Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 28
Filter
1.
Int J Nurs Knowl ; 35(2): 130-135, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36859804

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the use of the nursing diagnosis Risk for Falls in Primary Care System of the Community of Madrid. METHODS: A retrospective review of the clinical histories was carried out in 262 health centers from January 2005 to December 2015. The study population are the patients who have recorded in their electronic health record the nursing diagnosis Risk for Falls. FINDINGS: Frequency of use of the Risk for Falls ND in the Community of Madrid was 53,340 diagnoses, increasing from 650 nursing diagnosis in 2005 to 14,695 in 2015. NOC Nursing Outcomes total identified were 109,145, which represents an average of 2.05 NOC Nursing Outcomes per diagnosis. NOC Nursing Outcomes frequently appeared as follows: Fall Prevention Behavior (35.9%), Safe Home Environment (11.3%), and Risk Control (10.5%). NIC Nursing Interventions total identified were 104,293, representing an average of 1.96 NIC nursing interventions per diagnosis. NIC Nursing Interventions frequently appeared as follows: Fall Prevention (45.9%), Environmental Management: Safety (27%), and Risk Identification (5.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Nursing diagnosis of Risk for Falls and the care process related to this diagnosis is starting to be used by the primary care nurses of the Community of Madrid. IMPLICATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Risk factors related to the nursing diagnosis of risk for falls identified in our study can be addressed with activities that nurses must implement to prevent falls. Nursing methodology in general and specifically the diagnosis of risk for falls must be included in guides and protocols for the prevention of falls, and its use should be promoted by primary care nurses.


Subject(s)
Nursing Diagnosis , Primary Health Care , Humans , Spain , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
2.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 11(22)2023 Nov 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37998472

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health literacy and eHealth literacy play a crucial role in improving a community's ability to take care of themselves, ultimately leading to a reduction in disparities in health. Embracing a healthy way of living is vital in lessening the impact of illnesses and extending one's lifespan. This research delves into the link between the health and eHealth literacy levels of individuals accessing primary healthcare services and investigates how this relates to adopting a health-conscious lifestyle. METHODS: The approach involves a cross-sectional examination carried out at a healthcare facility in the Madrid region of Spain, focusing on adult patients who are in need of primary care nursing services. Health and eHealth literacy and a healthy lifestyle were measured using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ), and the "PA100" questionnaire, respectively. RESULTS: Only some of the dimensions of the HLQ and eHLQ were significantly related to a healthy lifestyle, predominantly with a very low or low relationship. Dimension three of the HLQ and dimension five of the eHLQ acquired more importance and were positioned as positive predictors of a healthy lifestyle. CONCLUSIONS: This study helps comprehend the relationship between health and eHealth literacy and a healthy lifestyle, which provides information that contributes to understanding the factors that might have a higher impact on lifestyles.

3.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 11(14)2023 Jul 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37510479

ABSTRACT

Lifestyle, a major determinant of health status, comprises a number of habits and behaviours that form a part of daily life. People with healthy lifestyles have a better quality of life, suffer less disease, and have a longer life expectancy. This work reports the design and content validation of a questionnaire-the 'PONTE A 100' questionnaire-assessing the lifestyle of adults. This collects information across five dimensions-'Eating Habits', 'Physical Activity', 'Smoking and use of Alcohol and other Drugs', 'Emotional Wellbeing', and 'Safety and Non-intentional Injuries'-via the answering of a total 33 items. Psychometric validation of the instrument's content was obtained via expert opinions. This was performed by two rounds of assessment and involved 34 experts representing different health science disciplines (mean experience, 27.4 ± 9.4 years). At the end of each round, adjustments were made according to their recommendations. Agreement between the experts was examined using the Aiken V test. A final V value of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-1.00) was obtained for the questionnaire as a whole, highlighting the validity of its content. The questionnaire would therefore appear to be an appropriate instrument for assessing the lifestyle of adults.

