Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 10: 2150132719884298, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31658872

ABSTRACT

Introduction: An estimated 2.4 million people in the United States live with hepatitis C. Though there are effective treatments for chronic hepatitis C, many infected individuals remain untreated because 40% to 50% of individuals with chronic hepatitis C are unaware of their hepatitis C status. In 2013, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended that adults born between 1945 and 1965 should be offered one-time hepatitis C screening. The purpose of this study is to describe rates of birth cohort hepatitis C screening across primary care practices in the WWAMI region Practice and Research Network (WPRN). Methods: Cross-sectional observational study of adult patients born between 1945 and 1965 who also had a primary care visit at 1 of 9 participating health systems (22 primary care clinics) between July 31, 2013 and September 30, 2015. Data extracted from the electronic health record systems at each clinic were used to calculate the proportion of birth cohort eligible patients with evidence of hepatitis C screening as well as proportions of screened patients with positive hepatitis C screening test results. Results: Of the 32 139 eligible patients, only 10.9% had evidence of hepatitis C screening in the electronic health record data (range 1.2%-49.1% across organizations). Among the 4 WPRN sites that were able to report data by race and ethnicity, the rate of hepatitis C screening was higher among African Americans (39.9%) and American Indians/Alaska Natives (23.2%) compared with Caucasians (10.7%; P < .001). Discussion: Rates of birth cohort hepatitis C screening are low in primary care practices. Future research to develop and test interventions to increase rates of birth cohort hepatitis C screening in primary care settings are needed.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Mass Screening/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Alaska/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Idaho/epidemiology , Montana/epidemiology , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Washington/epidemiology , Wyoming/epidemiology
2.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 26(5): 525-8, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24004704

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Physician quality of work life is a key factor in career choice, satisfaction, and retention. The majority of physicians are currently employed by large health care organizations where physician loss of autonomy is common, yet some physicians have opened micropractices. There have been no previous studies comparing physician satisfaction between employed physicians and micropractice physicians. METHODS: A previously validated survey of physician satisfaction was sent to 72 physicians practicing in a residency setting, 111 physicians in community, nonresidency setting, and 42 physicians in a micropractice setting. RESULTS: Physicians in micropractices had the lowest satisfaction with income, but the highest satisfaction with family time and the ability to provide continuity of care. Micropractice physicians rated the overall quality of medical care they provide higher than employed physicians. Micropractice physicians reported a much smaller scope of practice. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, physicians in micropractices found more satisfaction in their work at the cost of decreased income and a narrower scope of practice.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Family Practice/organization & administration , Job Satisfaction , Physicians , Practice Management, Medical/organization & administration , Humans , Income , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Professional Practice Location/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
3.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 26(4): 460-9, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23833162

ABSTRACT

Reproductive health care of adolescent women is focused on prevention of disease. Adolescents are at higher risk for pelvic inflammatory disease than adult women; therefore, screening regularly for sexually transmitted infections is important. Immunization for human papillomavirus is the primary means of cervical cancer prevention because new guidelines recommend not initiating Papanicolaou smears until the age of 21. Contraception for adolescents is a challenge, and clinicians should focus on long-acting, reversible contraception in this group. The treatment of pelvic pain and menstrual disorders in adolescent women is distinct from adult women and is related to differing prevalence of conditions. Lastly, this article discusses the importance of confidential care when treating adolescent women.


Subject(s)
Contraception , Genital Diseases, Female/therapy , Reproductive Health , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Adolescent , Confidentiality , Female , Genital Diseases, Female/diagnosis , Humans , Pelvic Pain/diagnosis , Pelvic Pain/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Health Care , United States
5.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 21(1): 4-9, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21999360

ABSTRACT

The number of women over the age of 65 is projected to almost double in the next 20 years, and clinicians need to be comfortable treating conditions common to this cohort. This review covers several common gynecologic conditions seen in older women, including atrophic vaginitis, lichen sclerosis, pelvic floor disorders, and postmenopausal bleeding. We conclude with evidence-based screening recommendations for gynecologic cancers in older women and tips on doing a pelvic examination.


Subject(s)
Genital Diseases, Female/diagnosis , Genital Diseases, Female/epidemiology , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Health Status , Women's Health Services/organization & administration , Women's Health , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Genital Diseases, Female/prevention & control , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Health Services for the Aged/organization & administration , Humans , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Postmenopause , United States/epidemiology
6.
WMJ ; 109(6): 326-31, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21287884

ABSTRACT

The Contraceptive Equality Mandate took effect in Wisconsin on January 1, 2010. This mandate from the Wisconsin Office of the Commissioner of Insurance requires all insurance companies in the state of Wisconsin to cover all types of contraception, making Wisconsin the 28th state to do so. This article reviews the literature related to several types of contraception including Implanon (a newly available implantable contraception), drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive pills, and intrauterine devices. We also review evidence regarding depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and bone mineral density, and new cycling regimens for oral contraceptive pills.


Subject(s)
Contraceptive Agents, Female , Contraceptive Devices , Bone Density/drug effects , Contraceptives, Oral , Desogestrel , Female , Humans , Intrauterine Devices , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate , Wisconsin
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...