Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Exp Bot ; 63(12): 4359-73, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22577185

ABSTRACT

Root chicory (Cichorium intybus var. sativum) is a cash crop cultivated for inulin production in Western Europe. This plant can be exposed to severe water stress during the last 3 months of its 6-month growing period. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of a progressive decline in water availability on plant growth, photosynthesis, and sugar metabolism and to determine its impact on inulin production. Water stress drastically decreased fresh and dry root weight, leaf number, total leaf area, and stomatal conductance. Stressed plants, however, increased their water-use efficiency and leaf soluble sugar concentration, decreased the shoot-to-root ratio and lowered their osmotic potential. Despite a decrease in photosynthetic pigments, the photosynthesis light phase remained unaffected under water stress. Water stress increased sucrose phosphate synthase activity in the leaves but not in the roots. Water stress inhibited sucrose:sucrose 1-fructosyltransferase and fructan:fructan 1 fructosyltransferase after 19 weeks of culture and slightly increased fructan 1-exohydrolase activity. The root inulin concentration, expressed on a dry-weight basis, and the mean degree of polymerization of the inulin chain remained unaffected by water stress. Root chicory displayed resistance to water stress, but that resistance was obtained at the expense of growth, which in turn led to a significant decrease in inulin production.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological/physiology , Cichorium intybus/physiology , Inulin/metabolism , Plant Roots/physiology , Water/physiology , Carbohydrate Metabolism , Carbohydrates/analysis , Cichorium intybus/growth & development , Cichorium intybus/metabolism , Chlorophyll/metabolism , Dehydration , Droughts , Glucosyltransferases/metabolism , Hexosyltransferases/metabolism , Inulin/analysis , Photosynthesis/physiology , Plant Leaves/growth & development , Plant Leaves/metabolism , Plant Leaves/physiology , Plant Proteins/metabolism , Plant Roots/growth & development , Plant Roots/metabolism , Plant Shoots/growth & development , Plant Shoots/metabolism , Plant Shoots/physiology , Plant Stomata/growth & development , Plant Stomata/metabolism , Plant Stomata/physiology , Plant Transpiration/physiology
2.
Plant Cell ; 12(6): 885-900, 2000 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10852935

ABSTRACT

CONSTANS (CO) promotes flowering of Arabidopsis in response to long photoperiods. Transgenic plants carrying CO fused with the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (35S::CO) flowered earlier than did the wild type and were almost completely insensitive to length of day. Genes required for CO to promote flowering were identified by screening for mutations that suppress the effect of 35S::CO. Four mutations were identified that partially suppressed the early-flowering phenotype caused by 35S::CO. One of these mutations, suppressor of overexpression of CO 1 (soc1), defines a new locus, demonstrating that the mutagenesis approach is effective in identifying novel flowering-time mutations. The other three suppressor mutations are allelic with previously described mutations that cause late flowering. Two of them are alleles of ft, indicating that FT is required for CO to promote early flowering and most likely acts after CO in the hierarchy of flowering-time genes. The fourth suppressor mutation is an allele of fwa, and fwa soc1 35S::CO plants flowered at approximately the same time as co mutants, suggesting that a combination of fwa and soc1 abolishes the promotion of flowering by CO. Besides delaying flowering, fwa acted synergistically with 35S::CO to repress floral development after bolting. The latter phenotype was not shown by any of the progenitors and was most probably caused by a reduction in the function of LEAFY. These genetic interactions suggest models for how CO, FWA, FT, and SOC1 interact during the transition to flowering.


Subject(s)
Arabidopsis Proteins , Arabidopsis/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Plant Proteins/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Arabidopsis/growth & development , Circadian Rhythm , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant , MADS Domain Proteins , Mutagenesis, Site-Directed , Photoperiod , Plant Proteins/metabolism , Plants, Genetically Modified , Suppression, Genetic , Transcription Factors/metabolism
3.
New Phytol ; 135(1): 59-66, 1997 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33863157

ABSTRACT

Unifoliated plants of Lolium temulentum L. ev. Ceres, a qualitative long-day grass, were induced to flower by one 24-h long day (LD) or by one 8-h short day (SD) advanced by 1 2 h in the normal regime, so-called 'displaced short day' (DSD). Standard light for SD and DSD was a mixture of fluorescence and incandescence at 400 µmol m-2 s-1 whereas the extension period of the 24-h LD was solely incandescence at 10-15 µmol m-2 s-1 . The DSD system was first characterized by the timings of floral induction, stimulus translocation and apical development. Carbohydrates in the blade tissues and in leaf exudate were analysed comparatively in vegetative and induced plants. Fructans were not detected in the leaf tissues whereas sucrose and starch were found to be present in similar amounts. In SD, their contents exhibited a diurnal fluctuation and were not in large excess. The common change observed during the two inductive treatments was that starch remained at a high level during the LD extension, even though the lighting was unsuitable for photosynthesis, and increased transiently in DSD. Sucrose was the major sugar contained in the leaf exudate. Its content increased when flowering was induced, but not at the same time in the two systems. In LD, sucrose exudation rose when plants were returned to standard light after the inductive cycle, i.e. after the LD stimulus had left the leaf blade. By contrast, during the DSD, sucrose was transported at the same time as the floral stimulus. Results are discussed together with the methods used to time stimulus translocation and their implications.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...