ABSTRACT
Lung sounds, which include all sounds that are produced during the mechanism of respiration, may be classified into normal breath sounds and adventitious sounds. Normal breath sounds occur when no respiratory problems exist, whereas adventitious lung sounds (wheeze, rhonchi, crackle, etc.) are usually associated with certain pulmonary pathologies. Heart and lung sounds that are heard using a stethoscope are the result of mechanical interactions that indicate operation of cardiac and respiratory systems, respectively. In this article, we review the research conducted during the last six years on lung and heart sounds, instrumentation and data sources (sensors and databases), technological advances, and perspectives in processing and data analysis. Our review suggests that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are the most common respiratory diseases reported on in the literature; related diseases that are less analyzed include chronic bronchitis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, congestive heart failure, and parenchymal pathology. Some new findings regarding the methodologies associated with advances in the electronic stethoscope have been presented for the auscultatory heart sound signaling process, including analysis and clarification of resulting sounds to create a diagnosis based on a quantifiable medical assessment. The availability of automatic interpretation of high precision of heart and lung sounds opens interesting possibilities for cardiovascular diagnosis as well as potential for intelligent diagnosis of heart and lung diseases.
Subject(s)
Auscultation/trends , Heart Sounds/physiology , Heart/physiology , Lung/physiology , Respiratory Sounds/diagnosis , Respiratory Sounds/physiology , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/physiopathology , Auscultation/methods , Auscultation/standards , Coronary Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Disease/physiopathology , Humans , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , SoundABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Compare if localization of sounds and words discrimination in reverberant environment is different between children with dyslexia and controls. METHOD: We studied 30 children with dyslexia and 30 controls. Sound and word localization and discrimination was studied in five angles from left to right auditory fields (-90o, -45o, 0o, +45o, +90o), under reverberant and no-reverberant conditions; correct answers were compared. RESULTS: Spatial location of words in no-reverberant test was deficient in children with dyslexia at 0º and +90o. Spatial location for reverberant test was altered in children with dyslexia at all angles, except -90o. Word discrimination in no-reverberant test in children with dyslexia had a poor performance at left angles. In reverberant test, children with dyslexia exhibited deficiencies at -45o, -90o, and +45o angles. CONCLUSION: Children with dyslexia could had problems when have to locate sound, and discriminate words in extreme locations of the horizontal plane in classrooms with reverberation.
Subject(s)
Dyslexia/physiopathology , Sound Localization/physiology , Speech Perception/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Audiometry/methods , Auditory Threshold , Case-Control Studies , Child , Environment , Female , Humans , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Reference Values , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
Objective Compare if localization of sounds and words discrimination in reverberant environment is different between children with dyslexia and controls. Method We studied 30 children with dyslexia and 30 controls. Sound and word localization and discrimination was studied in five angles from left to right auditory fields (-90o, -45o, 0o, +45o, +90o), under reverberant and no-reverberant conditions; correct answers were compared. Results Spatial location of words in no-reverberant test was deficient in children with dyslexia at 0º and +90o. Spatial location for reverberant test was altered in children with dyslexia at all angles, except –-90o. Word discrimination in no-reverberant test in children with dyslexia had a poor performance at left angles. In reverberant test, children with dyslexia exhibited deficiencies at -45o, -90o, and +45o angles. Conclusion Children with dyslexia could had problems when have to locate sound, and discriminate words in extreme locations of the horizontal plane in classrooms with reverberation. .
Objetivo Comparar localización de sonidos y localización-discriminación de palabras bajo reverberación y sin reverberación en niños disléxicos y controles. Método Estudiamos 30 niños disléxicos y 30 controles, pareados por edad. La localización sonora y discriminación a palabras fue estudiada en cinco ángulos horizontales en los campos izquierdo y derecho (-90o, -45o, 0o, +45o, +90o), bajo reverberación y sin reverberación; las respuestas correctas fueron comparadas Resultados: La localización sonora sin reverberación fue deficiente en niños disléxicos a 0º y +90º. La localización bajo reverberación falló en niños disléxicos en todos los ángulos, excepto –-90o. Durante la discriminación a palabras, sin reverberación, los niños disléxicos fallaron en ángulos izquierdos. En la prueba reverberante, los niños disléxicos fallaron a -–45o, -90o y +45o. Conclusion Los niños con dislexia pueden tener problemas cuando tienen que localizar sonidos y discriminar palabras en las localizaciones extremas del plano horizontal en salones de clases típicos con reverberación. .
