Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
Pathog Glob Health ; : 1-9, 2023 Jul 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37525476

ABSTRACT

Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection syndrome has been observed in immunosuppressed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Detecting and treating asymptomatic Strongyloides infection in individuals from endemic areas can effectively prevent hyperinfection. Unfortunately, many clinicians are unaware of this neglected infection. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether including Strongyloides screening in COVID-19 management protocols would encourage this practice. To accomplish this, we conducted a retrospective single-center study at 'Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre' in Madrid, Spain, comparing two consecutive cohorts. The first cohort comprised all Latinx patients over 18 years old who were admitted for COVID-19 between March 1st and April 30th, 2020. The second cohort consisted of Latinx patients admitted between July 1st and December 31st, 2020, following an amendment to the COVID-19 management protocol that recommended screening for strongyloidiasis in at-risk patients. We identified 559 and 795 patients in the first and second periods, respectively. The percentage of individuals screened increased significantly from 8.8% to 51.6% after the screening recommendation was included in the protocol (odds ratio [OR] 11.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.01-15.33). In both periods, the screening rate was significantly higher among those receiving immunosuppression than those who did not receive steroids and/or tocilizumab. No other factors influenced the screening rate. In conclusion, including strongyloidiasis screening recommendations in COVID-19 management protocols led to its increased implementation. However, the overall screening rate remained low, emphasizing the need for further efforts to enhance screening practices.

2.
Am J Transplant ; 23(12): 1949-1960, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37479034

ABSTRACT

Infection is a common complication in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The usefulness of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) and hospital-acquired infection control (HAIC) initiatives in the general inpatient population is well established. We performed a quasi-experimental study to evaluate a joint ASP/HAIC initiative focused on KTRs. A dedicated ASP team optimized antimicrobial prescriptions in consecutive KTRs during the intervention period (June 2015-March 2016). A multifaceted, evidence-based HAIC program was concurrently implemented. Results were compared with the preceding period (June 2014-March 2015). We included 96 and 100 KTRs in the intervention and preintervention periods, respectively. There was a reduction in the consumption of meropenem (rate ratio [RR]: 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.75; P <.0001), ceftazidime (RR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.21-0.45; P <.0001), vancomycin (RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.53-0.8; P <.0001), and ciprofloxacin (RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.55-0.81; P <.0001) and an increase of fosfomycin (RR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.17-2.76; P =.008) during the intervention period. The incidence of cystitis (RR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.28-0.33; P <.001) and upper urinary tract infection (RR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.33-0.95; P =.04) decreased. A specific ASP/HAIC initiative was effective in optimizing antimicrobial use and reducing the incidence of common bacterial infections among KTRs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Cross Infection , Kidney Transplantation , Humans , Antimicrobial Stewardship/methods , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/etiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hospitals , Infection Control , Delivery of Health Care , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
3.
Mycoses ; 65(5): 517-525, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35262977

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infection, particularly intraabdominal candidiasis, exerts a negative impact on the outcome of pancreas transplant recipients (PTRs). Optimal antifungal prophylaxis in this context remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a single-centre retrospective study to compare the incidence of invasive candidiasis during the first 6 post-transplant months in a cohort of 218 PTRs over two periods in which different agents for antifungal prophylaxis were used: fluconazole (Fluco-Px) from March 1995 to June 2012, and micafungin followed by fluconazole (Mica-Px) from July 2012 to December 2018. RESULTS: A total of 152 and 66 PTRs received Fluco-Px and Mica-Px. Mean age was 39.7 ± 7.8 years, 56.4% (123/218) were males, and 85.3% (186/218) underwent simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Invasive candidiasis occurred in 21.7% (33/152) of PTRs under Fluco-Px compared to 24.2% (16/66) of those under Mica-Px (p-value = .681). Median time from transplantation to infection was 8 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 6-16) under Fluco-Px versus 6.5 (IQR: 3.3-15.8) under Mica-Px (p-value = .623). Non-albicans Candida species comprised 27.5% (11/40) and 25.0% (4/16) of episodes under Fluco-Px and Mica-Px respectively (p-value = .849). Surgical site infection was the most common form in both groups (82.5% [33/40] and 87.5% [14/16]; p-value = .954). Multivariable analysis identified cold ischaemia time of the pancreas and kidney grafts, surgical reintervention and insulin requirement after transplantation as risks factor for invasive candidiasis. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study did not reveal a significant benefit from the initial use of micafungin-based antifungal prophylaxis over fluconazole among PTRs in terms of invasive candidiasis.


