Precision and agreement of axial length in paediatric population measured with MYAH and AL-Scan biometers.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Measuring axial length is key in the field of myopia development and control. Hence, the precision and agreement of commercially available biometers is of vital interest to understand their variability and interchangeability in the paediatric population. BACKGROUND: Different biometers are available to measure axial length and monitor myopia progression in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to assess the precision (repeatability and reproducibility) and agreement of the MYAH and AL-Scan biometers in a paediatric population. METHODS: Three consecutive measurements were performed using MYAH and AL-Scan biometers in each subject by the same operator to test for repeatability. To test for reproducibility, two measurements were performed for each subject by two different observers with a 5-min interval between measurements. To test the agreement, each subject was measured once with each instrument. RESULTS: A total of 187 subjects, with a mean age of 8.5 ± 0.3 years and mean spherical equivalent refractive error of +0.22 ± 0.77 D participated in the study. For the repeatability study, the within-subject standard deviation was 0.01 mm, and the repeatability limit was 0.04 mm for both instruments, with no statistically significant differences among repeated measures (p = 0.162 for MYAH and p = 0.774 for AL-Scan). For the reproducibility study, the within-subject standard deviation was 0.01 mm and the repeatability limit was 0.04 mm. There were statistically significant differences for the repeated measures for the AL-Scan (p = 0.002) but not for the MYAH (p = 0.643). Regarding the agreement between both instruments, the 95% limit of agreement ranged from -0.04 to 0.05 mm, and the differences were statistically significant (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: The repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of the MYAH and AL-Scan biometers seem optimal for following children with myopia.

Short- and mid-term changes in CORVIS ST parameters in successful, adult orthokeratology patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The changes in various biomechanical and tomographic characteristics of the cornea associated with orthokeratology may allow us to identify potential mid- and long-term structural alterations, resulting in a better understanding of the governing mechanisms of this procedure and in its optimisation. BACKGROUND: The study aimed at describing short and mid-term changes in CORVIS ST® parameters and indices in orthokeratology (ortho-k), and their diurnal variations. METHODS: A prospective observational study was designed in which several CORVIS ST® parameters of 75 new adult participants successfully fitted with overnight ortho-k Seefree® (Conóptica - Hecht Contactlinsen) contact lenses were explored. Measurements were conducted in baseline (BL) conditions and in the morning and evening at the one-night (1 NM/1NT), one-week (1WM/1 WT) and 3-month (3 MM/3MT) follow-up visits. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found in DARatio_2 mm, IntRad, ARTh, CBI and TBI following overnight ortho-k, when compared with BL values, with most values reaching stability at 1WM or reverting to BL values at 3 MM. The ARTh and CBI parameters showed some of the most significant temporal variations (both p < 0.001), probably reflecting the encountered differences in central corneal thickness between BL and 1WM (p = 0.010) and between BL and 3 MM (p = 0.016). In general, corneal rigidity was higher in the morning at all follow-up visits, and decreased during the day. No statistically significant changes in adjusted intraocular pressure values were found. CONCLUSION: Ortho-k in adults may be considered a safe procedure in terms of short and mid-term changes in CORVIS ST® parameters. The observed alterations in most of the parameters provided by the Corvis ST® probably responded to the well-described changes in corneal pachymetry and tomography, rather than to actual alterations in corneal rigidity.

Efficacy, predictability and safety of long-term orthokeratology: An 18-year follow-up study.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy, predictability and safety of long-term orthokeratology in children and adults. METHODS: Case histories of 300 orthokeratology patients (596 eyes; 34.3% children; 65.7% adults) were reviewed to collect information on demographics, corneal and refractive parameters, visual acuity, residual refraction and adverse effects. Predictability was defined as the percentage of eyes with absolute values of spherical equivalent refraction ≤ 0.5 D of emmetropia, and efficacy as the ratio of post-orthokeratology uncorrected and pre-orthokeratology corrected distance visual acuity. RESULTS: Median duration of treatment was 37 and 28.5 months in children and adults, respectively (p = 0.022). During the first year, 17.2% of children and 33% of adults ceased lens wear (p < 0.001). For children and adults with a successful ortho-k treatment of at least one year of duration, 88.7% and 95.9% of eyes had a predictable refractive outcome, and efficacy was 0.98 and 1.01, respectively. A larger percentage of children (65.7%) were free of complications than of adults (55.4%) (p = 0.015). One event of microbial keratitis occurred in adults (6.8 cases per 10,000 patient-years) and none in children. Corneal staining was the most frequent complication, with a higher incidence in adults (p = 0.007) and in higher myopia (p < 0.001), higher anterior corneal eccentricity (p = 0.019) and smaller anterior horizontal radius (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Orthokeratology is a safe and predictable long-term procedure in children and adults, with a low incidence of serious adverse effects. Corneal staining episodes are relatively frequent throughout the course of the treatment, thus highlighting the relevance of education of experienced users.

Should Overnight Orthokeratology Patients Wear Their Lenses During Their Afternoon Nap?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in visual acuity, corneal curvature, elevation, pachymetry, and objective quality of vision of experienced orthokeratology patients using their contact lenses during a simulated 30-min afternoon nap. METHOD: Twelve patients aged 30.8±8.3 years were recruited for the study, with a history of overnight orthokeratology of 27.4±23.0 months. Patients were instructed to close their eyes for 30 min while wearing their contact lenses or without lenses. Anterior corneal curvature, elevation, and corneal pachymetry were assessed with the Pentacam Scheimpflug System at 17 predefined corneal locations, and the HD Analyzer (Terrassa, Spain) was used to measure objective quality of vision. Measurements were conducted before eye closure (baseline), immediately after eye opening/lens removal (M1), and 30 min later (M2). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in anterior corneal curvature and elevation between baseline values and M1 or M2, with and without contact lenses. Corneal swelling at M1 was greater without contact lenses (change in central corneal thickness of 2.3%±3.1%, P=0.001) than with contact lenses (1.7%±1.3%, P<0.001). Recovery at M2 was slower when lenses were worn. A statistically significant improvement in objective quality of vision and visual acuity was found only when patients napped with their lenses. CONCLUSIONS: Even if no significant changes were found in corneal curvature and elevation, patients of overnight orthokeratology may benefit from using their contact lenses during their afternoon nap in terms of objective quality of vision and visual acuity.