4.
BMC Nurs ; 22(1): 236, 2023 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37420220

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: 'Learning by doing' is a learning model based on performing actions and gaining experience. The 'nursing process' is a systematic, rational method for providing nursing care. During their university education, nursing students need to acquire the ability to promote healthy lifestyles. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of a learning strategy based on learning by doing and grounded in the use of the nursing process, on the lifestyle of nursing students. METHODS: This quasi-experimental intervention (before-after), performed over 2011-2022, involved 2300 nursing students at a university nursing school in Spain. The risk factors for chronic diseases-being a smoker, being overweight, or having high blood pressure-to which each student was exposed were recorded. Those positive for at least one risk factor selected companion students as 'support nursing students' who became responsible for designing an individualised care plan to reduce the risk(s) faced. To ensure the correct use of the nursing process, teachers approved and monitored the implementation of the care plans. Whether risk-reduction objectives were met was determined three months later. RESULTS: The students with risk factors largely improved their lifestyles (targets for reducing smoking/body weight were met) with the help of their supporting peers. CONCLUSIONS: The learning by doing method demonstrated its effectiveness, improving the lifestyle of at-risk students via the use of the nursing process.

5.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(4)2023 Apr 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37112758

ABSTRACT

Knowing the attitudes and behaviors of nursing students in relation to vaccination is important because they will soon be determinant for the health literacy of the population. Vaccination remains the most effective response in the fight against communicable diseases, including COVID-19 and influenza. The objective of this study is to analyze the attitudes and behaviors of Portuguese nursing students with regard to vaccination. A cross-sectional study was carried out, with data collection from nursing students at a university in Lisbon, Portugal. A sample of 216 nursing students was obtained, representing 67.1% of the students enrolled in this university. What stands out from the results of the questionnaire "Attitudes and Behaviors in Relation to Vaccination among Students of Health Sciences" is that for the majority of students the answers were positive; in addition, 84.7% had a completed vaccination schedule for COVID-19. Being a nursing student, being in the final years of the course and being a woman are the factors that most influence the positive attitude of the students. The results obtained are motivating, because these students will be the future health professionals most likely to integrate health promotion programs through vaccination.

6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36497572

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adequate eHealth literacy levels empower people to make informed decisions, enhancing their autonomy. The current study assessed a group using primary care services for their eHealth literacy and examined its relationship with sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS: Adult patients in need of primary care nursing services participated in this cross-sectional study, which was carried out in a healthcare center in the Madrid region of Spain. Through systematic random sampling, 166 participants were chosen for the study. The eHealth Literacy Questionnaire was used to assess eHealth literacy (eHLQ). RESULTS: The studied population showed higher eHealth literacy scores in dimensions 2 ("understanding of health concepts and language") and 4 ("feel safe and in control"); the lowest scores were recorded for dimensions 1 ("using technology to process health information"), 3 ("ability to actively engage with digital services"), and 7 ("digital services that suit individual needs"). People with completed secondary education and a better-perceived health status who were younger and employed showed a higher level of eHealth literacy. CONCLUSIONS: The findings advance our knowledge of the variables affecting eHealth literacy. We may be able to understand patients' needs and provide them with greater support if we can pinpoint the areas where they demonstrate the lowest eHealth literacy.


Subject(s)
Health Literacy , Telemedicine , Adult , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Computer Literacy , Telemedicine/methods , Health Literacy/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Language , Primary Health Care
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36142082

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health literacy enhances a population's self-care capacity and helps to reduce health inequalities. This work examines the health literacy of a population attending primary care services and explores its relationship with sociodemographic factors. METHODS: This cross-sectional study, conducted at a healthcare center in the Madrid region (Spain), involved adult patients requiring primary care nursing services. One hundred and sixty-six participants were recruited via systematic random sampling. Health literacy was measured using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). RESULTS: The studied population showed higher health literacy scores for literacy dimensions 1 (feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers) and 4 (social support for health); the lowest scores were recorded for dimensions 5 (appraisal of health information) and 8 (ability to find good health information). People with a better perceived health status showed a higher level of health literacy. People over 65 years of age, those with an incomplete secondary education, and those who were unemployed returned lower scores for several literacy dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: The results contribute to our understanding of the factors that influence health literacy. Identifying the areas in which patients show the poorest health literacy may help us comprehend their needs and better support them.