Subject(s)
Candidiasis, Invasive , Pancreas Transplantation , Adult , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candida , Candidiasis , Candidiasis, Invasive/drug therapy , Female , Fluconazole/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Micafungin , Middle Aged , Pancreas , Pancreas Transplantation/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Transplant Recipients
4.
Int J Infect Dis ; 117: 56-64, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35081417

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Controversy remains about the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) for the treatment of severe COVID-19. We aimed to analyze the profile of TCZ-respondent patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients with severe COVID-19 who received off-label TCZ after recommendation by a local committee and were admitted to the University Hospital "12 de Octubre" until May 2020. The primary end point was a significant clinical improvement (SCI) on day 14 after administration of TCZ. Factors independently related to SCI were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 428 (63.3%) patients treated with TCZ, 271 (63.3%) experienced SCI. After adjustment for factors related to unfavorable outcomes, TCZ administration within the first 48 hours from admission (odds ratio [OR]: 1.98, 95% confidence Interval [95% CI]: 1.1-3.55; P = 0.02) and ALT levels >100 UI/L at day 0 (OR: 3.28; 95% CI: 1.3-8.1; P = 0.01) were independently related to SCI. The rate of SCI significantly decreased according to the time of TCZ administration: 70.2% in the first 48 hours from admission, 58.5% on days 3-7, and 45.1% after day 7 (P = 0.03 and P = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: TCZ improves the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 the most if treatment starts within the first 48 hours after admission.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Humans , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Acta Trop ; 226: 106220, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34757044

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Agar-plate culture (APC) remains the most sensitive parasitological technique for S. stercoralis diagnosis. Although it was first described three decades ago, the time of incubation of the plates is neither a commonly described feature nor usually standardized. The aim of the study was to analyze the required time to detect S. stercoralis larvae in APC. METHODS: A prospective laboratory-based study including all patients with at least one positive APC was performed. The plates were incubated at room temperature for 7 days. Clinical, analytical and parasitological features including results of the direct visualization of the stool (DV) after formalin-ether concentration and time-to-detection (TTD) of the larvae in APC were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 141 samples from 75 patients had a positive APC. In 49 of them (65.3%) three or more stool samples were processed for direct visualization (DV) and APC. Of these 49 patients, 8 (16.3%) were also diagnosed with DV and 41 (83.7%) were diagnosed only with APC. In 38 samples from 23 (30.7%) patients, the TTD was below 2 days, while in 27 samples from 13 (17.3%) patients, the larvae were detected on the 6th and 7th day. CONCLUSION: Direct visualization failed to detect S. stercoralis in most of the patients that were diagnosed with APC. Incubation periods below 2 and 5 days would miss an important percentage of infections. At least 7 days of incubation of the APC are required to detect presumably low-burden chronic infections in non-endemic countries.


Subject(s)
Strongyloides stercoralis , Strongyloidiasis , Agar , Animals , Feces , Formaldehyde , Humans , Prospective Studies , Strongyloidiasis/diagnosis
6.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 17(10): 3662-3669, 2021 10 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34129422

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives: Influenza vaccination rates among medical students (MSs) are below the standards recommended in hospitals where influenza vaccination is not mandatory. We carried out a comparative study in two Spanish university hospitals to reassert this fact and evaluated the impact on vaccination rates of a specific program aimed at promoting influenza vaccination among MSs.Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed describing influenza vaccination rates and motivations for vaccination during the 2017/18 campaign among MSs in two hospitals affiliated to the same university. We subsequently performed a community-based intervention study during the 2018/19 campaign evaluating the impact of a strategy for promoting influenza vaccination, comparing the hospital where the intervention took place (hospital A) with the one where it did not take place (hospital B).Results: During de 2017/18 campaign the overall influenza vaccination rate was 44.8%, with no differences between hospitals A and B (difference: 3.9%; 95% CI: -4.36-12.16; p-value = .4). During the 2018/19 campaign, vaccination rate increased to 76.4% in hospital A, with significant differences compared with the previous campaign in the same hospital (29.8%; OR 5.00; 95% CI: 3.14-8.3; p-value = .0001) and with that observed in hospital B in the same campaign (21.1%; 95% CI: 13.38-28.82; p-value <.001).Conclusions: Influenza vaccination rates among MSs in two Spanish university affiliated hospitals were below the recommended standards. A new reproducible strategy for promoting influenza vaccination with a specific approach toward MSs achieved a significant improvement in vaccination rate.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Students, Medical , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Personnel , Hospitals, University , Humans , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccination
7.
Int J Infect Dis ; 105: 487-494, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33647515

