Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
PLOS Glob Public Health ; 3(8): e0002270, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37556441

ABSTRACT

The government of India has adopted the elimination of vertical transmission of HIV as one of the five high-level goals under phase V of the National AIDS and STD Control Programme (NACP). In this paper, we present the data from HIV estimations 2021 for India and select States detailing the progress as well as the attributable causes for vertical transmissions. The NACP spearheads work on mathematical modelling to estimate HIV burden based on the periodically conducted sentinel surveillance for guiding program implementation and policymaking. Using the results of the latest round of HIV Estimations in 2021, we analysed the mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) during the perinatal and postnatal (breastfeeding) period. In 2021, overall, around 5,000 [3,000-7,800] vertical transmissions were estimated nationally with 58% being perinatal infections and remaining during breastfeeding. MTCT at 6 weeks was around 12.95% [9.45-16.02] with the final transmission rate at 24.25% [18.50-29.50]. Overall, 57% of vertical transmissions were among HIV-positive mothers who did not receive ART during pregnancy or breastfeeding, 19% among mothers who dropped off ART during pregnancy or delivery, and 18% among mothers who were infected during pregnancy or breastfeeding. There were significant variations between States. Depending upon the States, the programme needs to focus on the intervention domains of timely engagement in antenatal care-HIV testing-ART initiation as well as programme retention and adherence support. Equally important would be strengthening the strategic information to generate related evidence for inputting India and State-specific parameters improving the MTCT-related modelled estimates.

2.
Virusdisease ; 32(2): 320-324, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33842676

ABSTRACT

People living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLHIV) are at greater risk of developing prolonged illness due to COVID 19 leading to longer duration of virus shedding owing to their underlying immune defects. The present study compared SARS-CoV-2 infection developing at the same time among two health care workers living with and without a history of HIV and working in the same ward of a tertiary care hospital of North India. A higher viral load was reported in the SARS-CoV-2 infected worker who was immunocompromised as compared to immunocompetent patient (19,193 copies/µL vs 9.4 copies/µL). In this preliminary case report, no difference was observed in the clinical presentation of both patients at the time of diagnosis. Further studies are required to investigate the COVID-19 susceptibility and severity among HIV-infected patients.

4.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 56(6): 106224, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33166694