Subject(s)
Health Literacy , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Status , Humans , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(3)2022 Mar 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35335092

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Vaccination is the most effective intervention to control seasonal influenza morbidity and mortality. The present study aimed to determine the influenza vaccination coverage in the Military Health Corps personnel in the 2020−2021 season, as well as the time trend and the possible influence of the pandemic on coverage, in order to study the reasons that led to the non-vaccination of health professionals and to analyze adverse drug reactions (ADRs). (2) Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted from February to May 2021. All FAS CMS personnel were included. A self-administered questionnaire was sent by e-mail to the selected personnel. (3) Results: Vaccination coverage in the 2016−2017 season was 15.8% (n = 276), in the 2019−2020 season it was 17.41% (n = 424), and in the 2020−2021 season it was 24.22% (n = 590). The percentage of vaccinated men was higher than the percentage of women. In 2019 and 2020 the most vaccinated group was 31−40 years old. Lieutenants had the highest vaccination uptake in 2019 and 2020. The personnel with the highest uptake of vaccines were those in the specialty of nursing in each of 2016, 2019 and 2020, with >30 years of time worked in 2016. In terms of factors leading to refusal of vaccination, the most reported was "not considered a risk group" (23.0%), and the least reported was "avoidance of vaccine administration" (2.2%). Eighty individuals presented adverse reactions after vaccine administration (9.6%). (4) Conclusions: The rate of influenza vaccination among healthcare professionals was lower during the 2020 season compared to the previous season, but was expected to increase in the upcoming 2021 season.

9.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(2)2022 Jan 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35214618

ABSTRACT

Vaccination against influenza and SARS-CoV-2 is recommended in health sciences students to reduce the risk of acquiring these diseases and transmitting them to patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate how the pandemic influenced the modification of influenza vaccination coverage during the 2019/2020 and 2021/2022 campaigns and to analyze the vaccination coverage against SARS-CoV-2 in health sciences students. A cross-sectional study was conducted among students of the Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry of the Complutense University of Madrid. A questionnaire was administered in two stages, the first, Q1, before the start of the pandemic, where we analyzed influenza coverage during the 2019/2020 campaign and a second, Q2, 18 months after the start of the pandemic where we analyzed influenza coverage during the 2021/2022 campaign and coverage against SARS-CoV-2. A total of 1894 students (58.78% of the total of those enrolled) participated. Flu vaccination coverage increased from 26.7% in Q1 to 35.0% in Q2 (p < 0.05), being higher in the age group older than 21 years, who studied nursing, were in their fourth year and lived with people at risk. Vaccination coverage against SARS-CoV-2 was very high (97.8%), especially in students vaccinated against influenza. Coverage of the influenza vaccine in health sciences students increased from 2019-2020 to 2021-2022, being higher in the age group older than 21 years, who studied nursing, were in their first and fourth year and lived with people at risk. Coverage of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in health sciences students was very high, especially in those vaccinated against influenza.

10.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(2)2022 Feb 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35214695

ABSTRACT

It is important to know the attitudes of students of health sciences (SHSs) towards vaccination since they will be tomorrow's health professionals. Vaccination is a powerful tool in the fight against COVID-19. The aim of the present, cross-sectional study was to examine how the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced the attitude of SHSs towards vaccination. Data were collected in the form of a questionnaire from all students of nursing, physiotherapy and chiropody matriculated at a Madrid University for the academic year 2019/2020 (i.e., before the start of the pandemic [Q1]), and from all those matriculated for the year 2021/22 (i.e., c18 months after the pandemic was declared [Q2]). A multivariate analysis was performed to identify the influence of sex, degree being studied, course year and the time of answering (Q1 or Q2), on the dimensions Beliefs, Behaviours and General Attitude. Overall, 1894 questionnaires were returned (934 [49.3%] for Q1, and 960 [50.7%] for Q2), of which 70.5% were completed by students of nursing, 14% by students of physiotherapy and 15.4% by those studying chiropody. In Q2, the results for all three dimensions were significantly better (p < 0.05). The most important influencing factors were being a student of nursing, being in the final years of training (years 3 or 4), female gender and answering at the time of Q2. The results obtained are encouraging since student nurses (who showed Q1 and Q2 General Attitude scores of 3.34 and 3.47 (maximum possible 4), respectively [p < 0.05]) are the health professionals of tomorrow most likely to be involved in vaccination programmes.

