ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) is a potential indicator that could guide when to use a resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in trauma patients with life-threatening injuries. This study aims to determine the optimal SBP threshold for REBOA placement by analyzing the association between SBP pre-REBOA and 24-hour mortality in severely injured hemodynamically unstable trauma patients. METHODS: We performed a pooled analysis of the aortic balloon occlusion (ABO) trauma and AORTA registries. These databases record the details related to the use of REBOA and include data from 14 countries worldwide. We included patients who had suffered penetrating and/or blunt trauma. Patients who arrived at the hospital with a SBP pre-REBOA of 0 mm Hg and remained at 0 mm Hg after balloon inflation were excluded. We evaluated the impact that SBP pre-REBOA had on the probability of death in the first 24 hours. RESULTS: A total of 1,107 patients underwent endovascular aortic occlusion, of these, 848 met inclusion criteria. The median age was 44 years (interquartile range [IQR], 27-59 years) and 643 (76%) were male. The median injury severity score was 34 (IQR, 25-45). The median SBP pre-REBOA was 65 mm Hg (IQR, 49-88 mm Hg). Mortality at 24 hours was reported in 279 (32%) patients. Math modeling shows that predicted probabilities of the primary outcome increased steadily in SBP pre-REBOA below 100 mm Hg. Multivariable mixed-effects analysis shows that when SBP pre-REBOA was lower than 60 mm Hg, the risk of death was more than 50% (relative risk, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.92; p = 0.001). DISCUSSION: In patients who do not respond to initial resuscitation, the use of REBOA in SBPs between 60 mm Hg and 80 mm Hg may be a useful tool in resuscitation efforts before further decompensation or complete cardiovascular collapse. The findings from our study are clinically important as a first step in identifying candidates for REBOA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.
Subject(s)
Arterial Occlusive Diseases , Balloon Occlusion , Endovascular Procedures , Shock, Hemorrhagic , Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Female , Blood Pressure , Aorta/injuries , Shock, Hemorrhagic/therapy , Injury Severity Score , Resuscitation , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a damage control tool with a potential role in the hemodynamic resuscitation of severely ill patients in the civilian pre-hospital setting. REBOA ensures blood flow to vital organs by early proximal control of the source of bleeding. However, there is no consensus on the use of REBOA in the pre-hospital setting. This article aims to perform a systematic review of the literature about the feasibility, survival, indications, complications, and potential candidates for civilian pre-hospital REBOA. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, LILACS and Web of Science databases. Primary outcome variables included overall survival and feasibility. Secondary outcome variables included complications and potential candidates for endovascular occlusion. RESULTS: The search identified 8 articles. Five studies described the use of REBOA in pre-hospital settings, reporting a total of 47 patients in whom the procedure was attempted. Pre-hospital REBOA was feasible in 68-100% of trauma patients and 100% of non-traumatic patients with cardiac arrest. Survival rates and complications varied widely. Pre-hospital REBOA requires a coordinated and integrated emergency health care system with a well-trained and equipped team. The remaining three studies performed a retrospective analysis identifying 784 potential REBOA candidates. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital REBOA could be a feasible intervention for a significant portion of severely ill patients in the civilian setting. However, the evidence is limited. The impact of pre-hospital REBOA should be assessed in future studies.
Subject(s)
Balloon Occlusion , Endovascular Procedures , Shock, Hemorrhagic , Aorta , Balloon Occlusion/methods , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Hospitals , Humans , Resuscitation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Hemorrhagic/etiology , Shock, Hemorrhagic/therapyABSTRACT
Introducción. La miastenia grave es una enfermedad autoinmunitaria con una prevalencia mundial de 150 a 250 casos por 1 Ì000.000 de habitantes. El tratamiento recomendado para la miastenia grave sin timoma es la timectomía total, la cual es la única alternativa de curación. Métodos. Se llevó a cabo un estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo de una serie de casos de pacientes adultos con miastenia grave sin timoma sometidos a timectomía, durante el periodo de 2010 a 2017. En el análisis estadístico descriptivo, se utilizaron frecuencias absolutas y porcentajes para las variables cualitativas y, para las variables cuantitativas, se utilizaron la mediana y el rango intercuartílico. Resultados. Veintiocho pacientes con miastenia grave sin timoma se sometieron a timectomía desde el año 2010 hasta el 2017. Se categorizaron según la clasificación del estado posterior a la intervención de la Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America y se evidenció que 4 (14,3 %) pacientes presentaban remisión completa y el grado 3 de manifestaciones clínicas mínimas fue el más frecuente en 19 (67,9 %); 26 (92,9 %) tuvieron mejoría con respecto al cambio del estado clínico, en 2 (7,1 %) no se documentaron cambios y en ningún paciente hubo empeoramiento, exacerbación o muerte secundaria a la enfermedad. Conclusiones. A lo largo de siete años se practicó timectomía a 28 pacientes con diagnóstico de miastenia grave sin timoma, aproximadamente, en el 15 % de los pacientes hubo remisión completa, el grado 3 de manifestaciones mínimas fue el más frecuente y el 93 % presentó mejoría de su estatus clínico.
