ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Depressiveness is a known and common problem after stroke, which puts a great burden on those affected. The main goal for stroke rehabilitation is to achieve the maximum possible self-determination and participation in the community. This research study examined how depressive symptoms influence the course of participation in outpatient neurological rehabilitation. METHODS: Stroke rehabilitants from 17 German outpatient neurological rehabilitation centers were interviewed in a multicentric observational study. Within the current work, data on participation and depressive symptoms recorded at the beginning and at the end of rehabilitation by self-assessment questionnaires, were evaluated. RESULTS: Data of 342 rehabilitants were considered. Results of a multinomial logistic regression analysis indicated that the depression value at the end of rehabilitation, in particular, proved to be a good predictor for the improvement in participation. The lower the depressiveness, the more likely an improvement in participation. At the beginning of the rehabilitation program there were no significant differences between mean depression scores of patients who improved and patients who deteriorated. DISCUSSION: A relationship between depressiveness and participation was shown. The treatment of depressive symptoms through timely administered psychotherapeutic and medicinal care and general activity promotion could influence the participation in a beneficial way.
Subject(s)
Depression , Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke , Depression/complications , Humans , Stroke/complications , Stroke/psychology , Stroke Rehabilitation/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The scales Barthel-Index (BI) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) are the most frequently used instruments for measurement of outcome in neurological rehabilitation. Both instruments show appropriate psychometric characteristics but there are some limitations for their use in outpatient neurorehabilitation. The "Score of Independence for Neurologic and Geriatric Rehabilitation (SINGER)" was developed to compensate the weaknesses of the established instruments and to facilitate a direct connection to the ICF. The results of the original validation study of the SINGER in an inpatient setting recommended a test of the SINGER also in an outpatient setting. METHOD: The SINGER has been applied in a multicentric validation study. Patients of 17 outpatient rehabilitation centres were included consecutively. In this study patients with stroke or TBI were asked to fill in a questionnaire at 4 points of measurement. Additionally, medical staff were asked to rate the patients' status at admission and discharge. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: SINGER-data could be collected of 429 patients. In sum, results recommend to use the SINGER in outpatient neurorehabilitation, though with some restrictions. In comparison to BI and FIM, the SINGER results show in any case considerably less ceiling effects. The further exclusive use of FIM and, above all, BI cannot be recommended. But for very weak affected patients SINGER is poor sensitive for change and because SINGER is not covering all relevant aspects of rehabilitation a combined clinical use of SINGER and other assessment instruments seems to be a constructive solution.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/methods , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Nervous System Diseases/rehabilitation , Psychometrics/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological , Disability Evaluation , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: So far, there are only few studies concerning the outcome of outpatient neurological rehabilitation in Germany. Considering the statutory obligations of quality assurance there is an urgent need of appropriate instruments to assess the rehabilitation outcome. The aim of this study was to assess the appropriateness of the Competency Rating Scale (CRS), which was used to measure rehabilitation outcome, and to collect data of the effects of outpatient neurological rehabilitation as a measure of rehabilitation outcome. METHODS: The basis of this study was data collected between 2008 and 2011. During that period the data of all patients of an outpatient neurological rehabilitation center were consecutively collected. There were no exclusion criteria. To measure rehabilitation outcome patients' self ratings with the CRS were used. To check the appropriateness of the CRS the dropout rate and the missing values were analysed. In addition, the patients' self ratings were compared with the data of a near relative rating with the CRS. RESULTS: On examining the entire group of patients, statistically significant improvements over time were found in the motor as well as in the cognitive-psychosocial areas. The analysis of the data with regard to the appropriateness of the CRS showed considerable ceiling effects and a high dropout rate. Differences between the self and the near relative ratings could be detected. CONCLUSION: For the overall group of patients positive effects of outpatient neurological rehabilitation can be proven. The assessment instrument used in this study is only partially suitable for assessing the outcome of outpatient neurological rehabilitation. The comparison of self and near relative ratings can systematically be used in the therapy process.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/standards , Nervous System Diseases/rehabilitation , Age Factors , Aged , Chronic Disease/rehabilitation , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nervous System Diseases/physiopathology , Nervous System Diseases/psychology , Patient Dropouts , Patient Satisfaction , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Rehabilitation Centers , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To date there is a lack of tools to measure participation and the already existing measures are not properly used as yet. In 2005 the IMET (Index zur Messung von Einschränkungen der Teilhabe) was developed and is able to measure the ICF associated construct participation as a generic instrument in chronic diseases. IMET and numerous instruments were applied in our own study and results were compared with results of an unpublished study. In addition, to test IMET for its use in neurorehabilitation the effects of outpatient neurorehabilitation were investigated and compared with results obtained in an inpatient setting. METHOD: In a multicentric observational study, consecutively treated patients of 6 outpatient neurorehabilitation centres were asked to fill in a questionnaire at three time points (admission and discharge in the course of rehabilitation and at 4 months follow-up). Additionally, clinical experts were asked to rate the patients' status at admission and discharge. The data were compared with results of a sample of inpatients of an unpublished study. RESULTS: The IMET seems to be the to date best instrument to measure participation in a global, ICF-defined and economic way. Especially participation, general health status and capacity in leisure time and daily routine show the biggest improvements. In comparison, the outpatients show improvements in their participation status. Participation-oriented outpatient neurorehabilitation seems to have a considerable impact on participation status in neurological patients through the course of rehabilitation.
