Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Autoimmune Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in connective tissue disease associated with interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). METHODS: We performed a multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients with CTD-ILD receiving rituximab between 2015 and 2020. The patients were assessed using high-resolution computed tomography and pulmonary function tests at baseline, at 12 months, and at the end of follow-up. The main outcome measure at the end of follow-up was forced vital capacity (FVC) > 10% or diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) > 15% and radiological progression or death. We recorded clinical characteristics, time to initiation of RTX, concomitant treatment, infections, and hospitalization. A Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with worsening ILD. RESULTS: We included 37 patients with CTD-ILD treated with RTX for a median (IQR) of 38.2 (17.7-69.0) months. At the end of the follow-up, disease had improved or stabilized in 23 patients (62.1%) and worsened in seven (18.9%); seven patients (18.9%) died. No significant decline was observed in median FVC (72.2 vs. 70.8; p = 0.530) or DLCO (55.9 vs. 52.2; p = 0.100). The multivariate analysis showed the independent predictors for worsening of CTD-ILD to be baseline DLCO (OR (95% CI), 0.904 (0.8-0.9); p = 0.015), time to initiation of RTX (1.01 (1.001-1.02); p = 0.029), and mycophenolate (0.202 (0.04-0.8); p = 0.034). Only 28 of the 37 patients (75.6%) were still undergoing treatment with RTX: two patients (5.4%) stopped treatment due to adverse events and seven patients (18.9%) died owing to progression of ILD and superinfection. CONCLUSION: Lung function improved or stabilized in more than half of patients with CTD-ILD treated with RTX. Early treatment and combination with mycophenolate could reduce the risk of progression of ILD.

Characteristics and Predictors of Progression Interstitial Lung Disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis Compared with Other Autoimmune Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics and progression of interstitial lung disease in patients with associated systemic autoimmune disease (ILD-SAI) and to identify factors associated with progression and mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective, observational study of patients with ILD-SAI followed between 2015 and 2020. We collected clinical data and performed pulmonary function testing and high-resolution computed tomography at diagnosis and at the final visit. The main outcome measure at the end of follow-up was forced vital capacity (FVC) >10% or diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide >15% and radiological progression or death. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with worsening of ILD. RESULTS: We included 204 patients with ILD-SAI: 123 (60.3%) had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 58 had (28.4%) systemic sclerosis, and 23 (11.3%) had inflammatory myopathy. After a median (IQR) period of 56 (29.8-93.3) months, lung disease had stabilized in 98 patients (48%), improved in 33 (16.1%), and worsened in 44 (21.5%). A total of 29 patients (14.2%) died. Progression and hospitalization were more frequent in patients with RA (p = 0.010). The multivariate analysis showed the independent predictors for worsening of ILD-SAI to be RA (HR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.3-2.7]), usual interstitial pneumonia pattern (HR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.0-2.9]), FVC (%) (HR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.4-3.9]), and smoking (HR, 2.7 [95%CI, 1.6-4.7]). CONCLUSION: Disease stabilizes or improves after a median of 5 years in more than half of patients with ILD-SAI, although more than one-third die. Data on subgroups and risk factors could help us to predict poorer outcomes.

Análisis de las características clínico-analíticas de pacientes con artritis reumatoide y enfermedad pulmonar intersticial: casos y controles / Analysis of Clinical-Analytical Characteristics in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Interstitial Lung Disease: Case-Control Study

Objetivos: Estudiar las diferencias en pacientes con artritis reumatoide (AR) y enfermedad pulmonar intersticial (EPID) y pacientes con AR sin EPID, e identificar factores asociados con la EPID en pacientes con AR. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio observacional de casos y controles. Pacientes: se seleccionaron pacientes de una cohorte con AR y EPID de diferentes centros de Andalucía. Controles: pacientes con AR sin EPID pareados por edad, género y tiempo de evolución. Protocolo: los pacientes con AR se revisan cada 3-6meses en consulta. Todos los pacientes son revisados de acuerdo con un protocolo predeterminado con recogida de datos sistemática. Desenlaces: descripción del tipo radiológico de EPID, diferencias en los marcadores de gravedad en casos y controles y en la actividad de la enfermedad. Otras variables: descripción del tipo de EPID por TACAR: neumonía intersticial usual (NIU), neumonía intersticial no específica (NINE) y de la función pulmonar por PFR; marcadores de actividad y gravedad de artritis: DAS28, HAQ, FR, ACPA, erosiones. Tratamiento con FAME. Análisis: descriptivo, χ2 o t de Student, seguida de regresión logística binaria (Vd:EPID en pacientes con AR). Resultados: Se incluyeron 82 pacientes: 41 con AR y EPID y 41 controles AR sin EPID. Los pacientes con EPID presentaron un mayor porcentaje de pacientes con FR y ACPA positivos y una mayor frecuencia de serositis y osteoporosis. No hubo diferencias significativas en DAS28 en casos y controles(p=0,145), pero los pacientes de AR con EPID presentaron peor HAQ (p=0,006). Todos los pacientes estaban en tratamiento con FAME. El análisis multivariante mostró que los pacientes con AR exfumadores y con artritis erosiva triplicaron el riesgo de presentar EPID (R2=0,36). Conclusiones: Los resultados de nuestro estudio apoyan la mayor frecuencia de NIU y NINE en pacientes con AR, así como la alteración de DLCO como el parámetro más importante.(AU)

