ABSTRACT
For children born with congenital heart defects (CHDs), extracorporeal life support may be necessary. This retrospective single-center study aimed to investigate the outcomes of children with CHDs on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), focusing on various risk factors. Among the 88 patients, 36 (41%) had a single-ventricle heart defect, while 52 (59%) had a biventricular defect. In total, 25 (28%) survived, with 7 (8%) in the first group and 18 (20%) in the latter. A p-value of 0.19 indicated no significant difference in survival rates. Children with biventricular hearts had shorter ECMO durations but longer stays in the intensive care unit. The overall rate of complications on ECMO was higher in children with a single ventricle (odds ratio [OR] 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-3.7); bleeding was the most common complication in both groups. The occurrence of a second ECMO run was more frequent in patients with a single ventricle (22% vs. 9.6%). ECMO can be effective for children with congenital heart defects, including single-ventricle patients. Bleeding remains a serious complication associated with worse outcomes. Patients requiring a second ECMO run within 30 days have lower survival rates.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Interhospital transfers of pediatric patients on the Berlin Heart Excor have been published on an occasional basis. METHODS: Nowadays medicine evolves away from just feasibility towards quality and safety issues. Management tools like risk analysis have found their way into clinical practice. RESULTS: Exemplary, we present a case of a 20 months old boy on a Berlin Heart BiVAD Excor who underwent a 224 km ground transport. After a systematic review of the published literature, we describe our safety management with the aim was to provide highest quality of care for the transport. CONCLUSION: Besides a risk analysis, we also describe our training and simulation protocol.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Heart Transplantation , Heart-Assist Devices , Male , Humans , Child , Infant , Treatment Outcome , Heart , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Pharmacodynamics suggests that levosimendan might be a valuable inotrope for weaning from extracorporeal life support (ECLS). As there is a paucity of evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of such an approach, the aim was to report the authors' experiences in ECLS weaning before and after the implementation of levosimendan in clinical practice. DESIGN: Retrospective before-and-after study. SETTING: Cardiac intensive care unit of a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 64 patients under ECLS for postcardiotomy cardiac failure, who underwent an ECLS weaning trial. INTERVENTION: Group comparisons between patients treated with levosimendan and patients treated with milrinone were made with the Mann-Whitney U test or the Pearson chi-squared test. Results are given as median (interquartile range) or numbers (percentages). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 64 patients, 26 (41%) received levosimendan. Successful ECLS weaning was achieved in 24 (92%) and 30 patients (79%) in the levosimendan and milrinone group, respectively (p = 0.18). In the levosimendan group, fewer patients had an intra-aortic balloon pump for weaning (2 [7.7%] v 15 [40%], p = 0.008). The support with norepinephrine was similar in the levosimendan and milrinone groups at the time of ECLS removal (0.06 [0.01-0.11] v 0.07 [0.01-0.16] µg/kg/min, p = 0.64) and 24 hours later (0.06 [0.04-0.09] v 0.04 [0.00-0.09] µg/kg/min, p = 0.15). Twenty-eight days (9/26 (35%) v 14/35 (40%), p = 0.28) and 180 days (13/26 [50%] v 15/34 [44%], p = 0.80) mortalities after ECLS removal were similar in the levosimendan and the milrinone groups. CONCLUSION: Levosimendan enabled ECLS weaning without increasing norepinephrine requirements when compared to a control group receiving milrinone.
