ABSTRACT
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia and has far reaching consequences for patients and their caregivers. Early detection and treatment are key factors in limiting the impact of the disease. However, a definitive diagnosis of AD requires an examination of brain tissue during an autopsy. Although a plethora of biomarkers such as neuroimaging, electrophysiological, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are available, their utility is limited to research due to their poor reach and prohibitive cost. In order for biomarkers to be widely used, they need to be accessible, affordable, and conducive for the patient population or disease stage. Blood-based biomarkers may not only be less expensive and more accessible compared to neuroimaging or CSF tests, but they are also preferred by patients with AD as they are much less invasive. In this mini-review article, we expand on the rationale for the use of blood-based biomarkers, review currently available biomarkers and discuss the need for the standardization of these biomarkers. We contrast the blood-based biomarkers with other available biomarkers and discuss the advantages of using a panel of blood-based biomarkers to strengthen their accuracy.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Biomarkers , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/blood , Alzheimer Disease/diagnostic imaging , Amyloid beta-Peptides , Biomarkers/blood , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Early Diagnosis , Neuroimaging , tau ProteinsABSTRACT
Despite controversy about the efficacy and safety of aducanumab, the FDA's fast-tracking of this medicine is truly historic. However, structural problems leading to socioeconomic disparities and systemic racism in science, healthcare, and society have left out under-represented populations. This perspective outlines the racial and socioeconomic health disparities in aducanumab treatment: 1) Disparities in the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD), 2) Limited participation from under-represented groups in AD trials raising concerns about the generalizability of the results, 3) Questionable applicability of the amyloid hypothesis in groups under-represented in AD research, and 4) Aducanumab's initial sticker price that unfairly singled out those with lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Potential solutions are discussed.
