ABSTRACT
Aim: To evaluate clinicians' and patients' perceptions of pharmacogenetic testing in a clinical setting. Materials & methods: This is a pragmatic mixed-method prospective observational study. Hospital pharmacists and neurologists participated in focus groups regarding pharmacogenetic testing; patients who received pharmacogenetic testing and their community pharmacists completed surveys to assess their perception of these tests. Results: Most study participants had a positive view of pharmacogenetic testing. Three major themes were identified from the focus groups: receptiveness to pharmacogenetic testing, pharmacogenetic test characteristics and integrating pharmacogenetic tests into practice. Conclusion: The views reported are encouraging for the eventual implementation of pharmacogenetics in practice. Local integration of these tests is an essential step to improve patient care through personalized medicine.
Genetic tests can help predict patients' response to medication. This study aimed to evaluate clinicians' and patients' perceptions of these genetic tests. Pediatric patients, with epilepsy, were tested and completed a survey to assess their perception of these tests. A survey was also completed by their community pharmacists, and virtual discussion groups were held with hospital pharmacists and neurologists. Most participants had a positive view of these tests, with three major themes identified from the discussion groups: receptiveness to testing, test characteristics and integration of tests into practice. The views reported are encouraging for the eventual implementation of these tests in practice, an essential step to improve patient care through personalized medicine.
Subject(s)
Neurology , Pharmacogenomic Testing , Attitude of Health Personnel , Child , Humans , Pharmacists , PharmacogeneticsABSTRACT
Mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) is a rare type of acute leukemia where blasts present phenotypes from more than one lineage. A poor prognostic has been associated with this disease, and limited data are currently available to guide the choice of therapy. Regarding FLT3-positive MPAL, only one case treated with midostaurin has been published to date. Here, we report the successful use of midostaurin to treat three FLT3-positive MPAL T/myeloid and B/myeloid patients. Midostaurin was successfully added to intensive induction (two patients) and consolidation chemotherapy (three patients) without significant adverse events requiring a dose adjustment or discontinuation. The therapy received resulted in complete remission for two patients and complete remission with an incomplete hematologic recovery for the third. All patients proceeded to HSCT and stayed in remission after an extended follow-up respectively at 28, 31, and 11 months later. These results suggest that the addition of midostaurin during induction and consolidation therapy may represent a treatment option for FLT3-positive MPAL.
