Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Nat Commun ; 9(1): 1960, 2018 05 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29773874

ABSTRACT

No efficient treatment exists for nephrotic syndrome (NS), a frequent cause of chronic kidney disease. Here we show mutations in six different genes (MAGI2, TNS2, DLC1, CDK20, ITSN1, ITSN2) as causing NS in 17 families with partially treatment-sensitive NS (pTSNS). These proteins interact and we delineate their roles in Rho-like small GTPase (RLSG) activity, and demonstrate deficiency for mutants of pTSNS patients. We find that CDK20 regulates DLC1. Knockdown of MAGI2, DLC1, or CDK20 in cultured podocytes reduces migration rate. Treatment with dexamethasone abolishes RhoA activation by knockdown of DLC1 or CDK20 indicating that steroid treatment in patients with pTSNS and mutations in these genes is mediated by this RLSG module. Furthermore, we discover ITSN1 and ITSN2 as podocytic guanine nucleotide exchange factors for Cdc42. We generate Itsn2-L knockout mice that recapitulate the mild NS phenotype. We, thus, define a functional network of RhoA regulation, thereby revealing potential therapeutic targets.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance/genetics , Glucocorticoids/pharmacology , Nephrotic Syndrome/drug therapy , Protein Interaction Maps/genetics , rhoA GTP-Binding Protein/genetics , Adult , Animals , Child , Child, Preschool , DNA Mutational Analysis , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , HEK293 Cells , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Infant , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Middle Aged , Mutation , Nephrotic Syndrome/genetics , Pedigree , Podocytes , RNA, Small Interfering/metabolism , Treatment Outcome , Exome Sequencing , rhoA GTP-Binding Protein/metabolism
2.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 13(1): 53-62, 2018 01 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29127259

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome overwhelmingly progresses to ESRD. More than 30 monogenic genes have been identified to cause steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. We previously detected causative mutations using targeted panel sequencing in 30% of patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Panel sequencing has a number of limitations when compared with whole exome sequencing. We employed whole exome sequencing to detect monogenic causes of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in an international cohort of 300 families. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Three hundred thirty-five individuals with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome from 300 families were recruited from April of 1998 to June of 2016. Age of onset was restricted to <25 years of age. Exome data were evaluated for 33 known monogenic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome genes. RESULTS: In 74 of 300 families (25%), we identified a causative mutation in one of 20 genes known to cause steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. In 11 families (3.7%), we detected a mutation in a gene that causes a phenocopy of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. This is consistent with our previously published identification of mutations using a panel approach. We detected a causative mutation in a known steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome gene in 38% of consanguineous families and in 13% of nonconsanguineous families, and 48% of children with congenital nephrotic syndrome. A total of 68 different mutations were detected in 20 of 33 steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome genes. Fifteen of these mutations were novel. NPHS1, PLCE1, NPHS2, and SMARCAL1 were the most common genes in which we detected a mutation. In another 28% of families, we detected mutations in one or more candidate genes for steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Whole exome sequencing is a sensitive approach toward diagnosis of monogenic causes of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. A molecular genetic diagnosis of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome may have important consequences for the management of treatment and kidney transplantation in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.


Subject(s)
DNA Mutational Analysis/methods , Exome Sequencing , Genetic Markers , Mutation , Nephrotic Syndrome/congenital , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Genetic Association Studies , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Heredity , Humans , Infant , Male , Mutation Rate , Nephrotic Syndrome/diagnosis , Nephrotic Syndrome/epidemiology , Nephrotic Syndrome/genetics , Nephrotic Syndrome/therapy , Pedigree , Phenotype , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Young Adult
3.
Nat Genet ; 49(10): 1529-1538, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28805828

ABSTRACT

Galloway-Mowat syndrome (GAMOS) is an autosomal-recessive disease characterized by the combination of early-onset nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) and microcephaly with brain anomalies. Here we identified recessive mutations in OSGEP, TP53RK, TPRKB, and LAGE3, genes encoding the four subunits of the KEOPS complex, in 37 individuals from 32 families with GAMOS. CRISPR-Cas9 knockout in zebrafish and mice recapitulated the human phenotype of primary microcephaly and resulted in early lethality. Knockdown of OSGEP, TP53RK, or TPRKB inhibited cell proliferation, which human mutations did not rescue. Furthermore, knockdown of these genes impaired protein translation, caused endoplasmic reticulum stress, activated DNA-damage-response signaling, and ultimately induced apoptosis. Knockdown of OSGEP or TP53RK induced defects in the actin cytoskeleton and decreased the migration rate of human podocytes, an established intermediate phenotype of SRNS. We thus identified four new monogenic causes of GAMOS, describe a link between KEOPS function and human disease, and delineate potential pathogenic mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Hiatal/genetics , Microcephaly/genetics , Multiprotein Complexes/genetics , Mutation , Nephrosis/genetics , Animals , Apoptosis/genetics , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Carrier Proteins/genetics , Cell Movement , Cytoskeleton/ultrastructure , DNA Repair/genetics , Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress/genetics , Gene Knockout Techniques , Humans , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/deficiency , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Metalloendopeptidases/deficiency , Metalloendopeptidases/genetics , Mice , Models, Molecular , Nephrotic Syndrome/genetics , Nephrotic Syndrome/pathology , Podocytes/metabolism , Podocytes/ultrastructure , Protein Conformation , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/deficiency , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics , RNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional/genetics , RNA, Transfer/metabolism , Telomere Homeostasis/genetics , Zebrafish , Zebrafish Proteins/deficiency , Zebrafish Proteins/genetics
4.
Nat Genet ; 48(4): 457-65, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26878725

