Analysis of failed and complicated laparoscopy on a gynecologic oncology service.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of and factors that predict failed or complicated operative laparoscopy on a gynecologic oncology service. METHODS: Two hundred four consecutive operative laparoscopies were reviewed. Procedures converted to laparotomy or associated with major operative or postoperative complications were compared with uncomplicated laparoscopies with respect to patient characteristics, details of operative procedure, and length of hospitalization. The influence of patient characteristics, operative findings, and specific procedures on the risk of failed or complicated laparoscopies was estimated. RESULTS: Twenty-five (12. 3%) procedures were either converted to laparotomy or associated with major operative or postoperative complications. Women with failed or complicated laparoscopies had significantly more previous laparotomies and adhesions, greater blood loss, and longer hospital stay than those with uncomplicated laparoscopies (60.0% vs 35.7%, P = 0.03, 68.0% vs 37.4%, P<0.001, 275 ml vs. 132 ml, P = 0.03; and 5. 9 days vs 0.98 days, P< 0.001, respectively). Age, body mass index, parity, menopausal status, preoperative CA-125, appearance of adnexal masses, and complexity of the procedure had no significant influence on failed or complicated laparoscopies. In univariate analysis, history of laparotomy and presence of adhesions and in multivariate analysis only presence of adhesions were predictive of failed or complicated laparoscopies (P = 0.03, <0.001, and 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of failed and complicated laparoscopy is low on a gynecologic oncology service. Presence of adhesions is the only significant independent risk factor predictive of failed or complicated laparoscopy.

Laparoscopic management of women with a family history of ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The safety of laparoscopic surgery in women with a family history of ovarian cancer predicted to have benign disease has not been established. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and complications of operative laparoscopy and to describe the pathologic findings in this patient population. METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive women with a family history of ovarian cancer who elected prophylactic oophorectomy or had predicted benign adnexal disease were offered laparoscopic surgery. Patient characteristics, details of laparoscopic surgery, operative and postoperative complications, and histopathologic findings were recorded. RESULTS: Laparoscopy was converted to laparotomy in 2 patients (3.2%); 1 patient (1.6%) had an operative vascular complication, and 1 patient (1.6%) had postoperative bleeding. Median (range) estimated blood loss, operative time, and hospital stay were 50 ml (50-1,500), 120 min (60-290), and 1 day (0-9), respectively. Histopathologic findings included normal ovaries (n = 20), corpus luteum cyst (n = 16), follicular cyst (n = 8), endometriotic cyst (n = 7), serous cystadenoma (n = 5), epithelial hyperplasia (n = 4), dermoid cyst (n = 1), and fibrothecoma (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery is feasible and safe in women with a family history of ovarian cancer predicted to have benign disease and is associated with low blood loss and short hospital stay. Most ovaries removed are either normal or have benign disease.