Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 76
Filter
1.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 22(4): 1077-87, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20074472

ABSTRACT

Eosinophil count in nasal fluid (ECNF) was used to differentiate nasal pathologies. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were performed to evaluate the ECNF's accuracy in distinguishing allergic rhinitis (AR) from non-allergic rhinitis (NAR). We also evaluated the accuracy of ECNF in recognizing patients with mild and severe symptoms of rhinitis and patients with ineffective and effective clinical responses to antihistamines. 1,170 consecutive adult patients with a clinical history of rhinitis were studied. ECNF's median in AR was 6.0 and 2.0 in NAR and the best cut-off value was > 3.0, AUC = 0.75. ECNF's median in AR with mild nasal symptoms was 3.0 and 7.0 with severe symptoms, and the best cut-off value was 4.0, AUC = 0.90. ECNF's median in NAR with mild nasal symptoms was 2.0 and 8.5 with severe symptoms, and the best cut-off value was > 4.0, AUC = 0.86. ECNF's median in AR with effective clinical response to antihistamines was 4.0 and 8.0 with ineffective response, the best cut-off value was < or = 5.0, AUC = 0.94. ECNF's median in NAR with an effective clinical response to antihistamines was 1.0 and 2.0 with ineffective response, and the best cut-off value was < or = 3.0, AUC = 0.64. Our results suggest an interesting practical use of ECNF data as evaluator of the clinical severity both AR and NAR. As predictor of the clinical response to antihistamines, ECNF is accurate only in patients with AR. The ECNF's performance was moderately accurate in distinguish patients with AR and NAR.


Subject(s)
Eosinophils/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Rhinitis/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Area Under Curve , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Nasal Lavage Fluid/cytology , Nasal Lavage Fluid/immunology , Patient Selection , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Rhinitis/diagnosis , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/diagnosis , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/drug therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/diagnosis , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 19(3): 629-38, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17026848

ABSTRACT

The role of helminths in asthma and/or rhinitis and in allergic sensitization is still unclear. We assessed the relationship between Ascaris-specific IgE, respiratory symptoms and allergic sensitization in Bangladesh immigrants. 246 individuals were examined from 1996 to 2001. Serum total IgE, Ascaris IgE, specific IgE to inhalant allergens, skin prick tests (SPT) and parasitological evaluation of the stool were performed. Total serum IgE were significantly higher in Ascaris-IgE positive (> 0.35 kU/L) individuals (806.5 [409.0-1436.0] kU/L vs. 207.0 [127.0-332.5] kU/L; P < 0.0001) and in subjects with respiratory symptoms (413.0 [239.0-1096.0] kU/L vs. 259.5 [147.0-387.0] kU/L), (P < 0.0001), but not in SPT positive subjects (413.0 [179.0-894.0] kU/L vs. 404.6 [305.0-1201.0] kU/L (P = 0.5). Ascaris-specific IgE were detected in 48 subjects with respiratory symptoms (40.0%) and in 46 subjects without respiratory symptoms (36.5%) (P = 0.5). The SPT positivity was similar between Ascaris-IgE seropositive (38.2%) and Ascaris-IgE seronegative (38.1%) subjects (P = 0.9). Total IgE and length of stay in Italy correlated with SPT positivity (OR 5.6 [CI 95% 1.5-19.8], P = 0.007, and OR 1.5 [CI 95% 1.3-1.7], P< 0.0001), and with respiratory symptoms (OR 13.7 [CI 95% 3.0-62.4];, P = 0.0007, and OR 2.4 [CI 95% 1.9-3.0], P < 0.0001). Ascaris-IgE were negatively associated with SPT positivity (OR 0.3 [CI 95% 0.1-0.8], P = 0.02) and with respiratory symptoms (OR 0.1 [CI 95% 0.04-0.7], P = 0.01). Our findings favour the role of environmental factors in the development of respiratory symptoms in immigrants, irrespective of Ascaris-IgE.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Helminth/blood , Ascaris lumbricoides/immunology , Asthma/etiology , Emigration and Immigration , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/etiology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/etiology , Adult , Air Pollution/adverse effects , Animals , Family Characteristics , Female , Humans , Hygiene , Logistic Models , Male , Skin Tests
3.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 31(3): 327-34, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16681569

ABSTRACT

In vitro and in vivo clinical and experimental data have suggested that leukotrienes play a key role in inflammatory reactions of the skin. Antileukotriene drugs, i.e. leukotriene receptor antagonists and synthesis inhibitors, are a new class of anti-inflammatory drugs that have shown clinical efficacy in the management of asthma. We searched the MedLine database and carried out a manual search on journals specializing in allergy and dermatology for the use of antileukotriene drugs in urticaria. Montelukast might be effective in chronic urticaria associated with aspirin or food additive hypersensitivity or with autoreactivity to intradermal serum injection when taken with an antihistamine but not in moderate chronic idiopathic urticaria. Evidence for the effectiveness of zafirlukast and the 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor, zileuton, in chronic urticaria is mainly anecdotal. In addition, there is anecdotal evidence of effectiveness of antileukotrienes in primary cold urticaria, delayed pressure urticaria and dermographism. No evidence exists for other physical urticarias, including cholinergic, solar and aquagenic urticarias, vibratory angio-oedema, and exercise-induced anaphylaxis.