ABSTRACT

Nucleoporins are essential components of the nuclear pore complex (NPC). Only a few diseases have been attributed to NPC dysfunction. Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), a frequent cause of chronic kidney disease, is caused by dysfunction of glomerular podocytes. Here we identify in eight families with SRNS mutations in NUP93, its interaction partner NUP205 or XPO5 (encoding exportin 5) as hitherto unrecognized monogenic causes of SRNS. NUP93 mutations caused disrupted NPC assembly. NUP93 knockdown reduced the presence of NUP205 in the NPC, and, reciprocally, a NUP205 alteration abrogated NUP93 interaction. We demonstrate that NUP93 and exportin 5 interact with the signaling protein SMAD4 and that NUP93 mutations abrogated interaction with SMAD4. Notably, NUP93 mutations interfered with BMP7-induced SMAD transcriptional reporter activity. We hereby demonstrate that mutations of NUP genes cause a distinct renal disease and identify aberrant SMAD signaling as a new disease mechanism of SRNS, opening a potential new avenue for treatment.


Subject(s)
Karyopherins/genetics , Nephrotic Syndrome/genetics , Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins/genetics , Age of Onset , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Cell Movement , Cell Proliferation , Cells, Cultured , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Resistance/genetics , Female , Genes, Recessive , Genetic Association Studies , Genetic Linkage , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Infant , Karyopherins/metabolism , Male , Mice , Molecular Sequence Data , Mutation , Nephrotic Syndrome/drug therapy , Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins/metabolism , Oxidative Stress , Podocytes/physiology , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Steroids/pharmacology , Steroids/therapeutic use , Xenopus laevis
5.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 26(6): 1279-89, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25349199

ABSTRACT

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is the second most frequent cause of ESRD in the first two decades of life. Effective treatment is lacking. First insights into disease mechanisms came from identification of single-gene causes of SRNS. However, the frequency of single-gene causation and its age distribution in large cohorts are unknown. We performed exon sequencing of NPHS2 and WT1 for 1783 unrelated, international families with SRNS. We then examined all patients by microfluidic multiplex PCR and next-generation sequencing for all 27 genes known to cause SRNS if mutated. We detected a single-gene cause in 29.5% (526 of 1783) of families with SRNS that manifested before 25 years of age. The fraction of families in whom a single-gene cause was identified inversely correlated with age of onset. Within clinically relevant age groups, the fraction of families with detection of the single-gene cause was as follows: onset in the first 3 months of life (69.4%), between 4 and 12 months old (49.7%), between 1 and 6 years old (25.3%), between 7 and 12 years old (17.8%), and between 13 and 18 years old (10.8%). For PLCE1, specific mutations correlated with age of onset. Notably, 1% of individuals carried mutations in genes that function within the coenzyme Q10 biosynthesis pathway, suggesting that SRNS may be treatable in these individuals. Our study results should facilitate molecular genetic diagnostics of SRNS, etiologic classification for therapeutic studies, generation of genotype-phenotype correlations, and the identification of individuals in whom a targeted treatment for SRNS may be available.


Subject(s)
Genetic Predisposition to Disease/epidemiology , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Nephrotic Syndrome/congenital , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Genes, Wilms Tumor , Genetic Association Studies , Genotype , Heterozygote , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Nephrotic Syndrome/epidemiology , Nephrotic Syndrome/genetics , Nephrotic Syndrome/physiopathology , Pedigree , Phenotype , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Young Adult
6.
J Clin Microbiol ; 41(6): 2289-93, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12791838

ABSTRACT

In a prospective study between July 1999 and September 2000, stool specimens of children below the age of 16 years with (n = 187) and without (n = 137) diarrhea were tested for the presence of enterovirulent bacteria by standard culture methods and by PCR. Targets for the PCR were the plasmid pCVD432 for enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC), the verotoxin 1 and verotoxin 2 genes for enterohemorrhagic E. coli, ipaH for enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC) and Shigella spp., genes coding for heat-stable and heat-labile toxins for enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), and the eaeA gene for enteropathogenic E. coli. The following bacteria could be associated with diarrhea: Salmonella enterica (P = 0.001), Campylobacter spp. (P = 0.036), ETEC (P = 0.012), and EAEC (P = 0.006). The detection of EAEC, ETEC, and S. enterica was strongly associated with a history of recent travel outside of Switzerland. EAEC isolates were found in the specimens of 19 (10.2%) of 187 children with diarrhea and in those of 3 (2.2%) of 137 children without diarrhea (P = 0.006) and were the most frequently detected bacteria associated with diarrhea. Among the children below the age of 5 years, the specimens of 18 (11.9%) of 151 with diarrhea were positive for EAEC, while this agent was found in the specimens of 2 (2.2%) of 91 controls (P = 0.007). Enteropathogenic E. coli isolates were found in the specimens of 30 (16.4%) of the patients and in those of 15 (10.9%) of the controls, with similar frequencies in all age groups (P > 0.05). We conclude that EAEC bacteria are involved in a significant proportion of diarrhea cases among children. Children younger than 5 years of age are more often affected by EAEC than older children.


Subject(s)
Diarrhea/epidemiology , Enteritis/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Bacterial Adhesion , Child , Child, Preschool , Culture Media , Diarrhea/microbiology , Enteritis/microbiology , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/growth & development , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Plasmids/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Switzerland/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...