ABSTRACT
Spinal fusion in young children for treatment of early onset scoliosis is not optimal because it limits growth and contributes to long-term lung compromise. Various types of growth-friendly spinal implants and newer technologies have been introduced in the past few years. Similarly, in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, fusion decreases spinal mobility and may lead to development of adjacent level disc degeneration. A variety of different new technologies have been developed for alternative surgical approaches that halt curve progression while maintaining spinal mobility.
Subject(s)
Disease Management , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Spinal Diseases/surgery , Child , HumansABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric biomechanical study. PURPOSE: We compared the "skipped segment screw" (SSS) construct with the conventional "all segment screw" (ASS) construct for cervical spine fixation in six degrees of freedom in terms of the range of motion (ROM). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Currently, no clear guidelines are available in the literature for the configuration of lateral mass (LM) screwrod fixation for cervical spine stabilization. Most surgeons tend to insert screws bilaterally at all segments from C3 to C6 with the assumption that implants at every level will provide maximum stability. METHODS: Six porcine cervical spine specimens were harvested from fresh 6-9-month-old pigs. Each specimen was sequentially tested in the following order: intact uninstrumented (UIS), SSS (LM screws in C3, C5, and C7 bilaterally), and ASS (LM screws in C3-C7 bilaterally). Biomechanical testing was performed with a force of 2 Nm in six degrees of freedom and 3D motion tracking was performed. RESULTS: The two-tailed paired t-test was used for statistical analysis. There was a significant decrease in ROM in instrumented specimens compared with that in UIS specimens in all six degrees of motion (p<0.05), whereas there was no significant difference in ROM between the different types of constructs (SSS and ASS). CONCLUSIONS: Because both configurations provide comparable stability under physiological loading, we provide a biomechanical basis for the use of SSS configuration owing to its potential clinical advantages, such as relatively less bulk of implants within a small operative field, relative ease of manipulating the rod into position, shorter surgical time, less blood loss, lower risk of screw-related complications, less implant-related costs, and most importantly, no compromise in the required stability needed until fusion.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To present the case of a patient with Munchausen's syndrome who underwent multiple surgeries in the spine before the diagnosis was made and, therefore, to highlight the importance of this obscure condition that can result in unnecessary surgical treatment. METHODS: A 44-year-old businesswoman presented with multiple episodes of low back pain and weakness in both lower limbs over past 11 years. Past history consisted of multiple hospitalizations, and three surgeries on her lumbar spine at different hospitals, with dramatic improvement in symptoms being reported each time after surgery. Clinical examination showed inconsistent and nonspecific neurological findings. Imaging studies like X-rays, magnetic resonance imaging, and all neurophysiological studies were within normal limits. RESULTS: Multi-disciplinary evaluation by a team of orthopedicians, neurologist and psychiatrist and rehabilitation specialists diagnosed it as 'Munchausen syndrome'. Only one report of this fictitious disease in spine was found in review of literature (Association AP, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR(®), 2003). CONCLUSIONS: A history of multiple surgical interventions at multiple hospitals, often followed by dramatic improvement and then relapse, should trigger a suspicion of Munchausen syndrome, particularly in the scenario of normal imaging studies. Diagnosing this rare condition in spine is key to avoid unnecessary surgery.