Subject(s)
Leukotriene Antagonists/therapeutic use , Urticaria/drug therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Aspirin/adverse effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Therapy, Combination , Food Additives/adverse effects , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Leukotrienes/physiology , Urticaria/etiology , Urticaria/immunology
4.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 18(4): 715-22, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16388720

ABSTRACT

Subjects with rhinitis but without asthma may have coexisting bronchial hyperresponsiveness, although the reasons for this are uncertain. To evaluate the factors that determine BHR in rhinitis we examined 410 patients with symptomatic rhinitis with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC)>or=80% of the predicted value. In all subjects a skin prick test (SPT) was performed, a determination of total serum IgE and an eosinophils count in the blood. Of the 410 subjects we found that 161 (39.3%) exhibited a methacholine PD20 of 800 mg or less (Group A), whereas 249 (60.7%) had a methacholine PD20 more of 800 mg (Group B). Despite the matched mean values for FEV1 and FVC, compared with Group B, Group A had a lower predicted forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75%(FEF25%-75%) (86.7 +/- 12.0 vs. 93.7 +/- 7.3, P < 0.0001). A great portion of the subjects of the Group Ain respect to subjects of the Group B were exposed to passive smoke (37.8% vs. 22.0%, P = 0.0008), reported having mothers with asthma (34.1% vs. 6.0%, P < 0.0001), presented a positive skin prick test (93.7% vs. 67.0%, P < 0.0001), had higher levels of total serum IgE (geometric mean of Log10 2.46 +/- 0.27 kU/L vs. 2.06 +/- 0.38 kU/L, P < 0.0001) and higher blood eosinophil counts (geometric mean of Log10 2.67 +/- 0.07 x 10(-3) mL vs. 2.57 +/- 0.09 x 10(-3) mL, P < 0.0001), and reported increased nasal obstruction (2.0 (95% CI 1.8 to 2.2) vs. 0.6 (95% CI 0.5 to 0.7), P < 0.0001). Logistic regression demonstrates that nasal obstruction (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.72 to 2.80) and the presence of positive SPT (OR 6.15, 95% CI 2.42 to 15.61) were the most available predictors to discriminate between subjects with BHR and subjects without BHR. In addition, BHR was positively related to blood eosinophil counts (OR= 2.80, 95% CI 1.54 to 5.07), FEF25%-75% values (OR= 2.72, 95% CI 1.23 to 5.99) and familiarity (mother) for asthma (OR = 2.45, 95% CI 1.10 to 5.46). Whereas passive smoke and total serum IgE were not positively related to BHR. Increased nasal obstruction and the presence of positive SPT were the most available predictors to discriminate between subjects with and without BHR. Finally, BHR was positively related to blood eosinophil counts, FEF25%-75% values and to familiarity (mother) for asthma.


Subject(s)
Bronchial Hyperreactivity/physiopathology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/physiopathology , Rhinitis/physiopathology , Adult , Bronchial Hyperreactivity/immunology , Eosinophils , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume/physiology , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/analysis , Immunoglobulin E/biosynthesis , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Leukocyte Count , Life Style , Male , Respiratory Function Tests , Rhinitis/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Skin Tests , Spirometry , Vital Capacity
5.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 34(4): 639-45, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15080819

