Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cir Cir ; 87(5): 496-500, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31448802

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify the efficacy and safety of the steam-roller maneuver, in patients treated with pneumatic retinopexy. METHOD: Experimental, prospective, comparative, longitudinal study in patients with retinal detachment, treated with pneumatic retinopexy. Patients were assigned to one of two groups: without steam roller maneuver (group 1) or with it (group 2). The proportions of single-intervention anatomical success, visual improvement, anatomical success with reintervention, and adverse events were compared between groups (chi squared); preoperative and postoperative visual acuity in logMAR was compared within groups (Wilcoxon's t). RESULTS: 40 eyes were evaluated (mean age 55.9 ± 13.3 years); 15 were assigned to group 1, 25 to group 2. The proportions of single-intervention anatomical success, visual improvement, anatomical success with reintervention, and adverse events did not differ between groups (p > 0.05). At the end of follow up, visual acuity improved in both groups; however, it only improved in group 2, in eyes with single intervention anatomical success (mean log MAR before surgery 1.72 ± 1.64; after surgery 0.61 ± 0.61; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The steam roller maneuver is efficient for improving visual acuity in patients with pneumatic retinopexy, who achieve single intervention anatomical success; furthermore, the maneuver does not impair prognosis in eyes that require reintervention.


OBJETIVO: Determinar la eficacia y la seguridad de la maniobra steam roller en pacientes tratados con retinopexia neumática. MÉTODO: estudio experimental, prospectivo, comparativo y longitudinal en pacientes con desprendimiento de retina primario, tratados mediante retinopexia neumática. Los sujetos se asignaron a uno de dos grupos: sin maniobra de steam roller (grupo 1) o con ella (grupo 2). Se compararon entre grupos las proporciones de éxito anatómico con una sola intervención, mejoría visual, éxito anatómico con reintervención y eventos adversos (prueba de ji al cuadrado). Se comparó en cada grupo la agudeza visual preoperatoria con la posoperatoria (prueba t de Wilcoxon). RESULTADOS: 40 ojos (edad 55.9 ± 13.3 años); 15 se asignaron al grupo 1 y 25 al grupo 2. Las proporciones de éxito anatómico con una sola intervención, mejoría visual, éxito anatómico con reintervención y eventos adversos no difirieron entre grupos (p > 0.05). La agudeza visual mejoró en ambos grupos, pero en los ojos que presentaron éxito con una sola intervención solo mejoró en el grupo 2 (promedio logMAR preoperatorio 1.72 ± 1.64; postoperatorio 0.61 ± 0.61; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONES: La maniobra steam roller es eficaz para mejorar la agudeza visual en pacientes con retinopexia neumática, que alcanzan éxito anatómico con una sola intervención, y no deteriora el pronóstico en quienes requieren reintervención.


Subject(s)
Head Movements , Physical Therapy Modalities , Retinal Detachment/surgery , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injections, Intraocular , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retinal Detachment/etiology , Retinal Perforations/complications , Sulfur Hexafluoride/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Visual Acuity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...