Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aten Primaria ; 18(9): 497-501, 1996 Nov 30.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9280445

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To find how widespread incorrect inhalation techniques are in patients on long-term inhalation treatments, comparing different methods and the health control standard. DESIGN: A descriptive crossover study. SETTING: Three Health Centres in Burgos. PATIENTS: People over 15 with at least a month on inhalation treatment. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A questionnaire was composed to find the characteristics of the patients and their illness. Then their inhalation method was qualified as correct, acceptable or incorrect, using a scale based on Newman's classic criteria. Average age was 63.8 +/- 15.6, with 66.5% men. 11.6% of patients were active smokers. The most common diagnosis was COPD (61.6%). 65% of the patients were monitored within primary care (PC). The most common inhalation method was pressurised aerosol (61%); 26.2% of patients used two or more different methods. Only 21.3% of patients correctly performed the technique of inhalation, with better results for patients under specialist care (SC) than PC. 10.5% of patients had never received instruction on an inhalation technique. The method with the best results was the dry dust one, with differences close to statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: There is widespread incorrect use of methods of inhalation. Most people use a pressurised aerosol. There are a large number of patients who have never been shown the correct way to inhale.


Subject(s)
Administration, Inhalation , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...