Objectives: To study the differences between rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients and RA patients without ILD in severity markers and disease activity and to identify factors associated with the presence of ILD in RA patients. Patients and methods: Patients: RA-ILD patients selected from a multicentre cohort in Andalusia, Spain. Controls: RA-patients without ILD paired by sex, age and disease duration. Protocol: RA patients are reviewed every 3-6months in rheumatology consultation. All patients are reviewed according to a predetermined protocol with systematic data collection. Outcomes: description of ILD type, differences in severity markers and disease activity in both groups. Other variables: ILD type by imaging technique (HRCT): nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP)/usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Lung function by PTF. Activity and severity markers of arthritis by DAS28-ESR, HAQ, RF, ACPA and erosions. Treatment with DMARD. Statistical analysis: descriptive and paired T-test or Chi-square test followed by binary logistic regression (DV: ILD in patients with RA). Results: Eighty-two patients were included, 41 RA-ILD and 41 RA controls. RF and ACPA positivity, serositis and osteoporosis were more frequent in RA-ILD patients. No significant differences in DAS28 were observed (P=.145) between RA-ILD and RA control patients. RA-ILD patients presented worse HAQ scores (P=.006). All patients were treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The risk of developing ILD in RA patients is tripled by a history of smoking or the presence of erosive arthritis (R2=.36). Conclusions: The results of our study support the higher frequency of UIP and NSIP in RA patients. DLCO is the most sensitive parameter to detect ILD in RA patients. Our study showed that ILD in RA patients was associated with RA severity (presence of erosions and ACPA) and with a history of smoking.(AU)

Predictors of Progression and Mortality in Patients with Prevalent Rheumatoid Arthritis and Interstitial Lung Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a prospective cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated with interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) and identify risk factors associated with disease progression and mortality in this cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients with RA-ILD receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) between 2015 and 2020. The patients were assessed using high-resolution computed tomography and pulmonary function tests at baseline and at 60 months. The main endpoint was "Progression to ILD at the end of follow-up" in terms of the following outcomes: (1) improvement (i.e., improvement in forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥10% or diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≥15% and absence of radiological progression); (2) nonprogression (stabilization or improvement in FVC ≤10% or diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) <15% and absence of radiological progression); (3) progression (worsening of FVC >10% or DLCO >15% and radiological progression); or (4) death. We recorded demographic and clinical characteristics, lung function, and the incidence of adverse events. A Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the worsening of ILD. RESULTS: After 60 months, lung disease had stabilized in 66 patients (56.9%), improved in 9 (7.8%), and worsened in 23 (19.8%). Eighteen patients (15.5%) died, with a mean survival of 71.8 (1.9) months after diagnosis of ILD. The Cox multivariate analysis revealed the independent predictors of worsening of RA-ILD to be usual interstitial pneumonia (hazard ratio (HR), 2.6 (95%CI, 1.0-6.7)), FVC <80% (HR, 3.8 (95%CI, 1.5-6.7)), anticitrullinated protein antibody titers (HR, 2.8 (95%CI, 1.1-6.8)), smoking (HR, 2.5 (95%CI, 1.1-6.2)), and treatment with abatacept, tocilizumab, or rituximab (HR, 0.4 (95%CI, 0.2-0.8)). During follow-up, 79 patients (68%) experienced an adverse event, mostly infection (61%). Infection was fatal in 10/18 patients (55.5%) during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Lung function is stable in most patients with RA-ILD receiving treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), although one-third worsened or died. Identifying factors associated with worsening in RA-ILD is important for clinical management.