11.
Aten. prim. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 53(2): 101962-101962, feb. 2021. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-202696

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: El objetivo general del estudio es conocer la prevalencia de la preocupación a caer en personas mayores, independientes para la deambulación, que viven en la comunidad, según la versión reducida del FES-I y los factores asociados que influyen en esta preocupación. DISEÑO: Estudio descriptivo transversal. Emplazamiento: Centro de Salud El Greco (Getafe), Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria de Madrid. PARTICIPANTES: Ciento ochenta y nueve pacientes ≥ 70 años independientes o con dependencia funcional leve-moderada (índice de Barthel ≥ 60) e independientes para la deambulación (camina 45 min sin ayuda o con bastón). El estudio se ofreció a 328 personas: 217 aceptaron y rechazaron 111. Mediciones principales: La variable dependiente, miedo a caerse (MC), fue evaluada mediante el cuestionario Short FES-I, considerando como punto de corte para el cribado positivo del MC una puntuación ≥ 11. Como variables independientes se consideraron: índice de Barthel, escala Downton, prueba de fragilidad Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), caídas en el último año, lesiones asociadas a las caídas, tiempo desde la última caída, déficit sensorial, uso de dispositivos de la marcha, comorbilidad y tratamiento farmacológico. RESULTADOS: La prevalencia del MC fue del 42,9% (IC 95%: 35,5-50,2). Los factores asociados al MC en el análisis multivariante final fueron: sexo femenino, vivir solo, alto riesgo de caídas, presencia de fragilidad, uso de hipotensores y lesiones asociadas a caídas previas. CONCLUSIONES: La prevalencia del miedo a caer en personas mayores es elevada. Los profesionales de atención primaria deben sistematizar el cribado de este problema de salud, priorizando especialmente en las personas que presentan los siguientes factores de riesgo: ser mujer, vivir solo, tener una puntuación baja en el SPPB (como indicador de fragilidad) o presentar un elevado riesgo de caídas


AIM: To know, in the population over 70, independent for walking, the prevalence of the concern to fall according to the short version of the Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) questionnaire, in old people living in the community and their associated factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. LOCATION: Centro de Salud El Greco, Getafe, Madrid, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: 189 patients ≥ 70 years with a Barthel ≥ 60, independent for walking (walk 45minutes without help or with a cane). The study was offered to a total of 328 people, of these accepted 217 and rejected 111. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The dependent variable, fear of falling (FOF), was evaluated by means of the short FES-I questionnaire, considering as a cut-off point for the positive screening of the MC a score ≥ 11. As independent variables we considered: Barthel index, Downton scale, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) fragility test, falls in the last year, injuries associated with falls, time since the last fall, sensory deficit, use of gait devices, comorbidity and pharmacological treatment. RESULTS: The prevalence of FOF was 42.9% (95% CI: 35.5-50.2). The factors associated with FOF in the final multivariate analysis were: female sex, living alone, high risk of falls, presence of frailty (SPPB ≤ 9), use of hypotensive drugs, and injuries associated with previous falls. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of FOF in older people is high. Primary Care professionals should systematize the screening of this health problem, prioritizing especially in people who present the following risk factors: being a woman, living alone, having a low score on the SPPB (as an indicator of frailty) or presenting a high risk of falls


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Fear , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Independent Living/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Independent Living/psychology , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Risk Assessment , Physical Functional Performance
12.
Aten Primaria ; 53(2): 101962, 2021 02.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33446358

ABSTRACT

AIM: To know, in the population over 70, independent for walking, the prevalence of the concern to fall according to the short version of the Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) questionnaire, in old people living in the community and their associated factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. LOCATION: Centro de Salud El Greco, Getafe, Madrid, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: 189 patients ≥70years with a Barthel ≥60, independent for walking (walk 45minutes without help or with a cane). The study was offered to a total of 328 people, of these accepted 217 and rejected 111. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The dependent variable, fear of falling (FOF), was evaluated by means of the short FES-I questionnaire, considering as a cut-off point for the positive screening of the MC a score ≥11. As independent variables we considered: Barthel index, Downton scale, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) fragility test, falls in the last year, injuries associated with falls, time since the last fall, sensory deficit, use of gait devices, comorbidity and pharmacological treatment. RESULTS: The prevalence of FOF was 42.9% (95%CI: 35.5-50.2). The factors associated with FOF in the final multivariate analysis were: female sex, living alone, high risk of falls, presence of frailty (SPPB≤9), use of hypotensive drugs, and injuries associated with previous falls. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of FOF in older people is high. Primary Care professionals should systematize the screening of this health problem, prioritizing especially in people who present the following risk factors: being a woman, living alone, having a low score on the SPPB (as an indicator of frailty) or presenting a high risk of falls.