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The role of combination immunomodulatory therapy with systemic corticosteroids and tocilizumab (TCZ) for aged patients with COVID-19-associated cytokine release syndrome remains unclear. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was conducted on consecutive patients aged ≥65 years who developed severe COVID-19 between 03 March and 01 May 2020 and were treated with corticosteroids at various doses (methylprednisolone 0.5mg/kg/12h to 250mg/24h), either alone (CS group) or associated with intravenous tocilizumab (400-600mg, one to three doses) (CS-TCZ group). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality by day +14, whereas secondary outcomes included mortality by day +28 and clinical improvement (discharge and/or a ≥2 point decrease on a 6-point ordinal scale) by day +14. Propensity score (PS)-based adjustment and inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) were applied. RESULTS: Totals of 181 and 80 patients were included in the CS and CS-TCZ groups, respectively. All-cause 14-day mortality was lower in the CS-TCZ group, both in the PS-adjusted (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.68; P=0.002) and IPTW-weighted models (odds ratio [OR]: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.21-0.68; P=0.001). This protective effect was also observed for 28-day mortality (PS-adjusted HR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.21-0.72; P=0.003). Clinical improvement by day +14 was higher in the CS-TCZ group with IPTW analysis only (OR: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.49-3.41; P<0.001). The occurrence of secondary infection was similar between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of corticosteroids and TCZ was associated with better outcomes among patients aged ≥65 years with severe COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Methylprednisolone/administration & dosage , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
8.
Int J Infect Dis ; 105: 319-325, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33592340

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A subgroup of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection was thought to have developed cytokine release syndrome and were treated with tocilizumab; however, a significant percentage of patients evolved. This study aimed to determine the usefulness of anakinra as a rescue treatment for patients with tocilizumab-refractory COVID-19 disease. METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who received anakinra as salvage therapy after failure of tocilizumab were compared (1:1) with selected controls in a historical cohort of patients treated with tocilizumab. Cases and controls were matched by age, comorbidities, pulse oximetry oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO2/FiO2) ratio at baseline, and time elapsed since the initiation of treatment with tocilizumab. The primary outcome was the improvement in clinical status measured by a 6-point ordinal scale, from baseline to day 21. RESULTS: The study included 20 cases and 20 controls (mean age 65.3 ± 12.8 years, 65% males). No differences were found in the clinical improvement rates at 7, 14 and 21 days of follow-up. The in-hospital mortality rate for patients receiving anakinra was 55% vs. 45% in the control group (P = 0.527). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with anakinra was not useful in improving the prognosis of patients with tocilizumab-refractory severe COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Cytokine Release Syndrome/drug therapy , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , COVID-19/complications , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Cytokine Release Syndrome/etiology , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Immunomodulation/drug effects , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Salvage Therapy , Spain/epidemiology , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome
9.
Am J Transplant ; 21(2): 703-716, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32780498

ABSTRACT

To investigate risk factors for invasive aspergillosis (IA) after kidney transplantation (KT), we conducted a systematic search in PubMed and EMBASE to identify studies published until June 2020. We included case-control or cohort design studies comprising KT recipients with a diagnosis of IA, defined according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group criteria, and assessed risk factors for the development of IA. Random-effect models meta-analysis served to pool data. We identified eleven case-control studies (319 IA cases and 835 controls). There was an increased risk of IA among recipients with underlying chronic lung diseases (odds ratio [OR] = 7.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-50.06) and among those with diabetic nephropathy (OR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.10-2.48). Requiring posttransplant hemodialysis (OR = 3.69; 95% CI = 2.13-6.37) or surgical reintervention (OR = 6.28; 95% CI = 1.67-23.66) were also associated with an increased risk. Moreover, a positive link was identified between IA and posttransplant bacterial infection (OR = 7.51; 95% CI = 4.37-12.91), respiratory tract viral infection (OR = 7.75; 95% CI = 1.60-37.57), cytomegalovirus infection or disease (OR = 2.67; 95% CI = 1.12-6.32), and acute graft rejection (OR = 3.01; 95% CI = 1.78-5.09). In contrast, receiving a kidney from a living donor was associated with a reduced risk (OR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.46-0.93). KT recipients that accumulate several of these conditions should be closely monitored and a low threshold of suspicion for IA should be maintained. Future studies should explore the benefit of mold-active prophylaxis to this subgroup of KT recipients at highest risk.