Non-anti-TNF biologic agents are associated with slower worsening of interstitial lung disease secondary to rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the effect of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on the outcome of interstitial lung disease secondary to rheumatoid arthritis (RA-ILD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients with RA-ILD receiving DMARDs between 2015 and 2017. The patients were assessed using high-resolution computed tomography and pulmonary function tests at baseline and at 24 months. The radiological assessment was centralized. The main outcome measure at 24 months was changed in lung function (improvement, stabilization, worsening, or death). We recorded the 28-joint Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and adverse events. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with worsening of ILD. RESULTS: After 24 months, lung disease was stabilized in 40 patients (57.1%), improved in 8 (11.4%), and worse in 21 (30.0%). One patient (1.4%) died. The factors associated with worsening of ILD in the multivariate analysis were treatment with abatacept, tocilizumab, or rituximab (OR, 0.102 [95%CI, 0.015-0.686]), DAS28 (OR, 1.969 [95%CI, 1.005-3.857]), and smoking (OR, 6.937 [95%CI, 1.378-4.900]). During follow-up, 30 patients (42.9%) experienced an adverse event, which was severe in 12 cases (17.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Lung function is stable and inflammatory activity well controlled in most patients with RA-ILD receiving treatment with DMARDs. Non-anti-TNF DMARDs reduce the risk of worsening of lung disease in 90% of patients. The inflammatory activity of RA and smoking, on the other hand, are associated with worsening. Key Points • We have performed prospectively evaluated lung and joint function in patients with RA-ILD receiving treatment with various DMARDs. • In our study, the lung function is stable and inflammatory activity well controlled in most patients with RA-ILD receiving treatment with DMARDs. • Neither csDMARDs nor anti-TNF agents were associated with a significant risk of worsening of lung disease, whereas non-anti-TNF bDMARDs could reduce the risk of worsening of lung disease. • Smoking and poor control of joint involvement were the main factors associated with worsening of lung disease.

Analysis of Clinical-Analytical Characteristics in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Interstitial Lung Disease: Case-Control Study. / Análisis de las características clínico-analíticas de pacientes con artritis reumatoide y enfermedad pulmonar intersticial: casos y controles.

OBJECTIVES: To study the differences between rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients and RA patients without ILD in severity markers and disease activity and to identify factors associated with the presence of ILD in RA patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients: RA-ILD patients selected from a multicentre cohort in Andalusia, Spain. CONTROLS: RA-patients without ILD paired by sex, age and disease duration. PROTOCOL: RA patients are reviewed every 3-6months in rheumatology consultation. All patients are reviewed according to a predetermined protocol with systematic data collection. OUTCOMES: description of ILD type, differences in severity markers and disease activity in both groups. Other variables: ILD type by imaging technique (HRCT): nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP)/usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Lung function by PTF. Activity and severity markers of arthritis by DAS28-ESR, HAQ, RF, ACPA and erosions. Treatment with DMARD. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: descriptive and paired T-test or Chi-square test followed by binary logistic regression (DV: ILD in patients with RA). RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included, 41 RA-ILD and 41 RA controls. RF and ACPA positivity, serositis and osteoporosis were more frequent in RA-ILD patients. No significant differences in DAS28 were observed (P=.145) between RA-ILD and RA control patients. RA-ILD patients presented worse HAQ scores (P=.006). All patients were treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The risk of developing ILD in RA patients is tripled by a history of smoking or the presence of erosive arthritis (R2=.36). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study support the higher frequency of UIP and NSIP in RA patients. DLCO is the most sensitive parameter to detect ILD in RA patients. Our study showed that ILD in RA patients was associated with RA severity (presence of erosions and ACPA) and with a history of smoking.

Deformidad de Madelung / Madelung's deformity

No disponible

Eficacia a 2 años de tocilizumab en pacientes con artritis reumatoide activa en la práctica clínica habitual / Two-year efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice

Objetivos. Evaluar la eficacia del tratamiento con tocilizumab (TCZ) en pacientes con artritis reumatoide (AR) en práctica clínica, las tasas de supervivencia del fármaco y variables clínicas predictoras de respuesta. Métodos. Es un estudio descriptivo, prospectivo, longitudinal y abierto en el que se incluyó a pacientes en condiciones de práctica clínica que recibieron TCZ (8mg/kg/cada 4 semanas). Las respuestas clínicas se midieron utilizando los criterios de respuesta de la European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), las tasas de actividad baja y remisión según el Disease activity score-28 (DAS28-VSG) y Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Resultados. La tasa de respuesta EULAR fue del 86,63%, con una tasa de remisión DAS28 del 53,7% a los 6 meses de tratamiento. El 52,9% de los pacientes presentaron baja actividad de la enfermedad a los 24 meses según CDAI y 47,1% según DAS28. No hubo diferencias significativas en cuanto a respuesta EULAR, baja actividad y remisión DAS28 entre pacientes en tratamiento con TCZ en monoterapia y terapia combinada, ni entre pacientes positivos y negativos para factor reumatoide (FR) y/o anticuerpo antipéptido cíclico citrulinado (anti-PCC). Los pacientes que recibieron TCZ de primera línea presentaron mejores tasas de remisión y baja actividad a los 6 meses. La tasa de supervivencia fue del 61% a los 24 meses, siendo una de las causas de discontinuación más frecuente los efectos adversos. Conclusión. El TCZ es efectivo en pacientes con AR, tiene eficacia similar cuando se utiliza en monoterapia o en combinación con fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad (FAME) sintéticos y presenta altas tasas de supervivencia (AU)