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic allergic inflammatory disease, which manifests itself with eczematous skin lesions. OBJECTIVE: We compared the clinical efficacy of tacrolimus ointment (0.1%) given twice a day and oral cyclosporine (3 mg/kg) given once daily. Rescue medication for itching included cetirizine 10-20 mg (equal to one or two tables). METHODS: Thirty patients, aged 13-45 years (mean+/-SD 27.1+/-10.9), with a history of moderate-to-severe AD were randomized to treatments, 15 patients for each treatments. Assessment of efficacy was based on SCORAD, on scores of daily itching, erythema, interference with sleep, due to the skin condition and days without use of cetirizine tablets. SCORAD, measured on a scale (0-103), was evaluated before treatment (0) and at 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 days after treatment. Similarly, the means of daily symptoms, on a scale (0-3), were evaluated before the treatment (0) and at 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 days after treatment; finally, on day without use of cetirizine tablets. The safety of the study treatments was assessed through haematologic, biochemical and urinary testing and on systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rate measurements. RESULTS: SCORAD decreased in the two treatment groups 14 days after the beginning of the period study. However, the patients in tacrolimus ointment group reported significantly lower SCORAD than those treated with oral cyclosporine. Overall SCORAD, as assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) day(0-42) (score/day), was significantly lower in the tacrolimus ointment group when compared with oral cyclosporine (P<0.001). Similarly, AUC day(0-42) (score/day) for itching, erythema and number of nights without interference with the sleep due to skin condition were significantly lower in the group of patients treated with tacrolimus compared with those treated with cyclosporine (P=0.003, 0.005 and 0.01, respectively). As regards the use of rescue medication, expressed by median of number of days without use of anti-H(1), it was significantly lower in the group treated with tacrolimus (82.5) than in the cyclosporine group (76.5) (P=0.03). There were no appreciable changes in haematological and biochemical indices, in both treatments groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this comparative study demonstrate that tacrolimus ointment twice daily and cyclosporine administered orally once daily are effective on SCORAD, daily symptoms and anti-H(1) rescue. When we compared tacrolimus and cyclosporine there was a faster onset of action in the group treated with tacrolimus. The two drugs presented the same safety. However, these data support the preferential use of topical tacrolimus 0.1% in AD, because cyclosporine has potential side-effects.


Subject(s)
Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Cyclosporine/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Atopic/immunology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Eosinophils/pathology , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Leukocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Ointments , Severity of Illness Index , Tacrolimus/adverse effects
6.
Allergy ; 59(2): 192-7, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14763933

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Very few data are available from the literature on whether nonatopic subjects affected by persistent rhinitis may show the appearance of objective symptoms of rhinitis after the ingestion of food additives such as tartrazine (E102), erythrosine (E127), monosodium benzoate (E211), p-hydroxybenzoate (E218), sodium metabisulphite (E223), and monosodium glutamate (E620). It is still unclear whether the ingestion of food additive may cause, as well, a consensual reduction of nasal peak inspiratory flow (NPIFR). Therefore, we used a double-blind placebo-controlled (DBPC) study to evaluate this hypothesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-six consecutive patients (76 males and 150 females) aged 12-60 years (mean age 40.2 +/- 16.3 years). After 1 month of an additive-free diet regimen, an open challenge was carried out (food additive-rich diet for 2 weeks). After this period, challenges were administered in a DBPC manner using the above-mentioned substances under investigation. RESULTS: Twenty of 226 subjects (8.8%) reported an improvement of the symptoms of rhinitis after additive-free diet. More precisely, six of 226 (2.6%) were symptom-free and 14 of 226 (6.2%) showed an improvement in their symptoms after an additive-free diet. As far as the results for DBPC are concerned, 20 challenges with monosodium benzoate induced both objective (i.e. sneezing and rhinorrhoea) and subjective symptoms (nasal blockage and nasal itching) of rhinitis with reduction of NPIFR >/=20%, 45 challenges induced subjective symptoms of rhinitis (i.e. nasal blockage and nasal itching), without reduction of NPIFR >/=20% of the basal value, two with tartrazine, seven with erythrosine, 19 with monosodium benzoate, three with p-hydroxybenzoate, six with sodium metabisulphite, and eight with monosodium glutamate, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The observation that nonatopic persistent rhinitis may be caused by the frequent, probably daily, ingestion of small doses of a nontolerated substance is intriguing and suggests that at least some patients with 'chronic vasomotor rhinitis' may be intolerant to a particular food additive. Therefore, food additives can be considered triggers or aggravating factors, rather than aetiological factors.


Subject(s)
Food Preservatives/adverse effects , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/etiology , Rhinitis/immunology , Sodium Benzoate/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Nasal Cavity/physiopathology , Pulmonary Ventilation , Rhinitis/diagnosis , Rhinitis/diet therapy , Rhinitis/etiology , Sodium Benzoate/adverse effects
7.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 34(2): 259-67, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14987306