Subject(s)
Aspergillosis , Invasive Fungal Infections , Kidney Transplantation , Aspergillosis/epidemiology , Aspergillosis/etiology , Graft Rejection/etiology , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Risk Factors
10.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 27(8): 1171.e1-1171.e7, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33069858

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The World Health Organization recommends routinely screening HIV-infected patients with CD4+ T-cell counts <100/µL for cryptococcal infection to prevent cryptococcal meningitis (CM), based on studies in Sub-Saharan Africa where the prevalence of positive cryptococcal antigen (CrAg+) is ≥ 3% in this subgroup. Data about such prevalence in Spain are unavailable and rare in other European countries. Thus, the Spanish AIDS Study Group guidelines do not recommend routinely screening. We aim to determine the prevalence and outcomes of cryptococcal infection in this subgroup of patients in Spain. METHODS: We determined CrAg using a lateral flow assay in banked plasma from participants in the cohort of the Spanish AIDS Research Network. Eligible patients had CD4+ T-cell counts ≤100/µL at the time of plasma collection and a follow-up >4 weeks, unless they died. RESULTS: We included 576 patients from June 2004 to December 2017. Of these, 43 were CrAg+ for an overall prevalence of 7.5%. There were no differences depending on birthplace. The CrAg+ was independently associated with a higher mortality at eight weeks (hazard ratio (HR) 5.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46-19.56) and 6 months (HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.19-8.21). CM was reported in 10 of the 43 CrAg+ patients. There were no cases among negatives. Five patients had CM when the plasma was collected and five developed it during the follow-up. The number of subjects needed to screen to anticipate the diagnosis of one CM case was 114. CONCLUSIONS: The CrAg+ prevalence among HIV-infected patients with CD4+ T-cell counts ≤100/µL diagnosed in Spain, both immigrants and native-born Spanish, is >7%. Consequently, the Spanish AIDS Study Group guidelines have to be updated and recommend routine screening for cryptococcal infection in these patients. Future studies should explore whether this recommendation could be firmly applied to other European populations.


Subject(s)
AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections , HIV Infections , Meningitis, Cryptococcal , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/diagnosis , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/epidemiology , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Antigens, Fungal , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes , Cohort Studies , HIV Infections/complications , Humans , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/diagnosis , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/drug therapy , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/epidemiology , Spain
11.
J Med Virol ; 93(2): 831-842, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32672860

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can lead to a massive cytokine release. The use of the anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody tocilizumab (TCZ) has been proposed in this hyperinflammatory phase, although supporting evidence is limited. We retrospectively analyzed 88 consecutive patients with COVID-19 pneumonia that received at least one dose of intravenous TCZ in our institution between 16 and 27 March 2020. Clinical status from day 0 (first TCZ dose) through day 14 was assessed by a 6-point ordinal scale. The primary outcome was clinical improvement (hospital discharge and/or a decrease of ≥2 points on the 6-point scale) by day 7. Secondary outcomes included clinical improvement by day 14 and dynamics of vital signs and laboratory values. Rates of clinical improvement by days 7 and 14 were 44.3% (39/88) and 73.9% (65/88). Previous or concomitant receipt of subcutaneous interferon-ß (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06-0.94; P = .041) and serum lactate dehydrogenase more than 450 U/L at day 0 (aOR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.06-0.99; P = .048) were negatively associated with clinical improvement by day 7. All-cause mortality was 6.8% (6/88). Body temperature and respiratory and cardiac rates significantly decreased by day 1 compared to day 0. Lymphocyte count and pulse oximetry oxygen saturation/FiO2 ratio increased by days 3 and 5, whereas C-reactive protein levels dropped by day 2. There were no TCZ-attributable adverse events. In this observational single-center study, TCZ appeared to be useful and safe as immunomodulatory therapy for severe COVID-19 pneumonia.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Cytokine Release Syndrome/prevention & control , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Administration, Intravenous , Adult , Body Temperature/drug effects , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/virology , Cytokine Release Syndrome/immunology , Cytokine Release Syndrome/mortality , Cytokine Release Syndrome/virology , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Interferon-beta/adverse effects , L-Lactate Dehydrogenase/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Receptors, Interleukin-6/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptors, Interleukin-6/genetics , Receptors, Interleukin-6/immunology , Respiratory Rate/drug effects , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Analysis
13.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 22(5): e13372, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32562561