ABSTRACT

Many drugs have been tried for the treatment/prevention of COVID-19 with limited success. Direct household contacts of COVID-19 patients are at highest risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been tried against COVID-19 owing to its in vitro virucidal action against SARS-CoV-2, but the role of HCQ as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) remains inconclusive. In this open-label, controlled clinical trial, asymptomatic individuals who had direct contact with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases or had undertaken international travel in the last 2 weeks were offered HCQ prophylaxis and assigned to PEP (n = 132) or control (n = 185) group. The PEP group received HCQ 800 mg on Day 1 followed by 400 mg once weekly for 3 weeks. Both groups undertook home quarantine for 2 weeks along with social distancing and personal hygiene. Over 4-week follow-up, 50/317 participants (15.8%) had new-onset COVID-19. The incidence of COVID-19 was significantly (P = 0.033) lower in the PEP (14/132; 10.6%) compared to the control (36/185; 19.5%) group (total absolute risk reduction, -8.9% points). The NNT to prevent the occurrence of 1 COVID-19 case was 12. Overall relative risk was 0.59 (95% CI 0.33-1.05). Compliance was good. The most common adverse event was epigastric discomfort with burning sensation (three participants), with no serious adverse events. PEP with HCQ has the potential for the prevention of COVID-19 in at-risk individuals. Until definitive therapy is available, continuing PEP with HCQ may be considered in suitable at-risk individuals. Further randomised clinical trials with larger samples are required for better evaluation of HCQ as PEP for COVID-19 prevention.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Female , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged
5.
Anup Agarwal; Aparna Mukherjee; Gunjan Kumar; Pranab Chatterjee; Tarun Bhatnagar; Pankaj Malhotra; B Latha; Sunita Bundas; Vivek Kumar; Ravi Dosi; Janak Kumar Khambholja; Rosemarie de Souza; Raja Rao Mesipogu; Saurabh Srivastava; Simmi Dube; Kiran Chaudhary; Subash S; S. Anbuselvi Mattuvar K; V Rajendran; A Sundararajaperumal; P Balamanikandan; R S Uma Maheswari; R Jayanthi; S Ragunanthanan; Sudhir Bhandari; Ajeet Singh; Ashok Pal; Anjali Handa; Govind Rankawat; Ketan Kargirwar; Joyce Regi; Darshana Rathod; Edwin Pathrose; Nirankar Bhutaka; Mayur H Patel; Rahul J Verma; Kamal Malukani; Shivani Patel; Apurv Thakur; Satish Joshi; Rashmi Kulkarni; Nilay N Suthar; Nehal M Shah; Hemang M Purohit; Cherry K Shah; Monila N Patel; Saket Shah; Smit H Shah; Tehsim Memon; Vishal R Beriwala; Kusum Jashnani; Fatema Ezzy; Simran Agrawal; Rakesh Bhadade; Atish M N; Tushar Madke; Vikash Kavishwar; Ramesh Waghmare; Nitin Valvi; B Thrilok Chander; A Vinaya Sekhar; Akhilesh Kumar Maurya; K Hemanth; K Nagamani; K Sudha; T Ravi Chandra; K Tushara Rao; J Vyshnavi; Rashmi Upadhyay; Shalini Bahadur; Rambha Pathak; Shikha Seth; Rakesh Gupta; Rita Saxena; Preksha Dwivedi; Reeni Malik; Deepti Chourasia; Jaya Lalwani; UM Sharma; JL Marko; Amit Suri; Vijay Kumar; Rajnish Kaushik; Parul Kodan; Bhabani Prasad Acharya; Kuldeep Kumar Gaur; Anubhav Gupta; Prerna Sachdeva; Shruti Dogra; Aikaj Jindal; M Joseph John; Avtar Singh Dhanju; Ranjana Khetrepal; Neeraj Sharma; Neetu Kukar; Divya Kavita; Rajesh Kumar; Rajesh Mahajan; Gurpreet Singh; Jaspreet Kaur; Raminder Pal Singh; Rajni Bassi; Swapneil Parikh; Om Shrivastav; Jayanthi Shastri; Maherra Desai; Shreevatsa Udupa; Varun A Bafna; Vijay Barge; Rajendra Madane; Sheetal Yadav; Sanjeev Mishra; Archana Bajpayee; M K Garg; G K Bohra; Vijaylakshmi Nag; Puneeth Babu Anne; Mohd Nadeem; Pallavi Singh; Ram Niwas; Niranjan Shiwaji Khaire; Rattiram Sharma; Mini p Singh; Naresh Sachdeva; Suchet Sachdev; Rekha Hans; Vikas Suri; L N Yaddanapudi; PVM Lakshmi; Neha Singh; Divendu Bhushan; Neeraj Kumar; Muralidhar Tambe; Sonali Salvi; Nalini Kadgi; Shashikala Sangle; Leena Nakate; Samir Joshi; Rajesh Karyakarte; Suraj Goyanka; Nimisha Sharma; Nikhil Verma; Asim Das; Monika Bahl; Nitya Wadhwa; Shreepad Bhat; Shweta Deshmukh; Vrushali Wagh; Atul Kulkarni; Tanvi Yardi; Ram S Kalgud; Purushottam Reddy; Kavitha Yevoor; Prashanth Gajula; Vivek Maleyur; Medini S; Mohith HN; Anil Gurtoo; Ritika Sud; Sangeeta Pahuja; Anupam Prakash; Parijat Gogoi; Shailja Shukla; D Himanshu Reddy; Tulika Chandra; Saurabh Pandey; Pradeep Maurya; Ali Wahid; Vivek Kumar; Kamlesh Upadhyay; Nidhi Bhatnagar; Nilima Shah; Mamta Shah; Tarak Patel; Ram Mohan Jaiswal; Ashish Jain; Shweta Sharma; Puneet Rijhwani; Naveen Gupta; Tinkal C Patel; Mahesh G Solu; Jitendra Patel; Yash R Shah; Mayur Jarag; Varsha Godbole; Meenakshi Shah; Rikin Raj; Irfan Nagori; Pramod R Jha; Arti D Shah; Gowtham Yeeli; Archit Jain; Rooppreet Kaur Gill; KV Sreedhar Babu; B Suresh Babu; Alladi Mohan; B Vengamma; K Chandra Sekhar; Srinivasulu Damam; K Narsimhulu; C Aparna; G Baleswari; Ravindranath Reddy K; P Chandrasekhar; Sunil Jodharam Panjwani; Pankaj J Akholkar; Kairavi Parthesh Joshi; Pragnesh H Shah; Manish Barvaliya; Milind Baldi; Ashok Yadav; Manoj Gupta; Nitin Rawat; Dilip Chawda; M Natarajan; M Sintha; David Pradeep Kumar; Fathhur Rabbani; Vrushali Khirid Khadke; Dattatray Patki; Sonali Marathe; Clyde D Souza; Vipul Tadha; Satyam Arora; Devendra Kumar Gupta; Seema Dua; Nitu Chauhan; Ajeet Singh Chahar; Joy John Mammen; Snehil Kumar; Dolly Daniel; Ravindraa Singh; Venkatesh Dhat; Yogesh Agarwal; Sohini Arora; Ashish Pathak; Manju Purohit; Ashish Sharma; Jayashree Sharma; Manisha Madkaikar; Kavita Joshi; Reetika Malik Yadav; Swarupa Bhagwat; Niteen D Karnik; Yojana A Gokhale; Leena Naik; Sangita Margam; Santasabuj Das; Alka Turuk; V Saravana Kumar; K Kanagasabai; R Sabarinathan; Gururaj Deshpande; Sharda Sharma; Rashmi Gunjikar; Anita Shete; Darpan Phagiwala; Chetan Patil; Snehal Shingade; Kajal Jarande; Himanshu Kaushal; Pragya Yadav; Gajanan Sapkal; Priya Abraham.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20187252

