Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Women Health ; 56(5): 576-94, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26503900

ABSTRACT

The objectives of the authors in this study were two-fold: (1) to explore the role of resilience in recovery from eating disorders (EDs), and (2) to develop a model of resilience in women with EDs. Semi-structured interviews with ten women were conducted in April 2011, along with two focus groups with women who had recovered from EDs (n  = 5 women each; conducted in April 2012 at the University of Deusto, Spain), one focus group with clinical experts (n = 8; conducted in April 2012 at the Foundation Against EDs of Biskay, Spain), and six narratives from primary caregivers of ED patients living in Biskay, Spain (conducted in November 2012). All data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. All female participants acknowledged experiencing resilience in their recovery. The analysis resulted in a conceptual model of resilience composed of the following categories: deep dissatisfaction with life, turning point, acceptance, hope, determination to change, accountability for the ED, active coping, getting social support, gaining self-knowledge, getting information about EDs, increase well-being, trait resilience, initiating new projects and living in the here and now. According to the model presented, resilience preceded the experience of recovery in women with EDs in this sample and could be a useful asset for future interventions.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Feeding and Eating Disorders/psychology , Resilience, Psychological , Self Concept , Social Support , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Focus Groups , Grounded Theory , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Psychological Tests , Qualitative Research , Spain
2.
J Health Psychol ; 18(6): 737-49, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23221615

ABSTRACT

One of the few instruments to evaluate coping skills among patients with chronic illnesses is the Cuestionario de Afrontamiento al Estrés para Pacientes Oncológicos (CAEPO), created initially for cancer patients. We evaluate how well CAEPO applies to patients with non-cancer chronic illnesses. A total of 344 patients (115 with chronic hepatitis C, 120 with inflammatory bowel disease and 109 with recurrent vertigo) completed the CAEPO. Exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha provide only partial support for the seven factors suggested by the original CAEPO. A streamlined version with fewer dimensions and items may be a better solution for identifying coping strategies among these patients.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Chronic Disease/psychology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Hepatitis C, Chronic/psychology , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vertigo/psychology
3.
Assessment ; 20(4): 511-20, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21245050

ABSTRACT

This study sought to translate, using a back-translation procedure, and evaluate the psychometric characteristics of Depression in the Medically Ill questionnaire (DMI-18) and its short version (DMI-10) in a Spanish population. Patients with somatic disorders (N = 366) completed the translated DMI-18 and another depression questionnaire. Among these, 167 were also assessed by a mental health professional (gold standard) to test criterion validity. Furthermore, coefficient alpha for both the versions were high (>.90), and convergent validity assessed against the Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was satisfactory (r > .74). Confirmatory factor analysis results supported the one-factor model. When compared with the gold standard, sensitivity and specificity were 93% and 73% for DMI-18 and 87% and 74% for DMI-10, respectively. Thus, both the versions are acceptable measures that can be used by nonpsychiatric professionals to detect affective comorbidities in their patients.


Subject(s)
Cross-Cultural Comparison , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Disease/psychology , Personality Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Sick Role , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Aged , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Spain , Translating
4.
J Psychosom Res ; 69(4): 399-406, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20846541