Objectives. To evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice, retention rates of the drug and predictors of response. Methods. We performed a descriptive, prospective, longitudinal, open-label study in patients receiving TCZ (8mg/kg/4 weeks) in a clinical practice setting. The clinical responses were evaluated using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, and the low activity and remission rates according to the Disease Activity Score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Results. The EULAR response rate was 86.63% and the DAS28 remission rate was 53.7% after 6 months of treatment; rates of low disease activity were 52.9% on CDAI and 47.1% on DAS28 at month 24. There were no statistically significant differences in EULAR response, rates of low activity and remission on DAS28 between patients receiving TCZ alone and those receiving TCZ in combination therapy, or between patients positive or negative for rheumatoid factor (RF) and/or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies. The naïve biological therapy patients showed better remission and low activity rates after 6 months of treatment. The retention rate was 61% at month 24. Adverse events were among the most frequent causes of discontinuation. Conclusions. Tocilizumab is effective in RA, has a similar efficacy when used alone or in combination with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and shows high retention rates (AU)

Two-year efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice. / Eficacia a 2 años de tocilizumab en pacientes con artritis reumatoide activa en la práctica clínica habitual.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice, retention rates of the drug and predictors of response. METHODS: We performed a descriptive, prospective, longitudinal, open-label study in patients receiving TCZ (8mg/kg/4 weeks) in a clinical practice setting. The clinical responses were evaluated using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, and the low activity and remission rates according to the Disease Activity Score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). RESULTS: The EULAR response rate was 86.63% and the DAS28 remission rate was 53.7% after 6 months of treatment; rates of low disease activity were 52.9% on CDAI and 47.1% on DAS28 at month 24. There were no statistically significant differences in EULAR response, rates of low activity and remission on DAS28 between patients receiving TCZ alone and those receiving TCZ in combination therapy, or between patients positive or negative for rheumatoid factor (RF) and/or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies. The naïve biological therapy patients showed better remission and low activity rates after 6 months of treatment. The retention rate was 61% at month 24. Adverse events were among the most frequent causes of discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab is effective in RA, has a similar efficacy when used alone or in combination with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and shows high retention rates.

Carcinoma de células pequeñas mixto: un desafío diagnóstico / A rare case of combined small-cell lung carcinoma: a challenging diagnosis

Los síndromes neurológicos paraneoplásicos constituyen un conjunto de manifestaciones neurológicas asociadas a la existencia de una tumor oculto no diagnosticado en un paciente. Los síndromes neurológicos paraneoplásicos están producidos por mecanismos inmunológicos donde tiene lugar una respuesta inmunológica frente a antígenos compartidos por el tumor y el tejido neuronal del paciente. La detección serológica de los anticuerpos onconeuronales (Hu, Yo, Ri, Ma-2, anfifisina, etc.) es de utilidad en el diagnóstico de los síndromes neurológicos paraneoplásicos asociados. Presentamos el caso de una paciente que acude a Urgencias por presentar alteraciones neurológicas y donde los resultados obtenidos por el laboratorio clínico permiten orientar el estudio diagnóstico de la paciente hacía la búsqueda de un tumor oculto de estirpe microcítica mixta (AU)

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes are a set of neurological manifestations associated with the existence of a hidden tumour in a patient. Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes are produced by immunological mechanisms where an immune response occurs against antigens shared between tumour and neuronal tissue of the patient. Serological detection of onconeural antibodies (Hu, Yo, Ri, Ma-2, amphiphysin, etc.) is useful in the diagnosis of associated paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. The case is presented of a patient who was admitted to emergency room due to neurological disorders. With the results of the clinical laboratory, the study was oriented towards the search for a hidden tumour of microcytic mixed lineage (AU)