ABSTRACT

ObjectivesConvalescent plasma (CP) as a passive source of neutralizing antibodies and immunomodulators is a century-old therapeutic option used for the management of viral diseases. We investigated its effectiveness for the treatment of COVID-19. DesignOpen-label, parallel-arm, phase II, multicentre, randomized controlled trial. SettingThirty-nine public and private hospitals across India. ParticipantsHospitalized, moderately ill confirmed COVID-19 patients (PaO2/FiO2: 200-300 or respiratory rate > 24/min and SpO2 [≤] 93% on room air). InterventionParticipants were randomized to either control (best standard of care (BSC)) or intervention (CP + BSC) arm. Two doses of 200 mL CP was transfused 24 hours apart in the intervention arm. Main Outcome MeasureComposite of progression to severe disease (PaO2/FiO2< 100) or all-cause mortality at 28 days post-enrolment. ResultsBetween 22nd April to 14th July 2020, 464 participants were enrolled; 235 and 229 in intervention and control arm, respectively. Composite primary outcome was achieved in 44 (18.7%) participants in the intervention arm and 41 (17.9%) in the control arm [aOR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.67, 1.77]. Mortality was documented in 34 (13.6%) and 31 (14.6%) participants in intervention and control arm, respectively [aOR) 1.06 95% CI: -0.61 to 1.83]. InterpretationCP was not associated with reduction in mortality or progression to severe COVID-19. This trial has high generalizability and approximates real-life setting of CP therapy in settings with limited laboratory capacity. A priori measurement of neutralizing antibody titres in donors and participants may further clarify the role of CP in management of COVID-19. Trial registrationThe trial was registered with Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI); CTRI/2020/04/024775.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...