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of four depression screening tools commonly used in patients with medical disorders, relative to a reference diagnostic standard-a structured psychiatric interview. METHODS: The Depression in the Medically Ill-18 (DMI-18) questionnaire was administered to 167 patients with medical disorders; of those, 53 completed the Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care (BDI-PC), 67 the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and 46 the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The entire sample was also interviewed with a structured psychiatric interview conducted by a mental health professional. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios (LRs), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated and compared for the different measures. RESULTS: At their respective recommended cutoff points, sensitivities [95% confidence interval (CI)] were 86% (70-95), 82% (63-94), 93% (86-97), and 68% (47-85) for the HADS-D, BDI-PC, DMI-18, and PHQ-9, respectively, while specificities ranged from 72% (47-90) for BDI-PC to 89% (72-98) for PHQ-9. The sensitivities of DMI-18 were significantly higher compared to those of HADS-D (P=.045) and PHQ-9 (P=.01). The PHQ-9 questionnaire obtained the most favorable positive LR (6.35; 95% CI, 2.48-18.36). In contrast, the DMI-18 showed the best negative LR (0.09; 95% CI, 0.04-0.18). Areas under the curves (95% CI) ranged from 0.92 (0.83-1.02) to 0.84 (0.74-0.94). Statistically significant differences were found between the AUCs of the DMI-10 and the BDI-PC. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that all evaluated scales have acceptable abilities and can be used as screening instruments for depression in patients with medical disorders. The DMI stands out for its sensitivity.


Subject(s)
Depression/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Area Under Curve , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spain
5.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 8: 29, 2010 Mar 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20298556

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To confirm the internal structure of the Health Related Quality of Life for Eating Disorders version 2 questionnaire (HeRQoLEDv2) and create and validate a shortened version (HeRQoLED-S). METHODS: 324 patients with eating disorders were assessed at baseline and one year later (75.6% of whom responded). We performed a confirmatory factor analysis of the HeRQoLEDv2 using baseline data, and then a Rasch analysis to shorten the questionnaire. Data obtained at year one was used to confirm the structure of the HeRQoLED short form and evaluate its validity and reliability. RESULTS: Two latent second-order factors -- social maladjustment and mental health and functionality -- fit the data for the HeRQoLEDv2. Rasch analysis was computed separately for the two latent second-order factors and shortened the HeRQoLEDv2 to 20 items. Infit and outfit indices were acceptable, with the confirmatory factor analysis of the HeRQoLED short form giving a root mean square error of approximation of 0.07, a non-normed fit index and a comparative fit index exceeding 0.90. The validity was also supported by the correlation with the convergent measures: the social maladjustment factor correlated 0.82 with the dieting concern factor of the Eating Attitudes Test-26 and the mental health and functionality factor correlated -0.69 with the mental summary component of the Short Form-12. Cronbach alphas exceeded 0.89. CONCLUSIONS: Two main factors, social maladjustment and mental health and functionality, explain the majority of HeRQoLEDv2 scores. The shortened version maintains good psychometric properties, though it must be validated in independent samples.


Subject(s)
Feeding and Eating Disorders/psychology , Health Status Indicators , Models, Statistical , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Humans , Probability , Prospective Studies , Psychometrics
6.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 60(8): 825-33, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17606179

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the responsiveness of the Health-Related Quality of Life for Eating Disorders questionnaire version-2 (HeRQoLEDv2) and present the psychometric characteristics of a new binge domain. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Patients with an eating disorder completed the HeRQoLEDv2, the Eating Attitudes Test-26, Short Form Health Survey-12, and two items from the Eating Disorder Inventory-2, at baseline and after 1 year. At the second assessment, patients completed the HeRQoLEDv2, as part of the battery of tests, along with health transitional questions. Validity and reliability analyses of the new binge domain were performed. Responsiveness was evaluated using distributional and anchor-based approaches, comparison of mean changes, mean change correlations, the minimal detectable change (MDC) at the individual and group level, and the minimal important difference (MID). RESULTS: Items in the binge domain loaded above 0.40. Cronbach alpha was 0.82. Regarding responsiveness, the mean changes detected by the HeRQoLEDv2 correlated above 0.30 with the criterion measures. Patients who reported improvement showed significant changes, and effect sizes above 0.30. The MDC(90%ind) was larger than the MID. CONCLUSION: The HeRQoLEDv2 includes the new binge domain. It responded to change at the group level. Further research regarding the MID is needed.


Subject(s)
Feeding and Eating Disorders/diagnosis , Health Status Indicators , Quality of Life , Adult , Attitude , Bulimia/diagnosis , Bulimia/psychology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...