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are considered to be particularly effective in reducing nasal congestion and are therefore recommended as first-line treatment in allergic rhinitis patients with moderate to severe and/or persistent symptoms. OBJECTIVE: We compared the clinical efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) 200 microg given once daily, administered in mono-therapy or combined therapy with a H1 receptor antagonist (cetirizine, CTZ) or with a leukotriene antagonist (montelukast, MSK), and the combined therapy of CTZ plus MSK in the treatment of patients affected by allergic rhinitis to Parietaria during natural pollen exposure. In addition, we examined the effect of the treatment on eosinophil counts and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in nasal lavage performed at beginning of season, during season and at the end of the season. METHODS: One hundred patients aged 12-50 years (mean+/-SD 31.8+/-9.6) with a history of moderate to severe Parietaria pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis were selected. A randomized, double-blind, double dummy, placebo (PLA)-controlled, parallel-group study design was used. Patients were treated FPANS 200 microg once daily (n=20) or with FPANS 200 microg once daily, plus CTZ (10 mg) in the morning (n=20), or with FPANS 200 microg once daily, plus MSK (10 mg) in the evening (n=20) or with CTZ (10 mg) in the morning plus MSK in the evening (n=20) or matched PLA (n=20). Assessment of efficacy was based on scores of daily nasal symptoms and on eosinophil counts and ECP in nasal lavage. RESULTS: All treatments showed significant differences (P<0.001) compared with PLA in terms of total symptom, rhinorrhea, sneezing and nasal itching scores. Concerning nasal congestion on waking and daily only the groups treated with FPANS in mono-therapy or in combined therapy showed significant differences compared with PLA. Comparing the group treated with FPANS alone and the groups treated with FPANS plus CTZ, we found significant differences for total symptom score (P=0.04) and for nasal itching (P=0.003). The comparison between FPANS plus CTZ and FPANS plus MSK showed significant difference for nasal itching (P=0.003). Finally, there were significant differences between the group treated with FPANS and the group treated with CTZ plus MSK for total symptom score (P=0.009), for nasal congestion on waking (P<0.001) and nasal congestion daily (P<0.001). Also the comparisons between the group treated with FPANS plus CTZ and the group treated with CTZ plus MSK demonstrated significant differences (P<0.001) for total symptom, for nasal congestion on waking and for nasal congestion on daily, for rhinorrhea (P=0.04) and for nasal itching (P=0.003) scores. Concerning the comparison between the group treated with FPANS plus MSK and the group treated with CTZ plus MSK we found significant differences for total symptom score (P=0.005), for nasal congestion on waking (P<0.001) and for nasal congestion on daily (P<0.001). No other differences were observed between the groups. Concerning blood eosinophil counts, significant differences were found between the treatments with FPANS in mono-therapy or in combined therapy with PLA group during and at the end of the season (P=0.0003 and P<0.0001, respectively). Concerning eosinophils and ECP in nasal lavage, all treatments showed significant differences (P<0.001) compared with PLA. Besides, there were significant differences (P<0.001) between the groups treated with FPANS alone or in combined therapy and the group treated with CTZ plus MSK. CONCLUSION: The results of this comparative study demonstrate that FPANS is highly effective for treating patients affected by allergic rhinitis, with efficacy exceeding that of CTZ plus MSK in combined therapy. In addition, the regular combined therapy of FPANS plus CTZ or plus MSK would not seem to offer substantial advantage with respect to FPANS in mono-therapy in patients affected by seasonal allergic rhinitis.


Subject(s)
Androstadienes/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Acetates/therapeutic use , Administration, Intranasal , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Androstadienes/therapeutic use , Blood Proteins/analysis , Cetirizine/therapeutic use , Child , Cyclopropanes , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Eosinophil Granule Proteins , Female , Fluticasone , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Leukotriene Antagonists/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Ribonucleases/analysis , Sulfides
9.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 131(4): 296-300, 2003 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12915773

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aetiology of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) has so far not been completely clarified. Recently, several studies reported that patients affected by cutaneous diseases (i.e. dermatitis, eczema and urticaria) with positive patch test to nickel have a positive oral nickel challenge. OBJECTIVE: A retrospective data analysis of patch test and oral nickel challenge in 380 patients (204 women and 176 men) affected by RAS was performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined 380 consecutive patients affected by RAS during the period 1990-1999. In 28/380 patients the appearance of their oral symptoms coincided with the fitting of orthodontic appliance, while 352/380 reported that their oral symptoms worsened after the fitting of orthodontic appliance. All patients were studied with the series (European standard series and series for dental materials) for patch tests. RESULTS: Seventy out of 380 patients (18.4%) presented a contact sensitization to nickel sulphate (positive patch test). In all of these, the orthodontic appliance was replaced with one made of nickel-free materials. All patients were re-examined by the dentist 6 months after the removal of the orthodontic appliance. The symptoms had completely remitted in 28/70 patients, partially had improved in 31/70 patients and had remained unchanged in 11/70 patients. In all patients (n = 70) with a positive patch test to nickel we performed an oral double-blind placebo-controlled challenge (DBPC) test with nickel sulphate. The DBPC was positive in 32/70 patients, 21 of whom had partially improved and 11 had not, even after the replacement of the orthodontic appliance with material not containing nickel. None of the 28 patients in complete remission showed an adverse reaction to oral nickel challenge. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that, in some patients with a positive patch test to nickel sulphate, the perpetuation of RAS can be related to a hypersensitivity to ingested nickel salts, independently of local contact to nickel.