Subject(s)
Fear , Independent Living , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Prevalence , Risk Factors
13.
Health Expect ; 24(1): 33-41, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33124759

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In recent decades, many self-report instruments have been developed to assess the extent to which patients want to be informed and involved in decisions about their health as part of the concept of person-centred care (PCC). The main objective of this research was to translate, adapt and validate the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS) using a sample of primary care health-care professionals in Spain. METHODS: Baseline analysis of PPOS scores for 321 primary care professionals (general practitioners and nurses) from 63 centres and 3 Spanish regions participating in a randomized controlled trial. We analysed missing values, distributions and descriptive statistics, item-to-scale correlations and internal consistency. Performed were confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the 2-factor model (sharing and caring dimensions), scale depuration and principal component analysis (PCA). RESULTS: Low inter-item correlations were observed, and the CFA 2-factor model only obtained a good fit to the data after excluding 8 items. Internal consistency of the 10-item PPOS was acceptable (0.77), but low for individual subscales (0.70 and 0.55). PCA results suggest a possible 3-factor structure. Participants showed a patient-oriented style (mean = 4.46, SD = 0.73), with higher scores for caring than sharing. CONCLUSION: Although the 2-factor model obtained empirical support, measurement indicators of the PPOS (caring dimension) could be improved. Spanish primary care health-care professionals overall show a patient-oriented attitude, although less marked in issues such as patients' need for and management of medical information.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Humans , Patient-Centered Care , Primary Health Care , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
Texto & contexto enferm ; 30: e20190243, 2021. tab
Article in English | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-1290314

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective to determine the psychometric properties of the international 7-item Falls Efficacy Scale. Method a psychometric study. Convenience sample consisting of 170 older adults living in the Madeira Autonomous Region, Portugal. A two-part instrument was used (sociodemographic characterization and the Falls Efficacy Scale-International-Portugal). The starting point was the translation and transcultural adaptation already carried out for the Falls Efficacy Scale - International (16 items). Construct validity (factorial analysis and discriminant validity) and the reliability (Cronbach's α) of the 7-item scale were evaluated. Previous authorization was obtained from the Ethics Commission and from the people involved. Results in the exploratory factorial analysis, the International 7-item Falls Efficacy Scale presents an explained variance of 65.8%. The Spearman's correlation between the score obtained based on the 7 items and the score obtained based on the 16 items is significant and very strong (r=0.987, p<0.0001). Internal consistency was 0.958. Conclusion the validity and reliability study of the International 7-item Falls Efficacy Scale revealed that it is an adequate scale for the evaluation of the fear of falling in the community-dwelling older adults.


RESUMEN Objetivo determinar las propiedades psicométricas de la escala Falls Efficacy Scale Internacional de 7 ítems. Método estudio psicométrico. Muestra por conveniencia de 170 ancianos que viven en la Región Autónoma da Madeira, Portugal. Se empleó un instrumento constituido por dos partes (caracterización sociodemográfica y la escala Falls Efficacy Scale Internacional - Portugal). Se partió de la traducción y adaptación transcultural ya realizada de la escala Falls Efficacy Scale Internacional (16 ítems). Se evaluó la validez de constructo (análisis factorial y validez discriminante) y la confiabilidad (α de Cronbach) de la escala de 7 ítems. Previamente se obtuvo la autorización de la Comisión de Ética y de las personas involucradas. Resultados en el análisis factorial exploratorio, la escala Falls Efficacy Scale Internacional de 7 ítems presenta una varianza explicada del 65,8%. La correlación de Spearman entre la puntuación obtenida sobre la base de los 7 ítems y la obtenida sobre la base de los 16 ítems es significativa y muy fuerte (r=0,987, p<0,0001). La consistencia interna fue de 0,958. Conclusión el estudio de la validez y la confiabilidad de la escala Falls Efficacy Scale Internacional de 7 ítems reveló que es una escala adecuada para evaluar el miedo a caer en el anciano que vive en la comunidad.


