM: The present study aimed to compare the effects of different routes of salbutamol administration (oral and nebulized) at different doses in a cecal ligation and puncture-induced (CLP-induced) sepsis model of rats. METHODS: Rats were separated into 8 groups: 1) sham, 2) sham+4 mg/kg oral salbutamol, 3) sham+6 min 2 mg/ml nebulized salbutamol, 4) CLP, 5) CLP+2 mg/kg oral salbutamol, 6) CLP+4 mg/kg oral salbutamol, 7) CLP+3 min 2 mg/ml nebulized salbutamol, 8) CLP+6 min 2 mg/ml nebulized salbutamol. Subsequently, sepsis was induced by CLP through 16 h. RESULTS: CLP-induced sepsis increased serum cytokine levels (TNF-α, IL-1ß, and IL-6), increased tissue oxidative stress (8-Isoprosraglandin F2α), decreased antioxidant parameters (SOD, GSH), and increased lung injury by inflammatory cell accumulation. CONCLUSION: This study showed for the first time that oral administration of salbutamol exerted protective effects on CLP-induced sepsis and related lung injury in rats. We conclude that despite the greater side effects of oral salbutamol, it should be considered for administration in oral form due to its systemic effectiveness during septic conditions in emergency settings.
Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use , Albuterol/therapeutic use , Sepsis/prevention & control , Administration, Inhalation , Administration, Oral , Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , Albuterol/administration & dosage , Animals , Antioxidants/metabolism , Cytokines/blood , Disease Models, Animal , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Inflammation/complications , Inflammation/prevention & control , Lung Injury/complications , Lung Injury/pathology , Male , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Rats , Sepsis/bloodABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Renal transplantation (RT) is the most appropriate form of treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Pre-emptive RT decreases the rates of delayed graft function and acute rejection episodes, increasing patient and graft survival, while reducing costs and complications associated with dialysis. In this study, we investigated the relationship between a predialysis education program (PDEP) for patients and their relatives and pre-emptive RT. METHODS: We divided 88 live donor kidney transplant recipients into 2 groups: transplantation without education (non-PDEP group; n = 27), and enrollment in an education program before RT (PDEP group n = 61). RESULTS: Five patients in the non-PDEP group underwent pre-emptive transplantation, versus 26 of the PDEP group. The rate of pre-emptive transplantations was significantly higher among the educated (42.62%) versus the noneducated group (18.51%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: PDEP increased the number of pre-emptive kidney transplantations among ESRD patients.