Subject(s)
Nickel/immunology , Stomatitis, Aphthous/immunology , Adult , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Orthodontic Appliances/adverse effects , Patch Tests , Retrospective Studies , Stomatitis, Aphthous/etiology
10.
Allergy ; 57(12): 1180-6, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12464047

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The recovery of mediator metabolites from urine has the potential to provide a rapid, safe, and easily available index of release of mediators. We aimed to determine urinary metabolites of both histamine and leukotrienes (LTs) in patients affected by chronic urticaria (CU). METHODS: Twenty patients with CU were studied. They were selected on the basis of double-blind placebo-controlled challenge (DBPC) with acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) and food additives. Ten patients (group B) were negative to both challenges. Ten patients (group C) presented urticaria and/or the appearance of angioedema during or 24 h after challenge, with reactions to ASA (five patients) or food additives (five patients). We recruited 15 healthy volunteers as controls (group A). During a second challenge, groups B and C were challenged double-blind with a single dose of ASA, or a specific food additive, or placebo. The healthy group was challenged only with a placebo (talc capsule). Patients in groups B and C were challenged twice: with placebo (as groups B1 and C1) and with ASA (groups B2 and C2) or food additives (C2). Four samples of urine were collected; one during the night before the specific or sham challenge (baseline), and three at 2, 6 and 24 h after the challenge. Urinary methylhistamine (N-MH) and LTE4 were analyzed and normalized for urinary creatinine. RESULTS: For urinary N-MH at baseline, there was a significant difference only between group A and groups B1, B2, C1 and C2 (A vs. B1, P < 0.0001; A vs. B2, P < 0.0001; A vs. C1, P < 0.0001; A vs. C2, P < 0.0001). We detected a significant variation in urinary methylhistamine excretion only in group C2 after 2 h, 6 h and 24 h (P < 0.0001). However, no variations were observed in N-MH excretion rate in the other groups (A, B1, C1) after challenge with placebo, and in B2 after challenge with ASA 20 mg. For urinary LTE4 at baseline no differences were found between the mean values for the different groups. After specific challenge, only C2 patients showed significantly increased excretion rates of urinary LTE4 compared with the other groups challenged with placebo (A, B1, C1), or ASA (B2) (P < 0.0001). No significant correlation was seen between urinary LTE4 and methylhistamine excretion rate in any patients. CONCLUSION: Our results show that urinary excretion of N-MH and LTE4 is different for CU patients without ASA or food hypersensitivity, compared to those with CU with ASA or food additive hypersensitivity after specific challenge.


Subject(s)
Aspirin/adverse effects , Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Food Additives/adverse effects , Leukotriene E4/urine , Methylhistamines/urine , Urticaria/urine , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Biomarkers/urine , Bronchoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage , Bronchoconstrictor Agents/adverse effects , Chronic Disease , Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic , Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/urine , Female , Food Additives/administration & dosage , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Sodium Benzoate/administration & dosage , Sodium Benzoate/adverse effects , Sodium Glutamate/administration & dosage , Sodium Glutamate/adverse effects , Sulfites/administration & dosage , Sulfites/adverse effects , Tartrazine/administration & dosage , Tartrazine/adverse effects , Time Factors
11.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 32(3): 397-400, 2002 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11940070

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adverse reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)s are frequent, and the need to identify a safe alternative drug is a common problem in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To assess the tolerability of rofecoxib, a drug that specifically inhibits COX-2, in a group of NSAID-sensitive patients. METHODS: One-hundred and four subjects (29 males and 75 females, mean age 35.6 +/- 14.1) were enrolled. All subjects had experienced one or more episode characterized by cutaneous symptoms (erythema, and/or urticaria angioedema) following the assumption of NSAIDs; 92 subjects experienced reactions to only one NSAID (single intolerance: SI) and 12 subjects had reactions to multiple NSAIDs (multiple intolerance: MI). Rofecoxib was challenged at the following dosages: 1/4 of 25 mg (6.25 mg), 1/4 of 25 mg, and 1/2 of 25 mg (12.5 mg), at intervals of 1 h if no symptoms had developed with the previous administration, in order to reach a cumulative dose of 25 mg. All subjects underwent two double-blind, placebo-controlled challenges in two consecutive days. RESULTS: No reactions against placebo were observed. Similarly, no reactions were observed in all subjects both after the first and after the second challenge to rofecoxib. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that rofecoxib does not have cross-reactivity to NSAIDs. Rofecoxib is a safe alternative in subjects with previous adverse cutaneous reaction to NSAIDs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Lactones/therapeutic use , Skin Diseases/chemically induced , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Drug Evaluation , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunoglobulin E/drug effects , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Sulfones , Treatment Outcome , Urticaria/chemically induced
12.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 31(10): 1607-14, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11678862