RESUMO Objetivo determinar as propriedades psicométricas da Falls Efficacy Scale Internacional 7 itens. Método estudo psicométrico. Amostra de conveniência, de 170 idosos residentes em Região Autónoma da Madeira, Portugal. Recorreu-se a instrumento constituído por duas partes (caracterização sociodemográfica e a Falls Efficacy Scale Internacional Portugal). Partiu-se da tradução e adaptação transcultural já realizada para a Falls Efficacy Scale Internacional (16 itens). Avaliou-se a validade de constructo (análise fatorial e validade discriminante) e a confiabilidade (α de Cronbach) da escala de 7 itens. Obteve-se previamente autorização da Comissão de Ética e das pessoas envolvidas. Resultados na análise fatorial exploratória a Falls Efficacy Scale Internacional 7 itens apresenta uma variância explicada de 65,8%. A correlação de Spearman entre a pontuação obtida com base nos 7 itens e a pontuação obtida com base nos 16 itens é significativa e muito forte (r=0.987, p<0.0001). A consistência interna foi de 0,958. Conclusão o estudo da validade e a confiabilidade da Falls Efficacy Scale Internacional 7 itens revelou ser uma escala adequada para a avaliação do medo de cair na pessoa idosa residente na comunidade.


Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Accidental Falls , Aged , Risk Factors , Validation Study , Fear
15.
Aten. prim. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 52(9): 617-626, nov. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-198438

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Estudiar el efecto del tipo de seguimiento según la cartera de servicios y de otros factores asociados en la disminución de las cifras de HbA1c en personas con diabetes mellitus tipo 2, nuevo diagnóstico y con mal control inicial. DISEÑO: Estudio observacional analítico de una cohorte en condiciones de práctica clínica habitual. EMPLAZAMIENTO: 262 centros de salud de Atención Primaria de Madrid. Participantes: 1838 personas mayores de 18 años con nuevo diagnóstico de diabetes y cifras de HbA1c inicial ≥ 7% o ≥ 8,5% si tienen más de 75 años. Intervenciones: La variable exposición fue el tipo de seguimiento según la cartera, categorizado en mínimo, medio y óptimo, según el número de intervenciones realizadas y periodicidad por tipo de plan terapéutico-farmacológico. MEDICIONES PRINCIPALES: Se estudiaron comorbilidad, plan terapéutico-farmacológico, consejos dieta y ejercicio, índice de privación. La variable resultado principal fue la diferencia entre la HbA1c final e inicial. RESULTADOS: Tras 2 años de seguimiento se produjo una disminución media de la HbA1c de -1,7 puntos porcentuales (IC del 95%: -1,6; -1,8), siendo 0,39 puntos mayor en los pacientes con tipo de seguimiento óptimo: -2,1 (IC del 95%: -1,7; -2,4). Los factores asociados a la disminución fueron: tipo de seguimiento óptimo -0,29 (IC del 95%: -0,5; -0,1) y medio -0,26 (IC del 95%: -0,5; -0,0), y valor de la HbA1c inicial -0,9 (IC del 95%: -0,9; -0,9) y los factores asociados al aumento: tratamiento con insulina y vivir en zonas socialmente desfavorecidas. CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes con diagnóstico reciente de diabetes en los que se realiza un seguimiento óptimo según la cartera de servicios mejoran el control glucémico


OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of the type of follow-up according to Service Portfolio and other associated factors, in the reduction of HbA1c levels in people with a new diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and poor initial control. DESIGN: Analytical observational study of a cohort under routine clinical practice conditions. Location: 262 Primary Health Care Centres in Madrid. PARTICIPANTS: 1,838 individuals older than 18 years with a new diagnosis of type 2 DM and initial HbA1c levels ≥ 7%, or ≥ 8.5% if older than 75 years. Interventions: The exposure variable was the type of follow-up according to Portfolio, categorised as minimum, medium, and optimal, according to the number of interventions performed and periodicity of type of therapeutic-pharmacological plan. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: A study was made of the comorbidity, therapeutic-pharmacological plan, diet - exercise advice and deprivation index. The main outcome was the difference between the final and initial HbA1c. RESULTS: After 2 years of follow-up there was a mean decrease in HbA1c by -1.7 percentage points (95% CI: -1.6;-1.8), which was 0.36 points higher in patients with optimal follow-up: -2.1 (95% CI: -1.7;-2.4). The factors associated with a decrease in HbA1c were the optimal follow-up -0.29 (95% CI: -0.5;-0.1), the medium follow-up -0.26 (95% CI: -0.5; -0.0), and the initial HbA1c value -0.9 (95% CI: -0.9; -0.9. The factors associated with the increase were insulin treatment and living in socially disadvantaged areas. CONCLUSIONS: Glycaemic control was improved in patients with a new diagnosis of diabetes in which optimal follow-up is performed as proposed in the Service Portfolio