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Which are the consequences of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in liver transplant (LT) recipients? METHODS: We attempted to address this question by reviewing our single-center experience during the first 2 months of the pandemics at a high incidence area. RESULTS: Nineteen adult patients (5 females) were diagnosed by May 5, 2020. Median age was 58 (range 55-72), and median follow-up since transplantation was 83 (range 20-183) months. Cough (84.2%), fever (57.9%), and dyspnea (47.4%) were the most common symptoms. Thirteen patients (68.4%) had pneumonia in x-ray/CT scan. Hydroxychloroquine was administered in 11 patients, associated with lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon ß in 2 cases each. Immunomodulatory therapy with tocilizumab was used in 2 patients. Immunosuppression (IS) was halted in one patient and modified in only other two due to potential drug interactions. Five (26.3%) patients were managed as outpatient. Two patients (10.5%) died, 10 (52.6%) were discharged home, and 2 (10.5%) were still hospitalized after a median follow-up of 41 days from the onset of symptoms. Baseline IS regimen remained unchanged in all surviving recipients, with good liver function. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experience shows a broad spectrum of disease severity in LT patients with COVID-19, with a favorable outcome in most of them without needing to modify baseline IS.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/immunology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Immunocompromised Host , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Severity of Illness Index , Spain/epidemiology , Transplant Recipients , Treatment Outcome , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
14.
Clin J Gastroenterol ; 13(2): 271-275, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31529379

ABSTRACT

Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is a life-threatening complication with high mortality rate. Even if it is more commonly described after hematopoietic stem-cell transplant, hepatic-SOS may occur following the use of certain chemotherapeutic agents. Mitomycin-C has been previously identified as a causal agent when administered intravenously at high doses. We report herein the first case of hepatic-SOS due to intravesical instillation of mitomycin-C, after a traumatic urinary catheterization with significant hematuria. Although this procedure is usually considered safe, without the systemic side effects related to intravenous administration of the drug, clinicians must be aware of its potential risks to facilitate an early diagnosis, avoid a delay in the withdrawal of the causative drug and set up an appropriate therapy as soon as possible.


Subject(s)
Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease/chemically induced , Mitomycin/adverse effects , Administration, Intravesical , Aged , Humans , Male , Mitomycin/administration & dosage
15.
Autoimmun Rev ; 18(5): 493-500, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30844550

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the ocular manifestations of patients with GPA, their treatment and outcome. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study performed at the National Referral Center for Vasculitis, Cochin Hospital, Paris (France), from January 2005 to December 2015. Among 308 patients with a new diagnosis of GPA in accordance with the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria and/or revised Chapel Hill nomenclature definitions, we identified those with ocular involvement and a subsequent follow up in our center. RESULTS: The prevalence of ocular involvement in our GPA series was 38.6%; 63 patients were analysed with a median follow-up of 50.5 months (IQR: 17.8-82.8). Scleritis (18 patients, 28.6%) and episcleritis (18 patients, 28.6%) were the most common ophthalmologic manifestations, followed by orbital disease (13 patients, 20.6%). Bilateral involvement and visual acuity loss was seen in 29.1% and 16.7% of patients, respectively. Ocular involvement was the first GPA manifestation in 9 patients (14.3%), concomitant with systemic manifestation in 36 (57.1%), and occurred only during follow-up in 18 (28.6%). The indication for GPA treatment was suggested by ocular involvement in 12 patients (19.0%), by systemic features in 40 (63.5%) and by both ocular and systemic involvement in 11 (17.5%). Remission of ocular involvement was achieved in 51 patients (80.9%). In the remaining 12 (19.1%), symptoms persisted or even worsened, finally leading to rituximab (RTX) therapy in 8 of them (66.7%). Altogether, when used as first line or for refractory disease, ocular remission was achieved in 11 of the 12 cases (91.7%) treated with RTX versus 34 of the 47 cases (72.3%) treated with CYC (P = .260). Eye disease relapsed in 14 patients (22.2%). RTX allowed achievement of remission in 8 of them (57.1%). In the remaining six, other immunosuppressive drugs were used. CONCLUSIONS: Scleritis and episcleritis are the most common ocular manifestations in GPA, most of the time associated with other systemic manifestations. In >40% of cases, ocular manifestations were refractory to initial treatment or recurrent and led to RTX prescription, which appeared to be useful in these situations.


