Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aerosp Med Hum Perform ; 95(6): 333-336, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38790123

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the literature, central serous retinopathy (CSR) accompanying solitary fibrous tumors (SFT) in a pilot has not been reported. In airline pilots, mass effect-related symptoms such as diplopia, ptosis, etc., seen with orbital tumors may endanger flight safety.CASE REPORT: A 62-yr-old male commercial airline pilot presented with blurred vision in the right eye. He had been receiving treatment for 2 mo because of CSR. His visual acuity was 10/20 in the right eye and 20/20 in the left. During examination, ptosis and exophthalmos were noticed in the right eye. Ocular movements were free in all cardinal directions and there was downward displacement in the right eye. There was no diplopia. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 1.5- to 2-cm well-defined contrast-enhancing mass in the lateral extraconal orbit. His medical flight certificate was suspended for 3 mo due to decreased visual acuity and superior visual defect. Superior orbitotomy was performed without any complication. Ptosis and CSR had regressed 1 wk after surgery. All systemic and ophthalmological examinations met aviation medical certificate requirements. He returned to flight on the condition of being checked every 3 mo. At the 1-yr follow-up, there was no sign of recurrences of SFT or CSR.DISCUSSION: SFTs are slow-growing neoplasms that can manifest symptoms related to mass effect. In the current literature, there are no reported cases of the coexistence of orbital SFT and CSR or pilots able to resume flight duties only 1 wk after a successful orbitotomy and tumor resection surgery.Altinbas M, Ozpinar A, Akbaba M, Nacaroglu SA, Sargolzaeimoghaddam M, Sargolzaeimoghaddam M. Orbital solitary fibrous tumor in a commercial airline pilot. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(6):333-336.


Subject(s)
Aerospace Medicine , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Orbital Neoplasms , Pilots , Solitary Fibrous Tumors , Humans , Male , Solitary Fibrous Tumors/surgery , Solitary Fibrous Tumors/diagnostic imaging , Solitary Fibrous Tumors/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Orbital Neoplasms/surgery , Orbital Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Orbital Neoplasms/diagnosis , Visual Acuity/physiology , Vision Disorders/etiology
2.
J Refract Surg ; 39(8): 524-530, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37578176

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcomes of bilateral implantation of two commercially available trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOL; Alcon Laboratories, Inc and AcrivaUD Trinova IOL; VSY Biotechnology). METHODS: This comparative, investigator-initiated, single-center randomized trial was conducted by the Department of Ophthalmology of the Medipol Mega University Hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. Adult patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio using a block randomization program to undergo cataract surgery and receive the implantation of either the PanOptix or Trinova IOL in both eyes. Outcome measures including binocular uncorrected and corrected visual acuities at distance, intermediate (66 cm), and near (40 cm), defocus curve, refractive outcomes, contrast sensitivity, glare and halos, and patient satisfaction were assessed at a minimum of 3 months following bilateral IOL implantation. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients (142 eyes) were included, with 35 patients (70 eyes) in the PanOptix IOL group and 36 patients (72 eyes) in the Trinova IOL group. At the 3-month follow-up examination, mean distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (primary endpoint) was significantly better for the PanOptix IOL group (0.0 ± 0.09 logMAR) compared with the Trinova IOL group (0.01 ± 0.10 logMAR) (P = .0304). Mean logMAR uncorrected intermediate acuity (UIVA) and near (UNVA) visual acuity were also significantly better for the PanOptix IOL group (UIVA = 0.1 ± 0.10 logMAR; UNVA= 0.0 ± 0.09 logMAR) compared with the Trinova IOL group (UIVA = 0.2 ± 0.10 logMAR; UNVA = 0.2 ± 0.11 logMAR) (both P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in all other outcomes between groups. No adverse events were reported in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the PanOptix IOL provides better intermediate and near visual outcomes compared to the Trinova IOL and represents a good choice for patients seeking to achieve spectacle independence. [ J Refract Surg. 2023;39(8):524-530.].


Subject(s)
Lenses, Intraocular , Phacoemulsification , Adult , Humans , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methods , Pseudophakia/surgery , Eyeglasses , Refraction, Ocular , Visual Acuity , Patient Satisfaction , Prosthesis Design
3.
Curr Eye Res ; 46(5): 630-637, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33599172

ABSTRACT

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the one-year clinical results of an allograft corneal inlay (ACI) implantation in a case series of 28 hyperopic eyes of 16 patients.Methods: Patients with manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) between +1.00 and +6.00 D and having a cylindrical refraction of less than 1 D were included in this prospective study. The refractive powers of excimer laser-shaped ACIs were determined based on the refractive error of the individual subject's eyes. After the creation of a femtosecond flap, the inlays were centered on the pupillary axis. Visual acuities, refractive results, and other clinical findings were reported for the 6- and 12-month follow-up exams.Results: The mean age of the patients included in the study was 36.2 ± 12.4 years (range 22-65 years). The mean pre-operative MSRE of 3.6 ± 1.51 D decreased to 0.21 ± 0.56 D (P < .001). The uncorrected distance and near visual acuity increased from 0.33 ± 0.22 and 0.17 ± 0.13 to 0.75 ± 0.22 (P < .001) and 0.72 ± 0.19 (P < .001), respectively. The corrected distance visual acuity remained unchanged (pre-OP: 0.79 ± 0.22; post-OP: 0.80 ± 0.21; P = .916), and the corrected near visual acuity increased from 0.78 ± 0.22 to 0.84 ± 0.20 (P = .003). The mean K-value and central corneal thickness increased from 42.57 ± 0.81 D and 557.5 ± 43.0 µm to 44.8 ± 1.4 D (P < .001) and 597.1 ± 58.1 µm (P < .001), respectively. No significant postoperative complications such as diffuse lamellar keratitis, epithelial ingrowth, or decentralization were observed.Conclusion: Excimer laser-shaped ACI offers an alternative treatment modality for patients with hyperopia. Acceptable visual results and similar regression rates were observed with ACI implantation compared with other laser refractive procedures.


Subject(s)
Corneal Stroma/transplantation , Hyperopia/surgery , Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ/methods , Lasers, Excimer/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Allografts , Corneal Stroma/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hyperopia/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Slit Lamp Microscopy , Surgical Flaps , Visual Acuity/physiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...