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Primary Health Care/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Analysis of Variance , Sex Distribution , Follow-Up Studies , Reference Values , Spain
16.
Aten Primaria ; 52(9): 617-626, 2020 11.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32576384

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of the type of follow-up according to Service Portfolio and other associated factors, in the reduction of HbA1c levels in people with a new diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and poor initial control. DESIGN: Analytical observational study of a cohort under routine clinical practice conditions. LOCATION: 262 Primary Health Care Centres in Madrid. PARTICIPANTS: 1,838 individuals older than 18 years with a new diagnosis of type 2 DM and initial HbA1c levels ≥ 7%, or ≥ 8.5% if older than 75 years. INTERVENTIONS: The exposure variable was the type of follow-up according to Portfolio, categorised as minimum, medium, and optimal, according to the number of interventions performed and periodicity of type of therapeutic-pharmacological plan. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: A study was made of the comorbidity, therapeutic-pharmacological plan, diet - exercise advice and deprivation index. The main outcome was the difference between the final and initial HbA1c. RESULTS: After 2 years of follow-up there was a mean decrease in HbA1c by -1.7 percentage points (95% CI: -1.6;-1.8), which was 0.36 points higher in patients with optimal follow-up: -2.1 (95% CI: -1.7;-2.4). The factors associated with a decrease in HbA1c were the optimal follow-up -0.29 (95% CI: -0.5;-0.1), the medium follow-up -0.26 (95% CI: -0.5; -0.0), and the initial HbA1c value -0.9 (95% CI: -0.9; -0.9. The factors associated with the increase were insulin treatment and living in socially disadvantaged areas. CONCLUSIONS: Glycaemic control was improved in patients with a new diagnosis of diabetes in which optimal follow-up is performed as proposed in the Service Portfolio.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Blood Glucose , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Primary Health Care
17.
Int J Nurs Knowl ; 31(2): 124-133, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31379131

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To establish technical values for nursing diagnoses in primary healthcare with which to weight the delivery of care based on criteria of complexity and relevance. METHODS: A three-phase cross-sectional descriptive study: (1) establishing and weighting of the assessment criteria of technical values, (2) scoring of the assessment criteria per diagnosis, and (3) assigning technical values. FINDINGS: Diagnoses were ordered on the scoring scale obtained and a technical value of 1 to 4 was assigned according to their quartile. CONCLUSIONS: Having a technical value for each nursing diagnosis helps to measure the diversity and complexity of care. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Technical values may contribute to improving nursing management indicators, as they incorporate a quantitative view into the assessment process.


OBJETIVO: Definir un valor técnico para los diagnósticos enfermeros en Atención Primaria que permita ponderar la prestación de cuidados en base a criterios de complejidad y relevancia. MÉTODOS: Estudio descriptivo transversal realizado en 3 fases: 1) definición y ponderación de los criterios de valoración del valor técnico, 2) puntuación de los criterios de valoración por diagnóstico, 3) asignación del valor técnico. RESULTADOS: Se ordenaron los diagnósticos en la escala de puntuación obtenida y se asignó un valor técnico del 1 al 4 en función del cuartil. CONCLUSIONES: Disponer de un valor técnico de cada diagnóstico enfermero permite dimensionar la diversidad y la complejidad de los cuidados. IMPLICACIONES: El valor técnico puede contribuir a mejorar los indicadores de gestión de servicios enfermeros al añadir una visión cuantitativa al proceso evaluativo. PALABRAS CLAVE: diagnóstico de enfermería; terminología normalizada de enfermería; Atención Primaria de salud; indicadores de calidad de la atención de salud; indicadores de gestión.