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The cause and pathogenesis of chronic urticaria are still poorly understood. IgE-independent reactions, are common in adult patients with chronic urticaria, who have daily spontaneous occurrence of weals. H(1)-receptor antagonists (antihistamines) are the major class of therapeutic agents used in the management of urticaria and angioedema. Nevertheless, chronic urticaria is often difficult to treat and may not be controlled by antihistamines alone. It has been postulated that mediators other than histamine, such as kinins, prostaglandin and leukotrienes, may be responsible for some of the symptoms in urticaria which are not controlled by antihistamines. In this study, which was randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, we compare the clinical efficacy and safety of montelukast (MT) 10 mg given once a day and cetirizine (CET) 10 mg given once a day with placebo (PLA), in the treatment of patients with chronic urticaria who have positive challenge to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and/or food additives. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A group of 51 patients, ranging in age from 15 to 71 years, with chronic urticaria and positive challenge to food additives and/or ASA, participated in this study for a period of 4 weeks, starting from a 3-day run-in. The assessment of the efficacy was based on scores of daily urticaria symptoms. RESULTS: MT significantly increased the percentage of symptom-free days for hive and itch. Analysis of frequency distribution of urticaria scores for each symptom gave similar results (MT vs. CET and MT vs. PLA, P < 0.001). The interference with sleep due to their skin condition was also lower in the group treated with MT (P < 0.001). In addition, the median number of days without the rescue medication was significantly higher in the MT group (24 days) than both the CET and the PLA groups (18 days, P < 0.001, and 20 days, P < 0.001, respectively). Finally, a low incidence of adverse events was observed in this study. CONCLUSION: The results of this comparative study demonstrate that montelukast orally administered once a day is very effective for the treatment of cutaneous symptoms in patients with chronic urticaria due to food additives and/or ASA.


Subject(s)
Acetates/antagonists & inhibitors , Acetates/therapeutic use , Aspirin/adverse effects , Cetirizine/antagonists & inhibitors , Cetirizine/therapeutic use , Food Additives/adverse effects , Food Hypersensitivity/etiology , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Leukotriene Antagonists/therapeutic use , Quinolines/antagonists & inhibitors , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Urticaria/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Cyclopropanes , Double-Blind Method , Female , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Humans , Incidence , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Sleep Stages/drug effects , Sulfides , Treatment Outcome , Urticaria/complications
13.
Clin Rheumatol ; 20(4): 279-81, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11529638

ABSTRACT

The link between food allergy and arthritis is still a matter for debate. Here we report two cases of patients suffering from arthritis sustained by food allergy. Diagnosis was performed on the basis of a 2-week elimination diet followed by an open and double-blind challenge test which was repeated three times. Both patients had a previous medical history of food allergy/intolerance. As the number of patients with joint complaints sustained by food allergy is very small it makes no sense to put all patients on diet. A previous medical history of food intolerance is one of the main reasons to start the long and difficult path towards a diagnosis of food allergy.


Subject(s)
Arthritis/complications , Arthritis/drug therapy , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Food Hypersensitivity/diet therapy , Adult , Arthritis/diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Pain Measurement , Recovery of Function , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Skin Tests , Treatment Outcome
14.
Recenti Prog Med ; 92(6): 390-1, 2001 Jun.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11433717

ABSTRACT

Cyclosporin A seems to became more and more important in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Open, prospective study: 8 weeks of treatment and 6 months of follow-up in wash-out. 15 patients were selected (10 males and 5 females) with mean age of 35.5. The patients were suffering of atopic dermatitis non responder to preceding treatments, and free from any pathological conditions contra-indicating the use of cyclosporin A. Cyclosporin A was orally administered at the dosage of 5 mg/kg/day for 8 weeks. The patients used a diary with a score from 0 to 3 for the following symptoms: extensions of skin lesions, itch and sleeping sickness. Treatment with cyclosporin A induced a significant improvement of the parameters evaluated. No significant side effects were observed. No relapses were recorded during the six months of follow-up.


Subject(s)
Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies
15.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 125(2): 164-75, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11435734

