Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JHEP Rep ; 4(10): 100547, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36052219

ABSTRACT

Background & Aims: Although EASL guidelines recommend anti-HDV testing in all HBsAg-positive individuals, HDV infection remains an underdiagnosed condition. We describe the impact of an HDV screening program by reflex anti-HDV testing in all HBsAg-positive samples and compare the results before and after its implementation. Methods: In total, 2,236 HBsAg-positive determinations were included from January 2018 to December 2021. Only the first sample from each participant was evaluated: 1,492 samples before reflex anti-HDV testing (2018-2020) and 744 samples after (2021). Demographic and clinical characteristics of anti-HDV-positive patients were collected. Results: Before reflex testing, anti-HDV had been tested in 7.6% (114/1492) of HBsAg-positive individuals: 23% (91/390) attended in an academic hospital and only 2% (23/1,102) in primary care centres. After reflex testing was established, 93% (691/744) of HBsAg-positive cases were evaluated for anti-HDV: 91% (533/586) in the academic hospital and 100% (158/158) in primary care. The anti-HDV-positive prevalence was similar before and after reflex testing: 9.6% (11/114) and 8.1% (56/691), respectively. However, the absolute number of anti-HDV-positive patients increased. Most anti-HDV-positive patients were young, HBeAg-negative, Caucasian males. HDV-RNA was detectable in 35 (65%) of 54 tested, HBV-DNA was undetectable in 64%, and alanine aminotransferase levels were normal in 48%. Conclusions: Anti-HDV reflex testing quintupled the absolute number of diagnoses of chronic hepatitis D infection. Before the reflex test, a large percentage of HBsAg-positive individuals had not undergone any anti-HDV determination. Implementation of reflex testing increases the diagnosis of patients with chronic hepatitis D. Lay summary: Chronic hepatitis delta (CHD) is a viral disease caused by HDV, which requires the presence of HBV to propagate. HDV infection can cause rapid progression to cirrhosis, among other severe complications. The prevalence of CHD worldwide is controversial, and the infection often goes unrecognised, mainly because of unawareness among physicians. Use of reflex testing in other viral hepatitis has proven to increase detection and linking-to-care of infected patients. Implementation of anti-HDV testing in all HBsAg-positive patients has led to a 5-fold increase in the number of HDV diagnoses in an academic hospital and primary care centres.

2.
Microbiol Spectr ; 10(2): e0214921, 2022 04 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35377229

ABSTRACT

The measurement and interpretation of HBV DNA and RNA levels in HBV infected patients treated with antiviral therapy supports the objective of HBV disease management. Here, we quantified circulating HBV RNA through a standardized and sensitive assay in follow-up samples from both naive and treated patients as a marker of infection evolution. HBV DNA (HBV DNA for use in Cobas 6800/8800 Automated Roche Molecular Systems), RNA (Roche HBV RNA Investigational Assay for use in the Cobas 6800/8800; Roche), HBeAg and HBsAg (Elycsys HBsAg chemiluminescence immunoassay by Cobas 8000; Roche), and core-related antigen (Lumipulse G chemiluminescence assay; Fujirebio) levels were measured in cohorts of untreated or nucleos(t)ide treated, HBV-infected subjects in an outpatient hospital setting. HBV DNA levels in untreated people were 3.6 log10 higher than corresponding RNA levels and were stable over 5 years of observation. While only five of 52 treated patients had DNA levels below the lower limit of quantification (10 IU/mL) at the end of follow-up, 13 had HBV RNA levels persistently above this limit, including eight with undetectable DNA. In samples with undetectable core-related antigen we observed a median HBsAg titer 2.7-fold higher than in samples with undetectable RNA (adjusted P = 0.012). Detectable HBV RNA with undetectable HBV DNA was a negative predictor of HBsAg decrease to a level ≤100 IU/mL (P = 0.03). In naive patients the difference between HBV DNA and RNA was higher than previously reported. HBV RNA rapidly decreased during treatment. However, in some cases, it was detectable even after years of effective therapy, being a negative predictor of HBsAg decrease. The investigational RNA assay for use on the Cobas 6800/8800 instruments is a sensitive and standardized method that could be applied in general management of HBV infection. IMPORTANCE This study focused on the quantification of circulating HBV RNA by using a standardized and sensitive assay. Thanks to this system we observed a higher difference between circulating HBV DNA and RNA than previously reported. In treated patients, HBV RNA decreased together with DNA, although some patients presented detectable levels even after years of successful antiviral treatment, suggesting a persistent viral transcription. Of note, the detection of viral RNA when HBV DNA is undetectable was a negative predictor of HBsAg decrease to a level ≤100 IU/mL. This assay could be extremely helpful in HBV patients management to study viral transcription and to identify those treated patients that may achieve sustained viral suppression.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B virus , Hepatitis B, Chronic , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Biomarkers , DNA, Viral , Follow-Up Studies , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B virus/genetics , Hepatitis B, Chronic/diagnosis , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Humans , RNA, Viral
3.
World J Gastroenterol ; 27(41): 7144-7158, 2021 Nov 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34887634

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Different forms of pregenomic and other hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA have been detected in patients' sera. These circulating HBV-RNAs may be useful for monitoring covalently closed circular DNA activity, and predicting hepatitis B e-antigen seroconversion or viral rebound after nucleos(t)ide analog cessation. Data on serum HBV-RNA quasispecies, however, is scarce. It is therefore important to develop methodologies to thoroughly analyze this quasispecies, ensuring the elimination of any residual HBV-DNA. Studying circulating HBV-RNA quasispecies may facilitate achieving functional cure of HBV infection. AIM: To establish a next-generation sequencing (NGS) methodology for analyzing serum HBV-RNA and comparing it with DNA quasispecies. METHODS: Thirteen untreated chronic hepatitis B patients, showing different HBV-genotypes and degrees of severity of liver disease were enrolled in the study and a serum sample with HBV-DNA > 5 Log10 IU/mL and HBV-RNA > 4 Log10 copies/mL was taken from each patient. HBV-RNA was treated with DNAse I to remove any residual DNA, and the region between nucleotides (nt) 1255-1611 was amplified using a 3-nested polymerase chain reaction protocol, and analyzed with NGS. Variability/conservation and complexity was compared between HBV-DNA and RNA quasispecies. RESULTS: No HBV-DNA contamination was detected in cDNA samples from HBV-RNA quasispecies. HBV quasispecies complexity showed heterogeneous behavior among patients. The Rare Haplotype Load at 1% was greater in DNA than in RNA quasispecies, with no statistically significant differences (P = 0.1641). Regarding conservation, information content was equal in RNA and DNA quasispecies in most nt positions [218/357 (61.06%)]. In 102 of the remaining 139 (73.38%), HBV-RNA showed slightly higher variability. Sliding window analysis identified 4 hyper-conserved sequence fragments in each quasispecies, 3 of them coincided between the 2 quasispecies: nts 1258-1286, 1545-1573 and 1575-1604. The 2 hyper-variable sequence fragments also coincided: nts 1311-1344 and 1461-1485. Sequences between nts 1519-1543 and 1559-1587 were only hyper-conserved in HBV-DNA and RNA, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our methodology allowed analyzing HBV-RNA quasispecies complexity and conservation without interference from HBV-DNA. Thanks to this, we have been able to compare both quasispecies in the present study.


Subject(s)
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids , Hepatitis B, Chronic , Hepatitis B , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , DNA, Viral/genetics , DNA, Viral/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B/drug therapy , Hepatitis B virus/genetics , Hepatitis B, Chronic/diagnosis , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Humans , Quasispecies , RNA
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...