Subject(s)
Nursing Diagnosis , Primary Health Care , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
18.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 403, 2019 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31221215

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Virtual communities of practice (vCoPs) facilitate online learning via the exchange of experiences and knowledge between interested participants. Compared to other communities, vCoPs need to overcome technological structures and specific barriers. Our objective was to pilot the acceptability and feasibility of a vCoP aimed at improving the attitudes of primary care professionals to the empowerment of patients with chronic conditions. METHODS: We used a qualitative approach based on 2 focus groups: one composed of 6 general practitioners and the other of 6 practice nurses. Discussion guidelines on the topics to be investigated were provided to the moderator. Sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was performed using the ATLAS-ti software. RESULTS: The available operating systems and browsers and the lack of suitable spaces and time were reported as the main difficulties with the vCoP. The vCoP was perceived to be a flexible learning mode that provided up-to-date resources applicable to routine practice and offered a space for the exchange of experiences and approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this pilot study show that the vCoP was considered useful for learning how to empower patients. However, while vCoPs have the potential to facilitate learning and as shown create professional awareness regarding patient empowerment, attention needs to be paid to technological and access issues and the time demands on professionals. We collected relevant inputs to improve the features, content and educational methods to be included in further vCoP implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02757781 . Registered on 25 April 2016.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Education, Distance/methods , General Practitioners/psychology , Nurses/psychology , Primary Health Care , Adult , Chronic Disease , Feasibility Studies , Female , General Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Learning , Male , Middle Aged , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Patient Participation , Pilot Projects , Qualitative Research
19.
Trials ; 18(1): 505, 2017 Oct 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29084597

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Communities of practice are based on the idea that learning involves a group of people exchanging experiences and knowledge. The e-MPODERA project aims to assess the effectiveness of a virtual community of practice aimed at improving primary healthcare professional attitudes to the empowerment of patients with chronic diseases. METHODS: This paper describes the protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. We will randomly assign 18 primary-care practices per participating region of Spain (Catalonia, Madrid and Canary Islands) to a virtual community of practice or to usual training. The primary-care practice will be the randomization unit and the primary healthcare professional will be the unit of analysis. We will need a sample of 270 primary healthcare professionals (general practitioners and nurses) and 1382 patients. We will perform randomization after professionals and patients are selected. We will ask the intervention group to participate for 12 months in a virtual community of practice based on a web 2.0 platform. We will measure the primary outcome using the Patient-Provider Orientation Scale questionnaire administered at baseline and after 12 months. Secondary outcomes will be the sociodemographic characteristics of health professionals, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients, the Patient Activation Measure questionnaire for patient activation and outcomes regarding use of the virtual community of practice. We will calculate a linear mixed-effects regression to estimate the effect of participating in the virtual community of practice. DISCUSSION: This cluster randomized controlled trial will show whether a virtual intervention for primary healthcare professionals improves attitudes to the empowerment of patients with chronic diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClicalTrials.gov, NCT02757781 . Registered on 25 April 2016. Protocol Version. PI15.01 22 January 2016.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Chronic Disease/therapy , Group Processes , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Nurses/psychology , Patient Care Team , Patient Participation , Physicians, Primary Care/psychology , Primary Health Care , Self Care , Chronic Disease/psychology , Clinical Decision-Making , Games, Experimental , Humans , Internet , Learning , Nurse-Patient Relations , Physician-Patient Relations , Primary Care Nursing , Research Design , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
20.
Int J Nurs Knowl ; 27(1): 43-8, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25622991

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine whether patients assigned to primary care nurses who use the nursing process (use of NANDA-I, NIC, and NOC) achieve better intermediate health outcomes than the population assigned to nurses who do not use the nursing process. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted in 34 primary healthcare centers of Area 11 of the Community of Madrid (Spain) based on electronic health records. FINDINGS: The extension of health care provided was greater in nurses who used the nursing process. Patients assigned to these nurses have better control of their chronic diseases and incur lower drug costs. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the nursing process can lead to improved health of populations. IMPLICATIONS: The development of strategies is necessary to ensure greater use of the nursing process among nurses in primary care.


Subject(s)
Nursing Process , Primary Health Care , Chronic Disease/nursing , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Costs , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...