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nasal polyposis (NP) often coexists with asthma, rhinitis and sinusitis. Polyp histology typically shows chronic, eosinophilic inflammation. The inflammatory cell infiltrate generally includes eosinophils, lymphocytes, plasma cells and mast cells. OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the natural history of NP, we analysed mediator levels and leukocyte values in nasal fluids and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), total IgE levels and eosinophils in the blood in several groups of both allergic and non-allergic patients with nasal polyps and in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). METHODS: Thirty-two patients with nasal polyps entered the study. As a control group, we studied 55 patients with AR, i.e. 20 patients with seasonal AR to grass pollen, 24 with AR sensitive to Parietaria and 11 with AR sensitive to house dust mite (HDM). Eighteen patients with nasal polyps were also allergic patients (8 were sensitive to Parietaria and 10 were sensitive to HDM), whereas 14 were non-allergic patients. Tryptase and histamine values were assayed in nasal fluids, whereas total IgE was determined in serum. ECP values were assayed both in nasal fluids and serum. Eosinophils were quantified both in the blood and nasal fluids. RESULTS: Tryptase levels were significantly higher in the nasal lavages from patients with NP than in those from patients without NP (4.7 vs. 3.5 U/l, p < 0.001) and correlated with symptom scores (r(s) = 0.42, p < 0.0001). The median levels of histamine in nasal fluids from patients with NP were also significantly higher than those observed in patients without NP (50.0 vs. 21.3 ng/ml, p < 0.001), but did not correlate with symptom scores. Finally, the median levels of ECP in nasal fluids from patients with NP were significantly higher than those observed in patients without NP (38.1 vs. 16.1 ng/ml, p < 0.001) and correlated with symptom scores (r(s) = 0.38, p < 0.001). Analysis of variance showed that, among the variables studied, the presence of nasal polyps was the factor responsible for the higher levels of tryptase, histamine and ECP in nasal fluids. With regard to leukocyte counts in nasal fluids, no significant differences were observed between rhinitis patients with NP and those without NP. With regard to serum ECP and serum total IgE, no significant differences were detected between the two groups under study. Blood eosinophil levels in patients with NP were significantly higher than those observed in patients without NP (5.8 vs. 5.6, p = 0.002). Analysis of variance showed that both the presence of nasal polyps and the type of sensitisation were important. Considering the total symptom scores, no significant differences were observed between rhinitis patients with NP and those without NP. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings are consistent with the view that chronic eosinophil mucosal inflammatory disease in NP involves a self-sustaining mechanism, i.e. local release of inflammatory mediators, independent of allergen stimulation of nasal mucosa. Increased release of inflammatory mediators contributes to the development of nasal polyps, determining oedema and an increased recruitment of inflammatory cells. Besides eosinophils, mast cells also play a key role in this process.


Subject(s)
Body Fluids/chemistry , Eosinophils/chemistry , Inflammation Mediators/analysis , Mast Cells/chemistry , Nasal Cavity/metabolism , Nasal Polyps/metabolism , Ribonucleases , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Blood Proteins/analysis , Body Fluids/cytology , Eosinophil Granule Proteins , Eosinophilia/immunology , Eosinophilia/metabolism , Eosinophilia/pathology , Female , Histamine/analysis , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Leukocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Mites/immunology , Nasal Polyps/immunology , Nasal Polyps/pathology , Pollen/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/metabolism , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/pathology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/metabolism , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/pathology , Serine Endopeptidases/analysis , Severity of Illness Index , Skin Tests , Therapeutic Irrigation , Tryptases
16.
Clin Rheumatol ; 19(2): 114-7, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10791621

ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of methotrexate treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in a 3-year open trial. Seventeen patients, 14 men and three women (mean age 32.7+/-8.9 years), suffering from ankylosing spondylitis and non-responders to treatment with sulphasalazine, were enrolled in our study. Sixteen of them were evaluable at the end of the study. Methotrexate (7.5-10 mg/week) was administered for 3 years. Efficacy was evaluated on the basis of clinical and laboratory variables, radiographic signs of disease progression and daily dosage of indomethacin. We obtained a good and relatively prompt clinical response except for peripheral arthritis and iridocyclitis; in fact, after 3 months of methotrexate treatment a significant amelioration of the following parameters was observed: visual analogue scale for the evaluation of both night pain and general well-being, Shober's test, occiput-wall distance, fingertip to floor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein level and daily dose of indomethacin. A further improvement was obtained during the subsequent period. Radiographs of the spine and sacroiliac joints did not show any signs of disease progression. Side-effects were a transitory elevation of transaminases (four cases) and slight hypogammaglobulinaemia (one case). Methotrexate treatment may be useful in ankylosing spondylitis, but a combined treatment might be indicated for patients with peripheral arthritis.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/drug therapy , Adult , Alanine Transaminase/blood , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Aspartate Aminotransferases/blood , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Drug Evaluation , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Indomethacin/therapeutic use , Male , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Safety , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/blood , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/physiopathology , Sulfasalazine/therapeutic use
17.
Recenti Prog Med ; 91(2): 72-5, 2000 Feb.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10748651