Subject(s)
Eye Diseases , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis , Adult , Cohort Studies , Eye Diseases/diagnosis , Eye Diseases/epidemiology , Eye Diseases/etiology , Eye Diseases/therapy , Female , France/epidemiology , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/complications , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/diagnosis , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/epidemiology , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
16.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 46(3): 325-331, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29873003

ABSTRACT

Functional status linked to a poor outcome in a broad spectrum of medical disorders. Barthel Activities of Daily Life Index (BADLI) is one of the most extended tools to quantify functional dependence. Whether BADLI can help to predict outcomes in elderly patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) is unknown. The current study aimed to ascertain the influence of BADLI on 6-month all-cause mortality in aged patients with VTE. This is a prospective observational study. We included consecutive patients older than 75-year-old with an acute VTE between April 2015 and April 2017. We analyzed several variables as mortality predictors, including BADLI-measured functional status. Afterward, we performed a multivariate analysis, using logistic regression, to identify all-cause mortality independent predictive factors. Two hundred and two subjects were included. Thirty-five (17%) patients died in the first 6 months. The leading cause of death was cancer (59%). After multivariable logistic regression, we identified BADLI and Charlson index as independent predictors for 6-months mortality [BADLI (every decrease of 10 points) OR 1.21 95% CI (1.03-1.42) and Charlson index OR 1.71 95% CI (1.21-2.43)]. Body mass index (BMI) values were inversely related to mortality [OR 0.85 95% CI (0.75-0.95)]. In conclusion, BADLI, BMI, and Charlson index scores are independent predictive factors for 6-month all-cause mortality in old patients with VTE.


Subject(s)
Venous Thromboembolism/mortality , Acute Disease , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , Humans , Logistic Models , Neoplasms/mortality , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis
17.
Transpl Int ; 29(10): 1094-105, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27362817

ABSTRACT

The measurement of intracellular concentrations of adenosine triphosphate (iATP) in phytohemagglutinin-stimulated CD4(+) T cells constitutes a surrogate marker for post-transplant cell-mediated immunity (CMI). This assay has shown suboptimal accuracy for predicting infection after kidney transplantation (KT). We hypothesize that its predictive capacity depends on the specific contribution of the CMI to host-pathogen interactions. We assessed iATP levels in 100 KT recipients at baseline and months 1, 3, and 6 (363 measurements). No association was found between iATP at month 1 and the risk for overall or bacterial infection, although such association was evident for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease (multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio [per 50-unit increment]: 0.83; P-value = 0.048). There were no significant differences in mean iATP between stable patients (319.4 ng/ml) and those developing overall (304.1 ng/ml) or bacterial infection (346.9 ng/ml) over the 45 days following monitoring. However, iATP was significantly lower in patients who developed CMV disease (223.5 ng/ml; P-values <0.002). The optimal cutoff (265 ng/ml) for predicting CMV disease in patients not receiving antiviral prophylaxis yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of 85.7%, 68.3%, 15.2%, and 98.6%, respectively. In conclusion, a non-pathogen-specific monitoring of CMI by means of iATP informs the risk of CMV disease in KT recipients.


