Sonication did not provide reliability to Maki technique for catheter related bloodstream infection diagnosis / La sonicación no proporciona rentabilidad a la técnica de Maki para el diagnóstico de bacteriemia relacionada con catéter

Objective. The aim of our study was to analyze sonicationand Maki techniques for diagnosis of catheter tip colonizationand catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) on patientsadmitted to ICU.Material and methods. Observational and prospectivestudy in one Intensive Care Unit. Patients with some centralvenous catheter (CVC) at least for 7 days and catheter-relatedinfection (CRI) suspicion (new episode of fever or sepsis) wereincluded. We performed Maki technique followed by sonication of catheter tip. We compared area under the curve (AUC)of Maki, sonication, and techniques combination to diagnosiscatheter tip colonization and CRBSI.Results. We included 94 CVC from 87 CRI suspicion episodes. We found 14 cases of catheter tip colonization and 10cases of CRBSI. Of the 14 catheter tip colonization cases, 7(50.0%) were detected by Maki and sonication techniques, 6(42.9%) were detected only by Maki technique, and 1 (7.1%)was detected only by sonication technique. Of the 10 CRBSI,6 (60.0%) were detected by Maki and sonication techniques,4 (40.0%) were detected only by Maki technique, and anyonly by sonication technique. We found higher AUC in Makitechnique than in sonication technique to diagnosis of CRBSI(p=0.02) and to diagnosis of catheter tip colonization (p=0.03).No significant differences were found in AUC between Makitechnique and combination techniques for diagnosis of catheter tip colonization (p=0.32) and of CRBSI (p=0.32).Conclusion.: Sonication did not provide reliability to Makitechnique for diagnosis of catheter tip colonization and CRBSI. (AU)

Objetivo. El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue analizar lastécnicas de sonicación y Maki para el diagnóstico de la colonización de la punta del catéter y la bacteriemia relacionada conel catéter (CRBSI) en pacientes ingresados en UCI.Material y método. Estudio observacional y prospectivoen una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. Se incluyeron pacientescon algún catéter venoso central (CVC) insertado al menos durante 7 días y sospecha de sospecha de infección relacionadacon el catéter (IRC) (nuevo episodio de fiebre o sepsis). Se realizó técnica de Maki y posteriormente sonicación de la puntadel catéter. Comparamos áreas bajo la curva (AUC) de Maki,sonicación y combinación de técnicas para el diagnóstico decolonización de la punta del catéter y de CRBSI.Resultados. Se incluyeron 94 CVC de 87 episodios de sospecha de IRC. Encontramos 14 casos de colonización de la puntadel catéter y 10 casos de CRBSI. De los 14 casos de colonizaciónde la punta del catéter, 7 (50,0%) fueron detectados por Maki ytécnicas de sonicación, 6 (42,9%) fueron detectados solo por latécnica de Maki y 1 (7,1%) fue detectado solo por la técnica desonicación. De los 10 CRBSI, 6 (60,0%) fueron detectados portécnicas de Maki y sonicación, 4 (40,0%) fueron detectados solopor la técnica de Maki, y ninguno solo por la técnica de sonicación. Encontramos mayor AUC con Maki que en la sonicaciónpara el diagnóstico de CRBSI (p=0.02) y para el diagnóstico decolonización de la punta del catéter (p=0.03). No encontramosdiferencias significativas en AUC entre Maki technique y combinación de técnicas para el diagnóstico de CRBSI (p=0.32) y parael diagnóstico de colonización de la punta del catéter (p=0.32).Conclusiones. La sonicación no proporcionó rentabilidada la técnica de Maki para el diagnóstico de colonización de lapunta del catéter y CRBSI. (AU)

Skin insertion site culture for the prediction of primary bloodstream infection.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have analyzed the capability of skin insertion site culture to predict catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). However, there has been not analyzed its capability to predict primary bloodstream infection (PBSI), that include CRBSI and bloodstream infection of unknown origin (BSIUO). The novel objective of our study was to determine the capability of insertion skin site culture to predict CRBSI and primary bloodstream infection (PBSI), that include CRBSI and bloodstream infection of unknown origin (BSIUO). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational and prospective study in one Intensive Care Unit. Patients with some central venous catheter (CVC) at least during 7 days and suspected catheter-related infection (CRI) (new episode of fever or sepsis) were included. Cultures of insertion skin site, paired blood samples, catheter-tip, and other clinical samples were taken. Capability of insertion skin site culture to predict CRBSI and PBSI was determined. RESULTS: We included 108 CVC from 96 CRI suspicion episodes. The causes that motivated CRI suspicion were 20 (18.5%) PBSI, 44 (40.7%) other infections, and 44 (40.7%) unknown. Among the 20 PBSI, 11 (55%) were CRBSI and 9 (45%) were BSIUO. Negative predictive value of insertion skin site culture to predict CRBSI was 95% (87-98%) and to predict PBSI was 85% (76-91%). CONCLUSIONS: The new finding of our study was that skin insertion site culture had a good negative predicted valued for the prediction of CRBSI and PBSI.