ABSTRACT

Celiac disease represents one of the most frequent chronic inflammatory diseases. In Italy the prevalence among school-age population has been calculated in 1:180 subjects. Along with typical forms of the disease characterized by overt symptoms and signs of malabsorption, many cases are undiagnosed because they are subclinical, atypical or even symptomless. In adults, the disease may present with infertility; in particular celiac disease may be responsible of multiple abortions. These manifestations, whose pathogenesis is unknown, are not related to the severity of the disease; the gluten-free diet strongly ameliorates the fertility. In this paper we have focused the connection between abortion and celiac disease. A better knowledge of this relationship may lead to correctly diagnose and consequently to treat the cause of some cases of abortion, previously labelled as cases of unidentified origin.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous/etiology , Celiac Disease/complications , Adult , Celiac Disease/diagnosis , Celiac Disease/diet therapy , Female , Glutens/adverse effects , Humans , Infertility, Female/etiology , Infertility, Male/etiology , Male , Pregnancy
18.
Clin Rheumatol ; 19(6): 505-7, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11147769

ABSTRACT

During recent years, aggressive therapeutic approaches have been proposed in order to control the Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) activity and to avoid joint destruction. Here we report the results of an open 3-year trial on the combination of three second-line drugs, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), methotrexate (MTX) and gold sodium thiomalate (GST), in early active RA. Four men and 17 women were enrolled in the study and were treated during the first year with HCQ 400 mg/day, GST 50 mg/week and oral MTX 7.5 mg/week; during the second and the third years the doses of HCQ and MTX were reduced to 200 mg/day and 5 mg/week, respectively; the interval between the GST injections was progressively increased until 4 weeks. Prednisone at an initial dose not higher than 10 mg/day was associated. Sulindac was allowed. Eight patients left the study because of side-effects, 2 patients abandoned the study, 12 patients compleated the 3 years of treatment. We obtained a significant and early amelioration of both clinical and laboratory parameters during the first year; in the two subsequent years the positive results were maintained. In our opinion the most significant result is the absence of anatomical progression in 10 out of 12 patients, even if a more prolonged observation is necessary to obtain more reliable data.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Gold Sodium Thiomalate/administration & dosage , Hydroxychloroquine/administration & dosage , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Adult , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Disease Progression , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Gold Sodium Thiomalate/adverse effects , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Male , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
19.
Recenti Prog Med ; 90(7-8): 403-6, 1999.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10429522

ABSTRACT

In literature there are only a few papers about renal involvement in rheumatoid arthritis. The scarcity of reports is due to the difficulties of pinpointing this subject; in fact a bloody investigation like kidney biopsy is necessary to obtain an exact diagnosis. Moreover it is often clinically hard to distinguish renal injury provoked by rheumatoid arthritis from nephropathy caused by drugs, either non steroidal antiinflammatory drugs or disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. This topic is perhaps neglected because primary renal involvement in rheumatoid arthritis is not considered to influence the survival, with the exception of renal amyloidosis. Pathologic examination of kidney biopsy shows in order of frequency: mesangial nephritis, renal amyloidosis, membranous nephritis, focal proliferative nephritis, minimal nephritis, interstitial nephritis. Both immune complexes and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies may play a pathogenetic role. The mesangial nephritis with IgA or IgM deposits is linked to high levels of rheumatoid factor of IgA or IgM class; it has been hypothesized that the ability of mesangium to remove circulating immune complexes provokes the mesangial damage. Moreover it has been observed that rheumatoid arthritis with renal involvement shows positivity for perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies more frequently than rheumatoid arthritis without nephropathy. Also in the former cases the title of these autoantibodies is higher. The aim of this paper is to bring the terms of the problem into focus by the revision of the literature. Further and wider studies are necessary to obtain more available data.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Kidney Diseases/etiology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic/immunology , Antigen-Antibody Complex/immunology , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , Biopsy , Glomerulonephritis/chemically induced , Glomerulonephritis/diagnosis , Glomerulonephritis/pathology , Humans , Kidney/drug effects , Kidney/pathology , Kidney Diseases/chemically induced , Kidney Diseases/pathology , Nephrotic Syndrome/chemically induced , Nephrotic Syndrome/etiology , Nephrotic Syndrome/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Rheumatoid Factor/immunology
20.
Recenti Prog Med ; 90(6): 325-6, 1999 Jun.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10399471

ABSTRACT

We have evaluated the effectiveness of cetirizine in 40 patients (25 males and 15 females, mean age 32.8 yrs) suffering from perennial allergic rhinitis due to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. Patients were treated for 30 days with oral cetirizine (10 mg once a day) and had to report the severity of the symptoms considered (sneezing, runny nose, itching and congestion) on daily card. During the study no other medication was allowed. After 4 weeks symptoms were statistically improved and this beneficial effect increased at the end of the treatment. No side effects were reported. Oral cetirizine is therefore a useful treatment in perennial allergic rhinitis due to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Cetirizine/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/drug therapy , Adult , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Mite Infestations/complications , Mite Infestations/drug therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...