Subject(s)
Adenosine Triphosphate/metabolism , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Cytomegalovirus Infections/immunology , Renal Insufficiency/surgery , Adult , Aged , Cytomegalovirus , Female , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Humans , Immune System , Immunity, Cellular , Immunosuppressive Agents , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Predictive Value of Tests , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Renal Insufficiency/complications , Risk , Transplant Recipients
18.
Endocrinol. nutr. (Ed. impr.) ; 63(4): 145-156, abr. 2016. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-150562

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El objetivo de esta revisión es evaluar la efectividad para disminuir los eventos adversos clínicos y la seguridad de la insulinoterapia en régimen bolo-basal-corrector o basal-corrector frente a la insulinoterapia en «pauta deslizante», en pacientes con diabetes o con hiperglucemia de reciente diagnóstico ingresados en una planta de hospitalización convencional, no críticos, tanto médica como quirúrgica. Método: Se realizó búsqueda en Medline. La odds ratio fue la medida resumen principal. Se empleó un modelo de efectos aleatorios con la técnica de Mante-Haenszel. Resultados: Novecientas cincuenta y siete citas de las cuales 9 fueron finalmente incluidas en la revisión sistemática. Los pacientes en el grupo BB tuvieron un mejor control glucémico que aquellos con PD. Globalmente, se objetiva una tendencia no significativa hacia un menor riesgo de eventos adversos en el grupo BB frente a PD (OR 0,67 —IC 95%: 0,22-2,04— [I2 = 71%]). Existe una tendencia no significativa hacia un mayor riesgo de hipoglucemia en el grupo BB (OR: 2,29; IC 95% 0,50-10,49 [I2 = 70%]). Conclusión: A pesar de su beneficio para el control glucémico durante la hospitalización, esta revisión no ha objetivado que el uso de la pauta BB disminuya eventos clínicos en pacientes hospitalizados en planta convencional. Debido a la heterogeneidad en los resultados, consideramos que se requieren ensayos clínicos que contemplen su efecto en subgrupos de pacientes en los que la pauta BB se pueda usar de forma segura y con períodos de seguimiento más prolongados (AU)


Introduction: The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness to reduce clinical adverse events and safety of insulin administered in basal-bolus-corrector or basal-corrector regimens (BB) versus a sliding scale scheme (SS) in patients with diabetes or newly diagnosed hyperglycemia admitted to a conventional (not critical) medical or surgical hospital ward. Method: A Medline search was conducted. The Odds ratio was the main summary measure. A random effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel procedure was used. Results: A total of 957 citations were collected, of which nine were finally included in the systematic review. Patients in the BB group had better blood glucose control than those with SS. Overall, there was a nonsignificant trend to a lower risk of adverse events in the BB as compared to the SS group (OR 0.67 [95% CI 0.22 to 2.04], [I2 = 71%]). There was a nonsignificant trend to an increased risk of hypoglycemia in the BB group (OR 2.29 [95% CI 0.50 to 10.49] [I2 = 70%]). Conclusion: Despite its benefit for glycemic control during hospitalization, this review did not show that use of the BB scheme decreases clinical events in patients hospitalized in a conventional ward. Because of heterogeneity of the results, we think that clinical trials are needed addressing its effect in patient subgroups in which the BB scheme may be used safely and with longer follow-up periods (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Insulins/adverse effects , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data
19.
Endocrinol Nutr ; 63(4): 145-56, 2016 Apr.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26826772

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness to reduce clinical adverse events and safety of insulin administered in basal-bolus-corrector or basal-corrector regimens (BB) versus a sliding scale scheme (SS) in patients with diabetes or newly diagnosed hyperglycemia admitted to a conventional (not critical) medical or surgical hospital ward. METHOD: A Medline search was conducted. The Odds ratio was the main summary measure. A random effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel procedure was used. RESULTS: A total of 957 citations were collected, of which nine were finally included in the systematic review. Patients in the BB group had better blood glucose control than those with SS. Overall, there was a nonsignificant trend to a lower risk of adverse events in the BB as compared to the SS group (OR 0.67 [95% CI 0.22 to 2.04], [I(2)=71%]). There was a nonsignificant trend to an increased risk of hypoglycemia in the BB group (OR 2.29 [95% CI 0.50 to 10.49] [I(2)=70%]). CONCLUSION: Despite its benefit for glycemic control during hospitalization, this review did not show that use of the BB scheme decreases clinical events in patients hospitalized in a conventional ward. Because of heterogeneity of the results, we think that clinical trials are needed addressing its effect in patient subgroups in which the BB scheme may be used safely and with longer follow-up periods.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Insulin/adverse effects , Hospitalization , Humans , Hyperglycemia , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Insulin/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...